In other words, I am sure many other engineers will tell you the results
would be insignificant and probably not measureable....Besides why introduce
more stress on the tubing by pressurizing it.
Joe
Structural, nuclear engineer
<lethal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194431612.9...@k35g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
I'm not planning to use air.... considering nitrogen or CO2.
On Nov 7, 9:08 pm, "Joseph Gliebe" <jcarr...@bellsouth.ner> wrote:
> You may find pressurizing your chassis would introduce more problems than
> strength. The pressure you would need would be very very high to even be
> measureable. If you used air, the oxidation process in your chassis would
> be enhanced (not a good thing).
>
> In other words, I am sure many other engineers will tell you the results
> would be insignificant and probably not measureable....Besides why introduce
> more stress on the tubing by pressurizing it.
>
> Joe
> Structural, nuclear engineer
>
> <lethaldri...@gmail.com> wrote in message
The only thing it will help prevent is buckling-mode failure - and
that's almost never a factor in non-collision situations. It increases
static tensile stress and, unless you're using Kevlar tubing, will have
negative effect on the longevity of the chassis (although at the
pressure you're proposing, it will have negligible effect).
Filling the tubes with argon or nitrogen will help prevent corrosion a
little though.
Joe
"Bob P" <era...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RDCYi.43062$eY....@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net...
Porsche did exactly this on the 908, but for very different reasons. The
tubular frame was prone to cracking, so they pressurised it and checked
with it using a tyre pressure gauge. Low or no pressure meant a crack
had developed somewhere.......
--
Chris
I am not young enough to know everything.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
"mower man" <"chrislovett <nospam> wrote in message
news:49ydnUfU0bCvsqzU...@pipex.net...