On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:11:57 -0500, Alan Bowler <
atbo...@thinkage.ca>
wrote:
Not at all, all these modern engines (and trannies) have algorithmic
curves and limits no matter how hard you mash the pedal.
>It is more accurate if you think of it as "Second" like the "2"
>old 3 speed automatics.
Automatic transmissions have always been problematic about allowing
engine braking, it does seem to happen even on the CVT and I'm a bit
surprised at that.
What difference that leaves between "S" and "L" is still unclear to
me. But I cannot get the same behavior out of the car in "D" that I
do in "S". A smarter "D" algorithm would read pedal movements better
and would allow something closer - I wish, even driving in "S", that
sometimes the CVT would relax a little more and upshift if no
acceleration is being demanded.
FWIW in standard urban driving the "S" setting seemed to use about 15%
more gas than the "D" setting - which is already a pig in urban
driving, and unresponsive to boot. The "Econ" setting saves maybe 10%
over "D" and is marginally even less responsive.
J.
ps - I just now finally called the dealer and asked about adding
paddle shifters to the 2013 and the service rep's take, after asking
somebody (?), was that no, they couldn't add them at the dealer.