Has anyone had any success going after GM to cover expenses for this design
flaw?
In calling GM, they would like a certified dealer to fully diagnose the
problem, which requires taking off the manifold at an expense of $400,
before they will even start to talk about covering any of the expenses. If
I go down this route I am at risk of GM covering nothing and being forced to
use the GM service center to fix this problem at a highly inflated cost vs.
using my trusted independent garage. GM is being very unreasonable and
won't even run a simple scenario to help me decide that IF (in the probable
case) the manifold needed to be replace, would they cover any costs.
Any recommendations on how to proceed? Do consumers just need to take it in
the shorts for these design issues?
Thanks,
Jeff
Really it's both manifolds, upper and lower. The problem is
really with the EGR pipe in the lower manifold. The plastic
manifold warping is just a result of the improperly designed
lower manifold.
> Any recommendations on how to proceed? Do consumers just need to take it
in
> the shorts for these design issues?
I think that at the mileage your vehicle is at....you probably
will get no satisfaction. Do you know anyone who can
get you the parts at a better price....ie, someone who works
at a dealership. You are probably better off to purchase
the parts and take them to your trusty mechanic for
installation.
Ian
Yep. He's right about that.
>
> Has anyone had any success going after GM to cover expenses for this design
> flaw?
I've had more success only buying GM products with the more venerable engines
such as the 350 V8. It really sucks that one finds everything out about a car
usually after he has one. But this information was out there before you
bought this car. GM definitely has some engine configurations to stay away
from.
Avenger.
"Avenger" <sos_a...@yahoo.com.> wrote in message
news:9635B6E352E7C388.ABF17044...@lp.airnews.net...
>I've had more success only buying GM products with the more venerable engines
>such as the 350 V8. It really sucks that one finds everything out about a car
>usually after he has one. But this information was out there before you
>bought this car. GM definitely has some engine configurations to stay away
>from.
>
>Avenger.
And the name of the 4/5 passenger car that GM sold
in 1998 in North America with a 350 cid V-8 was ??????
Which one?
Avenger.
Any one.
Go ahead, name it.
Are you now claiming there aren't any GM cars with 350 motors???
Avenger.
Understand that GM might be buying Honda v6 engines,then
maybe those problem will stop!
Andy
!"Jeff James" <jsja...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:kF6Q9.2305$Y5.181...@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> I've had more success only buying GM products with the more venerable
engines
> such as the 350 V8. It really sucks that one finds everything out about a
car
> usually after he has one. But this information was out there before you
> bought this car. GM definitely has some engine configurations to stay away
> from.
>
> Avenger.
I guess I should have been more suspicious of GM. I did look into the
engine prior to purchase and received many comments regarding the 3800 being
a good solid well-established engine, perhaps those were targeted towards
the Series I. Given GM is trying to re-establish a good quality standard,
it's mind blowing they would not thoroughly life test a change like this on
such a widely used engine. It is also frustrating their lack of flexibility
in helping customers with known class issues such as this.
Thanks all for your comments.
Jeff
I hate to say that I will not buy another GM vehicle but when these STUPID
things CONTINUE to happen, it seems that I MUST buy something else to SURVIVE
the hidden costs of ownership of a GM product.
John
>> >> And the name of the 4/5 passenger car that GM sold
>> >> in 1998 in North America with a 350 cid V-8 was ??????
>> >
>> >Which one?
>> >
>>
>> Any one.
>>
>> Go ahead, name it.
>
>
>Are you now claiming there aren't any GM cars with 350 motors???
Are you concrete focking block stupid?
Look genius, READ what I wrote, not what you WISH is wrote.
Name the 4/5 passenger car with a 350 cid engine that GM sold
in North America in 1998.
There have probably been zillions produced but when the same problem pops up
consistently, you begin to think that maybe there is a problem with GM.
Read THIS:
http://www.geocities.com/gm_intake/
AND THIS:
http://www.petitiononline.com/GMcnsmrs/petition.html
if you REALLY think there is no problem. There are over 1000 sigs on the
petition.
I realize that these sites concern the 3.4 and 3.1 engines but if you read the
NG, the 3.8 II has a DIFFERENT manifold problem, but there is STILL a problem.
If I understand properly, GM has had an intake manifold gasket/sealing problem
for many years and has actually done NOTHING to cure it (except say it is not
there or if it IS there, it is not their fault!) This is similar to the pot
saying the kettle isn't BLACK!
My comment concerned the fact that GM seems to use the PUBLIC to test its
products. And then says it doesn't.
John
Eventually, you may get the idea that there IS a problem with GM engines..
John
Umm... not to take sides here, but this guy claims that his cam snapped, and
that caused the engine to run ROUGH? Anyone care to explain how an engine
will run AT ALL with a broken camshaft??
Are there little gremlins inside pushing the valves open & closed? Do the
valves open just out of habit?
"FIERO NUT" <fier...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030101133956...@mb-fs.aol.com...
Harryface
Presently cruising in ~_~_~_>>
4. 1991 Pontiac Bonneville LE, 249,000 miles.
Not Bad For An AMERICAN CAR
The Former Fleet -----~~~~>>>
1. 1973 Chevy Impala 4 door, 1980 - 83
2. 1968 Buick LeSabre Convertible, 1983-86
3. 1978 Olds Holiday 88, 1986 -91
5. 1989 Chevy Cavalier Z- 24 Convertible, 1996 to 2000
Darby, I think the number is up to 18 by now.
---Bob Gross---
The only decent engine they make is the 4.6L Northstar
> engine and the 5.7L engine and these two engines are put in cars that cost
> over $50K dollars.
The Northstar has it's own set of problems. I've got one
apart in my bay as we speak. Just a simple oil leak, but
it costs over 2000 dollars to fix properly. Not to mention,
head bolts that pull the aluminum threads out of the block,
and the water pumps that fail on a regular basis.
Ian
>People use the forum to present problems, I understand......and I'm glad
>because if every 3800 owner chimed in with their trouble free
>experiences(like me), this place would be buried.
> By the way, I went to the two sites you linked......nothing
>statistically,comprehensively, or scientifically collected. Just a low
>number of anecdotal comments, many for the same couple of owners-exactly my
>original point.
> This site is fantastic with "how-to" stuff by smart turn-wrenchers. That
>I value. Much of the rest reminds me of my kids chat groups(gossip).
>P.S. If I do develop a leak in my engine, I'll eat some crow and post so
>here :^) (I won't be lambasting GM though at that mileage).....99' 3.8 108k
>and away!
>
You might not have the problem (I hope not), but I've found that when
enough people start squeaking, and guys like Shiden are kept busy
fixing the problem, there's.....a problem.
What puzzles me, and I've mentioned this before regarding the 2.8 and
3.1 intake man gaskets, is why the problem is significant, but not
universal.
I think I've already said I don't think it's a design flaw, but is
more a QC or assembly flaw. Otherwise it would be more widespread.
'Course you could always argue that anything causing significant
problems is ultimately a design flaw.
Beats the hell out of me. I really enjoy hearing about it from those
who deal with it on a daily basis, because I expect them to eventually
come up with more details, and a final fix.
But I agree with anybody who slams GM for not paying for the fix.
Another black mark for GM, which has enough already.
And it does make me think twice about buying the 3800 II.
--Vic
"vince markarian" <vma...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:VdmQ9.202681$Qr.54...@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
Oh great now you tell me there are problems with the Northstar
engine,,,,so much for buying that DHS......$2000 to repair an oil leak!
No way I want that.
And who ever thought of sticking a starter motor " Inside " the
engine...Brilliant, simply Brilliant !
Harryface
( Now considering keeping my old car longer. )
Presently cruising in ~_~_~_>>
4. 1991 Pontiac Bonneville LE, 249,000 miles.
Made In America By Good Ole Boys From Wentzville.
MissourA..
"M.Burns" <mhb...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:h2PQ9.112421$pe.42...@news2.east.cox.net...
> IAN
>
> Oh great now you tell me there are problems with the Northstar
> engine,,,,so much for buying that DHS......$2000 to repair an oil leak!
> No way I want that.
No, go ahead and buy the DHS. You won't be paying for
any repairs for 4 years and 80,000 klms anyway, and if you
really like the thing you can get an extended warranty to deal
with Northstar problems. The basic engine itself is absolutely
bulletproof. We do not see problems like bearing failures,
head/valve train failures...etc.
> And who ever thought of sticking a starter motor " Inside " the
> engine...Brilliant, simply Brilliant !
Actually, it is brilliant! The starter is kept in a nice clean
environment....(there is literally no room to install the
starter in any other location) and the Cadillac engineers
have designed the intake manifold so that you can lift
it up and have access to the starter in about 10 minutes.
Ian
> OK, I'll play devils advocate again.....lots of places to look for an oil
> leak. IS it the "bad crank seal"? Or perhaps some other leak related to
> maintenance or damage?
> ....can't blame GM if its a drainplug/gasket, or a chisel was used to
remove
> a stubborn filter :^), or the pan struck a road obstacle etc.
It's probably one of two things....oil pan gasket and/or
the rear main seal "housing" gasket has split and is leaking
oil. These are both common problems with the GEN II
3800. The oil pan's themselves are poorly designed and
manufactured and have quite large ripples in the sealing
surface. Of course, GM's fix is to spread RTV along
the surface of the pan along with the new gasket. It works,
but I always feel sorry for the next tech who has to pull
the pan off....the RTV makes it very difficult to pull off.
Ian
shiden_kai wrote:
> "Harry Face" wrote
>
> > IAN
> >
> > Oh great now you tell me there are problems with the Northstar
> > engine,,,,so much for buying that DHS......$2000 to repair an oil leak!
> > No way I want that.
>
> No, go ahead and buy the DHS. You won't be paying for
> any repairs for 4 years and 80,000 klms anyway, and if you
> really like the thing you can get an extended warranty to deal
> with Northstar problems. The basic engine itself is absolutely
> bulletproof. We do not see problems like bearing failures,
> head/valve train failures...etc.
>
And why fix a leak anyway???? lol
>
> > And who ever thought of sticking a starter motor " Inside " the
> > engine...Brilliant, simply Brilliant !
>
> Actually, it is brilliant! The starter is kept in a nice clean
> environment....(there is literally no room to install the
> starter in any other location) and the Cadillac engineers
> have designed the intake manifold so that you can lift
> it up and have access to the starter in about 10 minutes.
>
> Ian
Only time will tell, but those starters might last forever protected from
the elements.
Sound cool to me!
GW
> Only time will tell, but those starters might last forever protected from
> the elements.
If not that...at least they aren't greasy or dirty when
you go to remove them.
> Sound cool to me!
Here's a couple of pictures of the starter and
manifold.
http://www3.telus.net/public/ianrmac/Images/NSstarter.jpg
And this one is more of a closeup.
http://www3.telus.net/public/ianrmac/Images/NSstarter1.JPG
Note the high tech block of wood. Heh heh..
Ian
Man, that's a dinky looking little starter!
Does the factory recommend pine or maple?
> Man, that's a dinky looking little starter!
Yeah, most of the GM starters are the small
reduction gear starters these days.
> Does the factory recommend pine or maple?
I use whatever the factory sends me. I just
make blocks of wood from the crates that
the new engines or tranny's are sent in.
(grin)
Ian
So YOUR problem would be the one that would make it statistically significant?
Hmmm...now THAT is REALLY scientific!
John
shiden_kai wrote:
Yeah...that genuine "auto shop" wood always has such a nice deep dark
color to it.....not like that bright shiny "wood shop" crap.
lol
GW
In the picture you can se belt drive to the camshafts, how long will it take
to change the belts? and how often ?
In Europe there is a lot of belt drives, and a lot of broken belts = bend
valves. So on a lot of cars, you will have to change belt after 90K km.
Best regards
jesper ankersen
www.dynomet.dk
>
"FIERO NUT" <fier...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030103001134...@mb-mr.aol.com...
> In the picture you can se belt drive to the camshafts, how long will it
take
> to change the belts? and how often ?
Hello Jesper....actually that is not a belt driven camshaft that you
are seeing. That belt is used to drive the water pump. The water pump
on the Northstar is driven by left intake camshaft.
The camshafts are driven by chains. Here is a picture of the front
of the Northstar...gives you an idea of how the chain drives
look.
http://www3.telus.net/public/ianrmac/Images/NS11.JPG
> In Europe there is a lot of belt drives, and a lot of broken belts = bend
> valves. So on a lot of cars, you will have to change belt after 90K km.
Yes, and the Northstar would bend valves if the chains broke....but
they seem to be very robust. I have never even seen a chain wear
out yet.
Ian
Belt driven water pumps driven by the cam shaft ? What next ! Everytime
I read one of your posts on the Northstar I get more turned off on this
motor.......And what the hell is the altenator doing down there on the
bottom righthand side.........
Harryface
Presently cruising in ~_~_~_>>
4. 1991 Pontiac Bonneville LE, 249,000 miles.
Made In America By Good Ole Boys From
GM's Assembly Plant in Wentzville. MissourA..
~~~~>> The Former Fleet -----~~~~>>>
> Belt driven water pumps driven by the cam shaft ? What next ! Everytime
> I read one of your posts on the Northstar I get more turned off on this
> motor.......And what the hell is the altenator doing down there on the
> bottom righthand side.........
It actually might be one of the best motors that
GM has produced. (Geez, is that me saying that?)
Somebody slap me.
Alternator?.....you mean the alternator down
there? http://www3.telus.net/public/ianrmac/Images/NS4.JPG
Ian
Nice picture, is the engine block in aluminium , like the heads?
Jesper
Yeah , That altenator.....I read at the book store the AC Condersor &
Radiator need to be removed to get the ALT out of the Northstar...bad ,
very bad!
Gee is that blue thing actually the oil filter in plain view?....Where
the hell are the spark plugs?? Nice pictures by the way.
P.S. I bought my oil for the 250,000 mile oil change later this month..
Harryface
( Babying my car now, as I dread replacing it )
> Nice picture, is the engine block in aluminium , like the heads?
Yes....since you like the picture...here's another one. Left side
of the engine.... http://www3.telus.net/public/ianrmac/Images/NSleft.JPG
Ian
> Yeah , That altenator.....I read at the book store the AC Condersor &
> Radiator need to be removed to get the ALT out of the Northstar...bad ,
> very bad!
Only the water cooled alternator has to be replaced that way, the
regular air cooled alternator can be removed from the bottom.
There is a small plate that can be removed from the front lower
radiator support that allows you the room to pull the alternator
down.
> Gee is that blue thing actually the oil filter in plain view?....Where
> the hell are the spark plugs?? Nice pictures by the way.
Spark plugs are sitting under the coil packs which are sitting
right on top of the valve cover. You can see the eight bolts
that are holding the coil pack assembly to the valve cover.
> P.S. I bought my oil for the 250,000 mile oil change later this month..
Pretty good for a Bonneville. They were a good car.
Ian
"shiden_kai" <violet-lighte...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:RQ6R9.88977$Zv4.6...@news2.telusplanet.net...
So... at 4.6L this is sort of a dual Quad-4?
Aron
"shiden_kai" <violet-lighte...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hAJR9.96692$Zv4.7...@news2.telusplanet.net...
Now I can still imagine that quality has gone up and my Skylark is an
exception since my mom's Lumina is alright and the 3.1L developed a
reputation of being reliable, but there's more to the story. When I went to
do the intake manifold gasket job on my Buick, the gasket was made wrong.
The dealer told me they've see them made wrong before and gave me another
one. This one was made wrong too but it wasn't as bad. I was able to very
carefully file a locating pin to get the gasket to fit. It was definitely
the gasket because the same one wouldn't fit on either side and the one that
did fit would fit on both sides. It is plain old poor manufacturing. I
believe that some of the early 3.1L engines were made well to save face.
Once the reputation of reliability was there they made them unreliable and
sold them on reliability then raked in the dough on repair. Genius!
"Darby OGill" <insus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:x%EQ9.14976$Xc....@nwrddc04.gnilink.net...
> How many 3800II engines have been produced? How many have manifold leaks?
> Sometimes I think the same cranky 17 people post all the messages on the
> usenet.
> Darby...99' regal 3.8 108,659 trouble free (and powerful and
economical)
> miles and counting.
> "FIERO NUT" <fier...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20021231214758...@mb-fd.aol.com...
> > This DOES seem to be a problem with GM. They just flat DON'T seem to
care
> > about the customer.
> >
> > I hate to say that I will not buy another GM vehicle but when these
STUPID
> > things CONTINUE to happen, it seems that I MUST buy something else to
> SURVIVE
> > the hidden costs of ownership of a GM product.
> >
> > John
>
>
>
"Robert A. Barr" <rober...@who.needs.to.know> wrote in message
news:3E134D9A...@worldnet.att.net...
> FIERO NUT wrote:
>
> > Here's another dis-satisfied person: http://www.gm-v6lemons.com/
> >
> > Eventually, you may get the idea that there IS a problem with GM
engines..
> >
> > John
>
> Umm... not to take sides here, but this guy claims that his cam snapped,
and
> that caused the engine to run ROUGH? Anyone care to explain how an engine
> will run AT ALL with a broken camshaft??
>
> Are there little gremlins inside pushing the valves open & closed? Do the
> valves open just out of habit?
>
>
>
"Victor Smith" <victor...@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:n1t61vgvopdt8ck11...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2003 21:11:28 GMT, "Darby OGill"
> <insus...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >People use the forum to present problems, I understand......and I'm glad
> >because if every 3800 owner chimed in with their trouble free
> >experiences(like me), this place would be buried.
> > By the way, I went to the two sites you linked......nothing
> >statistically,comprehensively, or scientifically collected. Just a low
> >number of anecdotal comments, many for the same couple of owners-exactly
my
> >original point.
> > This site is fantastic with "how-to" stuff by smart turn-wrenchers.
That
> >I value. Much of the rest reminds me of my kids chat groups(gossip).
> >P.S. If I do develop a leak in my engine, I'll eat some crow and post so
> >here :^) (I won't be lambasting GM though at that mileage).....99' 3.8
108k
> >and away!
> >
> You might not have the problem (I hope not), but I've found that when
> enough people start squeaking, and guys like Shiden are kept busy
> fixing the problem, there's.....a problem.
> What puzzles me, and I've mentioned this before regarding the 2.8 and
> 3.1 intake man gaskets, is why the problem is significant, but not
> universal.
> I think I've already said I don't think it's a design flaw, but is
> more a QC or assembly flaw. Otherwise it would be more widespread.
> 'Course you could always argue that anything causing significant
> problems is ultimately a design flaw.
> Beats the hell out of me. I really enjoy hearing about it from those
> who deal with it on a daily basis, because I expect them to eventually
> come up with more details, and a final fix.
> But I agree with anybody who slams GM for not paying for the fix.
> Another black mark for GM, which has enough already.
> And it does make me think twice about buying the 3800 II.
>
> --Vic
>
>
>
> So... at 4.6L this is sort of a dual Quad-4?
No, not even close. It's a completely new
design (mind you, it has been around since
94). The picture I posted was also the newer
style Northstar. It has the coil packs that
are integral with the valve cover. The older
Northstar had the older style coil packs and spark plug
wires.
Ian
> That starter bears a striking resemblance to the starter on my '93
Mercury
> Sable. Do you know if the starters are made by the same manufacturer?
> Also, have you ever seen a case where the heave positive wire to the
starter
> wore through and shorted or someone cranked it too long and the starter or
> wire overheated?
I've never seen what you describe happen, but I've seen the positive cable
corrode badly at the battery and have to be replaced. The problem is that
the cable has one end that goes to the starter, another end that goes to the
alternator, and then one more end that runs along the subframe and over
to the drivers side of the underhood area. Pretty nasty cable to have to
replace.
Ian
--
--
DeathRat / DemiGod
GM Partsman for a Pontiac Dealership
Administrator of The Bonneville Attitude Forum
www.bonnevilleattitude.com
Email: ad...@bonnevilleattitude.com
Owner of The Bonneville Attitude Chat Forum
http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bonnevilleattitudechatforum/
--
"Darby OGill" <insus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gnQQ9.49042$ac.3...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> OK, I'll play devils advocate again.....lots of places to look for an oil
> leak. IS it the "bad crank seal"? Or perhaps some other leak related to
> maintenance or damage?
> ....can't blame GM if its a drainplug/gasket, or a chisel was used to
remove
> a stubborn filter :^), or the pan struck a road obstacle etc.
>
> "M.Burns" <mhb...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:h2PQ9.112421$pe.42...@news2.east.cox.net...
> > No coolant leak on my wife's 3800 (yet) but it leaves enough oil on the
> > garage floor to replenish what the Arabs pump every week. Been leaking
> for
> > 20K miles (bad crank seal?).
> > It still amazes may with all the state-of-the-art design aids that
> > automakers have, they still can't get the simplest things right.
> > ...Continuation of the quality myth. Supposedly they want to make cars
> last
> > to 200K miles. I'd be tickled if they'd just make it past 70K.
--
--
DeathRat / DemiGod
GM Partsman for a Pontiac Dealership
Administrator of The Bonneville Attitude Forum
www.bonnevilleattitude.com
Email: ad...@bonnevilleattitude.com
Owner of The Bonneville Attitude Chat Forum
http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bonnevilleattitudechatforum/
--
"Darby OGill" <insus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mIjR9.38$LY3...@nwrddc04.gnilink.net...
--
--
DeathRat / DemiGod
GM Partsman for a Pontiac Dealership
Administrator of The Bonneville Attitude Forum
www.bonnevilleattitude.com
Email: ad...@bonnevilleattitude.com
Owner of The Bonneville Attitude Chat Forum
http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/bonnevilleattitudechatforum/
--
"Darby OGill" <insus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mIjR9.38$LY3...@nwrddc04.gnilink.net...
My father has a 2001 Buick Lesabre 3.8 Liter Series II engine that
started leaking antifreeze. This antifreeze leak was not immediately
found as there were no "visable" puddles of antifreeze under the
vehicle. He did however have to occasionally add a small amount of
additional Dexcool coolant to the resevoir to keep the level at the
cool mark on the overflow tank. He was suspicious at this point but
not yet overly concerned. He started really to get concerned when he
came back from a long trip, and he had to add a full pint of
antifreeze to the resevoir. Obviously the antifreeze was going
somewhere but where??
He started testing the vehicle by running it and trying to find the
leak. He finally noticed it dripping on the right side of the engine
while the car was idling with the heater running. He immediately
took the vehicle to the dealer and the dealer said he had a leak
around the manifold gasket and that the gasket would be replaced which
it was and there appears to be no more leaking at this point. (My dad
asked if this was a common problem with these engines and the service
manager responded no). (Which I find hard to believe based on all the
comments about this condition on the internet)
My dad is very angry over this as he had a 1990 Bonneville with the
earlier version of this engine which gave him no trouble at all. In
fact, I recently bought a 2002 Chevy Impala with this 3.8 liter engine
because of the excellent reliability record of this engine. Now I
have to monitor this situation closely to avoid major problems of my
own.
I have several questions:
1. The dealer just replaced the manifold gasket to fix this problem.
How would my dad know whether the plastic "manifold" itself should
have been replaced or not?
2. What can you look for to determine whether antifreeze has gotten
mixed in with the oil?
3. What year was the 3800 engine modified to include this composite
plastic upper manifold and gasket? (Appears to be an engineering
change to save money on each engine manufactured).
4. Is the defect with the gasket, or is it with the composite plastic
upper manifold and its ability to take the heat of the EGR pipe (which
hot gasses travel through)?
5. Is the lower aluminum manifold a problem or is the problem
isolated to the gasket and the upper (plastic) manifold?
6. I saw a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) related to prior year
cars but has anything been done on the more recent years models (2001
and 2002 years) to correct this problem?
7. Does the Dexcool antifreeze have anything to do with this
situation?
8. My father has the factory service manual and told me it did not
look like a difficult job to replace the plastic manifold and the
gasket yourself. Is it that easy?
I have gained a great deal of knowledge about this situation from the
postings and will be monitoring this closely to see if GM does
something to correct this defect. (Hopefully before my warranty
expires).
Thanks for any input.
"Aron" <drenk...@earthlink.ten> wrote in message news:<WFlS9.16753$134.1...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
does the coolant leak/manifold problem occur on the Supercharged version of
the 3800 series II?
(ie: does the s/c version use a plastic manifold?)
~matt
"Curtis" <ckme...@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:df7b1df9.03011...@posting.google.com...
bob in ny
"matt" <bl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v2oir5s...@corp.supernews.com...
"Curtis" <ckme...@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:df7b1df9.03011...@posting.google.com...
Stopped it with some radiator stop-leak. With a car this old, I'm not
about to drop a lot more money into it with a gasket replacement. The
stop leak worked for me.
Rich
"MikeŠ" <my91...@yahoo.comedy> wrote in message
news:n8%W9.19866$Ib.6...@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> also add this question to the list:
>
> does the coolant leak/manifold problem occur on the Supercharged version
of
> the 3800 series II?
> (ie: does the s/c version use a plastic manifold?)
No, the supercharged version does not use the plastic
style intake manifold. These engines do not have this
particular intake leak problem. They do leak oil from
the intake manifold end seals as they get older as do
all 3800 v-6's.
Ian
Is the reason a SC 3800 doesn't use a plastic plenum becasue the SC
attatches to the upper intake??? Is the Intake Manifold a 2 piece
aluminum design???
Harryface
Presently cruising in ~_~_~_>>
4. 1991 Pontiac Bonneville LE
The 1/4 Million Mile Car.
> Is the reason a SC 3800 doesn't use a plastic plenum becasue the SC
> attatches to the upper intake??? Is the Intake Manifold a 2 piece
> aluminum design???
The supercharger basically "is" the upper intake manifold. There
was one in the shop today...I should have taken a picture....
heh heh..
Ian
"shiden_kai" <violet-lighte...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LeqS9.122304$Zv4.8...@news2.telusplanet.net...
When the guy with the supercharger comes in tomorrow or Friday to get
his car re-repaired take a picture of it ...LOL
Harryface
Get one of your buddies to take the owner across the street for coffee, and
then whip out the digital camera.
---Bob Gross---
http://www.thrashercharged.com/L67_htm/engine_tear.shtm
Its a really good read.
"Harry Face" <harr...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:19587-3E2...@storefull-2114.public.lawson.webtv.net...
> When the guy with the supercharger comes in tomorrow or Friday to get
> his car re-repaired take a picture of it ...LOL
It came back in today, but the tech that was working on it
only had it in the bay for a few minutes. Oh well, next time.
Ian
"matt" <bl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v2rumaf...@corp.supernews.com...