-GV
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Have you checked for a leaking intake manifold gasket? They fail all
the time on the 3.1/3.4 l GM engines and can cause all sorts of weird
problems. Also check carefully for any signs of water in the oil. The
first place it becomes visible is as a milky sludge on the underside of
the oil filler cap.
John
You should have started with the Ignition Control Module, but hindsight is
20/20 right?
Steve
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
I learned that pretty quick. I also find ALLData easier to navigate.
Steve
Driving? What do you mean driving? We can't even drive this thing,
as soon as you take your foot off the gas, it dies :)
> Is this a constant misfire, or just a rough idle stall,?
Constant, you can definitely hear the skip when you rev the engine.
> If so check the egr for not seating, remove and clean, try running the car with
>the connector off. Does this stall happen from the first cold start or only
>after it warms up.
Both. Have not checked EGR yet, thanks for the idea, will add to the
list.
>Have you cleaned the throttle body and iac for carbon accumulation, check
>for vacuum leaks especially around the throttle body,
>continually replacing parts is not the answer here, the base problem must be
>found, it is possible you may have to consider getting this to a pro who is
>familiar with these type problems.
Yes, as part of the tuneup the intake was cleaned out with carb
cleaner. Have not found any vacuum leaks yet. This thing will be
either fixed or going to a pro soon before we rip the rest of our hair
out!! :-)
-GV
Oil is fine, it was just changed, thanks for the idea though.
-GV
Maybe, in our travels with this vehicle thusfar the signs and advice
(from local mechanics and some internet research) have both pointed
to and away from the ICM.
-GV
Funny you mention that because the shop around here said that the ICM
rarely goes bad on these cars ;)
One thing I forgot to mention in my original post was that the car has
somewhat of a hard start too, seems to take a lot more cranks than it
should to start, but it does start. I've got another car with the
same motor and it doesn't take anywhere near the amount of cranks this
car does to start.
>another thought,fuel contamination?will it run on a direct shot of
>spray start?
Well, it runs regardless once it gets started, it just runs like crap
and it's not actually driveable.
-GV
-GV
If you got through the diagnostic chart and found that you had to replace
the ICM, but it didn't fix the problem, you must have missed something.
You'll have to go back through and check all 3x reference signal circuit
wires and connetions as outlined in the diagnostic chart. I also notice that
the coil packs should be inspected for cracks/arcing/carbon tracking/damge.
Steve
"GlassVial" <glas...@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:skl5m1te62d8hlq85...@4ax.com...
We replaced the ICM, the car still is not running properly and the
1374 code is still present. The coilpacks all check out fine.
Already replaced the crank sensor, car still starts hard. 80k miles
on car. Don't know about the timing jump problem? We're looking at
the possibility of a wiring problem right now, but this thing is
getting closer and closer to heading to a shop for full diagnosis,
it's definitely something that needs to be pinned down and is falling
outside our realm of expertise.
-GV
>http://users.eastlink.ca/~smackie/p1374.pdf
You don't happen to have the "Wiring Repair in Electrical Diagnosis",
or equivalent, do you?
-GV
"GlassVial" <glas...@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:o5t5m15ut0jbjgiid...@4ax.com...
>Not sure what you mean.
>>
I highly doubt a fuel additive would be throwing a P1374 code.
>how about injector voltages/pulses.did you say it ran better with
>replacement ICM?where did it come from?
Slightly better with the new ICM however the symptoms have not
changed, the problem still exists. Came from autozone, brand new.
>was the swap not available?(sure thing proof).you
>coulda got another bad one?
Highly unlikely, this wasn't a pickup from a junkyard this was a brand
new part.
>change the computer?
That's the last thing we want to do. A *new* computer is $350 and
would need to be reprogrammed.
>popping cyl means misstimed fire or lean mixture.like i said before.
>all kinky Gm problems for me have either been ICM ECM or injectors
>for the symptems you describe.
For the symptoms, AND a P1374 code, though??
>but he first question i always ask anyone is if car has
>recently been worked on or any special things been done out of the
>ordinary.
Nope. Car had just passed inspection and had an oil change, actually.
After it started this problem and the check engine codes came on the
first time, we gave it a good tuneup (as per my original post) plus we
replaced the MAP sensor due to a P0108 code (IIRC). As I posted
already, this is either a wiring/terminal problem we are going to
attempt to trace down, or it's the computer. It doesn't appear to be
the ICM (as this did not solve the problem and the P1374 code is still
there) and it's definitely not something as over-simplified as just
someone adding fuel injector cleaner.
-GV
...or if there is a specific piece of information you need, I could send
that over...
Steve
"GlassVial" <glas...@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:13t6m11k3858oal9i...@4ax.com...
Sorry I can't be more specific, I'm just reading what the printout we
got from the GM dealer says. Anything you can post would be helpful
and much appreciated!! :)
-GV
You know, I just can't f'n win. Went to the library today, they have
all the mitchell manuals EXCEPT the one for 1996 in one section, and
in another section they have mitchell manuals that have these
wonderful wiring diagrams that would probably be great EXCEPT the
thing is in this big binder and none of the librarians know how to
undo it to make copies, because you can't take it out of the library!!
-GV
"GlassVial" <glas...@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t3m7m191bqg0k09j9...@4ax.com...
The answer to all your questions is: I don't know. The car was
running fine when my friend first got it, all of a sudden the check
engine light came on and it started running like crap. We have not
yet ruled out a wiring problem or a computer, yet. We got past step 4
in the alldata chart posted by Steve Mackie, now we are on step 5
(that means we did not skip to step 8 if you are following along).
Simply ran out of time tonight, will be working on step 5 in the
coming days.
-GV
After lots and lots of frustration, I believe we've found the problem,
it appears to be a bad wire. The circuit 430 wire, purple/white, has
no continuity. That's the 3x reference high signal for those
following along at home. And, obviously I got my hands on the wiring
diagrams (finally) or else we never would have figured this out.
Now of course, the question is, what type of wire is used, what gauge
of wire is used, and how in the hell are we gonna run the wire from
under the hood to the inside of the car? And after all that, is this
finally going to fix the problem...I certainly hope so.
-GV
Nope. Replaced the wire that was bad, the P1374 code still throws.
We give up, it's going to the shop tomorrow.
-GV
-GV
Seems odd that you found bad wires, maybe there is more. Was one of the bad
wires going to the crank sensor? Were the bad wires repaired properly? Why
were there bad wires? Maybe there is an underlying issue no one is
addressing.
Steve
"GlassVial" <glas...@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55bin1lglo96f3vq3...@4ax.com...
Not sure exactly which bad wires were fixed, the shop fixed them, they
just said 3 bad wires, behind the alternator if I'm not mistaken. As
far as I know the 3 bad wires were repaired properly. I'm not 100%
sure why or how the wires went bad. Something about the 3 wires were
rubbing and shorted out which fried the computer. Also, got a chance
to scan the codes again after I got it home. P1374 code came up
twice, and P0108 came up once. P0108 indicates MAP sensor, but that's
already been replaced.
-GV
Was the MAP sensor the case of the P0108?
We replaced the MAP sensor because the p0108 code came up before. Now
it's coming up with 2 P1374 codes and 1 P0108 code. It's currently
back at the shop that "diagnosed" it. They are going to be eating the
labor until they find out exactly what the problem is, I'm beginning
to wonder if it really was the computer after all at this point.
-GV
So replacing the MAP didn't fix the P0108?
The first step in diagnosing a P0108 asks "Is the idle rough/unstable etc?"
"If so, repair idle first before trying to diagnose P0108."
Steve
Actually in the troubleshooting for the P0108 code, it states that if
you have a P1374 code to fix that first and see if it goes away. We
replaced the MAP sensor anyway because it was relatively inexpensive,
but at the end of the day it really didn't solve anything. The dealer
(that reprogrammed the computer) is of the opinion it could be the
harmonic balancer (aka vibration dampener) because "it's a common
problem" they see in their shop. We took the thing off to replace the
crank sensor on this car, and it seemed fine to me, so I doubt that's
it, but of course I could be wrong. Unfortunately a new one is $70!
-GV
What? Who told you that. I'm looking at the factory diagnositc chart and it
says nothing of the sort. You always fix the lower numbers first. ;)
Steve
Whoops, I was wrong, that info relates to the P0101 code, which this
car also was throwing at one point (not anymore) - "Using scan tool,
check for stored DTCs. If DTC P1635 or P1374 is also set, diagnose
that DTC first." So many codes, it gets confusing ;)
I think I also forgot to mention, that coming home from the dealer the
car was acting up like crazy and the check engine light came on almost
right away. Cleared the codes, drove it from my house back to the
shop that 'diagnosed' it, and it only acted up a little bit and the
check engine light didn't come back on, even though the shop is
further away than the dealer was. I have no doubt in my mind that the
code came back though, I should have brought the scantool with me and
checked it once we hit the shop.
-GV
-GV
--
-----------------
www.thesnoman.com
Believe me, we know exactly what this code means at this point :)
We're intimately familiar with it. And basically what it means is,
take it to the dealer. I'm basically finding that codes that start
with a 0 are generic codes, ie. P0108 which is a code we were getting
before on this heap. However, codes that start with a 1, ie P1374,
are "manufacturer specific" and really should be taken to a dealer,
and that's the point we're at.
-GV
Hehe.
http://www.troublecodes.net/OBD2/
Steve
Yup, exactly what I said (from the site):
2nd digit
0 = Standard
1 = Manufacturer specific
-GV
-GV
Doesn't sound too bad. The OEM manifold is about $200 and about 4-5 hours
labour.
Steve
Actually that was factoring in $70(USD) for the used part + labor, or
$110 new part + labor, and yes he did say it was ~5hr job.
Is it advised to go with new over used for this part? Bear in mind we
live in the rust/salt belt here :)
-GV
I'd buy new, but that's me.
Steve
Well, that's interesting... but I don't see how it would affect
the crankshaft sensor, camshaft sensor, or interaction between
the two...
http://www.motorage.com/motorage/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=20037
Who knows, it needs to be fixed *regardless* if it's the culprit or
not, lethal exhaust vapors leaking into the cabin is not good for
one's health. :)
-GV