You were almost THERE.
The tires supplied are T-rated, meaning 112 MPH. The speed limiter is at
112.
Ryan (who got a ticket last night for doing 53 in a 40)
"If I could have my way everyday would be a Friday and you could even speed on
the highway" - Skee Lo
"If I die before I learn to speak, will money pay for all the days I lived
awake but half asleep?" - Primitive Radio Gods
Tehehehee...
Beanboy
ford limits top speed to 103 or 106 mph. true top speed with no limit is close
to 140.
joe
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Mustang GT: 140mph
Taurus SHO: 140mph
Acura 3.5TL: 140 mph
Mercedes SLK230: 140mph
Volvo S70GLT: 140mph
Escort ZX2: Not quite 140mph
Mel H.
'98 SVT Contour (143mph)
Formerly '85 Merkur XR4ti (137mph)
joe
ChrisP UCF wrote in message
<199809090342...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
Knowing how widely mag stats can vary, and already having had this
"discussion" with Ryanmal, I was wondering if there is a ZX2 website out
there? Has anybody put up time slips for 1/4 times? I know that a
15.3-16.3 with 7.4-8.2 0-60 times and top speeds of 128-131 mph for
Neons are doable, since most mag results combined with viewing time
slips and top speed runs prove it. Since there seems to be some widely
debated performance issues for the ZX2, just curious if anybody has more
information to offer than the "Motor Trend review" or "my car can go 136
mph now."
Just curious,
Beanboy
PS I just couldn't resist: Winner of the economy car class in Car and
Driver's One-Lap of America: NEON!
My point was that many other mags have never got a 7.4 second or a sub
16 second 1/4 time out of a ZX2.
>there's no way a piece of shit escort can go over 120
Good luck
cpg
ps - get some V's if you're going to push that escort up to 130+
>
>John wrote in message <35f7221...@news.atl.bellsouth.net>...
>>You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. This is not
>>your father's Escort. (to borrow a line from an old Olds advertising
>>campaign.) Dual overhead cam, 16 valves and 0-60 in 7.4 seconds (with
>>the 5 speed--so sayeth Motor Trend's testing.)
>
>
FWIW, Motor Trend's 0-60 time of 7.4s was done on a preproduction unit
and they point this out in a later review where they got a 0-60 time of
7.8s. I have no idea why they don't use that most recent data in their
Road Test Review.
Gerald
Rudy wrote:
> That's a bunch of bullsh*t, I had a 91 Escort GT. Had speedo was buried
> past 120, estimated speed 132....BURIED past 120, had to let off because I
> hit outside of town at 120 in 25mph zone. Only time I ever took that fast,
> but I know it was more than 120.
>
> ChrisP UCF wrote in message
> <199809090342...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
Hmmm, what was the old Escort GT's drag coefficient? Let's see, 127/114
and weighing in at 2458 w/manual and a drag coefficient of at least in
the.35 or so range. Yea, that can do 132... Again, tehehee
Beanboy
Joe Langley wrote in message <35F74FB3...@worldnet.att.net>...
take care, Jim
ChrisP UCF wrote in message
<199809100112...@ladder03.news.aol.com>...
The ZX2 isn't really an escort. It goes from 0-60 is 7.4 seconds and is really
a nice car to drive. I liked it even better than the grand prix's, grand am's,
sunfires, and even a lincoln mark 8 convertable (94-95 I think).
-Ryan
"I'm sick you all you hypocrites holding me at bay, and I don't need your
sympathies to get me through the day" --Mike Portnoy (Dream Theater)
"Arrogance and ignorance go hand in hand" -- James Hetfield (Metallica)
I'm back. I have personally seen several of my friends get to 60 in under 7.4
seconds. It really depends on how well you launch a clutch. Also, to dredge
up the old Neon vs. ZX2 debate. Last weekend I started tweaking my ZX2, and
man, that is an engine with a huge amount of untapped power. With just a
resonator mod and a new air filter it is really toasting. And is kicking
neon's asses all over town. That, my friend, is based on personal experience.
>I'm back. I have personally seen several of my friends get to 60 in
under 7.4
>seconds. It really depends on how well you launch a clutch. Also, to
dredge
>up the old Neon vs. ZX2 debate. Last weekend I started tweaking my
ZX2, and
>man, that is an engine with a huge amount of untapped power. With just
a
>resonator mod and a new air filter it is really toasting. And is
kicking
>neon's asses all over town. That, my friend, is based on personal
experience.
>-Ryan
Wooohoo!! Here we go again... Other than for a few dips into the
low-end of the Usenet pool, this 'discussion' have been fairly decent.
Has anybody been able to dyno a mod'ed ZX2 yet? Have ya taken her to
the track or a local auto-x?
Beanboy
NYG Neon
If so, how long a patch out of curiosity. I see so many people talking about
how fast the Esco's are, but most of the Escrots I see suck.
Some input?
If my total lack of knowledge is bunk, let me know. (And please no
flaming!).. I mean they are linear relationships in the same gear,
aren't they?
-M
Mi...@canada.com wrote in message <35fbbe1...@news.istar.ca>...
joe
Ryanmal wrote in message
<199809120208...@ladder03.news.aol.com>...
>>
>>there's no way a piece of shit escort can go over 120
>
>The ZX2 isn't really an escort. It goes from 0-60 is 7.4 seconds and is
really
>a nice car to drive. I liked it even better than the grand prix's, grand
am's,
>sunfires, and even a lincoln mark 8 convertable (94-95 I think).
>
>
So don't talk about them anymore!
As someone who has owned 4 Escorts in my life (86, 93, 95 and 98) and
the days all of them combined have spent in the shop could be counted
on 1 hand, I'm curious.
Maybe you mean because it's not as fast as a Mustang? It's not
supposed to. It's basic transportation to get people places. Maybe
you mean it's not as fancy as a Navigator. There's a reason why it's
less than half the price. Maybe you just don't have a clue as to what
you are talking about and just like to see your name on the screen
because then you can show the kids at school? Probably.
<dismount soapbox>
Hey, I use AOL too. I'm not going to say that I love AOL, but I wouldn't call
most of it's users "too stupid". He may sound like he's 14 years old, but
there are many uneloquent adults out there these days. I feel somewhat angry
that you assume that his family is inbred and then the car assumption has no
basis either.
<<As someone who has owned 4 Escorts in my life (86, 93, 95 and 98) and
the days all of them combined have spent in the shop could be counted
on 1 hand, I'm curious.>>
I've driven 1 Escort in my life, the ZX2, and I'll say that I liked it. I just
can't afford a new car right now.
<<Maybe you mean because it's not as fast as a Mustang? It's not
supposed to. It's basic transportation to get people places. Maybe
you mean it's not as fancy as a Navigator. There's a reason why it's
less than half the price. Maybe you just don't have a clue as to what
you are talking about and just like to see your name on the screen
because then you can show the kids at school? Probably.>>
Who would want a Navigator, anyways? And getting your name on a screen is a
much simpler matter than posting several times to a newsgroup, and I doubt the
"kids at school" would be very impressed.
<<<dismount soapbox>>>
Watch your step.
Ryan
"If I could have my way everyday would be a Friday and you could even speed on
the highway" - Skee Lo
"If I die before I learn to speak, will money pay for all the days I lived
awake but half asleep?" - Primitive Radio Gods
joe
John wrote in message <35fe06b5...@news.atl.bellsouth.net>...
>Define suck. As in AOL sucks and is only used by people too stupid to
>use a real ISP? As in you sound like you're only 14 years old and
>your opinion on the matter doesn't count anyway? As in your inbred
>family has never owned a car newer than 10 years old so you base your
>opinions on that? Please, help us out here.
>
>As someone who has owned 4 Escorts in my life (86, 93, 95 and 98) and
>the days all of them combined have spent in the shop could be counted
>on 1 hand, I'm curious.
>
>Maybe you mean because it's not as fast as a Mustang? It's not
>supposed to. It's basic transportation to get people places. Maybe
>you mean it's not as fancy as a Navigator. There's a reason why it's
>less than half the price. Maybe you just don't have a clue as to what
>you are talking about and just like to see your name on the screen
>because then you can show the kids at school? Probably.
>
Okay.. I have one agreement and like 2-3 saying no..
Anyone else have an opinion with this?
Actually, why don't you guys go and try it? I mean I've driven our 4
vehicles, each going like 1/2 the speed at like 1/2 the tach.. try it.
:)..
I didn't think it had anything to do with the horsepower/torque curve
because that's kind of like a constant; it just has to do with the
gears going around twice as fast at twice the engine speed... or am I
explaining this all wrong?
Thanks again guys!
-M
>Could not have said it better myself. thanks John.
>
>
> joe
>John wrote in message <35fe06b5...@news.atl.bellsouth.net>...
>>Define suck. As in AOL sucks and is only used by people too stupid to
>>use a real ISP? As in you sound like you're only 14 years old and
>>your opinion on the matter doesn't count anyway? As in your inbred
>>family has never owned a car newer than 10 years old so you base your
>>opinions on that? Please, help us out here.
>>
>>As someone who has owned 4 Escorts in my life (86, 93, 95 and 98) and
>>the days all of them combined have spent in the shop could be counted
>>on 1 hand, I'm curious.
>>
>>Maybe you mean because it's not as fast as a Mustang? It's not
>>supposed to. It's basic transportation to get people places. Maybe
>>you mean it's not as fancy as a Navigator. There's a reason why it's
>>less than half the price. Maybe you just don't have a clue as to what
>>you are talking about and just like to see your name on the screen
>>because then you can show the kids at school? Probably.
>>
Speed to RPMs is definitely linear. But you are correct about air
friction, etc. making it difficult to get close to redline in top gear.
Regards,
Gerald
Opps, stand corrected :) Anyways, this all should help.
Mi...@canada.com wrote in message <35fd397...@news.istar.ca>...
joe
NeonGlowzz wrote in message
<199809150015...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
>that just means you suck........
joe
Didn't catch the original post.
--Sam
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Sennme wrote in message <19981006202136...@ng102.aol.com>...
I AGREE! IT IS A REAL KICK IN THE FACE WHEN ASSHOLES LIKE THAT PUT DOWN THE
VERY CAR THAT PEOPLE DRIVE, OR HAVE TO DRIVE BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO CHOICE! I
CAN ONLY AFFORD THAT CAR, AND I AM GLAD THAT I HAVE IT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT,
KEEP YOUR DAMN MOUTH SHUT, AND GO ABOUT YOUR BUSINESS. DON'T PRESS YOUR
IGNORANCE AND STUPIDITY ON OTHERS. BY THE WAY, IF THE ARE SO SHITTY, THEN WHY
THE HELL ARE THEY ONE OF THE BEST SELLING CARS PRODUCED? THERE MUST BE ALOT OF
STUPID PEOPLE OUT THERE THEN IF THE ARE SO SHITTY. SO IN CLOSING CHRISP UCF
SHOVE IT! I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ESCORT DID THAT WAS SO BAD TO YOU...
WC
If you can buy an Escort, you can also afford a Metro or Accent.
My fault, you said car.