My car is a '68 Galaxie 500 2 tudor hardtop with a fresh 302 (306 with just
shy of 2,000 miles on it).
Anywho... What parts will I need and where can I find them? Roughly how much
is this swap gonna cost? Any resources for information or tips and tricks? I
imagine finding a clutch pedal assembly will be tough. Also, I'm wondering
what I will use for a driveshaft... Is there any vehicle I can use a factory
one from? How about for my clutch linkage? Can I use a factory z-bar setup
(if I can find one), or should I use a cable clutch? If so what do I use for
that? I'm sure there are plenty of things I'm not thinking of.
I've been dreaming about powershifting through the gears all day... <grin>
Unfortunately in order to do that I've got to do a hell of a lot of work to
the car. I can't stand sitting there and doing nothing while I drive. It's
alright since I'm driving a cool car, but I want a manual transmission. It
would make the car much more fun to drive. I also want it for the overdrive
gear, as it will let me get deeper rear end gears. My 2.80:1 gears just
don't cut it with a small block. I'm too slow off the line, and it certainly
doesn't help any with my 12.75:1 compression (All I've got to say to that
one is oops. LOL).
Cory
> one from? How about for my clutch linkage? Can I use a factory z-bar setup
> (if I can find one), or should I use a cable clutch? If so what do I use for
> that? I'm sure there are plenty of things I'm not thinking of.
The mustang 5 speeds use a cable clutch, so the Z bar won't do you any
good. You'll have to do a cable set up. There is a company "windsor-fox"
I think they are called that makes assemblies to put the newer stuff
in old fords, mustangs in particular. You may be able to adapt something
they have if they don't already make something.
You'll probably also need a new driveshaft. If you don't have a floor
shift already you'll have to put a hole in the floor. Hopefully there
is punch out there for it.
> I've been dreaming about powershifting through the gears all day... <grin>
> Unfortunately in order to do that I've got to do a hell of a lot of work to
> the car. I can't stand sitting there and doing nothing while I drive.
I figured you'd be going for the fuel economy.
install pedals, use a cable, 83-93 T5 bellhousing,85-93 5.0 V8
transmission, modify trans mount & driveshaft,install 370-ish rear
gear, inquire about parts used to convert the older 65-73 mustangs to
5 speed.
> I've been dreaming about powershifting through the gears all day...
> <grin> Unfortunately in order to do that I've got to do a hell of a
> lot of work to the car. I can't stand sitting there and doing nothing
> while I drive. It's alright since I'm driving a cool car, but I want a
> manual transmission. It would make the car much more fun to drive. I
> also want it for the overdrive gear, as it will let me get deeper rear
> end gears. My 2.80:1 gears just don't cut it with a small block. I'm
> too slow off the line, and it certainly doesn't help any with my
> 12.75:1 compression (All I've got to say to that one is oops. LOL).
It's a stupid idea. If you want such a car, get yourself a rice burner.
None of the Mustang trannys recommended so far will handle that kind of
weight.
You sound like a 20 year old twerp who needs to be driving a Honda.
(...)
These types of conversions are expensive, hard to do and may not work very
well. Plus it will decrease the value of the car greatly, because it is so
far from original condition.
Get yourself a used car with a 5 speed. Hint: Used cars with standard
transmissions sell for less because not that many people know how to drive a
standard. So you should be able to pick one up cheap. I have a 97 Ford
Contour V6 with a 5-Speed. It has 100,000 mi and runs great. There are many
other good cars with standard transmissions in your price range. If you shop
well, you should be able to pick up a BMW with a standard for pretty cheap.
A deal has a '91 318i with a 5 speed and 154k mi for just $4000. You should
be able to get yourself other used 5 speeds (VWs, Hyundais, Hondas, and so
on) for pretty cheap, especially if you shop well.
Jeff
FWIW, the C-4 can be tweaked to respectable performance levels.
But I sympathize with wanting a manual gearbox. However I am
skeptical about the longevity of the mustang transmission in
such a heavy car at the performance level you seem to want.
I think I would be looking for a top-loader four speed and
about 3.90 gears. Lots of Torino parts will fit, if you can
find them.
I _do_ have a Honda. It's an '86 Prelude. It was fun to drive but overall I
don't like the car. It's got half an engine, and is a sub-subcompact. I like
full-size cars. If a modern 5 speed can't handle the weight of my Galaxie
even after deeper gears I'll end up beefing it up if possible, if not then I
would have to go with a toploader and lose the overdrive. Anywho, I'm trying
to sell the Honda... If you want a Prelude with a 1.8 dual carb and a 5
speed let me know... Stop by with $200 and it's yours.
Cory
I'm not concerned about the value of the car. I do not intend to ever sell
it. It was originally my great grandmothers car. It's already gone from
original as I've got an '85 302 block in it, an '84 aluminum intake, and
some unknown Holley carb. The original heads are gone, though everything
else original to the car I do have, and intend to keep... Just in case I
ever want to put it back to original. Since I'm never going to sell it the
value of the car is whatever it's worth to _me_, not a potential buyer. It
would be worth a lot more to me if it had a manual transmission, and an
overdrive gear would also increase it's value to me as I could go with
deeper rear end gears and still get better mileage. Remember, this is my
daily driver for the forseeable future.
> Get yourself a used car with a 5 speed. Hint: Used cars with standard
> transmissions sell for less because not that many people know how to drive
a
> standard. So you should be able to pick one up cheap. I have a 97 Ford
> Contour V6 with a 5-Speed. It has 100,000 mi and runs great. There are
many
> other good cars with standard transmissions in your price range. If you
shop
> well, you should be able to pick up a BMW with a standard for pretty
cheap.
> A deal has a '91 318i with a 5 speed and 154k mi for just $4000. You
should
> be able to get yourself other used 5 speeds (VWs, Hyundais, Hondas, and so
> on) for pretty cheap, especially if you shop well.
I have _two_ used cars with 5 speeds in them. An '86 Honda Prelude with a
1.8l dual carb and an '86 Olds Calais Supreme with a 2.5l fuel injection.
The Prelude is a sub-subcompact which although is fun to drive hurts to sit
in for more than 30 minutes (I'm 6'3" and I hit the roof unless the sunroof
is open) and is also useless in the winter. The Olds is a decent car, very
comfortable for a compact. It doesn't cut it though. I want a big car and I
want a car with a whole engine. I'm debating whether I should keep the Olds
around for a winter beater/backup vehicle or sell it. All it needs is a new
alternator, some work to the rear brakes, and an exhaust leak fixed. If it
wasn't for the 5 speed that Olds would have been intolerably boring to
drive.
Cory
I believe for a 5 speed I would need to come up with some way to modify my
crossmember to mount it. What about a toploader? Would that mount to my
current FMX crossmember without modification?
Also, are Torino clutch pedals the same as Galaxie pedals? I think this may
be one of the harder parts to find.
I've heard of that company before... I'll have to check it out.
> You'll probably also need a new driveshaft. If you don't have a floor
> shift already you'll have to put a hole in the floor. Hopefully there
> is punch out there for it.
That hole-cutting is the part I'm not looking forward to. I think that will
be one of those measure thrice, sleep on it, measure again, and then cut
with a fresh mind situations. heh heh
> > I've been dreaming about powershifting through the gears all day...
<grin>
> > Unfortunately in order to do that I've got to do a hell of a lot of work
to
> > the car. I can't stand sitting there and doing nothing while I drive.
>
> I figured you'd be going for the fuel economy.
11.5 MPG (on my last tank) isn't cutting it. I'd imagine after the initial
swap my mileage will go _way_ down when I'm still in the "Oh my God this is
so damn fun!" period. After that it should go up some. :)
Cory
Have you searched for a Galaxie-specific forum? You are going to
need advice from someone very hip to that particular series of car. I'm
going to bet that the clutch pedal does not cross over to Torinos. You
might start with Crites and see if he knows.
Another alternative, if you want something livelier to drive, is to
have a manual valve body AOD automatic built. This requires you to
shift up and down in traffic, which can be interesting with a ratchet
shifter. The OD will allow you to put 4.11 or 4.30 gears out back and
still have about the same ratio you have now in 3rd.
CobraJet
>
>
> I believe for a 5 speed I would need to come up with some way to modify my
> crossmember to mount it. What about a toploader? Would that mount to my
> current FMX crossmember without modification?
This is where you get out your measuring tape and check the
distance from the engine flange to the tail mount and the
tail mount requirements. The trannies came with a couple
different tailshaft housings, depending on vehicle.
I think if you find the right length, it will fall right in.
> Also, are Torino clutch pedals the same as Galaxie pedals?
> I think this may be one of the harder parts to find.
I was thinking mainly of drivetrain parts. I can't imagine
there being that many '68 Galaxies with manual transmision.
Myself, I have never seen any manual Galaxies newer than '66.
They were supposed to be sorta cushy family-type cars. Which
is why I suggested Torino as a possibility, being big body
but more racy. The pedals should be similar, as they tended
to use the same processes throughout the line to keep costs
down. Likely to have the same pivot shaft diameter, but maybe
longer or shorter, bent in different places, linkage a little
different, etc. Maybe usable or not.
Maybe even more worrisome is that little bracket that bolts
to the frame with the pivot for the clutch equalizer arm.
If you can't find or fabricate one of those to line up with
the pivot on the bellhousing, you're heading into cable or
hydraulic land.
You need to make friends with a junkyard owner who still has
these relics lying around and will let you poke around with a
flashlight and measuring tape.
i'm very familiar with the 1968, and i know what you mean about the
slush box feeling. but i've done my share of conversions, and while i'm
not saying it would be a bad idea, there is going to be some things to
consider.
first, and foremost, what are you wanting to do and how much are you
willing to spend to get to where you want to go? if you just want the
feeling of running through the gears, my suggestion is to find a car of
that year already made that way - it will be cheaper in the long run.
second, if you are wanting to put a 5 speed in and that's it, you will
not be happy with the performance. you are looking at a rear end swap
to give the torque off from the stop light, because the automatic had
somewhere about 3.00 whereas the manuals were about 3.25 or 3.50
once you convert everything you will have a nice car but it won't be a
performance car. if you try to jump on it. you are going to get wheel
hop, which calls for more money to plant those tires firmly on the
ground.
and it's not going to corner that well, because it is set up at a family
car.
that's the problem or the nice thing - depending on how you look at it,
the manufacture in later years has taken a lot of problems out of the
equation and address them, such cornering, and beefed up suspension.
if you want a hopped up car right from the factory, i've found the 99
ford c.v. are great with not that much money to put in them. i find
them for 4500 to 5000 for a good one with 3.55 positive gears and
almost a 50/50 weight ration for cornering.
when you start hacking, sawing and cutting and maybe welding, i'm just
wanting you to be happy with the finished product because nothing gives
you the feeling of a job well done that you did yourself.
explore all options.
let me know if you are interested in those police pursuits.
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
> In article <CdOlc.6042$L8....@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>,
> cad...@verizon.net says...
>
> I was thinking mainly of drivetrain parts. I can't imagine
> there being that many '68 Galaxies with manual transmision.
> Myself, I have never seen any manual Galaxies newer than '66.
MT 4 spd 390, MT 4 spd 428, MT 3 spd 240 (the big six), MT 3 spd 302 &
MT 3 spd 390 are the only manual Galaxies I know of made in 68. Threes
were "on the tree" of course.
Rob
> I was thinking mainly of drivetrain parts. I can't imagine
> there being that many '68 Galaxies with manual transmision.
> Myself, I have never seen any manual Galaxies newer than '66.
I almost bought a '69 500XL vert, 390 with 3spd on the column once.
Guy wanted too much for it and had what I swear was a dummy bidder
to get me to go higher. I walked away. Anyway, they are out there.
If it is a daily driver, do you really want to under take a big job like
this? If everythine doesn't go together well, you could be in trouble. Of
course, you could always put the old transmission back in, at least for a
while.
As far as the gas mileage is concerned, the it is not gear ratio in the
transmission or the rear end that really matters. It is the final drive
ratio (number of times the engine turns each time the rear wheels turn that
counts). So if you putting in lower gears in the rear end and put overdrive
in the transmission, you may end up with a lower final drive ratio and worse
mileage.
But you might still end up with better performance, because you have more
speeds and better gearing, and perhaps better gas milage becuase you have a
higher high gear and still a lower first gear.
(...)
> I have _two_ used cars with 5 speeds in them. An '86 Honda Prelude with a
> 1.8l dual carb and an '86 Olds Calais Supreme with a 2.5l fuel injection.
> The Prelude is a sub-subcompact which although is fun to drive hurts to
sit
> in for more than 30 minutes (I'm 6'3" and I hit the roof unless the
sunroof
> is open) and is also useless in the winter. The Olds is a decent car, very
> comfortable for a compact. It doesn't cut it though. I want a big car and
I
> want a car with a whole engine. I'm debating whether I should keep the
Olds
> around for a winter beater/backup vehicle or sell it. All it needs is a
new
> alternator, some work to the rear brakes, and an exhaust leak fixed. If it
> wasn't for the 5 speed that Olds would have been intolerably boring to
> drive.
The Olds Calais is probably pretty rare. May be valuable as an antique, too.
Not many Olds available for sale anymore. I think the Olds Alero 5 speed is
supposed to be pretty good, too. But rush and get one, if you want one. ;-)
Of course, I had no idea that you more than one car.
If changing the transmission to a manual makes you happy, happy shifting.
For me, I have given up worrying about the sales value of my 97 Contour. It
has a manual, lots of miles and very low sales value. I plan on running it
as long as it is sort of reliable and is safe. I hope to get another 100,000
mi or more.
Good luck,
Jeff
> Cory
>
>
> I can't imagine
> there being that many '68 Galaxies with manual transmision.
> Myself, I have never seen any manual Galaxies newer than '66.
>
Actually, the base full size Ford through 1972 had a 240 straight six and
three on the column. The trick is finding one. They were called the Custom,
and most of them went to fleet sales. Even the fleet sales vehicles
generally had a least a 302/C-4 combo. However, they were built on the same
frame and body as the Galaxie, so they were essentially the same car.
I saw a '69 Custom 2 door sedan a few years ago. They wanted $1200 for it.
It had the 240, three speed, and was equipped with a huge vacuum gauge on
the dash. They told me that it was bought new by a miserly old guy who
owned it until he died. I could just picture him watching that vacuum gauge
to make sure he always shifted economically.
I wish I had bought it now - it was in excellent shape, and I had no way of
knowing the frame was about to fail on my '69 Galaxie 429. Think of that
dowdy, stripped down car with a 429 in it. What a fooler it would be.
So, there is a source for a clutch pedal assembly and related parts for the
Galaxie, if you can just find one.