Also, after a bad tow wiped out the front diff and the subsequent
repair it just doesn't sound/feel right up there - not to mention
the filler plug on the torque converter being rounded off by
somebody somewhere along the line...
I'm thinking that used 'Burbs sb pretty reasonable - maybe even
more so when gas goes up close to $4.00/gallon.
But it seems like Suburbans have been gradually gentrified... the
new ones even look like they have plastic bumpers.
My use consists of periodic beach use. Always have a large
rooftop cargo container full of windsurfing stuff. Carry
windsurfers, kayaks, surf skis as well on a regular basis.
Is there a sweet spot year-wise - where the functionality is
largely intact? Or are the newer ones (say 2007+) just as
functional as my '98?
--
PeteCresswell
Depends what you define as functional. The new body will not fit a 4x8 sheet
of plywood in the back like the last two or three gens will. I owned a '94
K1500 Silverado and it was one of the best vehicles I ever owned. Had it for
10 years and over 200,000 miles. Still going strong when I sold it to get my
'04 Z71 Avalanche. Seriously looked at the '04 Suburban Z71 as well but got
a better deal on the Avalanche. In hindsight the Suburban would have been
better in quite a few situations. Nothing swallow cargo or carries stuff
like it does. The new series is less of an off-road vehicle as well. They're
been "gentrified".
The Suburbans were already "gentrified" in '98, and indeed prior to
that. I went looking for one in '97 and was so disgusted with them I got
a K3500 DRW instead.
True...but the newer body model takes it to a new level of non-truckness.
The previous ones had way better off road and carrying ability and were
essentially the same chassis as the 1/2 ton K1500 with lots of creature
comforts. My ')4 Z71 Avalanche is quite a good off road vehicle compared to
my '94 Z71 Suburban.
What is the first year of the newer body model?
--
PeteCresswell
"(PeteCresswell)" <x...@y.Invalid> wrote in message
news:0nmii59dh38m8rj6u...@4ax.com...
Was it the same year they dropped the 2dr? 99?
cheers
"(PeteCresswell)" <x...@y.Invalid> wrote in message
news:0nmii59dh38m8rj6u...@4ax.com...
> Per Augustus:
>>True...but the newer body model takes it to a new level of non-truckness.
>
> What is the first year of the newer body model?
2007 for the current incarnation.....
I think it was about 05 when they changed it so you can't get 4x8
plywood/drywall inside the vehicle with the back door shut. I also do not
like the 00 and newer rear doors. A liftback is not as practical as a
tailgate. For me, that ruined the vehicle completely as a utility vehicle.
If I have to go newer it will have to be an Avalanche, but that ruins my
passenger capacity. I like my 99.
I love the lift back on my Blazer. Wish a few other vehicles had them.
But I'm a bit biased. I like it because it works GREAT when you get
stuck directing traffic at a scene and it starts raining/snowing. Also
works nice with the rehab tent we have. You can set up the tent, flip up
the gate and have a nice place to set up the coffee pot and snacks.
--
Steve W.
I'd rather have the liftgate. I've got split doors on my Yuk and no rear
wiper sucks in snow and dirty road season.
I use my trailer for the long stuff or let it hang out for short trips.
The new Burbs look sweet but less trucklike and I don't like the silver
plastic interiors of most new models.
Hope you find what you're looking for.
Regards,
Bubba
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---