<SNIP>
>they won't budge, tell them Chrysler products suck and that you are buying
>Japanese from now on. .......
What would you recommend? Mitsubishi?
h
quote for the day:
"Can the entire group kill file him so that his post don't even show up on
our group? Because he is getting about as stale as three day old
fish."--Lynda
> I got this from rec.auto.makers.chrysler and it makes me very glad I
> own a benz!!!
> TO: Neon Owners experiencing gasket/oil leaks
> FROM: William K. Sites
> DATE: March 22, 2000
> received over 75 e-mails regarding the Neon gasket problem. As a former law
> student, present-day journalist, and pissed-off consumer, I have researched
> the Neon's 4 cylinder SOHC engine gasket problem extensively. When my wife
> started experiencing severe oil leaks and gasket problems with her Neon (at
> 72,000 miles), I inquired as to why? Well, looks like we have a lot of
> company - I mean, A LOT OF COMPANY!!!!!!!!!
<snip>
I find it kind of amusing that right after this post in alt.auto.mercedes
was the following:
From jsg...@home.com Fri Mar 24 03:20:56 2000
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 06:41:15 GMT
From: jsgjlee <jsg...@home.com>
Newsgroups: alt.auto.mercedes, alt.autos.mercedes
Subject: M-Class Poor Quality and consumer report
Is Mercedes Benz planning to do anything to fix the quality problem
of the 1998 M-class they sold? If not, how are they going to fix
the image problem? Don't they feel shame to sell a vehicle like that?
Yes, they might have fix 2000 and on M-Class. But they have left a
lot of 1998 and 1999 M-Class vehicles in the world.
The April 2000 issue of Consumer Report documents this, with JD Power
in the past. It might be too early to tell the 1999 M-class quality
level, but basically 98 & 99 all have the same panels, trims, latches,
etc. that have the problems. It has a great AWD system, but it has
the poorest quality record Mercedes Benz ever had.
Jose
Daniel the Red wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Captain Canuck wrote:
>
> > I got this from rec.auto.makers.chrysler and it makes me very glad I
> > own a benz!!!
>
> > TO: Neon Owners experiencing gasket/oil leaks
> > FROM: William K. Sites
> > DATE: March 22, 2000
>
> > received over 75 e-mails regarding the Neon gasket problem. As a former law
> > student, present-day journalist, and pissed-off consumer, I have researched
> > the Neon's 4 cylinder SOHC engine gasket problem extensively. When my wife
> > started experiencing severe oil leaks and gasket problems with her Neon (at
> > 72,000 miles), I inquired as to why? Well, looks like we have a lot of
> > company - I mean, A LOT OF COMPANY!!!!!!!!!
>
See what happens when they let americans build their cars for them? <grin>
> Not only that, I'm sure that I can buy many Neons with the price for the
> crapy Benz.
>
Indeed, and just as likely that you would HAVE to.
h
quote for the day:
"Who gives a rats ass." -- lynda
--
---------------------------
charlie
era...@cybernex.net
http://www2.cybernex.net/~eraser
With the new quad oval headlight treatment of the past few years it seems as
if this is being phased out. Also, for some reason they delete the wipers
if you go for the xenon lights on the SL (and possibly other models).
h
quote for the day:
"Any chance you rich imbeciles could set a better example for us po folk?
" -- Richard Sexton
Actually, the washers are included when you order Xe headlights on other
models. Perhaps the wipers scratch the Xe light lenses, or the
temperature is too high, or something. It could be the Xe, which emits uv
radiation, degrades the rubber on the wipers.
But Audi and Porsche have used just high-pressure wipers, no washers, for
a good many years now, and the E-class has been around for a while too, so
they must work OK.
:
: h
:
:
:
:
:
Well, Saab and Volvo are part of the Big 3 these days, as is Mercedes.
BTW, Chrysler offered headlight washers and wiper brushes on the Imperial
for a year or two in the early 70s. The idea was concealed headlights
often didn't get washed at gas stations or in car washes.
:
: Harvey Louzon wrote:
: >
: > Jose Barroso <j...@igtcard.com> wrote in message
: > news:38DBA202...@igtcard.com...
: >
: > > Not only that, I'm sure that I can buy many Neons with the price for the
: > > crapy Benz.
: > >
: >
: > Indeed, and just as likely that you would HAVE to.
: >
: > h
: >
: > quote for the day:
: >
: > "Who gives a rats ass." -- lynda
Lloyd R. Parker wrote:
> Well, Saab and Volvo are part of the Big 3 these days, as is Mercedes.
And Jaguar. And Lotus. And Lamborghini was for a while, now it isn't again.
-- Stephen G. Lacker
sglacker at texas dot net
"Turn off your blinding fog lights, hang up, and DRIVE!"
eraser wrote:
>
> The one thing I like about Benz is that some of the luxury models have
> those headlight wipers, very innovative idea - wish the Big 3 would use
> em.
>
No, Lotus is independent once again. Lambo is part of VW-Audi now, so
maybe the "Big 5"?
BTW, if DC and Mitsu merge, it will be #3, ahead of Toyota and VW.
"Captain Canuck" <som...@somwhere.com> wrote in message
news:TUPC4.16569$Xk2....@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
Yeah, i find that ironic as well. Maybe i should re-post with the title
"I'm sooo glad
I own a Benz
i hope the picture worked.
> The one thing I like about Benz is that some of the luxury models have
> those headlight wipers, very innovative idea - wish the Big 3 would use
> em.
Not so "innovative" as it seems. Headlamp cleaning systems have been
mandatory under ECE (European) auto safety regulations for many years.
Wipers were first required in Sweden in '74 and high-pressure spray type
washers in Germany not long after that; the current ECE regulation permits
either or both systems to be fitted, but one or the other (or both) MUST
be fitted and must be capable of restoring the low beam performance to 80
percent of the output from a perfectly clean headlamp within a certain
number of seconds of operation, when the lamp is glooped-up with a
specified test gunk.
Headlamp cleaning systems aren't just for the benefit of those driving
behind them, but also for the benefit of those driving towards them.
Lightly-soiled headlamps emit far more glare towards oncoming traffic
because of diffusion of the beam.
We in the USA not only still get inferior headlamps, but we have no
requirement for headlamp cleaning systems. Nor for headlamp levelling
systems, also required by ECE for nearly a decade now.
--Daniel
TO WRITE TO ME: Remove the headlamp from my return address.
.______DANIEL STERN LIGHTING______.
| http://lighting.mbz.org |
---
dastern "at" vrx "dot" net
Automotive Lighting and Signalling Services
NBCS b6f+wg++rp
> With the new quad oval headlight treatment of the past few years it seems as
> if this is being phased out. Also, for some reason they delete the wipers
> if you go for the xenon lights on the SL (and possibly other models).
Wiper systems tend to be troublesome and prone to jamming in ice, snow,
etc. High-pressure spray wash systems are also permitted under the ECE
(European) requirement for headlamp cleaning equipment. On late Benzes
with the quad round headlamps, a small rectangular panel between the outer
and inner lamps shifts forward to reveal a high-pressure, double-headed
squirter. Of course, this is not required in North America, land of the
world's most ass-backwards auto "safety" regulations.
Note that while we only see this sort of safety equipment on high-end cars
in the USA, and then even only as an option in some cases, it's
*mandatory* in Europe. European Chrysler Stratus, Neon, Voyager, Jeep
Cherokee, etc. all have this equipment.