S. Perry
Thank You! This guys sorta like a gnat that won't go away.
He states he was victimized by everyone (though I am sure 'like most
egocentric people' will deny this)...Mercedes for making a poor car, Mercedes
dealerships for charging too much to repair, etc....when ultimately, if he
would listen to what we have written, instead of spending so much time
defending himself (fat chance) he would realize that he has to look at himself
for being so trusting of a mechanic that obvioiusly sold him a "bill of goods"
about a car that was not in good condition, and probably had been abused.
If nothing else, if his mechanic was worth his weight in salt, he sould have
warned McBrue that Mercedes are not good cars, and they ALL need the seals and
gaskest replaced at 70,000, and that it will cost you thousands to keep one in
good repair.
BUT...MCBRUES mechanic is obvioulsy not to be trusted, and Mercedes are hardly
ever like the one he had.
It just a shame he cant seem to see this without being so sarcastic about his
resolve.
:-)
John
>No more so than mcbrue wishes the MB adieu !
How about at least wishing the NG adieu and leaving it for good?
Danny
Hey MCBRUE...
Sorry I have just started reading this ng again and have apparently
missed your gripe with MB.
I have been busy fighting off someone like you in another ng.
I guess you got burned on one.
Just what type of vehicle do you drive now?
What was the most reliable vehicle that you have owned?
Other than your MB, what was the worst vehicle you have owned?
Just curious...
--
Chuck
I am sure EVERY other vehicle he has owned or will own has been more reliable
than his sorry 400E, that his trusty Mechanic/Salesman (talk about a conflict
of interest......BUT McBrue STILL does not get this point...He thinks this guy
is/was on his side....talk about NIAVE).
Its just so unfortunate that someone judges a Manufacterer on one car that to
EVERYONE B U T McBrue (and the mechanic that sold it to him) was obviously
abused and not maintained as it should have been. Then telling us all the
Mercedes told him it was NORMAL for seals to be replace at 70K when no one
else can seem to get the same info.
He should get a Lexus, and enjoy....nothing says "Ihave arrived better than an
expensive Toyota"
--
I guess what I'm trying to get out of him is if he actually judges a
make of cars from buying a used one and lets that represent all of that
make.
I have had excellent luck out of the 3 fords that I have owned but my
parents had 2 fords that were lemons.
I have had a honda that was the biggest piece of crap but bought another
one and it was a great car.
Geez mcbrue...dont judge all MB's just because you got ahold of a lemon.
I own an 83 300d turbo and it has it's share of problems but it is by no
means a lemon...It's a USED car!
Chuck
Its real simple: The items he mentioned that were in need of replacement, were
not in need of replacement overnight..so either the guy who sold it is a lousy
mechanic and did not see the problems (highly unlikely..since he himself touted
him as an excellent and log term Mercedes mechanic) or, he saw McBrue coming
and sold him a Mercedes that was in need of work
I think most reading what he wrote believe the later to be true.
Lessons are hard and expensive to learn sometimes. Unfotrunately the lesson
you thing you were supposed to learn was that Mercedes are unreliable and too
expensive. The real lesson is that he should never have blindly trust what the
person tells about a vehicle when they are a dealer, trying to make money and
get rid of it....the have a vested interest in saying anything to make a sale.
Sad but true. He should have and everyone should have propective used car
purchases checked by an independent third party.
Too bad he is condeming the wrong entity. Guess he will have this happen
again, since he did not learn THE lesson this time. Kinda sad
Click9 wrote in message <19971229233...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
Certainly on here I have seen many comments about the MBs that really do not
say much about their reliability. But you don't buy an MB for reliability - you
buy it for durability. And you buy it for the statement that it makes for you,
I guess. Of course any car that can blow its airbags at you when you use the
phone in the car really does make some sort of statement, and I am not sure it
says much about arriving at anyplace I want to get to ! (Hehehehehehe!)
And yes - I should have had the car evaluated by an independant shop. But the
fact that the selling location did put a 90 day warranty on it lulled me since
the local MB dealer does not warranty his used cars. Truely I was stupid to buy
a used car in the first place! I just don't have the time to screw around with
that sort of thing.
Now you have made it your part time job to lurk around in the Mercedes
newsgroup to whine about what your stupidity has cost you. Is this your way of
getting revenge?
Do yourself a favor, turn off your computer and use the time you save to get a
job where you can make enough money to buy a new car. No one on this newsgroup
cares about your opinions since they are all about a used car!
Finally, car phones don't cause airbags to deploy - whoever told you this must
have known that it would set you off on some crusade to notify the world. I'm
sure they're enjoying a good laugh at your expense! (Hehehehehehe!)
--
Chuck
> So I do tend to believe that sort
> of experience as he sells to the big company fleets!
Does MB actually have fleet sales? Who would by a fleet of MB's?
> Of course any car that can blow its airbags at you when you use the
> phone in the car really does make some sort of statement
Ok...I have seen the thread about the air bags and cell phones in the ng
but haven't read it because it sounds so stupid.
MCBRUE, have you heard this from MB or an authorized MB dealer or is it
some idiot that is trying to get the crap stirred up in the ng?
That is the most ridiculous thing I have heard all year!
Remember MCBRUE, you cant believe everything that you hear or read.
Don't be so gullible!(sp)
--
Chuck
The Greenville SC dealer has a salesman who identifies himself as the fleet
dealer. Darned if I know why they need one - but they got one.
The airbag blowing up from phone conversations seems quite far-fetched to me
too. But it first came out of England on this ng after many questions were
asked about why MB has the statement in the owners book about not using a phone
inside the car. And no one has contradicted it. We all know that the English
are above that sort of practical joke mentality, right?
Sorry - gotta run now - would like to stay and play but I have to go try to
get a job so I can buy a new car. Hmmm ..... lets see ..... if I buy a new
MB I will need to get some jewlers rouge for the wavy windows ...... and it
better not be a sales job requiring that I use the phone inside the car
........ and since the car just screams money and arrival, maybe I better not
try to buy one if I have a job working for someone because they will start
wondering how I can afford one, thinking I am paid too much or checking the
books - gee, I sure wouldn't want my new bosses at Mickey Dee's (that is
MacDonalds - a sort of old line dining establishment chain for all you arrived
types) getting all upset.
This just is one more example of McBrues attempts to skew what is really going
on.
The airbag thing is hillarious.....just how stupid are people?
I agree - it must really be funny to see the air bags go off when some poor MB
driver picks up his phone to use it. Of course, I am not so sure the drivers
find it so amusing. And I did not report this - it comes from England.
MB does indeed sell to fleets, they have a large number of vehicles with
Budget Rent-A-Car, as well as private fleets.
Well MCBRUE,
When I called the aurthorized MB dealer in Greenville, S.C., Carlton
Motorcars, they told me they did did not have a fleet sales manager,
fleet sales person, or anyone with the title of "Corporate Market
Manager".
I had a conversation with the pre-owned sales manager and he assured me
that all of the vehicles he sells that have or are offered a warranty of
some kind. My understanding is he doesn't carry vehicles with over 100k
miles.
The airbag situation... He said that he has never heard anything of
that. I would think that he would be a good source on that.
MCBRUE, did you buy the car from Carlton or from Southern Star, which is
NOT an authorized dealer?
If you bought from Carlton, I think you are full of crap and need to get
a life.
If you bought from Southern Star or another dealer maybe you should buy
from an "aurthorized dealer" next time!
Actually, I don't believe that you have ever owned a MB, have alot of
time on your hands and just trying to get crap stirred up!
You probably drive a 73 Dodge Dart, right?
You might want to check out rec.music.country.western and get with
"surge" and "drmjohnson". They like to cause trouble too and you three
might get along well together. Maybe even get your own ng started. Call
it alt.need.to.get.a.life !
bye!
Chuck
But, more my point McBrue, just makes stuff up as he goes.
Anyway - I gotta go out and put some moonshine in my 64 dart - gonna get cold
here tonite. Then maybe I'll just mosy on over to the new group for MB owners
to read while they sit around waiting to get their tranny seals replaced - its
called alt.get.a.life
PS - I did not buy it at the official MB dealer, but at a reputable used dealer
who did warranty it out of his own pocket. Official MB dealer did not have
warranties on his used cars over 50,000 miles last spring. Maybe he does now,
and that would be an improvement. The car had less than 100,000 miles when I
got it.
Happy New Year to all !
--
MCBRUE...
You are misleading.
You are leading people to think think that you bought the car from the
authorized MB dealer, which would be Carlton Motorcars in Greenville.
So, is it the MB dealer or the used car dealer that has a "corporate
market manager"? According to Carlton it's not them.
You need to be clear on what you are saying!
Now you are saying that the "dealer" that you bought the car from DID
offer a warranty.
If he did why didn't he take care of your problems? Must not be the
"reputable dealer" that you said he was.
Don't you think that a car with over 50k miles just might have a thing
or two wrong with it?
Like someone in an earlier post in this thread said, a car that has
problems with it and doesn't pass the inspections at an authorized
dealer will be wholesaled to used car lots that sell junk!
Anyone who would buy a car like a MB, BMW, Jag, etc... from a used car
lot is asking for trouble!
Stop your whining MCBRUE!!
Chuck
My apologies to Chuck and the group. The message I intended to convey was that
few people are interested in the complaints of some idoit who buys an old MB
off a used car lot in front of a mechanics shop. Then he makes it his part
time job to spew misinformation about the brand on a newsgroup populated by
people looking for helpful information.
Since I work for one of MB's competitios I can tell you with authority,
MB most certainly does have someone in this capacity, as do BMW and
ourselves. Rental companies large & small buy a significant number of
premium luxury cars every year.
Funny thing, I gave my friend a ride to the Nissan dealship. He bought an
Altima, as soon as they worked out a deal some guy sits down and tries to
sell him "Acid rain protection for his new car". I looked at the guy and
said" see that car over there it's 8 years old, and it has one ding in the
paint that's it."
His answer was, that's a Mercedes, different paint.
-- Kirill Gomelski --
E 55 AMG <e55...@aol.com> wrote in article
<19971228185...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
I'll second that.
-- Kirill Gomelski --
You use a salesman's statement as an example?
We all can look foreward to many fascinating exchanges throughout the coming
year I am sure.
No, for the record, I did not ever comment about gold trim on a Mercedes. Gold
trim looks tacky in my humble opinion (imho before one of you really
experienced netizans tells me).
Gee - do you mean that there is hope for my MB? That maybe it too will die?
Apology accepted!!
Thinking about it I might have taken what you were saying the wrong way
too. If so im sorry about that. My wife says that I have a habit of
doing that.
I agree with the last statement 100%
Hope you have a great new year!
--
Chuck
: I agree - it must really be funny to see the air bags go off when some poor MB
: driver picks up his phone to use it. Of course, I am not so sure the drivers
: find it so amusing. And I did not report this - it comes from England.
McBrue, you moron, kindly produce references of actual deployment
incidents. Weak minds cling to urban legends. Reality is just too boring
for the McBrue clan.
Add this to the McBrue FAQ: Urban legend supports McBrue point of view.
Not just any urban legend, but an urban legend STRAIGHT FROM ENGLAND.
: get a job so I can buy a new car. Hmmm ..... lets see ..... if I buy a new
: MB I will need to get some jewlers rouge for the wavy windows ...... and it
Just so everyone knows what this moron is talking about, he saw an early
post re. how to remove scratches from an old, used windshield.
On a quality vehicle, the (typically) intelligent owner will notice things
like a sand scratch on the windshield. The intelligent owner will know
that heavy use of polishing compounds will either cause waviness by
removing material (this is the part McBrue is blaming on Mercedes, he
didn't bother to understand the post), or the polishing process will
create too much localized heating of the glass, breaking it.
McBrue, on the other hand, will blame the ocean for breaking up the rocks
that made the sand, that blew in the wind to land on the wiper, that
scratched the windshield, and caused the nasty mechanic to create waviness
in a windshield when attempting to polish it.
Perhaps he won't blame the ocean, perhaps the grain of sand that caused
the scratch is the fault of the glacier that melted to form the ocean that
broke up the rocks . . .
Please add this info to the McBrue FAQ: McBrue blames glacier for
destroying MB windshield clarity.
bob
What I had seen and was refering to about the jewlers rouge was the posts on
the new E320s that had streaks in the windshields under the wipers. Several
different possibilites were suggested. But the best solution seemed to involve
the fact that the factory had produced glass of uneven thickness. Sorry, but I
did not read the earlier post about the scratched used windshield. I have not
had to worry about such things before getting into the MB family. Just allways
took a car in and said to fix it and they did, but those were not MBs. And this
one of mine is a used monster, the first used car I ever bought.
>And this one of mine is a used monster, the first used car I ever
>bought.
And for everyones sake I sure hope it's the last!
Chuck
Overall there is no doubt that the MB would win hands down. Also with so
many new MB models lately Mercedes makes a mich wider variety of vehicles
than BMW. However looking at a particular class of the large sedans BMW
740iL (not the 750, which has a nightmare of an engine) beats the current
S-class.
-- Kirill Gomelski --
MBCA
90 500 SL
98 ML 320
Dunno, BMW's are sporter, but I know a lot more happy
Benz owners than BMW owners. The latter, when asked
always seem to to say, great car, but not worth the
hassle.
--
Richard Sexton 28...@mbz.org Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada
1970 280SE, 1972 280SE http://www.mbz.org
>Mercedes or BMW.
>
>Which is overall a better car?
>
Its a matter of choice. But consider. The depreciation on the BMW over the
first few years is much faster than Mercedes. You can get a darn good deal on
a l994 or so 7 series! The Mercedes tends to age well- look at an older
mercedes, as the l986 E class, or a l983 500SEC, and they still look good in
l998. BMW's age quick in appearance. Conventional wisdon is that the BMW
handles better and that it is a real drivers car. But I have always questioned
the thought that the Mercedes does not handle as well. The Mercedes design
criteria are different, but, when pushed to the limit, the Mercedes handling
limits are truly amazing-- its just that few Mercedes drivers push the cars
that hard. On a Merceess in a corner, the car has more body roll than the BMW.
However, the Mercedes leans only to a point, sets up and has great cornering
ability. Also consider the dealer situation in your particular area. Some
dealers, both BMW and Mercedes are absolutely lousy, unreliable and will
overcharge, even without doing the repairs as represented. So check out the
dealers from people who use them.
JohnC
Satish
stum...@tir.com
Reg Diodati
JohnC507 wrote in message <19980118141...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
When entering into this perrenial discussion, I am always reminded of what a
dealer friend of mine said who sold both cars. He said, if you are only
planning to keep the car for two years by the BMW. If you want to have it
longer than that the Mercedes. I think there is a world of wisdom in that
admonition. BMWs are indeed a lot of fun to drive, (maybe because they
allow you to expereience a little of that "whew we made it" feeling. Long
term though, Mercedes seem to provide an almost bed rock feel to them.
A couple of weeks ago I had to do a very scary manuever at 70+ mph in my 83
300TD, wheels screeching in a semi sideways skid down the freeway. The car
recovered so transparently I was astonished. I never felt that I was at
risk of rolling although I think in many cars I would have definetly flipped
over.
I think the only way to make a clear comparison is pobably to live with one
for a while.
Steve
What year 320i?
I don't doubt that MB is a better car, I just said the current S-class is
not as good as the current 740i.
James S. Porter wrote in message <6a478u$2...@news1.infoave.net>...
>Satish: the only problem with your logic is that you do have a product
>that has higher resale(in most cases). However, you PAY by driving
>a BORING status symble. Try an 8 or 12 cylinder BMW and learn to
>LIVE a little!.........
Problem is the BMW 12 cilinder is junk. Not many engines have more problems
than the 5.0 V-12 that Bimmer makes. Speaking about boring try the CL600 or
the SL600 even over the 850CSi and there is no contest.
We'll see when the new BMW roadster comes out what it will be like, but I'll
bet the next SL will beat it hands down.
In article <69tufj$kbc$1...@news.ncal.verio.com>, "Steve" <jsp...@verio.com>
writes:
> A couple of weeks ago I had to do a very scary manuever at 70+ mph
> in my 83 300TD, wheels screeching in a semi sideways skid down the
> freeway.
70+ mph? Wheels screeching? Are you sure you were driving a diesel? :-)
Danny
>Satish
>stum...@tir.com
Depends on model in question, If you want an expensive,opulent and
VERY BORING auto ,buy a MB or get yourself a V-8or12 BMW and
live a little!!!!!!!
>Depends on model in question, If you want an expensive,opulent and
>VERY BORING auto ,buy a MB or get yourself a V-8or12 BMW and
>live a little!!!!!!!
Or buy the BMW and have it look completely stupidly outdated when the new
model comes out. Doesn't have the graceful classy lines of a Mercedes. The
old S-class, old SL-s and old E-class still look great and majestic. Look
at the old 380SEC or a 300CE, 450SL, 300TE, beautifully modern yet
classically refined. Compare that to an old 3-series (aka Cadillac
Cimmorran, Chevy Cavalier) or 5-series (downright ugly with that exhaust
pipe in the center). The cheap bumper covers are metallisized rather than
real chrome as well. Plasticy black dashboard looks like a Chrysler
Sebring. Where's the wood, leather, etc.?
Stick with MB who invented the motorcar and most of the technological
innovations that all other manufacturers use as a pinnacle of engineering
quality.
According to the Guiness Book of World Records, the fastest
four passenger sedan is not a beemer, it's a benz. The 582 HP
330 km/h Brabus 600 series. See http://www.brabus.com/e12.htm
Richard J. Sexton wrote in message <6a36ej$s01$1...@ns1.vrx.net>...
>I once asked a Mercedes/BMW salesman regarding a 1991 560SEL vs. BMW 750IL.
>He told me, "When in doubt, always buy a Mercedes. Much higher resale given
>constant depreciation terms across the board. Everyone in the car business
>knows this..." I wasn't exactly convinced so a local call to my public
>library for BLACKBOOK (the most current official figures at any one time)
>and some simple math proved him to be correct. At least back then...
>Satish
>stum...@tir.com
Satish: the only problem with your logic is that you do have a product
>The 582 HP
>330 km/h Brabus 600 series.
You can't compare a production car with a finely tuned car that has gone
through major changes !
I wasn't comparing squat, I was merely pointing out that if you
want to "live a little" you still had options under the silver star.
Really ever seen a BMW 3 series convertible take a roll and land upside
down. Not a pretty sight (only Miata could be worse). Now the same
scenario in a R129 SL or a W124 convertible with roll bar/hear rest
protection? Two totally different pictures.
Also the M-class is considered by many to be the safest truck on the road
not only for the occupants of the M but also for those in other cars
involved in a crash with it.
Agreed! I test drove the 850CSi and concluded that the 8 cylinder 500 was
nicer than the BMW 12
92 500 SL
Does it matter?
92 500 SL
Didn't you just get done telling me that the CL600 and the SL600 are better
cars than the anything BMW builds?
I don't know whether he meant that the Mercedes' safety features would
save your life or if the car would last your lifetime, but it probably works
both ways.
Brian
And you believe everything that the insurance people tell you? Also what
where they comparing, was it apples to oranges. I would not argue that the
LS400 may be safer than an A-class but I seroiusly doubt that there is much
of a difference between the S420 and the LS400. Also according to what I
have read most cars now use the same crumple zones, etc. that MB invented in
the 80s and sold to everyone, correct me if I am wrong.
BMW only wishes it were in the same class and the MB S-Class.
I felt like I was in an overstuffed 5 series when I drove one, the MB feels (as
is) much bigger inside, yet handles and performs exceptionally well for a car
half it size and weight.
I like driving as well as my E class
CMS
MBCA
1998 E300 Diesel
1996 S500
I am SURE no BMW could match the crashworthiness of the S-Class, and if you
have read ANY document that states the S-Class is inferior in crashworthiness
to ANY car post it here.
Interesting discussion... please visit the message board and post. We
welcome the disscusion that will follow!
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/messageboard/mbs.cgi/mb37390
Ben
Cites?
Ed
Kirill A. Gomelsky wrote:
>
>
> And you believe everything that the insurance people tell you? Also what
> where they comparing, was it apples to oranges. I would not argue that the
> LS400 may be safer than an A-class but I seroiusly doubt that there is much
> of a difference between the S420 and the LS400. Also according to what I
> have read most cars now use the same crumple zones, etc. that MB invented in
> the 80s and sold to everyone, correct me if I am wrong.
>
> -- Kirill Gomelski --
> MBCA
> 90 500 SL
> 98 ML 320
--
Bill
ow...@ibm.net
88' 300E 131,000
85' 380SE 185,000
MBCA Member