Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Atheists claim a 'thing' happened.
79 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Christ
Feb 6, 2020, 10:59:34 PM2/6/20
to
I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.
"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Michael Christ
--
Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
yet sinners, Christ died for us.
"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
John Locke
Feb 7, 2020, 2:28:46 AM2/7/20
to
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
>Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
"nothing can create itself ??"...someone tell Stevie that he doesn't
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
>Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
understand "nothing".
Ted
Feb 7, 2020, 9:55:50 PM2/7/20
to
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> Michael Christ
Nobody is making that claim, liar.
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> Michael Christ
Davej
Feb 8, 2020, 12:17:20 PM2/8/20
to
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 9:59:34 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Apparently the Big Bang always existed.
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Michael Christ
Feb 8, 2020, 4:41:09 PM2/8/20
to
If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
Simple.
Isn't it?
Well??
However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just up
and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
You are wankers.
Michael Christ
Feb 8, 2020, 4:42:48 PM2/8/20
to
Atheism, dumber and dumberer by the day!!
Lucifer
Feb 8, 2020, 5:35:26 PM2/8/20
to
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
>Simple.
>
>Isn't it?
>
>Well??
>
>However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
>inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just up
>and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
>
>You are wankers.
You don't know either.
>Michael Christ
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ
>> <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>
>>
>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>
>>
>>> Michael Christ
>>
>>
>> Nobody is making that claim, liar.
>
>All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
>
>If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
My claim is nobody knows.
>On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ
>> <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>
>>
>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>
>>
>>> Michael Christ
>>
>>
>> Nobody is making that claim, liar.
>
>All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
>
>If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
>Simple.
>
>Isn't it?
>
>Well??
>
>However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
>inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just up
>and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
>
>You are wankers.
>Michael Christ
Davej
Feb 8, 2020, 6:03:10 PM2/8/20
to
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 3:41:09 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
> [...]
Time began at the Big Bang.
There was no time before the Big Bang.
The universe has existed for 13+ billion years.
The earth has existed for 4.5+ billion years.
Life has existed for 3.7+ billion years.
Fossils provide evidence that life evolved from
simple forms to increasingly complex forms.
Approximately 99% of species are now extinct.
> [...]
> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> [...]
Time began at the Big Bang.
There was no time before the Big Bang.
The universe has existed for 13+ billion years.
The earth has existed for 4.5+ billion years.
Life has existed for 3.7+ billion years.
Fossils provide evidence that life evolved from
simple forms to increasingly complex forms.
Approximately 99% of species are now extinct.
Michael Christ
Feb 8, 2020, 6:14:37 PM2/8/20
to
On 9/02/2020 10:03 am, Davej wrote:
> On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 3:41:09 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
>> [...]
>> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
>> [...]
>
> On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 3:41:09 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
>> [...]
>> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
>> [...]
>
Davej wrote:
> Time began at the Big Bang.
> There was no time before the Big Bang.
> The universe has existed for 13+ billion years.
> The earth has existed for 4.5+ billion years.
> Life has existed for 3.7+ billion years.
> Fossils provide evidence that life evolved from
> simple forms to increasingly complex forms.
> Approximately 99% of species are now extinct.
>
And so...everything just up and maded itself.
> Time began at the Big Bang.
> There was no time before the Big Bang.
> The universe has existed for 13+ billion years.
> The earth has existed for 4.5+ billion years.
> Life has existed for 3.7+ billion years.
> Fossils provide evidence that life evolved from
> simple forms to increasingly complex forms.
> Approximately 99% of species are now extinct.
>
Now do you see what I am saying?
You are playing with minutia and not looking at the big picture. Your
claim is impossible!
The non-existent cannot bring forth existence.
I have to thank Cloud Hobbit for being the vessel for that reality, but
not the source. Sorry.
Kevrob
Feb 8, 2020, 6:41:44 PM2/8/20
to
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 5:35:26 PM UTC-5, Lucifer wrote:
> You don't know either.
The theists, religious-minded and advocates of totalist
> You don't know either.
theories of all types )e.g. Marxists) are loathe to admit
to themselves that their systems don't completely explain
the universe, let alone that they may be fundamentally flawed.
"We don't know that bit yet" sticks in their craw. If the
ideology/theology were to be re-examined, it might fall apart
like the tissue-paper structure it is. People with a mindset
of philosophical and methodological naturalism can deal with
an incomplete or falsified theory. It's just "back to the
old drawing board!"
Sometimes having a cherished belief overturned is the best
opportunity for discovering amazing new ideas. When one is
in the grip of "received wisdom" rather than doing one's own
thinking, one misses out on that.
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
Yap Honghor
Feb 8, 2020, 8:10:38 PM2/8/20
to
On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 11:59:34 AM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Yes, no pixie can create itself if it had no parents!!!!!!!!!!!
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Nature did create itself, a fact no one can deny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Davej
Feb 8, 2020, 8:35:37 PM2/8/20
to
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 5:14:37 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
> On 9/02/2020 10:03 am, Davej wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 3:41:09 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> >> [...]
> >
>
> Davej wrote:
> > Time began at the Big Bang.
> > There was no time before the Big Bang.
> > The universe has existed for 13+ billion years.
> > The earth has existed for 4.5+ billion years.
> > Life has existed for 3.7+ billion years.
> > Fossils provide evidence that life evolved from
> > simple forms to increasingly complex forms.
> > Approximately 99% of species are now extinct.
> >
>
> And so...everything just up and maded itself.
>
> Now do you see what I am saying?
>
You're saying that you want to pretend that you know something
> On 9/02/2020 10:03 am, Davej wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 3:41:09 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> >> [...]
> >
>
> Davej wrote:
> > Time began at the Big Bang.
> > There was no time before the Big Bang.
> > The universe has existed for 13+ billion years.
> > The earth has existed for 4.5+ billion years.
> > Life has existed for 3.7+ billion years.
> > Fossils provide evidence that life evolved from
> > simple forms to increasingly complex forms.
> > Approximately 99% of species are now extinct.
> >
>
> And so...everything just up and maded itself.
>
> Now do you see what I am saying?
>
with zero evidence to support it.
MyNews Hot-Text
Feb 9, 2020, 12:00:59 AM2/9/20
to
"Michael Christ" wrote in message
news:r1inb4$hbl$5...@dont-email.me...
Michael Christ
My Nothing Lives And Was Not Create
The Nonliving Can't Create A Thing
With Out The Help Of The Living
This Saith The Holy Guost
All Thing Came Out Of Nothing
I Am
0 Root Of All-Things
TAV
The End
ALEF
The Begenning
SHIN
Unto The Son
The One And Only
LAMED
I Am
That No Man Created
ALEPH
Atheists Claim A 'Thing' Happened
Just Happened That
Dan Collect And Return
From The End To The Begenning
All Things
Too IT's Rightful Owner
Heaven Or Earth
news:r1inb4$hbl$5...@dont-email.me...
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
I Said Nothig Is My God
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Michael Christ
My Nothing Lives And Was Not Create
The Nonliving Can't Create A Thing
With Out The Help Of The Living
This Saith The Holy Guost
All Thing Came Out Of Nothing
I Am
0 Root Of All-Things
TAV
The End
ALEF
The Begenning
SHIN
Unto The Son
The One And Only
LAMED
I Am
That No Man Created
ALEPH
Atheists Claim A 'Thing' Happened
Just Happened That
Dan Collect And Return
From The End To The Begenning
All Things
Too IT's Rightful Owner
Heaven Or Earth
Ted
Feb 9, 2020, 12:13:06 PM2/9/20
to
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
you wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ
> > <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >
> >
> >> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >
> >
> >> Michael Christ
> >
> >
> > Nobody is making that claim, liar.
> All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> Simple.
> Isn't it?
> Well??
> However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
> inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just
up
> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
> You are wankers.
> Michael Christ
That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why
> On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ
> > <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >
> >
> >> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >
> >
> >> Michael Christ
> >
> >
> > Nobody is making that claim, liar.
> All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> Simple.
> Isn't it?
> Well??
> However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
> inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just
up
> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
> You are wankers.
> Michael Christ
you wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
Michael Christ
Feb 9, 2020, 4:27:40 PM2/9/20
to
have a good look at it. :-).
But you haven't got one have you.
Peter Pan
Feb 10, 2020, 7:03:14 PM2/10/20
to
Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> And so...everything just up and maded itself.
>
> Now do you see what I am saying?
Mike McChrist, some time and in some way you are going to
> And so...everything just up and maded itself.
>
> Now do you see what I am saying?
have go beyond, MX says-so. How can the world know of
your brilliance if you can't explain what you say. At
least show something in terms of define, analyse,
compare, relate, contrast; y'know, show us the money.
Michael Christ
Feb 10, 2020, 7:17:36 PM2/10/20
to
Peter Pan
Feb 10, 2020, 7:23:07 PM2/10/20
to
state your case already.
Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
if you are Christ Lite.
Cloud Hobbit
Feb 10, 2020, 7:35:55 PM2/10/20
to
MXReligiowanker said:
>The non-existent cannot bring forth existence.
And nobody has said otherwise.
>The non-existent cannot bring forth existence.
There has never been a time when a literal nothing ever existed.
Nothing "made itself" from nothing because nothing is not another kind of something and does not and never has existed.
Michael Christ
Feb 10, 2020, 9:20:35 PM2/10/20
to
> You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
> state your case already.
>
> Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
> if you are Christ Lite.
I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> state your case already.
>
> Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
> if you are Christ Lite.
hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
insanely ignorant.
Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??
Michael Christ
Feb 10, 2020, 9:27:42 PM2/10/20
to
Cloudoatheistowanker.
"No thing, nothing can create itself", which is something you subscribed
to when I first said it. Then your brain realised the fatal
ramifications of that truth in relation to your moron atheism and then
you back-peddled. :-).
And don't forget, 'Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief'
for our foundation is what we choose to believe.
Which brings me to a thank you for offering to us all what you believe.
Sadly though, it cannot be proven and you don't even know what you
believe. :-).
Yet...if you can comprehend...the truth will reveal itself at some point
or another no matter what anyone testifies as their belief.
I know I'm relaxed.
Peter Pan
Feb 10, 2020, 10:15:20 PM2/10/20
to
Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> >>>> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> You are wankers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Michael Christ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
> >>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
> >>
> >> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
> >> have a good look at it. :-).
> >>
> >> But you haven't got one have you.
>
> Pete piped:
> > You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
> > state your case already.
> >
> > Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
> > if you are Christ Lite.
>
> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> insanely ignorant.
You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> You are wankers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Michael Christ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
> >>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
> >>
> >> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
> >> have a good look at it. :-).
> >>
> >> But you haven't got one have you.
>
> Pete piped:
> > You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
> > state your case already.
> >
> > Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
> > if you are Christ Lite.
>
> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> insanely ignorant.
is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
"Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
"I can't understand, so it's impossible" is not a case.
"I'm christ and i said so" is not a case.
You don't respond well to rational discussion. You flop
around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
fantasies. You are incoherent, never mind the case.
A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
metaphors. It's time to accept that you suck at this
christing thing.
> Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??
in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
may, as someone often says. Dry your tears, cupcake.
Take it like a christ.
Michael Christ
Feb 10, 2020, 10:26:21 PM2/10/20
to
On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
>>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>>>> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
>
>>>>>> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are wankers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Christ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
>>>>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
>>>>
>>>> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
>>>> have a good look at it. :-).
>>>>
>>>> But you haven't got one have you.
>>
>> Pete piped:
>>> You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
>>> state your case already.
>>>
>>> Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
>>> if you are Christ Lite.
>>
>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
>> insanely ignorant.
>
> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
>>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>>>> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
>
>>>>>> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are wankers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Christ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
>>>>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
>>>>
>>>> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
>>>> have a good look at it. :-).
>>>>
>>>> But you haven't got one have you.
>>
>> Pete piped:
>>> You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
>>> state your case already.
>>>
>>> Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
>>> if you are Christ Lite.
>>
>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
>> insanely ignorant.
>
> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
Believe it or not.
And you are not the case master of the universe, Poopy.
>
> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
Eternal God or nothing would be here.
Why?
No thing, nothing can create itself.
Take it or leave it, Oh Glorious Case Master of the Universe.
>
> "I can't understand, so it's impossible" is not a case.
> "I'm christ and i said so" is not a case.
>
> You don't respond well to rational discussion.
God of Cases.
You flop
> around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
> denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
> fantasies. You are incoherent, never mind the case.
is and what isn't, Poopy. You should know that by now.
>
> A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
> metaphors. It's time to accept that you suck at this
> christing thing.
>
>> Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??
>
> Ted can take care of you on his own. I am free to jump
> in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
> may, as someone often says. Dry your tears, cupcake.
> Take it like a christ.
floundering with you, you heartless ape.
Peter Pan
Feb 10, 2020, 10:57:02 PM2/10/20
to
Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> >> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> >> insanely ignorant.
> >
> > You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> > is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
>
> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
>
> Believe it or not.
Thanks, I'll take "or not".
> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> >> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> >> insanely ignorant.
> >
> > You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> > is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
>
> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
>
> Believe it or not.
> > "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
>
> Not the way I put it.
> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
>
> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
>
> Why?
>
> No thing, nothing can create itself.
Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?
> Take it or leave it, Oh Glorious Case Master of the Universe.
Universe. Does that come with annointment to the office
of Junior Christ?
> > You don't respond well to rational discussion.
>
> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
> God of Cases.
is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
christ are you anyway?
Michael Christ
Feb 10, 2020, 11:04:15 PM2/10/20
to
On 11/02/2020 2:56 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
>>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>>>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
>>>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
>>>> insanely ignorant.
>>>
>>> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
>>> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
>>
>> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
>>
>> Believe it or not.
>
> Thanks, I'll take "or not".
>
>
>>> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
>>
>> Not the way I put it.
>
> Of course. Nothing makes sense the way you put it.
>
>> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
>>
>> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> No thing, nothing can create itself.
Pete popped:
> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
>>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
>
>>>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
>>>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
>>>> insanely ignorant.
>>>
>>> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
>>> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
>>
>> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
>>
>> Believe it or not.
>
> Thanks, I'll take "or not".
>
>
>>> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
>>
>> Not the way I put it.
>
> Of course. Nothing makes sense the way you put it.
>
>> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
>>
>> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> No thing, nothing can create itself.
> Is that a deductive argument? Or an inductive one.
> Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?
Its an un-challengeable reality.
> Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?
>
>
>> Take it or leave it, Oh Glorious Case Master of the Universe.
>
> Wow. I'm promoted to Glorious Case Master of the
> Universe. Does that come with annointment to the office
> of Junior Christ?
>
>
>>> You don't respond well to rational discussion.
>>
>> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
>> God of Cases.
>
> You're demanding that I explain what rational discussion
> is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
> christ are you anyway?
>
shadows hoping to be light.
Peter Pan
Feb 10, 2020, 11:33:00 PM2/10/20
to
Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> On 11/02/2020 2:56 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> >>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >>>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> >>>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> >>>> insanely ignorant.
> >>>
> >>> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> >>> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
> >>
> >> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
> >>
> >> Believe it or not.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll take "or not".
> >
> >
> >>> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
> >>
> >> Not the way I put it.
> >
> > Of course. Nothing makes sense the way you put it.
> >
> >> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
> >>
> >> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
> >>
> >> Why?
> >>
> >> No thing, nothing can create itself.
>
> Pete popped:
> > Is that a deductive argument? Or an inductive one.
> > Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?
>
> Its an un-challengeable reality.
I have challenged it a thousand times, and you can't
> On 11/02/2020 2:56 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/02/2020 2:15 pm, Peter Pan wrote:
> >>> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >>>> I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am still waiting to
> >>>> hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous and
> >>>> insanely ignorant.
> >>>
> >>> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> >>> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
> >>
> >> Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief.
> >>
> >> Believe it or not.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll take "or not".
> >
> >
> >>> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
> >>
> >> Not the way I put it.
> >
> > Of course. Nothing makes sense the way you put it.
> >
> >> I put it this way, if that is alright with you??
> >>
> >> Eternal God or nothing would be here.
> >>
> >> Why?
> >>
> >> No thing, nothing can create itself.
>
> Pete popped:
> > Is that a deductive argument? Or an inductive one.
> > Or merely an infallible ex cathedra christly decree?
>
> Its an un-challengeable reality.
explain how you made your leap of illogic.
So much for your christly unchallengeability.
> >>> You don't respond well to rational discussion.
> >>
> >> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
> >> God of Cases.
> >
> > You're demanding that I explain what rational discussion
> > is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
> > christ are you anyway?
> >
>
> You are just another snipping coward, Peter Poop, dancing around in the
> shadows hoping to be light.
plus your content-free poop-talk reply. If you want to
see your poop talk again, go back and read it. It's
still there, waste of electrons though it is.
Michael Christ
Feb 11, 2020, 3:39:38 PM2/11/20
to
You can challenge Le Bron too but reality is not going to yield to you!
:-).
> and you can't
> explain how you made your leap of illogic.
>
> So much for your christly unchallengeability.
You can't challenge reality with delusion, Bud.
>
>
>>>>> You don't respond well to rational discussion.
>>>>
>>>> You don't lay down the foundation of what rational discussion is, Lord
>>>> God of Cases.
>>>
>>> You're demanding that I explain what rational discussion
>>> is, so you can finally win an argument? What kind of
>>> christ are you anyway?
>>>
>>
>> You are just another snipping coward, Peter Poop, dancing around in the
>> shadows hoping to be light.
>
> Oh, cry me a river. What I snipped was what I wrote,
> plus your content-free poop-talk reply.
If you want to
> see your poop talk again, go back and read it. It's
> still there, waste of electrons though it is.
>
ravn
Feb 11, 2020, 4:06:55 PM2/11/20
to
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 7:59:34 PM UTC-8, Michael Christ wrote:
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
Perhaps things look deep when you're in a metaphysical hole, digging yourself in even further down the hole of whimsy.
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
Are you sure about that? Really? "According to present-day understanding of what is called the vacuum state or the quantum vacuum, it is "by no means a simple empty space".[1][2] According to quantum mechanics, the vacuum state is not truly empty but instead contains fleeting electromagnetic waves and particles that pop into and out of existence.[3][4][5]"
[1]Astrid Lambrecht (2002). Hartmut Figger; Dieter Meschede; Claus Zimmermann (eds.). Observing mechanical dissipation in the quantum vacuum: an experimental challenge; in Laser physics at the limits. Berlin/New York: Springer. p. 197. ISBN 978-3-540-42418-5.
[2] Christopher Ray (1991). Time, space and philosophy. London/New York: Routledge. Chapter 10, p. 205. ISBN 978-0-415-03221-6.
[3]AIP Physics News Update,1996
[4] Physical Review Focus Dec. 1998
[5] Walter Dittrich & Gies H (2000). Probing the quantum vacuum: perturbative effective action approach. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-67428-3.
But atheism isn't a claim that something came out of nothing in the first place. You're assuming that because you're insisting that god did it, & if nothing like god did it, then in your mind, things would have to come out of nothing. But that might just be literally the case. So, now what? What objective force does your belief have over the facts?
Philosophically speaking, you would also have to consider where did god come from? If a thing as complex as god can just exist, why couldn't that be the case for anything else far less complex?
Michael Christ
Feb 11, 2020, 10:22:26 PM2/11/20
to
non-existence cannot produce existence.
See how simple it is with God? :-).
ravn
Feb 12, 2020, 4:36:24 PM2/12/20
to
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 7:22:26 PM UTC-8, Michael Christ wrote:
> See how simple it is with God? :-).
See what a simpleton you are using god as an excuse. (That's not a question. Look at yourself, dummy.) "God" is your excuse to be a degenerate. Who are you kidding? Even yourself? Your depravity is apparently complete. Anybody with half a brain can tear the arms off of any of your assertions & stupid arguments & beat you to death with them. Feel free to keep posting your to oblige them. You must like dwelling in the world of pain.
> See how simple it is with God? :-).
Ted
Feb 12, 2020, 4:46:23 PM2/12/20
to
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:27:37 +1100, Michael Christ
My "case" is that you're fulla shit.
Cloud Hobbit
Feb 12, 2020, 5:24:56 PM2/12/20
to
MXReligiowanker said:
>Sorry Raving, wank on till your dick falls off if you like,
non-existence cannot produce existence.
And still nobody here says that it did.
>Sorry Raving, wank on till your dick falls off if you like,
non-existence cannot produce existence.
Nothing does not exist.
SOMETHING went bang.
SOMETHING had to already exist in order to go bang.
Nothing can cause something to do anything because nothing does not exist.
Whatever happens in the universe has SOMETHING that causes it to happen.
Should we assume a god when there is no evidence of one?
Should we ignore all the evidence for the big bang?
Should all evidence that contradicts your beliefs be ignored?
Better to accept the evidence rather than ignore it based on your beliefs.
Peter Pan
Feb 12, 2020, 5:32:40 PM2/12/20
to
LeBron is challenged at hoops, he is ready and willing to
come out onto the court and play the game.
When Michael the Christ is challenged on his silly ex
cathedra assertions, he repeats himself, equivocates,
dances around, then goes into pooptalk mode.
Your unchallengeable reality loses the challenge by
forfeit.
<snippage of more pooptalk>
Ted
Feb 12, 2020, 7:29:03 PM2/12/20
to
> You don't respond well to rational discussion. You flop
> around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
> denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
> fantasies. You are incoherent, never mind the case.
> A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
> metaphors. It's time to accept that you suck at this
> christing thing.
> > Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??
> Ted can take care of you on his own. I am free to jump
> in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
> may, as someone often says. Dry your tears, cupcake.
> Take it like a christ.
Yap Honghor
Feb 12, 2020, 9:05:40 PM2/12/20
to
On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 5:27:40 AM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> > <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ >
> >> <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> >> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >> > > >> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >> > > >> Michael Christ
> >> > > > Nobody is making that claim, liar.
> >
> >
> >> All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
> >
> >
> >> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> >
> >
> >> Simple.
> >
> >
> >> Isn't it?
> >
> >
> >> Well??
> >
> >
> >> However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
> >> inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just
> > up
> >> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
> >
> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> > <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ >
> >> <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> >> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >> > > >> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >> > > >> Michael Christ
> >> > > > Nobody is making that claim, liar.
> >
> >
> >> All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
> >
> >
> >> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> >
> >
> >> Simple.
> >
> >
> >> Isn't it?
> >
> >
> >> Well??
> >
> >
> >> However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
> >> inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just
> > up
> >> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
> >
> > That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
> > wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
>
> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
> have a good look at it. :-).
What fucking case?
> > wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
>
> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
> have a good look at it. :-).
You theists imagined that there is a worm up in the sky, not atheists!!!!!!!
>
> But you haven't got one have you.
You do not have one......that is the case, wanker!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> But you haven't got one have you.
Yap Honghor
Feb 12, 2020, 9:07:18 PM2/12/20
to
Yap Honghor
Feb 12, 2020, 9:10:24 PM2/12/20
to
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 10:27:42 AM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> On 11/02/2020 11:35 am, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> > MXReligiowanker said:
> >
> >> The non-existent cannot bring forth existence.
> >
> > And nobody has said otherwise.
> >
> > There has never been a time when a literal nothing ever existed.
> >
> > Nothing "made itself" from nothing because nothing is not another kind of something and does not and never has existed.
> >
>
> Whatever you are bullshiting about does not sound like what I have said,
> Cloudoatheistowanker.
>
> "No thing, nothing can create itself", which is something you subscribed
> to when I first said it. Then your brain realised the fatal
> ramifications of that truth in relation to your moron atheism and then
> you back-peddled. :-).
>
> And don't forget, 'Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief'
> for our foundation is what we choose to believe.
>
> Which brings me to a thank you for offering to us all what you believe.
> Sadly though, it cannot be proven and you don't even know what you
> believe. :-).
>
> Yet...if you can comprehend...the truth will reveal itself at some point
> or another no matter what anyone testifies as their belief.
>
> I know I'm relaxed.
I know you are so stressed....because there is no fucking pixie up in the sky!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> On 11/02/2020 11:35 am, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> > MXReligiowanker said:
> >
> >> The non-existent cannot bring forth existence.
> >
> > And nobody has said otherwise.
> >
> > There has never been a time when a literal nothing ever existed.
> >
> > Nothing "made itself" from nothing because nothing is not another kind of something and does not and never has existed.
> >
>
> Whatever you are bullshiting about does not sound like what I have said,
> Cloudoatheistowanker.
>
> "No thing, nothing can create itself", which is something you subscribed
> to when I first said it. Then your brain realised the fatal
> ramifications of that truth in relation to your moron atheism and then
> you back-peddled. :-).
>
> And don't forget, 'Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief'
> for our foundation is what we choose to believe.
>
> Which brings me to a thank you for offering to us all what you believe.
> Sadly though, it cannot be proven and you don't even know what you
> believe. :-).
>
> Yet...if you can comprehend...the truth will reveal itself at some point
> or another no matter what anyone testifies as their belief.
>
> I know I'm relaxed.
Your fucking religion just sucks money from the fools, enough to sustain you skill-less idiots for life!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Michael Christ
Feb 12, 2020, 11:43:02 PM2/12/20
to
Did you read the Subject Title, Dickhead?
Thank you for agreeing.
Plunging into the shallows as usual, Cloudly. Everything made itself is
impossible.
Michael Christ
Feb 12, 2020, 11:47:16 PM2/12/20
to
If I told you LeBron was bouncing a ball on your head, you would still
go what, where?? It wouldn't matter how many basketballs were to wear out!
So flog yourself to death, unless you have an attitude change, nothing
is going to change. It is not me preventing you, it is you.
JWS
Feb 13, 2020, 12:11:02 AM2/13/20
to
with a post that proves you correct. He
does exactly what you said he would do. And
he shows no sign of embarrassment. He's
proud of his idiocy.
Michael Christ
Feb 13, 2020, 2:59:42 AM2/13/20
to
Michael Christ
>
>> You don't respond well to rational discussion. You flop
>> around from non-sequitur to leap of illogic to science
>> denialism to name-calling to masturbation to dick
>> fantasies. You are incoherent, never mind the case.
>
>
>> A real christ at least uses parables and illustrative
>> metaphors. It's time to accept that you suck at this
>> christing thing.
>
>
>> > Perhaps you'd like to have a go to try and help Ted out??
>
>
>> Ted can take care of you on his own. I am free to jump
>> in and speak my TRVTH, and let the cards fall where they
>> may, as someone often says. Dry your tears, cupcake.
>> Take it like a christ.
>
> LOL.
Michael Christ
Feb 13, 2020, 3:06:42 AM2/13/20
to
Michael Christ
> You theists imagined that there is a worm up in the sky, not atheists!!!!!!!
>>
>> But you haven't got one have you.
>
> You do not have one......that is the case, wanker!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
Michael Christ
Feb 13, 2020, 3:08:07 AM2/13/20
to
Lucifer
Feb 13, 2020, 3:16:26 AM2/13/20
to
On Thu, 13a Feb 2020 19:08:04 +1100, Michael Christ
Malcolm McMahon
Feb 13, 2020, 5:41:04 AM2/13/20
to
On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
>
Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing creates another.
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
>
Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
Siri Cruise
Feb 13, 2020, 6:03:49 AM2/13/20
to
In article
<9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
So maybe we evolved by Intelligent Design and we are the
Designers.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
<9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
Designers.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
Malcolm McMahon
Feb 13, 2020, 6:39:01 AM2/13/20
to
On Thursday, 13 February 2020 11:03:49 UTC, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article
> <9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
> Malcolm McMahon <malcol...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> > > I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> > >
> > > Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing
> > creates another.
> >
> > Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause
> > and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that
> > conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us
> > possible.
>
> So maybe we evolved by Intelligent Design and we are the
> Designers.
>
Except that intelligence is not required, just consciousness.
> In article
> <9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
> Malcolm McMahon <malcol...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> > > I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> > >
> > > Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing
> > creates another.
> >
> > Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause
> > and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that
> > conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us
> > possible.
>
> So maybe we evolved by Intelligent Design and we are the
> Designers.
>
Malcolm McMahon
Feb 13, 2020, 6:41:02 AM2/13/20
to
On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
We don't know why there's something rather than nothing and neither do you. You just use an unknowable God to hide from the unknown. Because, if there's a God, there's something.
> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>
> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
Michael Christ
Feb 13, 2020, 2:44:28 PM2/13/20
to
Michael Christ
Feb 13, 2020, 2:50:10 PM2/13/20
to
On 13/02/2020 9:41 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>
>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>
>>
>
> Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing creates another.
Awesome, simply awesome, Malcolm. That explains how no thing, nothing
> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>
>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>
>>
>
> Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing creates another.
can create itself...one thing creates another! Awesome!
>
> Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
>
It is not that difficult. Nothing would be here without an eternal God
because no thing, nothing can create itself.
You can't get around God the Creator of all that is around you.
Everything was created by an eternal being and He is personal because we
are 'conscious' if you like, personal.
It is really not that difficult but the implications for you are, aren't
they.
Michael Christ
Feb 13, 2020, 2:51:51 PM2/13/20
to
On 13/02/2020 10:03 pm, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article
> <9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
> Malcolm McMahon <malcol...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>>
>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing
>> creates another.
>>
>> Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause
>> and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that
>> conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us
>> possible.
>
> So maybe we evolved by Intelligent Design and we are the
> Designers.
Man is God, yeah. :-). That reminds me of a cartoon I saw once of a
> In article
> <9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
> Malcolm McMahon <malcol...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>>
>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing
>> creates another.
>>
>> Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause
>> and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that
>> conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us
>> possible.
>
> So maybe we evolved by Intelligent Design and we are the
> Designers.
man eating his own intestines.
Michael Christ
Feb 13, 2020, 2:56:04 PM2/13/20
to
On 13/02/2020 10:40 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>
>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>
>
> We don't know why
I do!
> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
>>
>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>>
>
> We don't know why
> there's something rather than nothing and neither do you. You just use an unknowable God
> to hide from the unknown. Because, if there's a God, there's something.
The basis of your reality is you...that is your problem, self is God but
unfortunately you are not all that all-knowing.
Cloud Hobbit
Feb 13, 2020, 3:43:06 PM2/13/20
to
MXReligiowanker said:
>Man is God, yeah. :-). That reminds me of a cartoon I saw once of a
man eating his own intestines.
A selfie?
>Man is God, yeah. :-). That reminds me of a cartoon I saw once of a
man eating his own intestines.
Peter Pan
Feb 13, 2020, 5:55:47 PM2/13/20
to
It's not me preventing you from accepting the tangy
tomatoey grace of The FSM. It's only you.
Ramen.
tomatoey grace of The FSM. It's only you.
Ramen.
Peter Pan
Feb 13, 2020, 7:03:04 PM2/13/20
to
brightest christ on the block.
Malcolm McMahon
Feb 14, 2020, 3:38:20 AM2/14/20
to
On Thursday, 13 February 2020 19:50:10 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 9:41 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> > On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >>
> >> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing creates another.
>
> Awesome, simply awesome, Malcolm. That explains how no thing, nothing
> can create itself...one thing creates another! Awesome!
>
>
>
> >
> > Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
> >
>
> Conscious life did not create itself.
>
So, is your God not conscious, or not alive?
> On 13/02/2020 9:41 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> > On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >>
> >> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing creates another.
>
> Awesome, simply awesome, Malcolm. That explains how no thing, nothing
> can create itself...one thing creates another! Awesome!
>
>
>
> >
> > Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
> >
>
> Conscious life did not create itself.
>
aaa
Feb 14, 2020, 12:12:49 PM2/14/20
to
--
God's spiritual evidence:
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.
Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
aaa
Feb 14, 2020, 12:12:49 PM2/14/20
to
Davej
Feb 14, 2020, 12:43:03 PM2/14/20
to
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 1:56:04 PM UTC-6, Michael Christ wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 10:40 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> >
> > there's something rather than nothing and neither do you. You
> > just use an unknowable God
>
> He is not unknowable!
>
Oh gosh and this god is so busy sending telepathic messages
> On 13/02/2020 10:40 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> >
> > there's something rather than nothing and neither do you. You
> > just use an unknowable God
>
> He is not unknowable!
>
to his kook followers that he hardly has enough spare time to
take a piss. And the kook followers never accept the fact that
hearing voices in your head is a common mental disorder.
Davej
Feb 14, 2020, 1:07:52 PM2/14/20
to
On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 11:12:49 AM UTC-6, aaa wrote:
>
> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
>
Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>
> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
>
aaa
Feb 14, 2020, 1:47:13 PM2/14/20
to
is concerned. Consciousness or life is only a gift of the eternal God.
aaa
Feb 14, 2020, 2:11:55 PM2/14/20
to
Cloud Hobbit
Feb 14, 2020, 3:00:54 PM2/14/20
to
aaa lied:
>On 2020-02-14 1:07 p.m., Davej wrote:
> On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 11:12:49 AM UTC-6, aaa wrote:
>>
>>> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
>>
>
>
>> Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>
>Blind denial.
Standard response from aaa meaning I can't prove anything I just said.
Jesus is heartbroken with sadness whenever you try to speak for him.
>On 2020-02-14 1:07 p.m., Davej wrote:
> On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 11:12:49 AM UTC-6, aaa wrote:
>>
>>> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
>>
>
>
>> Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>
>Blind denial.
Jesus is heartbroken with sadness whenever you try to speak for him.
Michael Christ
Feb 14, 2020, 3:44:30 PM2/14/20
to
No thing, nothing can create itself. The non-existent cannot bring
about existence.
It is not going change, Malcolm, no matter what spin you want to put on it.
Davej
Feb 14, 2020, 3:56:44 PM2/14/20
to
On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 1:11:55 PM UTC-6, aaa wrote:
> On 2020-02-14 1:07 p.m., Davej wrote:
> On 2020-02-14 1:07 p.m., Davej wrote:
> > On Friday, February 14, 2020, aaa wrote:
> >>
> >> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
> >>
> >
> > Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
> >
>
> Blind denial.
>
I'm not blind. You claim your gawd is INVISIBLE and SILENT.
> >>
> >> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
> >>
> >
> > Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
> >
>
> Blind denial.
>
Peter Pan
Feb 14, 2020, 5:49:44 PM2/14/20
to
Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> On 14/02/2020 7:38 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> > On Thursday, 13 February 2020 19:50:10 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> On 13/02/2020 9:41 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> >>> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> >>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing creates another.
> >>
> >> Awesome, simply awesome, Malcolm. That explains how no thing, nothing
> >> can create itself...one thing creates another! Awesome!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Conscious life did not create itself.
> >>
> >
> > So, is your God not conscious, or not alive?
>
> He is eternal life or nothing would be here (including consciousness).
> No thing, nothing can create itself. The non-existent cannot bring
> about existence.
>
> It is not going change, Malcolm, no matter what spin you want to put on it.
You're just like duke -- everything whooshes right over
> On 14/02/2020 7:38 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> > On Thursday, 13 February 2020 19:50:10 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> On 13/02/2020 9:41 pm, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> >>> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> >>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing creates another.
> >>
> >> Awesome, simply awesome, Malcolm. That explains how no thing, nothing
> >> can create itself...one thing creates another! Awesome!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Conscious life did not create itself.
> >>
> >
> > So, is your God not conscious, or not alive?
>
> He is eternal life or nothing would be here (including consciousness).
> No thing, nothing can create itself. The non-existent cannot bring
> about existence.
>
> It is not going change, Malcolm, no matter what spin you want to put on it.
you.
--
"I know the answer to every question that matters,
therefore thought is no longer necessary."
--the heart of MXian theology
Ted
Feb 14, 2020, 6:07:40 PM2/14/20
to
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:59:39 +1100, Michael Christ
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 11:29 am, Ted wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:15:17 +0800, Peter Pan <p...@172.16.1.1>
wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> Michael Christ
> >> > > You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
> >> > > state your case already.
> >> > > > > Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
> >> > > if you are Christ Lite.
> >
> >
> >> "I'm christ and i said so" is not a case.
> >
> > Well said, Peter, thank you.
> Yes, thank you Peter.
> Michael Christ
Yep. Peter is very intelligent. Much more intelligent than my ass,
and I'm intelligent like a muthafucka.
<jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 11:29 am, Ted wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:15:17 +0800, Peter Pan <p...@172.16.1.1>
wrote:
> >> Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
> >> > > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > On 11/02/2020 11:23 am, Peter Pan wrote:
> >> > > Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> > >> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> >> > >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> >
> >
> >> > >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> >
> >
> >> > >>>> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> You are wankers.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> Michael Christ
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal
paraphrase.
> > So why you
> >> > >>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
> >> > >>
> >> > >> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy.
Then
> > we can
> >> > >> have a good look at it. :-).
> >> > >>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal
paraphrase.
> > So why you
> >> > >>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
> >> > >>
> >> > >> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy.
Then
> > we can
> >> > >> have a good look at it. :-).
> >> > >>
> >> > >> But you haven't got one have you.
> >> > > Pete piped:
> >> > > You're claiming atheists claim this and claim that. So
> >> > > state your case already.
> >> > > > > Lying doesn't give you the right to sit in judgment, even
> >> > > if you are Christ Lite.
> >> > > I've made my case many times over, Peter Poop, and I am
still
> > waiting to
> >> > hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous
and >
> >> insanely ignorant.
> >
> >
> >> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> >> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
> >
> >
still
> > waiting to
> >> > hear from your side something that is not totally ridiculous
and >
> >> insanely ignorant.
> >
> >
> >> You've made assertions many times over, as if your say-so
> >> is the gold standard. Assertions do not a "case" make.
> >
> >
> >> "Eternal God or you made yourself" is not a case.
> >
> >
> >> "I can't understand, so it's impossible" is not a case.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> "I'm christ and i said so" is not a case.
> >
> > Well said, Peter, thank you.
> Yes, thank you Peter.
> Michael Christ
Yep. Peter is very intelligent. Much more intelligent than my ass,
and I'm intelligent like a muthafucka.
LinuxGal
Feb 15, 2020, 8:08:20 AM2/15/20
to
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>
> Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
Physics hasn't been "looking" at it, certain men who embrace
> On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
>
> Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us possible.
the Copenhagen Interpretation rather than Many Worlds or
the Pilot Wave angles are resorting to woo.
--
I have spoken.
https://twitter.com/LinuxGal
aaa
Feb 15, 2020, 12:21:58 PM2/15/20
to
On 2020-02-14 3:00 p.m., Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> aaa lied:
>
>> On 2020-02-14 1:07 p.m., Davej wrote:
>> On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 11:12:49 AM UTC-6, aaa wrote:
>>>
>>>> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>>
>
>> Blind denial.
>
> Standard response from aaa meaning I can't prove anything I just said.
Just pointing out the fact.
> aaa lied:
>
>> On 2020-02-14 1:07 p.m., Davej wrote:
>> On Friday, February 14, 2020 at 11:12:49 AM UTC-6, aaa wrote:
>>>
>>>> God is spiritual. The spiritual isn't a thing. It's the reality.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>>
>
>> Blind denial.
>
> Standard response from aaa meaning I can't prove anything I just said.
>
> Jesus is heartbroken with sadness whenever you try to speak for him.
>
aaa
Feb 15, 2020, 12:21:58 PM2/15/20
to
God is not invisible. God is above and beyond the visible.
Cloud Hobbit
Feb 15, 2020, 4:14:01 PM2/15/20
to
aaa lied:
>>>>>Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>>
>
>>> Blind denial.
>
>> Standard response from aaa meaning I can't prove anything I just said.
>Just pointing out the fact.
Based on what evidence?
>
>>Jesus is heartbroken with sadness whenever you try to speak for him.
You say the spiritual exists.
Prove it.
Cue evasion.
>>>>>Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>>
>
>>> Blind denial.
>
>> Standard response from aaa meaning I can't prove anything I just said.
>Just pointing out the fact.
>
>>Jesus is heartbroken with sadness whenever you try to speak for him.
Prove it.
Cue evasion.
aaa
Feb 15, 2020, 8:35:24 PM2/15/20
to
On 2020-02-15 4:13 p.m., Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> aaa lied:
>
>>>>>> Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>>>
>>
>>>> Blind denial.
>>
>>> Standard response from aaa meaning I can't prove anything I just said.
>
>> Just pointing out the fact.
>
> Based on what evidence?
The fact is the evidence.
> aaa lied:
>
>>>>>> Nope. The spiritual isn't a thing, and it isn't reality.
>>>
>>
>>>> Blind denial.
>>
>>> Standard response from aaa meaning I can't prove anything I just said.
>
>> Just pointing out the fact.
>
> Based on what evidence?
>
>>
>>> Jesus is heartbroken with sadness whenever you try to speak for him.
>
> You say the spiritual exists.
> Prove it.
>
> Cue evasion.
Cloud Hobbit
Feb 17, 2020, 3:16:58 PM2/17/20
to
aaa said:
>No evasion is needed. My signature proves it.
And there's one now.
>No evasion is needed. My signature proves it.
Your Sig is just more word salad. It is proof of nothing.
%
Feb 17, 2020, 3:19:17 PM2/17/20
to
at least he's proving something ,
you aren't doing anything
aaa
Feb 18, 2020, 10:10:49 AM2/18/20
to
Yap Honghor
Feb 21, 2020, 4:03:08 AM2/21/20
to
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 4:06:42 PM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 1:05 pm, Yap Honghor wrote:
> >>>> On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
> >>>>>>> Nobody is making that claim, liar.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Simple.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Isn't it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Well??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
> >>>> inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just
> >>> up
>
> Exactly. Thank you Mr Hongdong.
You theists have a case to look at?
2000 years have passed and am looking at it for the next 2 billion years, moron!
> On 13/02/2020 1:05 pm, Yap Honghor wrote:
> > On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 5:27:40 AM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> >>> <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >> On 10/02/2020 4:13 am, Ted wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 08:41:06 +1100, Michael Christ
> >>>> On 8/02/2020 1:55 pm, Ted wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:59:31 +1100, Michael Christ >
> >>>> <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >>>>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >>>>>>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >>>>>>>> Michael Christ
> >>>> <jesusisth...@hotmail.con> wrote:
> >>>>>> I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >>>>>>>> Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> >>>>>>> Nobody is making that claim, liar.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> All atheists are making that claim, Goofy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> If you say that is not true, then what is your claim??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Simple.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Isn't it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Well??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> However I can tell you now, whatever your atheist claim it will
> >>>> inevitably boil down to, yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa, everything just
> >>> up
> >>>> and all done dided went 'poop' and maded itself. :-).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That's an intentionally misleading very liberal paraphrase. So why you
> >>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
> >>
> >> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
> >> have a good look at it. :-).
> >
> > What fucking case?
> >>> wanna lie about it, motherfucker??
> >>
> >> State your case. Don't just waffle into the air, Teddy. Then we can
> >> have a good look at it. :-).
> >
>
> Exactly. Thank you Mr Hongdong.
You theists have a case to look at?
2000 years have passed and am looking at it for the next 2 billion years, moron!
Yap Honghor
Feb 21, 2020, 4:05:23 AM2/21/20
to
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 4:08:07 PM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> On 13/02/2020 1:10 pm, Yap Honghor wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 10:27:42 AM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> On 11/02/2020 11:35 am, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> >>> MXReligiowanker said:
> >>>
> >>>> The non-existent cannot bring forth existence.
> >>>
> >>> And nobody has said otherwise.
> >>>
> >>> There has never been a time when a literal nothing ever existed.
> >>>
> >>> Nothing "made itself" from nothing because nothing is not another kind of something and does not and never has existed.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Whatever you are bullshiting about does not sound like what I have said,
> >> Cloudoatheistowanker.
> >>
> >> "No thing, nothing can create itself", which is something you subscribed
> >> to when I first said it. Then your brain realised the fatal
> >> ramifications of that truth in relation to your moron atheism and then
> >> you back-peddled. :-).
> >>
> >> And don't forget, 'Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief'
> >> for our foundation is what we choose to believe.
> >>
> >> Which brings me to a thank you for offering to us all what you believe.
> >> Sadly though, it cannot be proven and you don't even know what you
> >> believe. :-).
> >>
> >> Yet...if you can comprehend...the truth will reveal itself at some point
> >> or another no matter what anyone testifies as their belief.
> >>
> >> I know I'm relaxed.
> >
> > I know you are so stressed....because there is no fucking pixie up in the sky!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > Your fucking religion just sucks money from the fools, enough to sustain you skill-less idiots for life!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
>
> Stop being an embarrassment to embarrassed atheists, Yapling.
You need to stop your miserable life...agonizing the non-existence of a pixie won't help you in any way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> On 13/02/2020 1:10 pm, Yap Honghor wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 10:27:42 AM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> >> On 11/02/2020 11:35 am, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> >>> MXReligiowanker said:
> >>>
> >>>> The non-existent cannot bring forth existence.
> >>>
> >>> And nobody has said otherwise.
> >>>
> >>> There has never been a time when a literal nothing ever existed.
> >>>
> >>> Nothing "made itself" from nothing because nothing is not another kind of something and does not and never has existed.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Whatever you are bullshiting about does not sound like what I have said,
> >> Cloudoatheistowanker.
> >>
> >> "No thing, nothing can create itself", which is something you subscribed
> >> to when I first said it. Then your brain realised the fatal
> >> ramifications of that truth in relation to your moron atheism and then
> >> you back-peddled. :-).
> >>
> >> And don't forget, 'Everything is belief and you can't prove a belief'
> >> for our foundation is what we choose to believe.
> >>
> >> Which brings me to a thank you for offering to us all what you believe.
> >> Sadly though, it cannot be proven and you don't even know what you
> >> believe. :-).
> >>
> >> Yet...if you can comprehend...the truth will reveal itself at some point
> >> or another no matter what anyone testifies as their belief.
> >>
> >> I know I'm relaxed.
> >
> > I know you are so stressed....because there is no fucking pixie up in the sky!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > Your fucking religion just sucks money from the fools, enough to sustain you skill-less idiots for life!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
>
> Stop being an embarrassment to embarrassed atheists, Yapling.
You need to stop your miserable life...agonizing the non-existence of a pixie won't help you in any way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yap Honghor
Feb 21, 2020, 4:06:50 AM2/21/20
to
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 7:03:49 PM UTC+8, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article
> <9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
> Malcolm McMahon <malcol...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <9c27653e-4ed0-4e04...@googlegroups.com>,
>
> > On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> > > I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> > >
> > > Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > On Friday, 7 February 2020 03:59:34 UTC, Michael Christ wrote:
> > > I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> > >
> > > Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Generally the idea is not that things create them selves, but that one thing
> > creates another.
> >
> > creates another.
> >
> > Recently physics has been looking at "retrocausality", the idea that cause
> > and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that
> > conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us
> > possible.
>
> > and effect are not necessarily in that order. In a way, it could be that
> > conscious life (us) guided the universe into a development path that made us
> > possible.
>
> So maybe we evolved by Intelligent Design and we are the
> Designers.
We are....we design all the ways we want to live and pixies are not involved!
> Designers.
>
> --
> :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
> 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
> The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
> to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
michellemalkingmail.com
Feb 21, 2020, 1:33:36 PM2/21/20
to
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 8:10:38 PM UTC-5, Yap Honghor wrote:
>
> Nature did create itself, a fact no one can deny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nature did not create itself. Nature evolved.
> On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 11:59:34 AM UTC+8, Michael Christ wrote:
> > I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >
> > Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
> Yes, no pixie can create itself if it had no parents!!!!!!!!!!!
> > I know, so deeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppp.
> >
> > Well, someone tell them, no thing, nothing can create itself.
>
>
> Nature did create itself, a fact no one can deny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nature did not create itself. Nature evolved.
temm
Dec 13, 2020, 11:59:48 PM12/13/20
to
Peter Pan wrote:
> It's not me preventing you from accepting the tangy
> tomatoey grace of The FSM. It's only you.
>
> Ramen.
>
pass the sauce
> It's not me preventing you from accepting the tangy
> tomatoey grace of The FSM. It's only you.
>
> Ramen.
>
pass the sauce
0 new messages