Idea for a new tshirt...

[bil...@m.nu]

Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
from morons aka theists...

T-shirt reads:


1. All christians are basically catholic
2. All catholics are morons
3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2



another T-shirt idea...

T-shirt reads:

All christians support pedophilia,
genocide, rape, and torture


another idea

T-shirt reads

Religion is good for one thing
and one thing only,
population control

another idea

T-shirt reads:

The jews killed and tortured the christians, the muslims killed and
tortured the christians, The christians kill and torture everyone .

[%]

and idea for a bonehead

[Kit]

On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:47:58 PM UTC-4, bil...@m.nu wrote:
> Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
> from morons aka theists...
>
> T-shirt reads:
>
>
> 1. All christians are basically catholic
> 2. All catholics are morons
> 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
>

Most Protestants will disagree with statement #2

>
>
> another T-shirt idea...
>
> T-shirt reads:
>
> All christians support pedophilia,
> genocide, rape, and torture
>
>

Most Christian would consider you a fabulous liar.

> another idea
>
> T-shirt reads
>
> Religion is good for one thing
> and one thing only,
> population control

How does religion support population control?
South America and Africa have some of the highest birth-rates in the world.

>
> another idea
>
> T-shirt reads:
>
> The jews killed and tortured the christians, the muslims killed and
> tortured the christians, The christians kill and torture everyone .

No comment.

-- Kit

[Africa-Has-No-Boss-But-Jesus]

On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:58:39 PM UTC-4, Kit wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:47:58 PM UTC-4, bil...@m.nu wrote:
> > Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
> > from morons aka theists...
> >
> > T-shirt reads:
> >
> >
> > 1. All christians are basically catholic
> > 2. All catholics are morons
> > 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
> >
>
> Most Protestants will disagree with statement #2
>

WHY?

[bil...@m.nu]

On Fri, 11 May 2018 12:58:37 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
wrote:

>On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:47:58 PM UTC-4, bil...@m.nu wrote:
>> Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
>> from morons aka theists...
>>
>> T-shirt reads:
>>
>>
>> 1. All christians are basically catholic
>> 2. All catholics are morons
>> 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
>>
>
>Most Protestants will disagree with statement #2

well then they are the ones that need to refer to statement 2.
ALL of christianity was started by catholics, It was the first
christian religion, The catholics basically wrote the entire new
testament.

>
>>
>>
>> another T-shirt idea...
>>
>> T-shirt reads:
>>
>> All christians support pedophilia,
>> genocide, rape, and torture
>>
>>
>
>Most Christian would consider you a fabulous liar.
>

well I guess it is a shame their ENTIRE religion is all based on a 12
year old girl being raped by their "god"

>> another idea
>>
>> T-shirt reads
>>
>> Religion is good for one thing
>> and one thing only,
>> population control
>
>How does religion support population control?
>South America and Africa have some of the highest birth-rates in the world.

The only thing that has killed more people than religion are the
really bad illnesses long ago.... Christians have murdered over 60
million people way over 60 million

[vtand...@gmail.com]

I have a better idea for a T-shirt:"If you need proof that atheists are mentally ill, just count all the lies they tell."

[Kit]

Typo. I meant write statement #1.

-- Kit

[bil...@m.nu]

On Fri, 11 May 2018 13:41:17 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>

wrote:

>On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 4:04:23 PM UTC-4, Africa-Has-No-Boss-But-Jesus wrote:
>> On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:58:39 PM UTC-4, Kit wrote:
>> > On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:47:58 PM UTC-4, bil...@m.nu wrote:
>> > > Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
>> > > from morons aka theists...
>> > >
>> > > T-shirt reads:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 1. All christians are basically catholic
>> > > 2. All catholics are morons
>> > > 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
>> > >
>> >
>> > Most Protestants will disagree with statement #2
>> >
>>
>>
>> WHY?
>
>Typo. I meant write statement #1.
>
>-- Kit

well as I said catholics started the first christian religion, it was
the catholics that composed the new testament which is what
christianity is all about. I mean the part about the "god" raping a
human child of 12 to make the baby harry potter... oops I meant jesus.
That is the foundation of christianity. If catholics weren't so stupid
maybe they would have considered writing a story about perhaps an
adult woman being raped by a god. I mean at least the greeks had zeus
raping a woman not a child <as far as I know anyway> I mean religion
is the same shit just different names.... Christianity has just as
many gods and idols as the greek and roman pagans.

[Cloud Hobbit]

A simpler shirt might read:

Where did Mrs. Caine come from?

[Yap Honghor]

Sounds reasonable....

[Yap Honghor]

What lies????
Show us the evidence......

[Robert Carnegie]

On Friday, 11 May 2018 23:40:11 UTC+1, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> A simpler shirt might read:
>
> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?

I think the previous suggestions need some fact checking.
For this, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakira_Caine>
says "British Guiana".

So now I'm imagining "Michael Caine" by "Madness"
in a cover version by Shakira - another lady of that
name, I think.

[Kevrob]

[quote]

{Inherit The Wind. Henry Drummond cross-examines Matthew Brady}

Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
she come from?

Brady: Who?

Drummond: Mrs. Cain. Cain's wife. If, in the beginning, there were just
Cain and Abel, and Adam and Eve, where did this extra woman come from?
Did you ever stop to think about that?

Brady: No, sir. I leave the agnostics to hunt for her.

Drummond: Never bothered you?

Brady: Never bothered me.

Drummond: Never tried to find out?

Brady: No.

Drummond: You figure somebody else pulled another creation over
in the next county somewhere?

[/quote] found at:

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/MovieSpeeches/moviespeechinheritthewind.html

Always a favorite.

Kevin R

[John Locke]

On Fri, 11 May 2018 17:07:07 -0700 (PDT), Kevrob <kev...@my-deja.com>
wrote:

...great movie. That last line is hilarious "You figure somebody else
pulled another creation over in the next county somewhere?"..heh, heh

[Siri Cruise]

In article <5472b28f-bb4e-4d67...@googlegroups.com>,

Kevrob <kev...@my-deja.com> wrote:

> Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
> went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
> on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
> she come from?

In a literal interpretation they were unnamed daughters of Adam and Eve. Incest
wasn't squicky until Moses receive the Law.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
I'm saving up to buy the Donald a blue stone This post / \
from Metebelis 3. All praise the Great Don! insults Islam. Mohammed

[Mitchell Holman]

vtand...@gmail.com wrote in
news:cdcddcd5-be5d-4ee8...@googlegroups.com:

"No atheist ever came to my
door trying to convert me"

[Cloud Hobbit]

Kevrob said:

Inherit the Wind always a favorite.

Me: It is my favorite movie ever.

[Kevrob]

I've loved it since I was a teenager.

When I auditioned for a part in one of our high school's
plays, in my senior year, I used a soliloquy from the
Hornbeck character, based on Mencken. I got to play
the main "villain" in "Arsenic and Old Lace."

The last play I had been in was in 6th grade. You
can't beat good material. :)

Kevin R

[vtand...@gmail.com]

Neither did any Jew or Hindu. Only a few Christian sects do that.
Even though Moslems want converts, they don't come to your door.

[%]

religious groups only go to good looking people's doors ,
i have to go out for the day to get rid of them

[vtand...@gmail.com]

They have knocked on my door a few times. When I told them I am a Jew, they apologized and left.

[Andrew]

"Siri Cruise" wrote in message news:chine.bleu-6371A...@reader.eternal-september.org...

> Kevrob wrote:
>
>> Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
>> went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
>> on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
>> she come from?
>
> In a literal interpretation they were unnamed
> daughters of Adam and Eve.

They had lots of sons and daughters. Yes, brother
and sister obviously married.

No genetic defects back then being so close to
the original Creation.

"Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5

[Atheist ------------------------------]

Siri Cruise wrote:

> In article <5472b28f-bb4e-4d67...@googlegroups.com>,
> Kevrob <kev...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
>>went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
>>on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
>>she come from?
>
>
> In a literal interpretation they were unnamed daughters of Adam and Eve. Incest
> wasn't squicky until Moses receive the Law.

You *must* "interpret" to make the absurd seem true to you.


--
There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.
Extortion (Believe or Burn) is *THE* foundation of Christianity.
Sycophant: a compulsive ass-kisser of un-evidenced dictator god.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Robert Carnegie said:

>I think the previous suggestions >need some fact checking.
>For this, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakira_Caine>
says "British Guiana".

Those who might think the reference was to Michael Caine's wife, would not be the target demographic.☺

[Siri Cruise]

In article <U6CdnQVT9Z01BGvH...@supernews.com>,

Atheist ------------------------------ <a...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Siri Cruise wrote:
>
> > In article <5472b28f-bb4e-4d67...@googlegroups.com>,
> > Kevrob <kev...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
> >>went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
> >>on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
> >>she come from?
> >
> >
> > In a literal interpretation they were unnamed daughters of Adam and Eve.
> > Incest
> > wasn't squicky until Moses receive the Law.
>
> You *must* "interpret" to make the absurd seem true to you.

Maybe that's why I prefaced with 'In a literal interpretation...'. The more
common nonliteral interpretation is Cain, Abel, and Seth stand for various
people in the Euphrates valley, which included women to wive.

[Yap Honghor]

On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 3:14:14 PM UTC+8, Andrew wrote:
> "Siri Cruise" wrote in message news:chine.bleu-6371A...@reader.eternal-september.org...
> > Kevrob wrote:
> >
> >> Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
> >> went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
> >> on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
> >> she come from?
> >
> > In a literal interpretation they were unnamed
> > daughters of Adam and Eve.
>
> They had lots of sons and daughters. Yes, brother
> and sister obviously married.

Obviously? Again pulling something from the air.....
Incest had great problems!!!

>
> No genetic defects back then being so close to
> the original Creation.

Again hot air from Andrew.....

>
> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5

It was a lie....no biological human lived longer than 100, even when there were no pollution.

[vtand...@gmail.com]

THAT'S A LIE


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_verified_oldest_people

[John Locke]

On Sat, 12 May 2018 00:14:33 -0700, "Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net>
wrote:

..we know for a fact from genetics studies that there was no Adam &
Eve and no "special creation". This has been explained to you many
times but you're still pissing in the wind.

[bil...@m.nu]

Wow that dude is lame as fuck. But is something really a lie when it
is a confirmed moron and liar reporting that someone else lied? Joe
has been shown to lie many many times, oh you better watch out he was
a lawyer in hte navy for 2 years, LOL

[Andrew]

"John Locke" wrote in message news:odmdfdhv330iqc0ct...@4ax.com...
> "Andrew" wrote:

>>"Siri Cruise" wrote:
>>> Kevrob wrote:
>>>
>>>> Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
>>>> went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
>>>> on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
>>>> she come from?
>>>
>>> In a literal interpretation they were unnamed
>>> daughters of Adam and Eve.
>>
>>They had lots of sons and daughters. Yes, brother
>>and sister obviously married.
>>
>>No genetic defects back then being so close to
>>the original Creation.
>>
>>"Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
>> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
>> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
>>

> we know for a fact from genetics
> studies that there was no Adam &
> Eve and no "special creation".

Yet apart from a "special creation"
you have no genetics to begin with.

This has previously been explained
to you.

[Andrew]

"Yap Honghor" wrote in message news:c31c718a-d150-44e9...@googlegroups.com...

>Andrew wrote:

>> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
>> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
>> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
>
> It was a lie....no biological human lived longer
> than 100, even when there were no pollution.

Please meet *Li Ching Yuen* who lived to be 256.

https://world.parhlo.com/256-years-old-man-breaks-silence-death-reveals-shocking-secrets-world/

He married 23 times and fathered over 200 children.

Since Adam lived to be 3.6 times longer than Li Ching Yuen,
we can figure approximately how many children Adam could
have had.

3.6 x 200 = 720

[vtand...@gmail.com]

I thought you atheist clowns were gonna ignore me.ROTFL!

[Peter Pan]

"Andrew" <andrew.3...@usa.net> wrote:

> "Yap Honghor" wrote in message news:c31c718a-d150-44e9...@googlegroups.com...
> >Andrew wrote:
>
> >> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
> >> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
> >> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
> >
> > It was a lie....no biological human lived longer
> > than 100, even when there were no pollution.
>
> Please meet *Li Ching Yuen* who lived to be 256.

No he didn't.

> He married 23 times and fathered over 200 children.

No he didn't.

> Since Adam lived to be 3.6 times longer than Li Ching Yuen,
> we can figure approximately how many children Adam could
> have had.
>
> 3.6 x 200 = 720

Not if he only had 1 wife. He'd have to be fucking his
daughters and granddaughters too. Still, that's less
than one kid a year.

Solomon had over 700 wives & concubines. If he knocked
them up once each, on average, he did better than Adam.
Of course, he didn't have 930 years to do it.

[Robert Carnegie]

Maybe I'm picky and parochial, but the name used
in English for the bible guy is Cain. Although
a game called "World of Darkness" calls him Caine...
as apparently the world's first vampire. And
I suppose therefore the world's oldest vampire.
Dracula can bite his... well, anyway.

[Amazing Answers]

On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 12:47:58 PM UTC-7, bil...@m.nu wrote:
> Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
> from morons aka theists...
>
> T-shirt reads:
>
>
> 1. All christians are basically catholic
> 2. All catholics are morons
> 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
>

There are fundamental differences between Catholics and Protestants.

1. Authority of the Bible vs authority of the Pope and tradition.
2. The deity of virgin Mary (fake Christian veneer over Isis/Diana) vs Mary as told by the Bible as having had other children (no virgin)
3. Salvation via authority of the church/works vs salvation through faith.
4. The church tells you what to do and has authority to change laws vs the Bible tells you what to do.
5. Shame (external pressure) vs internal pressure via Holy Spirit
6. And much, much more.

[Cloud Hobbit]

Robert Carnegie said:

>Maybe I'm picky and parochial, >but the name used
>in English for the bible guy is >Cain. Although
>a game called "World of >Darkness" calls him Caine...
>as apparently the world's first >vampire. And
>I suppose therefore the world's >oldest vampire.
>Dracula can bite his... well, >
>anyway.

Ah, I believe I've seen it spelled both ways but I might be wrong.

In future I will use your spelling to avoid confusion.

I'd hate to be called a liar over a spelling mistake as some here are won't to do.

[vtand...@gmail.com]

On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 12:47:58 PM UTC-7, bil...@m.nu wrote:
> Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
> from morons aka theists...
>
> T-shirt reads:
>
>
> 1. All christians are basically catholic
> 2. All catholics are morons
> 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
>
>
>

> another T-shirt idea...
>
> T-shirt reads:
>
> All christians support pedophilia,
> genocide, rape, and torture
>
>
> another idea
>
> T-shirt reads
>
> Religion is good for one thing
> and one thing only,
> population control
>
> another idea
>
> T-shirt reads:
>
> The jews killed and tortured the christians, the muslims killed and
> tortured the christians, The christians kill and torture everyone .

You should wear a T-shirt that is 5 sizes too large, then stuff the excess cloth in your mouth.

[Yap Honghor]

I was referring to people of ancient times.
Nowadays, due to better nutrition and medicine, people do live to 110 years.

[vtand...@gmail.com]

That's not what you said, you chickenshit liar.

[Yap Honghor]

On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 10:32:27 PM UTC+8, Andrew wrote:
> "Yap Honghor" wrote in message news:c31c718a-d150-44e9...@googlegroups.com...
> >Andrew wrote:
>
> >> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
> >> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
> >> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
> >
> > It was a lie....no biological human lived longer
> > than 100, even when there were no pollution.
>
> Please meet *Li Ching Yuen* who lived to be 256.

There was no record of what had happened to his dates....pure speculation and outright cheat!!!

>
> https://world.parhlo.com/256-years-old-man-breaks-silence-death-reveals-shocking-secrets-world/
>
> He married 23 times and fathered over 200 children.

No people, especially the old one after his age of 70-90 could have possibility of giving birth, not even in our present day!

>
> Since Adam lived to be 3.6 times longer than Li Ching Yuen,
> we can figure approximately how many children Adam could
> have had.

There was no such Adam or Eve thing...you possess another donkey brain, Andrew.

[Yap Honghor]

Some had already done that, and we few just want to laugh at you or expose you. We should take it easy to play with your nonsense, rather than having sincere effort to try to correct one who is a self regarded "know all"....

[%]

yes there was an adam and an eve

[%]

> Some had already done that, and i just want to laugh at you or expose you. i should take it easy to play with your nonsense, rather than having sincere effort to try to correct one who is a self regarded "know all"....
>

[Yap Honghor]

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 4:42:59 AM UTC+8, Amazing Answers wrote:
> On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 12:47:58 PM UTC-7, bil...@m.nu wrote:
> > Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
> > from morons aka theists...
> >
> > T-shirt reads:
> >
> >
> > 1. All christians are basically catholic
> > 2. All catholics are morons
> > 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
> >
>
>
> There are fundamental differences between Catholics and Protestants.

There are many other sects too.
Their aims are to milk their members long term!

>
> 1. Authority of the Bible vs authority of the Pope and tradition.

Con book vs Head of Con Organization

> 2. The deity of virgin Mary (fake Christian veneer over Isis/Diana) vs Mary as told by the Bible as having had other children (no virgin)

Stupid deities, same as Jesus pixie....

> 3. Salvation via authority of the church/works vs salvation through faith.

What salvation? Saving all the con workers by cheating the members of their money?

> 4. The church tells you what to do and has authority to change laws vs the Bible tells you what to do.

Fucking religious laws are for the fools. Even then, no one takes them seriously...

> 5. Shame (external pressure) vs internal pressure via Holy Spirit

Con tactics work on some but majority don't give a fuck.

> 6. And much, much more.

Ya, for all the fools......

[Yap Honghor]

Mad Joe, I was responding to Andrew's quote on Adam and Eve thing...you just want to look at a particular sentence and not the whole picture????

[vtand...@gmail.com]

I actually know very little, but it's 1000 times the amount you know, you babbling ignoramus..

[Andrew]

"Peter Pan" wrote in message news:vl4efdt1lvtqvtcdd...@4ax.com...
> "Andrew" wrote:

>> "Yap Honghor" wrote:
>> >Andrew wrote:
>>
>> >> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
>> >> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
>> >> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
>> >
>> > It was a lie....no biological human lived longer
>> > than 100, even when there were no pollution.
>>
>> Please meet *Li Ching Yuen* who lived to be 256.
>
> No he didn't.

Born 1677 ~ died 1933. Do the math.

He was into Chinese longevity herbs since the age of ten.
Including: Lingzhi, goji berry, wild ginseng, he shou wu,
gotu kola along with some others.

[Andrew]

"Yap Honghor" wrote in message news:d600fdef-4696-4470...@googlegroups.com...

> There was no such Adam or Eve thing...

Then explain our origin. You must have
male and female "from the get go" at the
exact same time.

[Amazing Answers]

Don't try to explain matters which are too hard to comprehend.

[Andrew]

"Amazing Answers" wrote in message news:0da6a1f8-79a1-45d5...@googlegroups.com...
> Andrew wrote:

>> "Yap Honghor" wrote:
>>
>> > There was no such Adam or Eve thing...
>>
>> Then explain our origin. You must have
>> male and female "from the get go" at the
>> exact same time.
>
> Don't try to explain matters which are too
> hard to comprehend.

It is simple to comprehend,

..except for those who are..

--> *willingly deceived*.

[Peter Pan]

Right, because everything on the internet must be true.
Science is false, but woo-woo websites are never wrong.
It couldn't be just an ---> Androoianoid fantasy.

parhlo.com has a bunch of amazing stuff... people can
live without food by photosynthesis, pets can see
spirits, there's a hole thru the earth in Antarctica...
it must all be true!!! Maybe you should tell them about
your angels living in the 18th dimension?

[Amazing Answers]

you'd be better off purchasing a Rose Tico figure at a Toy's R' Us.

[Yap Honghor]

If you know very little, you are lying about the 1000 times...
That is your habit!!!

[Yap Honghor]

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 12:32:17 PM UTC+8, Andrew wrote:
> "Peter Pan" wrote in message news:vl4efdt1lvtqvtcdd...@4ax.com...
> > "Andrew" wrote:
> >> "Yap Honghor" wrote:
> >> >Andrew wrote:
> >>
> >> >> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
> >> >> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
> >> >> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
> >> >
> >> > It was a lie....no biological human lived longer
> >> > than 100, even when there were no pollution.
> >>
> >> Please meet *Li Ching Yuen* who lived to be 256.
> >
> > No he didn't.
>
> Born 1677 ~ died 1933. Do the math.

They don't have any birth certificate then.
Any one can make claim, but without proof.

>
> He was into Chinese longevity herbs since the age of ten.
> Including: Lingzhi, goji berry, wild ginseng, he shou wu,
> gotu kola along with some others.

Some herbs helped, but they might not be beneficial to that extend. Otherwise, all Chinese lives could be at least about 200 years!!!

Andrew, you always pick up some misinformation to believe...

[Malte Runz]

On Sat, 12 May 2018 00:14:33 -0700, "Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net>

wrote:

>"Siri Cruise" wrote in message news:chine.bleu-6371A...@reader.eternal-september.org...
>> Kevrob wrote:
>>
>>> Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
>>> went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
>>> on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
>>> she come from?
>>
>> In a literal interpretation they were unnamed
>> daughters of Adam and Eve.
>
>They had lots of sons and daughters. Yes, brother
>and sister obviously married.
>

>No genetic defects back then being so close to
>the original Creation.

"So close" is roughly 15-1600 years after the "original Creation". Can
we agree on that?

The Bible doesn't say when the Fall took place, but it seems that most
agree that it happened not long after Creation week. 10-50 days. Okay
with that?

According to you the Fall is what triggered devolution, IOW genetic
defects began to appear in the genomes of all life forms.

Noah was about 600 years when the Flood took place, which means he was
born ~1000 years after the "original Creation" and the Fall.

As you might have guessed already, I have a few questions and I think
you're just the man who can provide the answers:

How many generations had passed during the 1000 years after the Fall
and until Noah was born with "no genetic defects"?

Did Noah pass on his immaculate genes to his three sons, and did the
sons' wives have the same 'quality' genes as they did?

Did all other life forms, living at the same time as Noah, also have
"no genetic defects"?

(snip)

--
Malte Runz

[%]

> (snip)
>

[Malte Runz]

You're assuming "creation" when you conclude as you do.

The scientific evidence, those facts that you refer to as "fantasy",
places earliest sexual reproduction about 1,5 billion years ago. But
it was not 'male and female', 'sperm and egg' "from the get go". Those
features evolved over the eons.

Note: Whenever Amassing Assvoid agrees, you're sure to be on the wrong
side of logic, reality and anything resembling truth.

--
Malte Runz

[aaa]

On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> A simpler shirt might read:
>
> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
>

That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific origin
of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual origin of
human suffering in sin and evil.

--
God's spiritual evidence:

Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.

[Mitchell Holman]

aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote in news:pd9esi$se3$4...@dont-email.me:

> On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
>> A simpler shirt might read:
>>
>> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
>>
>
> That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific origin
> of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual origin of
> human suffering in sin and evil.
>

"That's just your opinion. You need to support
your opinion with evidence."
"aaa", March 26 2018

[vtand...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 6:34:13 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> > A simpler shirt might read:
> >
> > Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
> >
>
> That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific origin
> of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual origin of
> human suffering in sin and evil.
>
> --

Very good. I congratulate you.

[vtand...@gmail.com]

Obviously, your knowledge of academic matters is very limited.
You can find verification of what he said in the writings of theologists, people who interpret the bible. I realize that atheists don't like reading such things, but it's the only source available.

[vtand...@gmail.com]

They taught us the same thing in Hebrew School.It's part of Jewish doctrine.

[Kevrob]

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 1:15:40 PM UTC-4, vtand...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 7:28:56 AM UTC-7, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote in news:pd9esi$se3$4...@dont-email.me:
> >
> > > On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> > >> A simpler shirt might read:
> > >>
> > >> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
> > >>
> > >
> > > That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific origin
> > > of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual origin of
> > > human suffering in sin and evil.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > "That's just your opinion. You need to support
> > your opinion with evidence."
> > "aaa", March 26 2018
>
> Obviously, your knowledge of academic matters is very limited.
> You can find verification of what he said in the writings of theologists,

Do you mean theologians? "Theologist" is a bit of an archaism.

> people who interpret the bible.

"Exegete" would be a more on-point term, for Christianity.

Judaism has its own traditions, which I'm sure you are aware of.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardes_(Jewish_exegesis)

> I realize that atheists don't like reading such things,
> but it's the only source available.

I read my share of this stuff before ditching the ghod-fixation.

Kevin R

[Mitchell Holman]

vtand...@gmail.com wrote in
news:5fb35127-79ee-4e25...@googlegroups.com:

> On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 7:28:56 AM UTC-7, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote in news:pd9esi$se3$4...@dont-email.me:
>>
>> > On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
>> >> A simpler shirt might read:
>> >>
>> >> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
>> >>
>> >
>> > That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific
>> > origin of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual
>> > origin of human suffering in sin and evil.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> "That's just your opinion. You need to support
>> your opinion with evidence."
>> "aaa", March 26 2018
>
> Obviously, your knowledge of academic matters is very limited.
> You can find verification of what he said in the writings of
> theologists, people who interpret the bible.

Why does the Bible need to be "interpreted"?

If a passage says X then X happened, it is
not a "metaphor" or an "allegory" for something
else, no?

[Kevrob]

Remember, most people are only reading a translation
of the original text. Unless you believe that the
translators can't have made mistakes, because they
had been sprinkled with magic invisible pixie dust,
aka "inspiration," ancient texts always need to be
interpreted. Which means jobs for priests, augurs,
oracles and theologians.

Even when the original text is written in what is
ostensibly the reader's "cradle language," it is often
in an archaic dialect. The same thing happens to vernacular
versions that have been around for quite some time. Compare
the King James babble to a very recent translation. They
read very differently.

I speak and read 20th Century/21st Century English, in a
Northeastern US dialect. If I read Shakespeare or Chaucer or
"Beowulf" it either has to be glossed or in translation for me
to understand all the vocabulary and catch all the cultural
references. That's why Penguin Classics are footnoted or end-
noted.

Kevin R

[Peter Pan]

It all depends, because its meaning is all a matter of
opinion.

Once you start saying this or that passage is allegorical
with whatever meaning you want to impute, you're starting
down the slippery slope toward realizing it's all
nonsense.

[duke]

On Sat, 12 May 2018 07:32:47 -0700, "Andrew" <andrew.3...@usa.net> wrote:

>"Yap Honghor" wrote in message news:c31c718a-d150-44e9...@googlegroups.com...

>>Andrew wrote:
>
>>> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
>>> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
>>> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
>>
>> It was a lie....no biological human lived longer
>> than 100, even when there were no pollution.
>
>Please meet *Li Ching Yuen* who lived to be 256.
>

> https://world.parhlo.com/256-years-old-man-breaks-silence-death-reveals-shocking-secrets-world/
>
>He married 23 times and fathered over 200 children.
>

>Since Adam lived to be 3.6 times longer than Li Ching Yuen,
>we can figure approximately how many children Adam could
>have had.
>

> 3.6 x 200 = 720

Except that he was not a real man.

the dukester, American-American


*****
The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did in
the OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.
*****

[Andrew]

"Malte Runz" wrote in message news:e5egfd5dv16gvh8vi...@4ax.com...

> "Andrew" wrote:
>>"Yap Honghor" wrote:
>>

>>> There was no such Adam or Eve thing...
>>
>>Then explain our origin. You must have
>>male and female "from the get go" at the
>>exact same time.
>
> You're assuming "creation" when you conclude as you do.
>
> The scientific evidence, those facts that you refer to as "fantasy",
> places earliest sexual reproduction about 1,5 billion years ago.
> But it was not 'male and female', 'sperm and egg' "from the get
> go". Those features evolved over the eons.

Thanks, now do you have any scientific
evidence to support your claim?

Or, are you simply citing pseudoscience
fantasy?

I suspect the later.

[Andrew]

"Malte Runz" wrote in message news:facgfd1fjmsgp95gi...@4ax.com...
> "Andrew" wrote:

>>"Siri Cruise" wrote:
>>> Kevrob wrote:
>>>
>>>> Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
>>>> went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
>>>> on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
>>>> she come from?
>>>
>>> In a literal interpretation they were unnamed
>>> daughters of Adam and Eve.
>>
>>They had lots of sons and daughters. Yes, brother
>>and sister obviously married.
>>
>>No genetic defects back then being so close to
>>the original Creation.
>
> "So close" is roughly 15-1600 years after the "original Creation". Can
> we agree on that?

No.

> The Bible doesn't say when the Fall took place, but it seems that most
> agree that it happened not long after Creation week. 10-50 days. Okay
> with that?

No, I suspect several decades.

> According to you the Fall is what triggered devolution, IOW genetic
> defects began to appear in the genomes of all life forms.

Yes, defects came after the Fall.

> Noah was about 600 years when the Flood took place, which means he was
> born ~1000 years after the "original Creation" and the Fall.
>
> As you might have guessed already, I have a few questions and I think
> you're just the man who can provide the answers:

Not necessarily.

> How many generations had passed during the 1000 years after the Fall
> and until Noah was born with "no genetic defects"?

He probably had some.

> Did Noah pass on his immaculate genes to his three sons, and did the
> sons' wives have the same 'quality' genes as they did?
>
> Did all other life forms, living at the same time as Noah, also have
> "no genetic defects"?

No.

>
> (snip)
>
> --
> Malte Runz

[vtand...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 7:28:56 AM UTC-7, Mitchell Holman wrote:

TRY THIS

https://tinyurl.com/y72bcxob

[Malte Runz]

On Sun, 13 May 2018 16:31:46 -0700, "Andrew"
<andrew.3...@usa.net> wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message news:e5egfd5dv16gvh8vi...@4ax.com...
>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>"Yap Honghor" wrote:
>>>
>>>> There was no such Adam or Eve thing...
>>>
>>>Then explain our origin. You must have
>>>male and female "from the get go" at the
>>>exact same time.
>>
>> You're assuming "creation" when you conclude as you do.
>>
>> The scientific evidence, those facts that you refer to as "fantasy",
>> places earliest sexual reproduction about 1,5 billion years ago.
>> But it was not 'male and female', 'sperm and egg' "from the get
>> go". Those features evolved over the eons.
>
>Thanks, now do you have any scientific
>evidence to support your claim?

Yes.

>
>Or, are you simply citing pseudoscience
>fantasy?

No.

>
>I suspect the later.

I know.

--
Malte Runz

[Malte Runz]

On Sun, 13 May 2018 16:47:56 -0700, "Andrew"
<andrew.3...@usa.net> wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message news:facgfd1fjmsgp95gi...@4ax.com...
>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>"Siri Cruise" wrote:
>>>> Kevrob wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Drummond: Now listen to this. This is Genesis 4 to 16: "And Cain
>>>>> went out from the presence of the Lord and dwelt in the land of Nod,
>>>>> on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife." Now where the hell did
>>>>> she come from?
>>>>
>>>> In a literal interpretation they were unnamed
>>>> daughters of Adam and Eve.
>>>
>>>They had lots of sons and daughters. Yes, brother
>>>and sister obviously married.
>>>
>>>No genetic defects back then being so close to
>>>the original Creation.
>>
>> "So close" is roughly 15-1600 years after the "original Creation". Can
>> we agree on that?
>
>No.

If the Earth was created 6000 years ago, and the Flood happened 4500
years ago...? Which of those numbers are wrong?

>
>> The Bible doesn't say when the Fall took place, but it seems that most
>> agree that it happened not long after Creation week. 10-50 days. Okay
>> with that?
>
>No, I suspect several decades.

"Suspect". Is that merely a gut feeling, or do you base your estimate
on extra-biblical evidence?

I'm happy, though, to accept "several decades", and it makes no
difference in the scheme of things.

>
>> According to you the Fall is what triggered devolution, IOW genetic
>> defects began to appear in the genomes of all life forms.
>
>Yes, defects came after the Fall.

Immediately?

>> Noah was about 600 years when the Flood took place, which means he was
>> born ~1000 years after the "original Creation" and the Fall.
>>
>> As you might have guessed already, I have a few questions and I think
>> you're just the man who can provide the answers:
>
>Not necessarily.

Give yourself some credit.

>> How many generations had passed during the 1000 years after the Fall
>> and until Noah was born with "no genetic defects"?

This is one of the important questions you needed to answer. It tells
us how fast the genome decayed after the Fall.

>
>He probably had some.

Do you realize that you're contradicting your previous claim of him
having "no genetic defects".

>
>> Did Noah pass on his immaculate genes to his three sons, and did the
>> sons' wives have the same 'quality' genes as they did?

Are you unable to answer this question, or did you just miss it. It's
actually important.

>>
>> Did all other life forms, living at the same time as Noah, also have
>> "no genetic defects"?
>
>No.

Did they "probably" have some, or do you know for a fact that Noah had
fewer genetic defects than all other life forms, maybe even including
all other human beings?

Let's take the horse kind as an example. Had it devolved into two or
five or maybe even ten different species by the time of the Flood?

--
Malte Runz

[Yap Honghor]

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 9:34:13 PM UTC+8, aaa wrote:
> On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> > A simpler shirt might read:
> >
> > Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
> >
>
> That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific origin
> of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual origin of
> human suffering in sin and evil.

If what you said is true, then there were no Adam, no Eve thing...

[Yap Honghor]

So, even our Mad Artie agrees that Adam/Eve thing was just bullshit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[vtand...@gmail.com]

WRONG. You are too stupid to understand that ancient literature was often a parable and not meant to be taken literally, just as Aesop's Fables are not meant to be taken literally.

[aaa]

On 2018-05-13 09:33 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2018 21:33:16 -0700, "Andrew"
> <andrew.3...@usa.net> wrote:
>
>> "Yap Honghor" wrote in message news:d600fdef-4696-4470...@googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> There was no such Adam or Eve thing...
>>
>> Then explain our origin. You must have
>> male and female "from the get go" at the
>> exact same time.
>
> You're assuming "creation" when you conclude as you do.

There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
of creation. In the same way, there is no assumption necessary to
realize that life as a complicated biological system has to be the
result of creation. This isn't rocket science. This is just simple logic.

>
> The scientific evidence, those facts that you refer to as "fantasy",
> places earliest sexual reproduction about 1,5 billion years ago. But
> it was not 'male and female', 'sperm and egg' "from the get go". Those
> features evolved over the eons.

That's just pure imagination and manufactured consent. There is no real
evidence of that except the imagination in the mind of evolutionists.
Sexual reproduction was a perfect reproduction process from its very
beginning. It had no need to improve itself. It has always been a
perfect design.

>
> Note: Whenever Amassing Assvoid agrees, you're sure to be on the wrong
> side of logic, reality and anything resembling truth.
>


--

[Siri Cruise]

In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:

> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result

Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badlands_Guardian

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
I'm saving up to buy the Donald a blue stone This post / \
from Metebelis 3. All praise the Great Don! insults Islam. Mohammed

[TT Liams]

On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:36:47 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2018 07:32:47 -0700, "Andrew"
<andrew.3...@usa.net> wrote:


> >"Yap Honghor" wrote in message
news:c31c718a-d150-44e9...@googlegroups.com...
> >>Andrew wrote:
> >
> >>> "Adam..begat sons and daughters: And all the
> >>> days that Adam lived were nine hundred and
> >>> thirty years: and he died." ~ Genesis 5:4-5
> >>
> >> It was a lie....no biological human lived longer
> >> than 100, even when there were no pollution.
> >
> >Please meet *Li Ching Yuen* who lived to be 256.
> >
> >
https://world.parhlo.com/256-years-old-man-breaks-silence-death-reveals
-shocking-secrets-world/
> >
> >He married 23 times and fathered over 200 children.
> >
> >Since Adam lived to be 3.6 times longer than Li Ching Yuen,
> >we can figure approximately how many children Adam could
> >have had.
> >
> > 3.6 x 200 = 720


> Except that he was not a real man.

Neither are you.

[Yap Honghor]

That is not literature.
Is there any indication telling people it was just fiction?
Not meant to be taken literally but you believe wholeheartedly!!

[%]

yes there is

[bil...@m.nu]

On Sun, 13 May 2018 00:23:18 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
<hhya...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 9:21:39 AM UTC+8, vtand...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:09:10 PM UTC-7, Yap Honghor wrote:
>> > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 10:34:26 PM UTC+8, vtand...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 6:48:27 AM UTC-7, bil...@m.nu wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, 11 May 2018 16:32:25 -0700 (PDT), Yap Honghor
>> > > > <hhya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 4:29:45 AM UTC+8, vtand...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > > >> On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 12:47:58 PM UTC-7, bil...@m.nu wrote:
>> > > > >> > Please give me you opinion. Atheists only I will not read any posts
>> > > > >> > from morons aka theists...
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > T-shirt reads:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > 1. All christians are basically catholic
>> > > > >> > 2. All catholics are morons
>> > > > >> > 3. If you are in doubt please refer to #2
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > another T-shirt idea...
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > T-shirt reads:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > All christians support pedophilia,
>> > > > >> > genocide, rape, and torture
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > another idea
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > T-shirt reads
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Religion is good for one thing
>> > > > >> > and one thing only,
>> > > > >> > population control
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > another idea
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > T-shirt reads:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > The jews killed and tortured the christians, the muslims killed and
>> > > > >> > tortured the christians, The christians kill and torture everyone .
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I have a better idea for a T-shirt:"If you need proof that atheists are mentally ill, just count all the lies they tell."
>> > > > >
>> > > > >What lies????
>> > > > >Show us the evidence......
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Wow that dude is lame as fuck. But is something really a lie when it
>> > > > is a confirmed moron and liar reporting that someone else lied? Joe
>> > > > has been shown to lie many many times, oh you better watch out he was
>> > > > a lawyer in hte navy for 2 years, LOL
>> > >
>> > > I thought you atheist clowns were gonna ignore me.ROTFL!
>> >
>> > Some had already done that, and we few just want to laugh at you or expose you. We should take it easy to play with your nonsense, rather than having sincere effort to try to correct one who is a self regarded "know all"....
>>
>> I actually know very little, but it's 1000 times the amount you know, you babbling ignoramus..
>
>If you know very little, you are lying about the 1000 times...
>That is your habit!!!

Thing is, it does not really know much at all, what it does know it
thinks is everything so it thinks it knows everything, this is why it
believes in fairies.

I just hope maybe everyone that reads this reply will believe me when
I say ALL christians are idiots, because they are, because they
believe in fairies. I don't care how much education they think they
have because IF they believe in fairies they are not educated at all.
As far as the moron joe, it has lied so many times it actually
believes its own bullshit.

[aaa]

Thanks! :-)

[aaa]

No, philosophy is always greater than science. The philosophical truth
rules supreme. Science is irrelevant.

[aaa]

As I recall, you are spiritually blind and philosophically illiterate.
What can I do?

[aaa]

On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>
>> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
>
> Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?

No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.

>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badlands_Guardian

[Siri Cruise]

In article <pdf9ke$8dd$1...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:

> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> > In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
> >
> >> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
> >
> > Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
>
> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.

Not everyone agrees.

[Mitchell Holman]

aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote in news:pdf2bj$j4u$8...@dont-email.me:

> On 2018-05-13 10:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote in news:pd9esi$se3$4...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
>>>> A simpler shirt might read:
>>>>
>>>> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific
>>> origin of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual
>>> origin of human suffering in sin and evil.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "That's just your opinion. You need to support
>> your opinion with evidence."
>> "aaa", March 26 2018
>
>
> As I recall, you are spiritually blind and philosophically illiterate.
> What can I do?

How about stop posting about what you think
the Bible says and actually READ it for a change?




"You should be amazed that I can understand
the Bible without reading it."
"aaa", Feb 24, 2018
http://tinyurl.com/ybscwza8

[aaa]

On 2018-05-15 03:19 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article <pdf9ke$8dd$1...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
>>>
>>> Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
>>
>> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.
>
> Not everyone agrees.
>

Then we need to improve our understanding about intelligence.

[Siri Cruise]

In article <pdgc1n$35d$7...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:

> On 2018-05-15 03:19 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> > In article <pdf9ke$8dd$1...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> >>> In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
> >>>
> >>> Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
> >>
> >> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.
> >
> > Not everyone agrees.
> >
>
> Then we need to improve our understanding about intelligence.

Perhaps 'intelligent design' is not as obvious as you think.

[aaa]

On 2018-05-15 08:45 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote in news:pdf2bj$j4u$8...@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 2018-05-13 10:28 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote in news:pd9esi$se3$4...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
>>>>> A simpler shirt might read:
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific
>>>> origin of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual
>>>> origin of human suffering in sin and evil.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "That's just your opinion. You need to support
>>> your opinion with evidence."
>>> "aaa", March 26 2018
>>
>>
>> As I recall, you are spiritually blind and philosophically illiterate.
>> What can I do?
>
>
> How about stop posting about what you think
> the Bible says and actually READ it for a change?

Nothing I said has contradicted with the Bible so far.

>
>
>
>
> "You should be amazed that I can understand
> the Bible without reading it."
> "aaa", Feb 24, 2018
> http://tinyurl.com/ybscwza8
>

[aaa]

On 2018-05-16 12:50 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article <pdgc1n$35d$7...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-05-15 03:19 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> In article <pdf9ke$8dd$1...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>> In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
>>>>
>>>> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.
>>>
>>> Not everyone agrees.
>>>
>>
>> Then we need to improve our understanding about intelligence.
>
> Perhaps 'intelligent design' is not as obvious as you think.
>

Only because intelligence can only be recognized and appreciated by

[duke]

On Tue, 15 May 2018 12:19:21 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <pdf9ke$8dd$1...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> > In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
>> >
>> > Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
>>
>> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.
>
>Not everyone agrees.

That would be you atheists that disagree.

[Smiler]

On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:05:18 -0400, aaa wrote:

> On 2018-05-16 12:50 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> In article <pdgc1n$35d$7...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-05-15 03:19 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>> In article <pdf9ke$8dd$1...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>> In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the
>>>>>>> result
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.
>>>>
>>>> Not everyone agrees.
>>>>
>>> Then we need to improve our understanding about intelligence.
>>
>> Perhaps 'intelligent design' is not as obvious as you think.
>>
> Only because intelligence can only be recognized and appreciated by
> intelligence.

That rules you out, then.

--
Smiler, The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made
to exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[Yap Honghor]

I am totally with you...
If someone can believe in his religious bullshits, it would show his brain is kaput, whether or not he has high education! It is a waste of money and time for the duration of his education!

And the time spent for education is stupid and wasteful because one can use his pixie for all things or situation!!!!

[Yap Honghor]

On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 12:37:09 AM UTC+8, aaa wrote:
> On 2018-05-14 03:59 AM, Yap Honghor wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 9:34:13 PM UTC+8, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2018-05-11 06:40 PM, Cloud Hobbit wrote:
> >>> A simpler shirt might read:
> >>>
> >>> Where did Mrs. Caine come from?
> >>>
> >>
> >> That's a stupid question. The Bible is never about the scientific origin
> >> of human race. It's about the philosophical and spiritual origin of
> >> human suffering in sin and evil.
> >
> > If what you said is true, then there were no Adam, no Eve thing...
> >
>
> No, philosophy is always greater than science. The philosophical truth
> rules supreme. Science is irrelevant.

Without science, man will never progress to today.
We can live without philosophy because it merely tell us what is our life.
But science is one that governs our lives.

[Yap Honghor]

On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 2:41:21 AM UTC+8, aaa wrote:
> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> > In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
> >
> >> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the result
> >
> > Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
>
> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.
>

Assuming this is true, what does pyramids give us?
A monument for appreciation?

[%]

that's what i do but now its time for you to go to bed mom said

[%]

your own statements prove you are wrong

[aaa]

On 2018-05-16 09:28 PM, Smiler wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2018 01:05:18 -0400, aaa wrote:
>
>> On 2018-05-16 12:50 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> In article <pdgc1n$35d$7...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-05-15 03:19 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>> In article <pdf9ke$8dd$1...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-05-14 08:35 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <pdctdg$sv5$2...@dont-email.me>, aaa <j...@somewhere.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no assumption necessary to recognize the pyramid as the
>>>>>>>> result
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you including the pyramids of Antarctica and Mars?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, the work of intelligence is unmistakable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not everyone agrees.
>>>>>
>>>> Then we need to improve our understanding about intelligence.
>>>
>>> Perhaps 'intelligent design' is not as obvious as you think.
>>>
>> Only because intelligence can only be recognized and appreciated by
>> intelligence.
>
> That rules you out, then.
>

Fortunately, I'm not blind to intelligence, but evolutionists are.

[aaa]

Or an indication of the power of intelligence.