The Weber Intelligence Test Series #1
Budikka666
a Chicken (aka Earl J. Weber, aka Puke, Duck Shit, Hurl, etc.) is that
he's never demonstrated any intelligence. What intelligent being
(outside the realm of sexual deviance) would repeatedly offer his dumb
ass to be roundly kicked, get it roundly kicked, and then deliberately
offer it up again?
Anyway, out of nothing more than sheer optimism, I present the Weber
Intelligence Test Series, Question #1:
Given the following two propositions:
1. Person A said that Item X was true.
2. Person A said that a book said Item X was true
Answer the following question:
Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
B. Saying two different things
Answer A or B.
Budikka
puke
A or B.
Budikka666
That's actually what the cowardly little lying hypocrite will do! (Of
course, then he'd fail the intelligence test, but he's not smart enough
to grasp that!) Excellent!
B.
raven1
wrote:
C. Duke's an idiot.
---
"This is how liberty dies: with thunderous applause"
- Padme Amidala, Episode III
duke
A and B.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
duke
Bud's a dud, and t-tom is son of dud.
Budikka666
Clearly you haven't read the messages. Fake Puke preempted you and we
all predicted you would do precisely this, thereby proving you're a
complete moron.
Either that or intellectual honesty is such an alien concept to you
that even in a **COMPLETELY HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION** you still run away
from it as fast as your pale skinny legs can carry your bulk! How
pathetic is that?!
You failed the intelligence test. Unless, of course, you want to
select one single letter - either A or B but not both - in answer to
the question. Then we can procede to stage 2 of the test.
Right now you're an 'F'. But everyone knows that, so don't worry too
much about it.
Budikka
duke
>> >Given the following two propositions:
>> >1. Person A said that Item X was true.
>> >2. Person A said that a book said Item X was true
>> >Answer the following question:
>
>> >Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
>> >A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
>> >B. Saying two different things
>> >Answer A or B.
>> A and B.
>Clearly you haven't read the messages. Fake Puke preempted you and we
>all predicted you would do precisely this, thereby proving you're a
>complete moron.
It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
Mike Painter
> On 25 Jun 2005 13:18:51 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
>>>> Given the following two propositions:
>>>> 1. Person A said that Item X was true.
>>>> 2. Person A said that a book said Item X was true
>>>> Answer the following question:
>>
>>>> Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
>>>> A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
>>>> B. Saying two different things
>
>>>> Answer A or B.
>
>>> A and B.
>
>> Clearly you haven't read the messages. Fake Puke preempted you and
>> we all predicted you would do precisely this, thereby proving you're
>> a complete moron.
>
> It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
Earl holds that A = not A if he says so.
Ben Goren
> duke wrote:
>> Budikka666 wrote:
>>
>>>>> Given the following two propositions:
>>>>> 1. Person A said that Item X was true.
>>>>> 2. Person A said that a book said Item X was true
>>>>> Answer the following question:
>>>>>
>>>>> Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
>>>>> A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
>>>>> B. Saying two different things
>>>>>
>>>>> Answer A or B.
>>>>
>>>> A and B.
>>>
>>> Clearly you haven't read the messages. Fake Puke preempted
>>> you and we all predicted you would do precisely this, thereby
>>> proving you're a complete moron.
>>
>> It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
>
> Earl holds that A = not A if he says so.
But isn't that an essential property of /all/ theist thought--at
least, at some level? Even the most rational and enlightened will
maintain that, for example, omnipotence does not necessarily
include the ability to do the impossible.
Of course, it's rarely so starkly demonstrated as it is with duke.
Cheers,
b&
--
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
God can never prove that this sentence is true.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Budikka666
> On 25 Jun 2005 13:18:51 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> >> >Given the following two propositions:
> >> >1. Person A said that Item X was true.
> >> >2. Person A said that a book said Item X was true
> >> >Answer the following question:
> >
> >> >Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
> >> >A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
> >> >B. Saying two different things
>
> >> >Answer A or B.
>
> >> A and B.
>
> >Clearly you haven't read the messages. Fake Puke preempted you and we
> >all predicted you would do precisely this, thereby proving you're a
> >complete moron.
>
> It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
No, it takes a moron to be asked to choose one or the other and then he
choses both. Both was not an option. The request was that you select
one letter and one letter only. You can choose option 'A' or you can
choose option 'B'. You failed to grasp this. It's entirely
unsurprising that in the very first Weber Intelligence Test Series
question, you failed dismally.
Obviously you lost your WITS.
And the two options *are* different - just FYI.
Budikka
Budikka666
> duke wrote:
> > On 25 Jun 2005 13:18:51 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>>> Given the following two propositions:
> >>>> 1. Person A said that Item X was true.
> >>>> 2. Person A said that a book said Item X was true
> >>>> Answer the following question:
> >>
> >>>> Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
> >>>> A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
> >>>> B. Saying two different things
> >
> >>>> Answer A or B.
> >
> >>> A and B.
> >
> >> Clearly you haven't read the messages. Fake Puke preempted you and
> >> we all predicted you would do precisely this, thereby proving you're
> >> a complete moron.
> >
> > It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
>
> Earl holds that A = not A if he says so.
Elegantly stated. And I'm sure you'll agree that this is not news, but
I think we have, in this thread, expressed it unequivocally for
everyone to see. Earl J. Weber is indeed a moron - case proven!
What he failed to grasp is that *even if the two were equivalent* (and
they're not), he wasn't given an option "'C. Both", he was asked to
choose one or the other of the two options given and he *still*
couldn't get it! Even tossing a coin would have given him a
fifty-fifty chance of getting it right. A coin-toss is clearly 50%
smarter than Earl!
B.
duke
wrote:
>duke wrote:
>> On 25 Jun 2005 13:18:51 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Given the following two propositions:
>>>>> 1. Person A said that Item X was true.
>>>>> 2. Person A said that a book said Item X was true
>>>>> Answer the following question:
>>>
>>>>> Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
>>>>> A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
>>>>> B. Saying two different things
>>
>>>>> Answer A or B.
>>
>>>> A and B.
>>
>>> Clearly you haven't read the messages. Fake Puke preempted you and
>>> we all predicted you would do precisely this, thereby proving you're
>>> a complete moron.
>>
>> It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
>
>Earl holds that A = not A if he says so.
Ok, you're a moron.
duke
>> It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
>No, it takes a moron to be asked to choose one or the other and then he
>choses both.
It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
Mike Painter
Earl again demonstrates his inability to comprehend that he and he alone
holds these beliefs.
Dubh Ghall
>On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 05:55:17 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net>
>wrote:
>
snip
>>
>>Earl holds that A = not A if he says so.
>
>Ok, you're a moron.
>
Interesting. You insult Mike, but you do not deny his assertion.
--
Puck Greenman
The spelling, Like any opinion stated here,
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
Plonked by Rob Duncan
Na bister 500,000
duke
wrote:
>> Ok, you're a moron.
>Earl again demonstrates his inability to comprehend that he and he alone
>holds these beliefs.
You haven't asked the ones I told yet.
duke
>>>Earl holds that A = not A if he says so.
>>Ok, you're a moron.
>Interesting. You insult Mike, but you do not deny his assertion.
That he's not a moron?
Budikka666
> On 26 Jun 2005 04:53:11 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> >> It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
>
> >No, it takes a moron to be asked to choose one or the other and then he
> >choses both.
>
> It takes a moron to fail to recognize that both apply.
If you could support that, it wouldn't be a lie now would it? And
since you can't support a thing you say, you're nothing but a lie.
The fact is that the two are not the same. If a person says that **a
book claims something** that person is merely reporting what a book
claims. It tells us nothing about what that person believes with
regard to the item being reported.
Since your intellect is clearly incapable of grasping the purely
logical, let's reduce it to the specific and demonstrate to you and the
rest of the world how phenomenally incompetent you truly are.
Consider the case of a true Christian. This Christian believes in god
without any shadow of a doubt. Out of curiosity, this Christian reads
a book which claims there is no god. This Christian has a friend who
asks the Christian what she is reading. She responds, "This book
insists there is no god."
Is the Christian insisting there is no god, or is the Christian merely
reporting that the book insists there is no god?
Now let's put that exact scenario into the A/B choice I gave you:
1. The Christian insisted there is no god.
2. The Christian said the book insisted there is no god.
Answer the following question:
Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
B. Saying two different things
Select either only A or only B as your answer and tell me which of the
two you have chosen.
Are you going to answer *this* question the same way you answered the
first one?
As with the original choice, **YOU WERE SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED TO CHOOSE
ONE LETTER OR THE OTHER**. Even if both had applied, it's irrelevant.
**YOU WERE SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED TO CHOOSE ONE LETTER OR THE OTHER**.
You could have chosen one and then made your dissent clear. That would
have been acceptable.
Even choosing both, or better yet, refusing to make the choice if you
felt it was a trick question would have been acceptable if you had
included some sort of rational argument supporting your choice, but
everyone knows you cannot do this because rationality is a completely
alien concept to you, as you've repeatedly proven.
As it happens, you're wrong on both counts. The two are not equivalent
as I've just demonstrated, and you were asked to pick only one, and
couldn't even do that. Your problem is that you don't possess the
smarts to grasp this. This was predicted in this thread before you
ever set foot in it!
This was an intelligence test and you predictably **FAILED DISMALLY AS
USUAL**! Why is it that you're so confoundedly stupid that you keep
running flat-footed, face-smacked against the wall into these things?
You really are the most pathetically and congenitally stupid person on
the planet without so much as the shadow of a doubt, and here you've
proven it **YET AGAIN**!!
Another of your problems (apart from cowardice, hypocrisy and chronic
vacuousness) is that you're so scared to death of me that you daren't
even give a straight answer to a simple straight-forward hypothetical
question when you have only two options to choose from and are
requested to choose only one option.
I think this is a good time to flush you and get on to dealing with
people who are worth my time. Clearly there's no point in
administering an intelligence test to someone who has no intelligence.
Earl, you've clearly lost your WITS. And you did it far faster than
even I expected. Thanks for proving my point. Sincerely - thanks!
It's been a balst. Bye Bye now.
Budikka
Mike Painter
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:56:33 GMT, "Mike Painter"
> <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>> Ok, you're a moron.
>> Earl again demonstrates his inability to comprehend that he and he
>> alone holds these beliefs.
>
> You haven't asked the ones I told yet.
There's no need. They have all volunteered the information.
No one supports you.
duke
>Consider the case of a true Christian. This Christian believes in god
>without any shadow of a doubt. Out of curiosity, this Christian reads
>a book which claims there is no god. This Christian has a friend who
>asks the Christian what she is reading. She responds, "This book
>insists there is no god."
>Is the Christian insisting there is no god, or is the Christian merely
>reporting that the book insists there is no god?
>Now let's put that exact scenario into the A/B choice I gave you:
>1. The Christian insisted there is no god.
>2. The Christian said the book insisted there is no god.
>Answer the following question:
>Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
>A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
>B. Saying two different things
>Select either only A or only B as your answer and tell me which of the
>two you have chosen.
Neither applies.
What's it like to live a life of falsehoods, bud the dud?
Dubh Ghall
You tell us, you claim far the greater experience.
Budikka666
> On 26 Jun 2005 17:13:39 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> >Consider the case of a true Christian. This Christian believes in god
> >without any shadow of a doubt. Out of curiosity, this Christian reads
> >a book which claims there is no god. This Christian has a friend who
> >asks the Christian what she is reading. She responds, "This book
> >insists there is no god."
>
> >Is the Christian insisting there is no god, or is the Christian merely
> >reporting that the book insists there is no god?
>
> >Now let's put that exact scenario into the A/B choice I gave you:
>
> >1. The Christian insisted there is no god.
> >2. The Christian said the book insisted there is no god.
> >Answer the following question:
>
> >Are propositions 1 and 2 above:
> >A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
> >B. Saying two different things
>
> >Select either only A or only B as your answer and tell me which of the
> >two you have chosen.
>
> Neither applies.
Google has noted your phenomenal and hilarious cowardice - yet again!
You sure aren't shy of embarrassing the heck out of yourself, are you,
Chick? What a riot! Earl Weber: so deathly scared of me that you
daren't even pick a letter in a simple hypothetical question which
cannot harm you in the slightest, and by your laughable cowardice you
harm yourself irreparably! How appallingly pathetic you've proven
yourself to be!
> What's it like to live a life of falsehoods, bud the dud?
I don't know! You tell me: you're the one so buried in lies that you
don't know truth from the hole you've dug for yourself.
Budikka
duke
>Google has noted your phenomenal and hilarious cowardice - yet again!
When did "Google" tell you that? Haahaahaahaahaahaa
Vic Sagerquist
> On 27 Jun 2005 14:47:41 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Google has noted your phenomenal and hilarious cowardice - yet again!
>
> When did "Google" tell you that? Haahaahaahaahaahaa
>
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=duckgumbo
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Plonked by Jason Gastrich for all eternity...
Lovingly plonked by Roger Pearse
______________
"I'm sickened by all religions. Religion has divided people. I don't think
there's any difference between the pope wearing a large hat and parading
around with a smoking purse and an African painting his face white and
praying to a rock."
[Howard Stern]
Budikka666
> On 27 Jun 2005 14:47:41 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> >Google has noted your phenomenal and hilarious cowardice - yet again!
>
> When did "Google" tell you that?
Don't let the fact that you're too stupid to grasp that every lie you
tell is sitting on a server somewhere get in the way of you lying about
everything all the time, by any means.
Budikka
duke
Good grief, this dummy thinks a server is alive, I tell you, ALIVE.
duke
>On 27 Jun 2005, duke dropped trou, farted, whirled, then shouted:
>> On 27 Jun 2005 14:47:41 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>>Google has noted your phenomenal and hilarious cowardice - yet again!
>> When did "Google" tell you that? Haahaahaahaahaahaa
>http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=duckgumbo
haahaahaahaahaahaa
Masked Avenger
> On 27 Jun 2005 14:47:41 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Google has noted your phenomenal and hilarious cowardice - yet again!
>
>
> When did "Google" tell you that? Haahaahaahaahaahaa
>
I gotta admit Earl ........ watching you intellectually disintegrate in
this thread has been a real blast ....... I didn't think it was possible
for you to go any lower ....... but somehow you've managed to provide
the 'definitive' proof that you truly are brain dead .......
--
Masked Avenger
aa#2224
EAC Chief Technician in charge of remotely rigging Fundie 'Spell
Checkers' so they all look like hick home schooled yokels
Does Schroedinger's cat have 18 half lives ?
Budikka666
> >Don't let the fact that you're too stupid to grasp that every lie you
> >tell is sitting on a server somewhere get in the way of you lying about
> >everything all the time, by any means.
>
> Good grief, this dummy thinks a server is alive, I tell you, ALIVE.
I'll make that official lie #18.
You have a very bad habit of lying about what other people said.
Clearly you've decided you're better than any god and no longer need to
keep the ninth commandment.
Budikka
Budikka666
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:29:42 -0500, Vic Sagerquist <add...@withheld.com> wrote:
>
> >On 27 Jun 2005, duke dropped trou, farted, whirled, then shouted:
> >> On 27 Jun 2005 14:47:41 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>Google has noted your phenomenal and hilarious cowardice - yet again!
> >> When did "Google" tell you that? Haahaahaahaahaahaa
>
> >http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=duckgumbo
>
> haahaahaahaahaahaa
Clearly that's the most coherent thing Chick is capable of. If he
could support it with some fact or evidence, that would be something,
but his laughter echoes as hollowly as does his skull when you rap it
with reality.
Budikka
Budikka666
Still waiting on your cowardly ass catching up with the latest two in a
long, long, LONG line of unanswered questions. Are you going to
**LIE** that I plagiarised these as well, just so you have a fake
excuse for your cowardice in addressing them?
#1 is from the Weber Intelligence Test Series. The series is stalled
at question #1 because you couldn't even answer that. The only
conclusion we can offer is that you lost your WITS:
Consider the case of a true Christian. This Christian believes in god
without any shadow of a doubt. Out of curiosity, this Christian reads
a book which claims there is no god. This Christian has a friend who
asks the Christian what she is reading. She responds, "This book
insists there is no god."
Is the Christian insisting there is no god, or is the Christian merely
reporting that the book insists there is no god?
Now let's put that exact scenario into the A/B choice I originally gave
you:
1. The Christian insisted there is no god.
2. The Christian said the book insisted there is no god.
Answer the following question:
Are propositions 1 and 2 above
A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
B. Saying two different things
Select either only A or only B as your answer and tell me which of the
two you have chosen.
Or:
This is the discussion *you* demanded I start. I started it and **YOU
RAN AWAY** 160+ times:
Let's discuss the issue of what God thinks of libel. Let's discuss
what God would think of someone who made false accusations of
plagiarism and let's discuss what God might think would constitute
what's legally required to substantiate true accusations.
If you don't understand the two questions, it's okay to ask for help.
Or you can just run away like you always do.
Budikka
duke
>> When did "Google" tell you that? Haahaahaahaahaahaa
>I gotta admit Earl ........ watching you intellectually disintegrate in
>this thread has been a real blast ....... I didn't think it was possible
>for you to go any lower ....... but somehow you've managed to provide
>the 'definitive' proof that you truly are brain dead .......
Well, I still think Gooble is not alive I tell you, not alive.
Budikka666
> Well, I still think Gooble is not alive I tell you, not alive.
Still waiting on your cowardly retarded ass catching up with the latest
two in a long, long, LONG line of unanswered questions. Are you going
to **LIE** that I plagiarised these as well, just so you have a fake
excuse for your cowardice in addressing them?
#51 is from the Weber Intelligence Test Series. The series is stalled
at question #1 because you couldn't even answer that. The only
conclusion we can offer is that you lost your WITS:
Consider the case of a true Christian. This Christian believes in god
without any shadow of a doubt. Out of curiosity, this Christian reads
a book which claims there is no god. This Christian has a friend who
asks the Christian what she is reading. She responds, "This book
insists there is no god."
Is the Christian insisting there is no god, or is the Christian merely
reporting that the book insists there is no god?
Now let's put that exact scenario into the A/B choice I originally gave
you:
1. The Christian insisted there is no god.
2. The Christian said the book insisted there is no god.
Answer the following question:
Are propositions 1 and 2 above
A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
B. Saying two different things
Select either only A or only B as your answer and tell me which of the
two you have chosen.
Or:
#52
Budikka666
> Well, I still think Gooble is not alive I tell you, not alive.
Dead. Just like you when it comes to debate.
Budikka
Budikka666
long, long, LONG line of unanswered questions. Are you going to
**LIE** that I plagiarised these as well, just so you have a fake
excuse for your cowardice in addressing them?
#1 is from the Weber Intelligence Test Series. The series is stalled
at question #1 because you're so scared of me that you daren't answer
in the format requested. The only conclusion you leave us is that you
lost your WITS:
Consider the case of a true Christian. This Christian believes in god
without any shadow of a doubt. Out of curiosity, this Christian reads
a book which claims there is no god (It's called "Why I am not a
Christian" By Bertrand Russell, BTW). This Christian has a friend who
asks the Christian what she is reading. She responds, "This book
insists there is no god."
Is the Christian insisting there is no god, or is the Christian merely
reporting that the book insists there is no god?
Now let's put that exact scenario into the A/B choice I originally gave
you:
1. The Christian insisted there is no god.
2. The Christian said the book insisted there is no god.
Answer the following question:
Are propositions 1 and 2 above
A. Different ways of saying precisely the same thing, or
B. Saying two different things
Select either only option A or only option B as your answer and tell me
which of the two you have chosen.
Or: