Burkhard actually asked,
> And what is wrong with that, exactly? Does the author try to imply
> they are misidentified, by somewhat disingenuously putting them next
> to a hoax story? Nice use of rhetoric to hide the fact that he seems
> to have no real evidence countering the identification.
This shows either the vast credulity or utter stupidity of Burkhard
(when he even tries to speak on his own recognizance).
What's WRONG with that? It is the epitome of building fantasy
castles in the air. That "logic" in practice is a main reason that
the public considers evolution to be non-science. Another nearly
identical case would be Darwinius. Same bombastic claims
ending in a fast retreat and disgrace.
As I remember, I correcetd some
mistakes of yours -Burkhard
You are wellcome, but should consider getting
a dictionnary of your own - Burkhard
Internet dating, together with plastic surgery,
could mean that one day, every person finds
a breeding mate. Burkhard
If a person doesn't think that there is a God to
be accountable to, then whats the point of trying
to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable
ranges? That's how I thought, anyway. I always
believed the THEORY of