https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/19/stacey-abrams-inflation-wouldnt-be-
so-bad-if-youd-just-let-us-kill-more-babies/
Democrat gubernatorial candidate and erotic romance novelist Stacey Abrams
suggested on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on Tuesday that if women could abort
their children, they wouldn’t have to be so worried about the rising costs
of gas and groceries.
“Having children is why you’re worried about your price for gas. It’s why
you’re concerned about how much food costs,” Abrams said. “For women, this
is not a reductive issue. You can’t divorce being forced to carry an
unwanted pregnancy from the economic realities of having a child.”
Abrams put her rejection of prenatal science on full display last month by
denying that unborn babies have heartbeats at six weeks of gestation,
making the conspiratorial assertion that ultrasound technology instead
uses “a manufactured sound designed to convince people that men have the
right to take control of a woman’s body.” A few weeks later, she falsely
claimed that “it is a fallacy we know exactly when the pregnancy starts.”
Now her blatant admission that babies would be better off murdered —
rather than living in families that are suffering the inflationary effects
of Democrats’ policies — reflects the new mainstream in her party, which
has long abandoned the abortion talking points of “safe, legal, and rare.”
As American leftists actively celebrate the act of baby-killing and invite
women to “shout your abortion,” candidates such as Abrams are increasingly
willing to say the quiet part out loud. In this case, that means
suggesting American parents kill their children to make their paychecks go
further.
Abrams isn’t the first leftist to advance such a cold, Malthusian solution
to economic woes. Just last week, Yahoo! Finance suggested that pro-life
pregnancy centers, which empower women to keep their babies, were
partially to blame for diaper shortages. Headlined “America is facing a
diaper crisis, and the anti-abortion movement is making it worse,” the hit
piece waved away the fact that pro-life groups handed out 1.2 million
diapers in 2019, and landed on the conclusion that women worried about a
diaper shortage should instead be “supported” in choosing to abort their
babies.
Back in May, shortly after the Supreme Court’s draft decision overturning
Roe v. Wade was leaked, Monica Hesse at The Washington Post made this
observation, which implies abortion could alleviate the effects of a baby
formula shortage for women:
…the formula shortage came to a head around the same time that a draft
opinion leaked from the Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. Wade. On
one hand, women would be forced to birth children. But on the other hand,
once those children arrive, there might not be food to feed them.
By insinuating that women should be able to abort their babies to avoid
dealing with shortages of formula, Hesse is pushing the same narrative as
Yahoo! Finance and Abrams: that the solution to economic ills is to
eliminate human beings, particularly unborn babies who cannot advocate for
themselves. Despite the fact that a majority of voters support abortion
restrictions at least as early in a pregnancy as the law at issue in the
Supreme Court’s Dobbs case, the radical position of abortion up to birth
for any reason has become the de facto platform of Democrats like Abrams.
Elle Purnell is an assistant editor at The Federalist, and received her
B.A. in government from Patrick Henry College with a minor in journalism.
Follow her work on Twitter @_etreynolds.
--
"LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
recover with no after effects.
No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.
Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
ballots. Report voter fraud:
sf.n...@mail.house.gov
Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.
Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.
President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.