Don't Believe The Lies About Secondhand Smoke

[Joe Bruno]

http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand-smoke/

[Adam A. Wanderer]

Joe Bruno <ajtan...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6394347b-9395-42cf...@googlegroups.com:

<https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke
/health_effects/>

<http://tinyurl.com/j2j4gsf>

There! Fixed it so it now shows the truth. No need to thank me, just
part of the service liberals perform for the ignorant conservatives.

[Joe Bruno]

On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 9:48:28 AM UTC-7, Joe Bruno wrote:
> http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand-smoke/

The human body is not that frail. We all inhale auto exhaust pollution every day and most of us don't get lung cancer.

[Don Kresch]

On 21 Mar 2017 17:38:46 GMT, "Adam A. Wanderer"

You realize that there isn't a shred of evidence showing that
2ndhand smoke causes anything other than some people to cough when
it's there, right?

Oh by the way: that rant from a script you were about to spew?
Don't bother. I'm an anarchist; it won't work on me.


Don
aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster
Praise "Bob" or burn in Slacklessness trying not to.

[Robert Carnegie]

Auto exhaust doesn't cause lung cancer. Cigarette
smoke causes lung cancer. Are you lying freelance
now? Turned professional?

[Davej]

On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 11:48:28 AM UTC-5, Joe Bruno wrote:
> [...]

If hitting yourself in the head with a hammer causes head injury
then why wouldn't hitting other people in the head with a hammer
also have the clear potential to cause head injuries?

[Joe Bruno]

On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 4:31:26 PM UTC-7, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 18:57:23 UTC, Joe Bruno wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 9:48:28 AM UTC-7, Joe Bruno wrote:
> > > http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand-smoke/
> >
> > The human body is not that frail. We all inhale auto exhaust pollution every day and most of us don't get lung cancer.
>
> Auto exhaust doesn't cause lung cancer.

WRONG

http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/14639/1/Dangers-of-Exhaust-Fumes.html

YOu have a unique combination of stupidity and arrogance.
Sailors would say you ain't rowing with both oars in the water.

[Siri Cruise]

In article <4f064244-ec1b-4799...@googlegroups.com>,

Joe Bruno <ajtan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 4:31:26 PM UTC-7, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 18:57:23 UTC, Joe Bruno wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 9:48:28 AM UTC-7, Joe Bruno wrote:
> > > > http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand
> > > > -smoke/
> > >
> > > The human body is not that frail. We all inhale auto exhaust pollution
> > > every day and most of us don't get lung cancer.
> >
> > Auto exhaust doesn't cause lung cancer.
>
> WRONG

California outlawed smoking where food is sold and where employees would have to
inhale it.

California also has extraordinary regulations to reduce car exhaust as well as
programs to encourage hydrogen and electric cars.

Here it's not one versus the other, but protect bystanders from both.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.

[Mitchell Holman]

Joe Bruno <ajtan...@gmail.com> wrote in

news:4f064244-ec1b-4799...@googlegroups.com:

"Diesel engines do not emit enough carbon monoxide
to kill anybody."
Republican Pat Buchanan, denying that thousands of
Jews were killed by that very method at the Treblinka
concentration camp. (New Republic, 10/22/90)

[Don Martin]

Trivia note: I recently read that spending an average day breathing
in Beijing is the equivalent of smoking 40 cigarettes. That might
explain why so many Chinese there smoke--might as well.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.

[Robert Carnegie]

I don't know about that, but it wasn't because
carbon monoxide gave them cancer.
<https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tf.asp?id=1163&tid=253#bookmark06>

Who sets up a web site called "HealthGuidance.org"
anyway? And who reads it? And tell me if this
is sneaky: it says "16K people like this" -
that's on every page. It's counted for the
entire site.

I accept that diesel exhaust, especially, can
cause serious long term injury to health, maybe
even cancer. But it kills a lot fewer of its
users (not counting the people you mentioned,
and victims of climate change, and vehicle
accidents - okay, maybe don't ignore all those),
and people around them, than cigarette smoke.
Although - that's going to depend on how much
you make a nonparticipant breathe in, of each.
not one person on a bus smoking, for instance,
but one person /not/ smoking. Well, anyway,
smoking isn't coming back. Live with it.
Live without it. (I wouldn't have that
confidence if Donald Trump was a smoker.
In fact, secondary smoke could kill him.
And it might be worth it.)

The unexpected hazard in diesel exhaust is
the sooty particles; until those were considered,
diesel really did seem to be the safer and more
efficient option.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <g8o3dcpaokles9a2i...@4ax.com>,

Don Martin <drdon...@comcast.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:31:24 -0700 (PDT), Robert Carnegie
> <rja.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 18:57:23 UTC, Joe Bruno wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 9:48:28 AM UTC-7, Joe Bruno wrote:
> >> > http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand-
> >> > smoke/
> >>
> >> The human body is not that frail. We all inhale auto exhaust pollution
> >> every day and most of us don't get lung cancer.
> >
> >Auto exhaust doesn't cause lung cancer. Cigarette
> >smoke causes lung cancer. Are you lying freelance
> >now? Turned professional?
>
> Trivia note: I recently read that spending an average day breathing
> in Beijing is the equivalent of smoking 40 cigarettes. That might
> explain why so many Chinese there smoke--might as well.

They've closed the last coal plant in the Beijing area. They're at least
trying.

--

JD


"May your winter feast be an orgy of delight"
-- The Big Furry, Late Show with Stephen
Colbert

[hypatiab7]

On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 12:48:28 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
> http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand-smoke/

Have you been examined for senility, ArtieJoe?

[hypatiab7]

Huge improvement. Thank you!

[hhya...@gmail.com]

On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 12:48:28 AM UTC+8, Joe Bruno wrote:
> http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand-smoke/

So, you don't mind being smoked all the time....being drunk at the bars won't notice anything, let alone smoke.

[hhya...@gmail.com]

You are only aware of his habits now?

[hhya...@gmail.com]

On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 10:46:21 AM UTC+8, Don Martin wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:31:24 -0700 (PDT), Robert Carnegie
> <rja.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 18:57:23 UTC, Joe Bruno wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 9:48:28 AM UTC-7, Joe Bruno wrote:
> >> > http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/22/dont-believe-the-lies-about-secondhand-smoke/
> >>
> >> The human body is not that frail. We all inhale auto exhaust pollution every day and most of us don't get lung cancer.
> >
> >Auto exhaust doesn't cause lung cancer. Cigarette
> >smoke causes lung cancer. Are you lying freelance
> >now? Turned professional?
>
> Trivia note: I recently read that spending an average day breathing
> in Beijing is the equivalent of smoking 40 cigarettes. That might
> explain why so many Chinese there smoke--might as well.

Ya, the pollution is bad and changes are coming...give a bit of time.

[hhya...@gmail.com]

He knows he is getting more senile by the day, and thinking that is the process of being getting old.

[Robert Carnegie]

I'm not sure I'd actually believe that someone
finds it worthwhile to pay him, but, why else?