Global warming and Evolution Hoax confirmed
Frankie Lee
you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
Unless you posture yourself as an enemy of the Christian Faith,
therefore one need to pervert their truths, and indulges in deeds of
deceits and dishonor in order to make the Christians look bad.
For thousands of years intellectuals found no fault in the records of
Moses, or ever complained of their past atrocities, not until a breed
of new slanderers came upon the public scene.
The accounts of Moses contained atrocities, and also implied spiritual
forces at work against the Israelites. The Bible speaks of the Devils’
atrocities and deceptions and yet attackers of the Bible just pretend
that aspect, the works of the devil, again and again.
It was written, for this cause that Jesus was manifested in the flesh
so that He might destroy the works of the Devils.
Is God being ruthless to demand enemies of Israel to be killed, and
even by not letting little kids go? Was the battle instructions God
gave to Moses harsh and unrealistic? Every military strategists and
Historians understood perfectly well, and can easily justify the
actions of Moses and his soldiers but not for the distorter of the
scriptures.
One of the strangest attacks by some intellectuals who had made
against God was: how could God be so ruthless against Israel's
enemies, and even had rules so tough for His own people?
By acknowledging the person God, meaning He is wise, clever and is the
Creator,so would any rational intellectual dispute His ways and
instructions? If it is God’s instruction then no one should have any
dispute, but contrarily if it is fallible man’s idea, then we surely
have something to gripe upon.
It took many generations of war for the Chinese to realize that
enemies’ children must also be killed, lest when he/she grows up, they
will take revenge. Taking the spoils of war, be it their women or
properties were right and sane.Otherwise, let there be no war.
In fact, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, the balance
approach where countries made that as a principle are still a
practice.
In the heat of war of words, Chinese generals made clear to Taiwan
that their Liberation Army were all prepared to attack, and such
decision were made. The Taiwanese made good promises that their
missiles will all reach Hongkong, for she is vulnerable, HK and Macau
are defenseless. It became stalemate and Taiwan was saved.
The Human rights club, the Peace activities and the Islamic world had
been advocating certain kind of doctrines for USA such as never seen
before.
Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton were fooled. We saw Black Hawk down.
Attacks after attacks against US soldiers and people continue unabated
by the Islamic world.Today, they claimed superiority of their
religion, and urge UN to pass Laws to favor only their Faith as
supreme-criminalizing those who criticized their religion.
The voices from them to American, and they advocate USA to play
sitting ducks, and to lie down and lie low, be the victim for the
rapists, so to speak.
Americans, then actually obliged. It was Bush who refused to listen to
world opinion, refused to allow Americans as sitting ducks which cause
the world to hate him and USA.
Today,Obama goes around apologizing for USA,bowing as low as possible,
in a kind of humble postures, thus gaining world recognition and so-
called respect.I, too can gets lot of praise from the atheists' nuts
by compromising with them and agreeing with them,using soothing words
of deceits.
Is that being true to one own principle?
The voices of the Islamic nation,(OIC) which spoke so loudly cursing
the Western civilization, are getting Ovations and recognitions. While
decent folks saw their deeds as a proof of their evilness, they
themselves saw their intimidation against civilized people as
legitimate.
How come our world celebrates weak leaders in the face of crude
realities and terrorism?It surely is a puzzle.
Did Americans get the spoil of war in Iraq? The Oil? Why USA liberates
oppressed people of Iraq and Afghanistan and then turn her wealth and
properties to them in turn gets rebuff and hatred by the International
community?
Bush spends untold billions and blood to reconstruct a nation for
them, support financially and manpower for the largest part of Africa,
fighting diseases and yet he receives no praise from the International
community?
Instead it was Obama who was being praise and even got the Nobel
Prize, for doing nothing.
Mindless nonsense was hurl at my messages. The atheistic mindsets
believe that by acting obnoxious, using foul languages, ridicules and
vulgarities; pretend to be wise so no one would be able to identify
them as crooks and fruitcakes.
It doesn’t take intelligence to glimpse at their self gloating chit-
chat, self congratulatory triumph, to understand their abysmal
handicap sanity. While they supposed their disdain look at others
meant superiority, but to the contrary, their own creditability are at
stakes.
Evolution Theory and Creationism debates allow us to understand the
former actually really has no legs to stand. Who gave a more plausible
explanation of the truths of God? The Atheist or the Christians? Can
one discern which is which, if anyone abides by the objectivity
principle? Human depravity blinds discernment.
The Human Global Warming fraud discovered recently (few days ago) by
some folks, with insurmountable evidence, only goes to show our
judgment were right all along. Why so many decades were people being
subjected to those lies? Will we be able to see apologies after
apologies by proponents of Global warmings, from political leaders to
junk scientists, to shamed Journalists from all over the world? Do you
think Al Gore would apologies on his errors?
Evolution Theory already was found to be a junk science, and it is a
fraud. How is it junk scientists still unable to admit to such
enormous errors? The second law of Thermodynamic and Entropy: as one
prominent scientist put it, nails ET as junk- science conclusively.
Our world is not a place where honor thrives or integrity is
celebrated.
There were many fruitless attempts by the secular world to mock at the
creationist model of explanations, and about the story of Genesis.
Contain in the documents of the creation story, were scientific facts
so accurate and powerful, and its wonders of the accounts continue to
dazzle and bespeaks of the great wisdom of God. Those who mock the
truth of Adam and Eve accounts only mock themselves of their useless
attempt to corrupt the truths.
In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. Time, Space
and Matter were recorded, and God the Lord is greater than all
combined. Everyone accepts Time, Space and Matter, and the
Intelligence of life, so where is the difficulty to believe in God,
the Supreme Being?
The name of God is inscribed in the US $ bill, “In God we trust”, so
where is the rationale to ridicule the’God’and His creative
attributes, and the story of Adam and Eve? Is Atheism found in the
culture of USA and Europe?
North Korea is practicing Atheistic principle. Was that a good model?
Jimbo
> Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
My mother always said that actions speak louder than words, and the
fact remains that the murderous, bloody history of christian
throughout their history gives more testament to their "docterines"
than their words ever could. From forced conversions, murders,
decimating aborigial tribes on three continents, enabling and
providing fresh victims for their pedophile clergy, the list goes on,
and it is very, very long. Certainly no christian, nor christianity
as a whole can claim a moral highground.
Frankie Lee
*** USA and UK have claim moral high grounds and they shouldn't be
ashamed of it,because they have articles enshrine in their
Constitution.
USA particular is renown for her human rights' ideals,although she
fell short.
Since actions speak louder than words,isn't it time to honor the
founding Fathers of USA,who gave freedom to human being,and spoke of
inalienable rights for all.These Christians had live their lives of
honor,so conversion should begin now.
Since action speak louder than words,Jesus sacrifice for our sins on
the cross-it is benevolence and we should rightly accept His words.
Since no one ever measure a person worth so sacred and so
precious,except from Jesus,so it is reasonable that we should come
before Him,acknowledging His words and teachings for our lives.
Uncle Vic
<nothing worth reading>
Why, idiot, do you continue to post your supernatural bullshit to
alt.atheism? Has ANYONE converted yet? You've been shitting on our lawn
for over a month now. ANY conversions?
You've done us one favor, I must admit. You've shown us and the lurkers at
alt.atheism that Christianity is fool's gold. Snake oil. Thank you for
that, dumbshit. And please, keep it up. Show us how stupid you have to be
to be a Christian.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Christians are like Slinkys. They're boring, but they'll put a smile on
your face when you push them down the stairs.
Olrik
Too long and too impersonal.
Olrik
<snip crap>
Virgil
<07c96288-86e6-4f84...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
Frankie Lee <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
There are many institutions in the world that know little and care less
about "what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines".
Consider the Hindus for example.
The Cynic
On Nov 22, 1:39 pm, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
What are they?
> Unless you posture yourself as an enemy of the Christian Faith,
> therefore one need to pervert their truths, and indulges in deeds of
> deceits and dishonor in order to make the Christians look bad.
What are you saying? Write it in English.
>
> For thousands of years intellectuals found no fault in the records of
> Moses,
Hee hee hee. I am sure you won't be able to name these intellectuals.
>or ever complained of their past atrocities, not until a breed
> of new slanderers came upon the public scene.
"past atrocities"? At last you had admitted your lords had committed
atrocities. Good.
>
> The accounts of Moses contained atrocities, and also implied spiritual
> forces at work against the Israelites. The Bible speaks of the Devils’
> atrocities and deceptions and yet attackers of the Bible just pretend
> that aspect, the works of the devil, again and again.
Can you cite from actual history and not fictitious accounts from the
fable book called bible?
>
> It was written, for this cause that Jesus was manifested in the flesh
> so that He might destroy the works of the Devils.
HEY, don't keep repeating that fiction again as the truth. You are
like a kid who believes Santa Claus brings presents. Hee hee hee
> Is God being ruthless to demand enemies of Israel to be killed, and
> even by not letting little kids go? Was the battle instructions God
> gave to Moses harsh and unrealistic? Every military strategists and
> Historians understood perfectly well,
and can easily justify the
> actions of Moses and his soldiers but not for the distorter of the
> scriptures.
Name these people. You are a liar if you cannot!
> One of the strangest attacks by some intellectuals who had made
> against God was: how could God be so ruthless against Israel's
> enemies, and even had rules so tough for His own people?
>
> By acknowledging the person God, meaning He is wise, clever and is the
> Creator,so would any rational intellectual dispute His ways and
> instructions? If it is God’s instruction then no one should have any
> dispute, but contrarily if it is fallible man’s idea, then we surely
> have something to gripe upon.
What are you blabbering?
You have a monkey-mind. Jumping from topic to topic without any focus.
> Evolution Theory and Creationism debates allow us to understand the
> former actually really has no legs to stand. Who gave a more plausible
> explanation of the truths of God? The Atheist or the Christians? Can
> one discern which is which, if anyone abides by the objectivity
> principle? Human depravity blinds discernment.
As a Christian do you believe you are a product of incest? Is that not
a sin? You will not answer but run.
> The Human Global Warming fraud discovered recently (few days ago) by
> some folks, with insurmountable evidence, only goes to show our
> judgment were right all along. Why so many decades were people being
> subjected to those lies? Will we be able to see apologies after
> apologies by proponents of Global warmings, from political leaders to
> junk scientists, to shamed Journalists from all over the world? Do you
> think Al Gore would apologies on his errors?
>
> Evolution Theory already was found to be a junk science, and it is a
> fraud. How is it junk scientists still unable to admit to such
> enormous errors? The second law of Thermodynamic and Entropy: as one
> prominent scientist put it, nails ET as junk- science conclusively.
> Our world is not a place where honor thrives or integrity is
> celebrated.
Wrong. Creation has been dismissed as JUNK!
Global warming is here to stay and destroy.
> There were many fruitless attempts by the secular world to mock at the
> creationist model of explanations, and about the story of Genesis.
> Contain in the documents of the creation story, were scientific facts
> so accurate and powerful, and its wonders of the accounts continue to
> dazzle and bespeaks of the great wisdom of God. Those who mock the
> truth of Adam and Eve accounts only mock themselves of their useless
> attempt to corrupt the truths.
Give irrefutable proof that creation took place. You cannot!!!!!!!!!!
>
> In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. Time, Space
> and Matter were recorded, and God the Lord is greater than all
> combined. Everyone accepts Time, Space and Matter, and the
> Intelligence of life, so where is the difficulty to believe in God,
> the Supreme Being?
Who created god?
> The name of God is inscribed in the US $ bill, “In God we trust”,
Which god are you referring to, Hindu god, Muslim god, Buddhist god,
kitchen god, tree god, water god, sky god etc etc.
> where is the rationale to ridicule the’God’and His creative
> attributes, and the story of Adam and Eve? Is Atheism found in the
> culture of USA and Europe?
> North Korea is practicing Atheistic principle. Was that a good model?
Philippines, Brazil, Mexico are Christian nations. Are they good
models? Look at the poverty, crime and lowdown life there.
Sanity's Little Helper
> *** USA and UK have claim moral high grounds and they shouldn't be
> ashamed of it,because they have articles enshrine in their
> Constitution.
Can you quote something from the UK constitution?
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
"Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
duity, and any response as persecution
Not authentic without this signature.
Frankie Lee
> On Nov 22, 1:39 pm, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> > you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
>
> What are they?
** Why don't you go and find out yourself?How come you are always that
lazy?
>
> > Unless you posture yourself as an enemy of the Christian Faith,
> > therefore one need to pervert their truths, and indulges in deeds of
> > deceits and dishonor in order to make the Christians look bad.
>
> What are you saying? Write it in English.
>
** It is not for you to understand.You are too immature.
>
>
> > For thousands of years intellectuals found no fault in the records of
> > Moses,
>
> Hee hee hee. I am sure you won't be able to name these intellectuals.
**heheheee I am sure you don't know what I am talking about.
>
> >or ever complained of their past atrocities, not until a breed
> > of new slanderers came upon the public scene.
>
> "past atrocities"? At last you had admitted your lords had committed
> atrocities. Good.
** Everyone knows Noah ark,where the whole world was covered with
water.So you believed already?heheeee...heeheee..
>
>
>
> > The accounts of Moses contained atrocities, and also implied spiritual
> > forces at work against the Israelites. The Bible speaks of the Devils’
> > atrocities and deceptions and yet attackers of the Bible just pretend
> > that aspect, the works of the devil, again and again.
>
> Can you cite from actual history and not fictitious accounts from the
> fable book called bible?
**Can you ask your grandmother to show you?
>
>
>
> > It was written, for this cause that Jesus was manifested in the flesh
> > so that He might destroy the works of the Devils.
>
> HEY, don't keep repeating that fiction again as the truth. You are
> like a kid who believes Santa Claus brings presents. Hee hee hee
***Heehee...U have shown great,,, massaging my back....haha!!You are
another Adrian Wiljaya!!heheeee
>
> > Is God being ruthless to demand enemies of Israel to be killed, and
> > even by not letting little kids go? Was the battle instructions God
> > gave to Moses harsh and unrealistic? Every military strategists and
> > Historians understood perfectly well,
>
> and can easily justify the
>
> > actions of Moses and his soldiers but not for the distorter of the
> > scriptures.
>
> Name these people. You are a liar if you cannot!
***Why don't you name them,,or you are a trye liar!!
>
> > One of the strangest attacks by some intellectuals who had made
> > against God was: how could God be so ruthless against Israel's
> > enemies, and even had rules so tough for His own people?
>
> > By acknowledging the person God, meaning He is wise, clever and is the
> > Creator,so would any rational intellectual dispute His ways and
> > instructions? If it is God’s instruction then no one should have any
> > dispute, but contrarily if it is fallible man’s idea, then we surely
> > have something to gripe upon.
>
> What are you blabbering?
*** Go and read again,and again...
*** Then how to make you focus like crazy????
>
> > Evolution Theory and Creationism debates allow us to understand the
> > former actually really has no legs to stand. Who gave a more plausible
> > explanation of the truths of God? The Atheist or the Christians? Can
> > one discern which is which, if anyone abides by the objectivity
> > principle? Human depravity blinds discernment.
>
> As a Christian do you believe you are a product of incest? Is that not
> a sin? You will not answer but run.
*** What are you bladdering??No meaning??
>
> > The Human Global Warming fraud discovered recently (few days ago) by
> > some folks, with insurmountable evidence, only goes to show our
> > judgment were right all along. Why so many decades were people being
> > subjected to those lies? Will we be able to see apologies after
> > apologies by proponents of Global warmings, from political leaders to
> > junk scientists, to shamed Journalists from all over the world? Do you
> > think Al Gore would apologies on his errors?
>
> > Evolution Theory already was found to be a junk science, and it is a
> > fraud. How is it junk scientists still unable to admit to such
> > enormous errors? The second law of Thermodynamic and Entropy: as one
> > prominent scientist put it, nails ET as junk- science conclusively.
> > Our world is not a place where honor thrives or integrity is
> > celebrated.
>
> Wrong. Creation has been dismissed as JUNK!
> Global warming is here to stay and destroy.
*** WSJ..you dumb nut!!No wonder you always are dumb..
>
> > There were many fruitless attempts by the secular world to mock at the
> > creationist model of explanations, and about the story of Genesis.
> > Contain in the documents of the creation story, were scientific facts
> > so accurate and powerful, and its wonders of the accounts continue to
> > dazzle and bespeaks of the great wisdom of God. Those who mock the
> > truth of Adam and Eve accounts only mock themselves of their useless
> > attempt to corrupt the truths.
>
> Give irrefutable proof that creation took place. You cannot!!!!!!!!!!
*** For you? Save it.
Frankie Lee
***I suspect you believe every word I say is true.In any case,I share
to you only the truths.
Frankie Lee
> It is an ancient Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com>, and he posteth:
*** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
Robibnikoff
"Frankie Lee" <leea...@yahoo.com>
<Bullshit deleted>
Oh look, nothing left.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & Belly Dancer Supreme
BAAWA Knight
#1557
Robibnikoff
Robibnikoff
"Frankie Lee" <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cf9adcc0-6ca2-4d65...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Fuck you - Do you own homework, you lazy shit.
Robibnikoff
Robibnikoff
Christopher A. Lee
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Nov 22, 4:21�pm, Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote:
>> It is an ancient Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com>, and he posteth:
>>
>> > *** USA and UK have claim moral high grounds and they shouldn't be
>> > ashamed of it,because they have articles enshrine in their
>> > Constitution.
A liar as well as an idiot, who assumes everybody else is even more
stupid, gullible and ignorant than he is.
>> Can you quote something from the UK constitution?
>>
>> --
>> David Silverman
>> aa #2208
>> Defender of Civilisation
>> "Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
>> duity, and any response as persecution
>>
>> Not authentic without this signature.
>
>*** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
What a fucking moron.
A textbook narcissist who gives the expedient off-the-cuff lie and
assumes people know even less than he does.
Christopher A. Lee
Gurer ner ab negvpyrf "rafuevarq va gur HX Pbafgvghgvba" orpnhfr gurer
vf ab sbezny Oevgvfu Pbafgvghgvba yvxr znal bgure pbhagevrf unir. Jung
gurer vf, vf n pbzovangvba bs pbheg whqtrzragf, fgnghgr ynj, gerngvrf,
cerprqrag naq genqvgvba.
Nosterill
Do you ever answer a question? I can't recall an occasion when you
haven't responded to a question with insults: Never answers - just
insults. My opinion of you and the fraud you represent was never great
and your behaviour isn't making it any better.
Sanity's Little Helper
> On Nov 22, 4:21�pm, Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote:
It's your assertion, you back it up.
Sanity's Little Helper
I think we have a tentative diagnosis on young Frankie. He's certainly a
troll, and probably a sociopath/psychopath of some sort. I detect a level
of narcissism that is way beyond the end of thew spectrum of normality.
I did entertain the possibility that he's an aggravated loki, but there are
clearly still mental health issues there.
Nosterill
wrote:
> It is an ancient Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com>, and he posteth:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 22, 10:19 am, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 22, 4:21 pm, Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote:
>
> >>> It is an ancient Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com>, and he posteth:
>
> >>> > *** USA and UK have claim moral high grounds and they shouldn't be
> >>> > ashamed of it,because they have articles enshrine in their
> >>> > Constitution.
>
> >>> Can you quote something from the UK constitution?
>
> >>> --
> >>> David Silverman
> >>> aa #2208
> >>> Defender of Civilisation
> >>> "Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
> >>> duity, and any response as persecution
>
> >>> Not authentic without this signature.
>
> >> *** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
>
> > Do you ever answer a question? I can't recall an occasion when you
> > haven't responded to a question with insults: Never answers - just
> > insults. My opinion of you and the fraud you represent was never great
> > and your behaviour isn't making it any better.
>
> I think we have a tentative diagnosis on young Frankie. He's certainly a
> troll, and probably a sociopath/psychopath of some sort. I detect a level
> of narcissism that is way beyond the end of thew spectrum of normality.
>
> I did entertain the possibility that he's an aggravated loki, but there are
> clearly still mental health issues there.
I was thinking that for a while but I agree - simulating rabid lunacy
as well as this isn't easy.
VoiceOfReason
The Cynic
> On Nov 22, 3:51 pm, The Cynic <i.thecy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 22, 1:39 pm, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> > > you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
>
> > What are they?
>
> ** Why don't you go and find out yourself?How come you are always that
> lazy?
You are a bloody congenital liar. You can't even backup what you
wrote.
>
> > > Unless you posture yourself as an enemy of the Christian Faith,
> > > therefore one need to pervert their truths, and indulges in deeds of
> > > deceits and dishonor in order to make the Christians look bad.
>
> > What are you saying? Write it in English.
>
> ** It is not for you to understand.You are too immature.
>
In other words, your thoughts are as murky as the sewers.
>
> > > For thousands of years intellectuals found no fault in the records of
> > > Moses,
>
> > Hee hee hee. I am sure you won't be able to name these intellectuals.
>
> **heheheee I am sure you don't know what I am talking about.
>
Brilliant deduction. I and others around here really don't know what
you are mumbling.
>
> > >or ever complained of their past atrocities, not until a breed
> > > of new slanderers came upon the public scene.
>
> > "past atrocities"? At last you had admitted your lords had committed
> > atrocities. Good.
>
> ** Everyone knows Noah ark,where the whole world was covered with
> water.So you believed already?heheeee...heeheee..
>
Noah is a piece of fiction for kiddos. You enjoy it like watching
Batman. hee hee hee
>
> > > The accounts of Moses contained atrocities, and also implied spiritual
> > > forces at work against the Israelites. The Bible speaks of the Devils’
> > > atrocities and deceptions and yet attackers of the Bible just pretend
> > > that aspect, the works of the devil, again and again.
>
> > Can you cite from actual history and not fictitious accounts from the
> > fable book called bible?
>
> **Can you ask your grandmother to show you?
Even my grandmother does not believe in fables unlike you and other
wimps.
>
>
> > > It was written, for this cause that Jesus was manifested in the flesh
> > > so that He might destroy the works of the Devils.
>
> > HEY, don't keep repeating that fiction again as the truth. You are
> > like a kid who believes Santa Claus brings presents. Hee hee hee
>
> ***Heehee...U have shown great,,, massaging my back....haha!!You are
> another Adrian Wiljaya!!heheeee
>
Who is Adrian? Your role model? hee hee hee
>
> > > Is God being ruthless to demand enemies of Israel to be killed, and
> > > even by not letting little kids go? Was the battle instructions God
> > > gave to Moses harsh and unrealistic? Every military strategists and
> > > Historians understood perfectly well,
>
> > and can easily justify the
>
> > > actions of Moses and his soldiers but not for the distorter of the
> > > scriptures.
>
> > Name these people. You are a liar if you cannot!
>
> ***Why don't you name them,,or you are a trye liar!!
As I predicted, you don't know what you are writing. So that makes you
a compulsive liar, doesn't it?
> > > One of the strangest attacks by some intellectuals who had made
> > > against God was: how could God be so ruthless against Israel's
> > > enemies, and even had rules so tough for His own people?
>
> > > By acknowledging the person God, meaning He is wise, clever and is the
> > > Creator,so would any rational intellectual dispute His ways and
> > > instructions? If it is God’s instruction then no one should have any
> > > dispute, but contrarily if it is fallible man’s idea, then we surely
> > > have something to gripe upon.
>
> > What are you blabbering?
>
> *** Go and read again,and again...
>
It is rubbish. Get someone educated to rehash it.
Hmm. You get crazy when you focus? Return to your mental ward.
> > > Evolution Theory and Creationism debates allow us to understand the
> > > former actually really has no legs to stand. Who gave a more plausible
> > > explanation of the truths of God? The Atheist or the Christians? Can
> > > one discern which is which, if anyone abides by the objectivity
> > > principle? Human depravity blinds discernment.
>
> > As a Christian do you believe you are a product of incest? Is that not
> > a sin? You will not answer but run.
>
> *** What are you bladdering??No meaning??
>
Of course, "bladdering" has no meaning. That is your word.
>
> > > The Human Global Warming fraud discovered recently (few days ago) by
> > > some folks, with insurmountable evidence, only goes to show our
> > > judgment were right all along. Why so many decades were people being
> > > subjected to those lies? Will we be able to see apologies after
> > > apologies by proponents of Global warmings, from political leaders to
> > > junk scientists, to shamed Journalists from all over the world? Do you
> > > think Al Gore would apologies on his errors?
>
> > > Evolution Theory already was found to be a junk science, and it is a
> > > fraud. How is it junk scientists still unable to admit to such
> > > enormous errors? The second law of Thermodynamic and Entropy: as one
> > > prominent scientist put it, nails ET as junk- science conclusively.
> > > Our world is not a place where honor thrives or integrity is
> > > celebrated.
>
> > Wrong. Creation has been dismissed as JUNK!
> > Global warming is here to stay and destroy.
>
> *** WSJ..you dumb nut!!No wonder you always are dumb..
>
You are the dumbass and village idiot here. Don't your realise that
everyone is poking you like a pig in a sack. LOL
> > > There were many fruitless attempts by the secular world to mock at the
> > > creationist model of explanations, and about the story of Genesis.
> > > Contain in the documents of the creation story, were scientific facts
> > > so accurate and powerful, and its wonders of the accounts continue to
> > > dazzle and bespeaks of the great wisdom of God. Those who mock the
> > > truth of Adam and Eve accounts only mock themselves of their useless
> > > attempt to corrupt the truths.
>
> > Give irrefutable proof that creation took place. You cannot!!!!!!!!!!
>
> *** For you? Save it.
>
Definitely you don't know but you are lying through your teeth.
>
> > > In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. Time, Space
> > > and Matter were recorded, and God the Lord is greater than all
> > > combined. Everyone accepts Time, Space and Matter, and the
> > > Intelligence of life, so where is the difficulty to believe in God,
> > > the Supreme Being?
>
> > Who created god?
>
> > > The name of God is inscribed in the US $ bill, “In God we trust”,
>
> > Which god are you referring to, Hindu god, Muslim god, Buddhist god,
> > kitchen god, tree god, water god, sky god etc etc.
>
> > > where is the rationale to ridicule the’God’and His creative
> > > attributes, and the story of Adam and Eve? Is Atheism found in the
> > > culture of USA and Europe?
> > > North Korea is practicing Atheistic principle. Was that a good model?
>
> > Philippines, Brazil, Mexico are Christian nations. Are they good
> > models? Look at the poverty, crime and lowdown life there.
Sure you cannot answer the above questions raised by me. Go and jump
into a pigshit pond.
The Chief Instigator
> On Nov 22, 2:18?pm, Uncle Vic <addr...@withheld.com> wrote:
>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> <nothing worth reading>
>>
>> Why, idiot, do you continue to post your supernatural bullshit to
>> for over a month now. ?ANY conversions?
>>
>> You've done us one favor, I must admit. ?You've shown us and the lurkers at
>> alt.atheism that Christianity is fool's gold. ?Snake oil. ?Thank you for
>> that, dumbshit. ?And please, keep it up. ?Show us how stupid you have to be
>> to be a Christian.
>>
>> --
>> Uncle Vic
>> aa Atheist #2011
>> your face when you push them down the stairs.
>
> ***I suspect you believe every word I say is true.In any case,I share
> to you only the truths.
You wouldn't recognize reality if it was shoved up your obviously psychotic
ass. Aside from that, you're completely powerless.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 2 (November 20)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, November 22 vs. Milwaukee, 4:05
Syd M.
Only lies, you mean.
PDW
Larry
news:1fj947nl46mj8.1...@40tude.net:
>> *** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
>
> It's your assertion, you back it up.
>
> --
> David Silverman
> aa #2208
> Defender of Civilisation
> "Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
> duity, and any response as persecution
>
> Not authentic without this signature.
>
>
I just had a flashback to Peter O'Toole playing a rich crazy man who slept
on a cross in his English mansion....but I can't, for the life of me,
remember the movie's title, dammit. The movie was hilarious....much like
this "discussion"....(c;]
--
Larry
Nosterill
> Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote innews:1fj947nl46mj8.1...@40tude.net:
"The Ruling Class"?
Ken
>*** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
>
> What a fucking moron.
>
> A textbook narcissist who gives the expedient off-the-cuff lie and
> assumes people know even less than he does.
Freaky Leaky's mental state:Clinical Sociopathic *NARCISSISM*"
Having 5 of these 9 "qualifies" a person as a narcissist...
How many of these fit him to a "T"?
1. Feels grandiose and self-importance (e.g., exaggerates
achievements and talents to the point of lying, demands to be
recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
2. Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success, fame, fearsome
power or omnipotence, unequalled brilliance (the cerebral
narcissist),
bodily beauty or sexual performance (the somatic narcissist), or
ideal, everlasting, all-conquering love or passion
3. Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being special,
can only be understood by, should only be treated by, or associate
with, other special or unique, or high-status people (or
institutions)
4. Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention and
affirmation - or, failing that, wishes to be feared and to be
notorious (narcissistic supply).
5. Feels entitled. Expects unreasonable or special and favourable
priority treatment. Demands automatic and full compliance with his or
her expectations
6. Is "interpersonally exploitative", i.e., uses others to achieve
his or her own ends
7. Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify with or
acknowledge the feelings and needs of others
8. Constantly envious of others or believes that they feel the same
about him or her
9. Arrogant, haughty behaviours or attitudes coupled with rage when
frustrated, contradicted, or confronted
Sanity's Little Helper
> On Nov 22, 5:55�pm, Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
That's the one. "How do you know you are God?" "Because every time I pray,
I find I am talking to myself".
Uncle Vic
> ***I suspect you believe every word I say is true.In any case,I share
> to you only the truths.
Of course you do. You imagine you speak the truth just as well as you
imagine all this "god" hooey is real.
Sanity's Little Helper
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LC-1X0MaWQE&feature=related
Enjoy!
David Canzi
Frankie Lee <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
>you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
I hear, in the distance, the sound of approaching bagpipes.
--
David Canzi
Uncle Vic
> *** What are you bladdering??
I found this little trinket rather amusing.
Uncle Vic
Free Lunch
wrote in alt.atheism:
>One fine day in alt.atheism, dmc...@remulak.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi)
>wrote:
>
>> In article
>> <07c96288-86e6-4f84...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>> Frankie Lee <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
>>>you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
>>
>> I hear, in the distance, the sound of approaching bagpipes.
>>
>
>I'll get my viola!
I'm not sure that will be enough to drown out bagpipes. You need a brass
band to do that.
Nosterill
> It is an ancient Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com>, and he posteth:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 22, 5:55 pm, Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
> >> Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote innews:1fj947nl46mj8.1...@40tude.net:
>
> >>>> *** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
>
> >>> It's your assertion, you back it up.
>
> >>> --
> >>> David Silverman
> >>> aa #2208
> >>> Defender of Civilisation
> >>> "Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
> >>> duity, and any response as persecution
>
> >>> Not authentic without this signature.
>
> >> I just had a flashback to Peter O'Toole playing a rich crazy man who slept
> >> on a cross in his English mansion....but I can't, for the life of me,
> >> remember the movie's title, dammit. The movie was hilarious....much like
> >> this "discussion"....(c;]
>
> >> --
> >> Larry
>
> > "The Ruling Class"?
>
> That's the one. "How do you know you are God?" "Because every time I pray,
> I find I am talking to myself".
That's the only film that I ever went back to see a second time, in
the same week. Brilliant!
Nosterill
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:09:56 -0600, Uncle Vic <addr...@withheld.com>
> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >One fine day in alt.atheism, dmca...@remulak.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi)
> >wrote:
>
> >> In article
> >> <07c96288-86e6-4f84-9a0e-ebe7edde3...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
> >> Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> >>>you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
>
> >> I hear, in the distance, the sound of approaching bagpipes.
>
> >I'll get my viola!
>
> I'm not sure that will be enough to drown out bagpipes. You need a brass
> band to do that.
And a shotgun. It's essential to puncture the bag from a safe distance.
hoser1605
> On Nov 22, 1:49 pm, Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 22, 12:39 am, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> > > you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
>
> > fact remains that the murderous, bloody history of christian
> > throughout their history gives more testament to their "docterines"
> > than their words ever could. From forced conversions, murders,
> > decimating aborigial tribes on three continents, enabling and
> > providing fresh victims for their pedophile clergy, the list goes on,
> > and it is very, very long. Certainly no christian, nor christianity
> > as a whole can claim a moral highground.
>
> *** USA and UK have claim moral high grounds and they shouldn't be
> ashamed of it,because they have articles enshrine in their
> Constitution.
>
> fell short.
>
> Since actions speak louder than words,isn't it time to honor the
> founding Fathers of USA,who gave freedom to human being,and spoke of
> inalienable rights for all.These Christians had live their lives of
> honor,so conversion should begin now.
>
> Since action speak louder than words,Jesus sacrifice for our sins on
> the cross-it is benevolence and we should rightly accept His words.
>
> Since no one ever measure a person worth so sacred and so
> precious,except from Jesus,so it is reasonable that we should come
> before Him,acknowledging His words and teachings for our lives.
Solid reply idiot.
Jimbo
> On Nov 22, 1:49 pm, Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 22, 12:39 am, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
> > > you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
>
> > My mother always said that actions speak louder than words, and the
> > fact remains that the murderous, bloody history of christian
> > throughout their history gives more testament to their "docterines"
> > than their words ever could. From forced conversions, murders,
> > decimating aborigial tribes on three continents, enabling and
> > providing fresh victims for their pedophile clergy, the list goes on,
> > and it is very, very long. Certainly no christian, nor christianity
> > as a whole can claim a moral highground.
>
> *** USA and UK have claim moral high grounds and they shouldn't be
> ashamed of it,because they have articles enshrine in their
> Constitution.
>
The USA and UK actually exist, and take thier lumps when they claim
the moral highground erroneously.
> USA particular is renown for her human rights' ideals,although she
> fell short.
And when she falls short, she takes the blame, and her lumps. Still
waiting for you to draw some sort of parallel with this analogy....
> Since action speak louder than words,Jesus sacrifice for our sins on
> the cross-it is benevolence and we should rightly accept His words.
You have yet to prove that this jesus fellow existed, or to prove that
he was the son of god, whom you also haven't proven exists. You need
to go back and satisfy those two requirements before you can make
further claims.
[I snipped the remainder of irrelelvant babble]
Larry
news:4f68f518-2b85-40ef...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com:
> On Nov 22, 5:55�pm, Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
>> Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote
>> innews:1fj947nl46mj8.1l
> rjxu6i8...@40tude.net:
>>
>> >> *** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
>>
>> > It's your assertion, you back it up.
>>
>> > --
>> > David Silverman
>> > aa #2208
>> > Defender of Civilisation
>> > "Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a
>> > sacre
> d
>> > duity, and any response as persecution
>>
>> > Not authentic without this signature.
>>
>> I just had a flashback to Peter O'Toole playing a rich crazy man who
>> slep
> t
>> on a cross in his English mansion....but I can't, for the life of me,
>> remember the movie's title, dammit. �The movie was hilarious....much
>> li
> ke
>> this "discussion"....(c;]
>>
>> --
>> Larry
>
> "The Ruling Class"?
>
Thank you
--
Larry
Smiler
> One fine day in alt.atheism, Frankie Lee <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> *** What are you bladdering??
>
> I found this little trinket rather amusing.
Is he taking the piss?
I don't think he has the capability, judging by his piss-poor posts.
--
Smiler
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to
perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer
Smiler
"We're DOOMED, I tell ya. DOOMED!"
Jesus Christ , a long - term fucker of the Prostitute St . Mary 's cunt hole , is an Unique Son of GOD
Uncle Vic
Not if your intention is to scare the bagpiper away.
Cory Albrecht
What's with this unreasonable intolerance of bagpipes? They make
wonderful music!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAztA-Iqb4g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye6caUf2vZM
and of course, the obligatory
Smiler
Sadist!
David Canzi
Uncle Vic <add...@withheld.com> wrote:
>One fine day in alt.atheism, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:09:56 -0600, Uncle Vic <add...@withheld.com>
>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>
>>>One fine day in alt.atheism, dmc...@remulak.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <07c96288-86e6-4f84...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Frankie Lee <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch for
>>>>>you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic doctrines.
>>>>
>>>> I hear, in the distance, the sound of approaching bagpipes.
>>>
>>>I'll get my viola!
>>
>> I'm not sure that will be enough to drown out bagpipes. You need a brass
>> band to do that.
>
>Not if your intention is to scare the bagpiper away.
Maybe this instrument would do the job...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC4n5iIbZG0
--
David Canzi
Uncle Vic
wrote:
> In article <Xns9CCBE93A...@216.196.97.131>,
> Uncle Vic <add...@withheld.com> wrote:
>>One fine day in alt.atheism, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:09:56 -0600, Uncle Vic <add...@withheld.com>
>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>
>>>>One fine day in alt.atheism, dmc...@remulak.uwaterloo.ca (David
>>>>Canzi) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <07c96288-86e6-4f84...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
>>>>> , Frankie Lee <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch
>>>>>>for you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic
>>>>>>doctrines.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hear, in the distance, the sound of approaching bagpipes.
>>>>
>>>>I'll get my viola!
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that will be enough to drown out bagpipes. You need a
>>> brass band to do that.
>>
>>Not if your intention is to scare the bagpiper away.
>
> Maybe this instrument would do the job...
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC4n5iIbZG0
>
A coworker brought in a hand-held game that plays 20 questions. She
claimed it was unbeatable. I beat it on my first try, with "Digeridoo".
It didn't even delve into the world of musical instruments, and its final
guess was "Chess Board".
Another coworker beat it again on the next try, with "Particle
Accelerator". Heh... I guess you have to challenge it with items other
than space ship or motorcycle.
Frankie Lee
Frankie"s reply:
When I ask for your contribution to contribute to the discussion,you
exhibit your dishonesty and went crazy,and you made obnoxious
remark,eg..WHAT A FUCKING MORON.
What you are trying to prove to me were,you yourself are so incapable
to reason except using such remarks,Fuck Off,Moron,Go away,liar..etc..
You: Freaky Leaky's mental state:Clinical Sociopathic *NARCISSISM*"
> Having 5 of these 9 "qualifies" a person as a narcissist...
> How many of these fit him to a "T"?
Me: A narcissist?How come you copied the idea from Ali Sina- so
identical-when he described Obama being a narcissist?
Freaky Leaky?Such narcissism of yours? and you have already shown
yourself to be one,and at the same time accuse me of one?Honestly,u
are stupid.I don't mean to insult.
Frankie Lee
> It is an ancient Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com>, and he posteth:
*** For one who has broken relationship with God,and having a haughty
heart,of course he would find himself talking to himself.
Frankie Lee
> One fine day in alt.atheism, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > ***I suspect you believe every word I say is true.In any case,I share
> > to you only the truths.
>
> Of course you do. You imagine you speak the truth just as well as you
> imagine all this "god" hooey is real.
>
> --
> Uncle Vic
> aa Atheist #2011
> Christians are like Slinkys. They're boring, but they'll put a smile on
> your face when you push them down the stairs.
If my imagined God is true without real solid proof,and real science
and evidence,then I am a fool like USA founding Fathers who gave
USA,and USA Constitution is also fool which inscribed God,right?
Since you cannot be persuaded by decent and honest witnesses,but
gloats along with silly people,whose mindless
insults,"obnoxiousness",and silly retorts were so obvious,I am sure
you are a real fool.It won't be long we will cross over the other side
soon.
Frankie Lee
U: Solid reply idiot.
** I predict you guys will say that,and you did that nonsensical-
reply to confirm my wisdom and great message.Go to my message
again,you stupid fool!
Frankie Lee
>U: You have yet to prove that this jesus fellow existed, or to prove that
> he was the son of god, whom you also haven't proven exists. You need
> to go back and satisfy those two requirements before you can make
> further claims.
Me: U want prove that Jesus existed?Do you want prove that a place
called London, existed?That which is obvious need not further
prove.You cannot understand the evidence and proves which were so
obvious,how are you able to see clearly if I further provide you with
proofs?
Frankie Lee
> One fine day in alt.atheism, dmca...@remulak.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article <Xns9CCBE93AB78A1vic...@216.196.97.131>,
> > Uncle Vic <addr...@withheld.com> wrote:
> >>One fine day in alt.atheism, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> >>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >>>>One fine day in alt.atheism, dmca...@remulak.uwaterloo.ca (David
> >>>>Canzi) wrote:
>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> <07c96288-86e6-4f84-9a0e-ebe7edde3...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
> >>>>> , Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>Every legitimate and decent institutions of our world can vouch
> >>>>>>for you on what Christian teaches and what were their basic
> >>>>>>doctrines.
>
> >>>>> I hear, in the distance, the sound of approaching bagpipes.
>
> >>>>I'll get my viola!
>
> >>> I'm not sure that will be enough to drown out bagpipes. You need a
> >>> brass band to do that.
>
> >>Not if your intention is to scare the bagpiper away.
>
> > Maybe this instrument would do the job...
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC4n5iIbZG0
> A coworker brought in a hand-held game that plays 20 questions. She
> claimed it was unbeatable. I beat it on my first try, with "Digeridoo".
> It didn't even delve into the world of musical instruments, and its final
> guess was "Chess Board".
Reply: How you guys drifted from the issue; chit-chat of insults to
silly talks of nonsense,totally unrelated to the excellent message of
mine!
You guys have proven to be a bunch of nuts and fruitcakes.See for
yourself,those mindless nonsense are proves.
You guys just give any readers here an impression,on how useless and
foolish were your response to my messages and retorts.
Alan Ford
> If my imagined God is true without real solid proof,and real science
> and evidence,then I am a fool like USA founding Fathers who gave
> USA,and USA Constitution is also fool which inscribed God,right?
??? What the shit?
--
If you don't beat your meat
You can't have any pudding
How can you have any pudding
If you don't beat your meat?
Larry
news:heftce$fkr$1...@rumours.uwaterloo.ca:
>>> I'm not sure that will be enough to drown out bagpipes. You need a
>>> brass band to do that.
>>
>>Not if your intention is to scare the bagpiper away.
>
>
My father fought the Germans in the US Army 1st Division in WW2.
He told me the one thing German troops were terrified of was the sound of
those goddamned Scottish bagpipes marching down a road....or across the
desert in Northern Africa.
--
Larry
Christopher A. Lee
>Frankie Lee wrote:
>
>> If my imagined God is true without real solid proof,and real science
>> and evidence,then I am a fool like USA founding Fathers who gave
>> USA,and USA Constitution is also fool which inscribed God,right?
>
>??? What the shit?
Further evidence that he is certifiably insane.
Robibnikoff
"Frankie Lee" <leea...@yahoo.com> babbled.....
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & Belly Dancer Supreme
BAAWA Knight
#1557
Robibnikoff
Robibnikoff
Frankie Lee
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:59:01 -0800, Alan Ford <zzz....@qqq.net> wrote:
> >Frankie Lee wrote:
>
> >> If my imagined God is true without real solid proof,and real science
> >> and evidence,then I am a fool like USA founding Fathers who gave
> >> USA,and USA Constitution is also fool which inscribed God,right?
>
> >??? What the shit?
>
> Further evidence that he is certifiably insane.
***In response to the discussion,you are also calling the founding
fathers as insane.
Robibnikoff
furlan
How about these?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q53Ajkll_kw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzCFYyK8c5g
http://pipinggirl.blogspot.com/2007/08/jazzy-bagpipes.html
--
aa #2301
"...The word that separates that which is dead from that which is
living....In the beginning was the word and that word was...CHOICE"
-- Tom Robbins (SLWW)
Nosterill
Here is the text of the US Constitution:
http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/text.html
Do you know how to do a text search? It's Ctrl F on most browsers. Try
searching for the words "God", "Christ" or "Christian" then get back
to us.
Devils Advocaat
Gee, no mention of God, Christ, Christian or even Jesus in that there
Constitution.
Nosterill
Exactly. It's frustrating how the Jesus-come-lately brigade simply
assume that the constitution is all about them without showing the
least interest in finding out. Of course, Frankie has to go one better
by even appealing to the UK Constitution!
Christopher A. Lee
Wwhere do I do that, pig-ignorant serial liar?
Tell you what, why don't YOU quote where the Constitution does this,
moron?
Christopher A. Lee
It's the expedient lie made up on the spot because they feel they have
to respond.
It's one of the symptoms of their narcissism. They live in their own
little world where they make all the rules.
In their mind these lies, even though they know they're not true,
don't make them liars. More like made-up facts for the duration. It's
the way their alternate reality works. They're just responses to shut
us up.
They are narcissists incapable of understanding the rest of the world
or the people who inhabit it, so they will never understand that
everybody else sees them see them, their lies and their stupidity for
what they are.
And they get mortally offended.
It is only one of the many barriers that are well nigh impossible to
break through.
The Cynic
So Hercules existed. So did Zeus, Jupiter, Odin, Jason etc.
>That which is obvious need not further prove.
Hee hee hee. What is obvious? Are you aware that the grounds for the
existence of Buddha is stronger than that for Jesus?
>You cannot understand the evidence and proves which were so
> obvious,how are you able to see clearly if I further provide you with
> proofs?
Can you ask someone who can write English to rehash the above?
Devils Advocaat
Funny that as the UK Constitution is not a single written document as
the US Constitution is, and it never actually has been.
David Canzi
Our minds wander. We go off on tangents. A mind that runs on
rails is a mind that is chronically frightened of where a moment
of unconstrained thought might take it. Like yours.
Bagpipes are a reference to the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.
--
David Canzi
Frankie Lee
: >You cannot understand the evidence and proves which were so
> obvious,how are you able to see clearly if I further provide you with
> proofs?
You: Can you ask someone who can write English to rehash the above?
Me: Just because you have a poor command of language doesn't mean
others were.If u cannot read simple english,what on earth are you
complaining?You purposely tried to be obnoxious,fully knowing that it
was correct sentences.Or perhaps you didn't know?Don't act like
sotong.Your colors are seen.
Such Ah Beng attitude only degrade yourself in any intelligent
debates.Trust me.How come you still identify yourself as an Idiot?Go
and changed your silly name.
U: Hee hee hee. What is obvious? Are you aware that the grounds for
the
existence of Buddha is stronger than that for Jesus?
Me: Have you ever read history?500 before Jesus Christ was Buddha
born.We live in the year of my Lord,After the Death of Jesus 2009.
Now which part you are still blurrr?
Smiler
No we don't. Nobody does.
That figure, 2009, has nothing to do with the supposed death of your
supposed jesus.
It's about time you idiot christers got your fairy stories straight.
--
Smiler
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to
perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer
Uncle Vic
> If my imagined God is true without real solid proof,and real science
> and evidence,then I am a fool like USA founding Fathers who gave
> USA,and USA Constitution is also fool which inscribed God,right?
That made no sense.
>
> Since you cannot be persuaded by decent and honest witnesses,but
> gloats along with silly people,whose mindless
> insults,"obnoxiousness",and silly retorts were so obvious,I am sure
> you are a real fool.It won't be long we will cross over the other side
> soon.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.
Uncle Vic
> Reply: How you guys drifted from the issue; chit-chat of insults to
> silly talks of nonsense,totally unrelated to the excellent message of
> mine!
>
> You guys have proven to be a bunch of nuts and fruitcakes.See for
> yourself,those mindless nonsense are proves.
>
> You guys just give any readers here an impression,on how useless and
> foolish were your response to my messages and retorts.
So who's going to win on Dancing With the Stars tonight? Wy wife is a big
Donnie Osmond fan. If the popular vote has enough weight, I think he has a
chance.
Larry
@mid.individual.net:
Belly dancer? Why are we talking about religion?!
--
Larry
Larry
3fd0c8...@a10g2000pre.googlegroups.com:
> Reply: How you guys drifted from the issue; chit-chat of insults to
> silly talks of nonsense,totally unrelated to the excellent message of
> mine!
>
>
Frankie, we are ATHEISTS, "free thinkers". Religion and its dogmas bore us
to tears as it's the same pounding over and over.
If you ever screw up and fall into a group of atheists, you'll find a
subject, no matter how serious, has a "mean duration" of about 8 minutes,
when the free thinkers move on to another subject of interest. If we can't
solve it in 8 minutes, flat, it's never going to be solved with this data
and technology.....so, we shelve it until something improves towards a
resolution.....not spend 2000 years harping over nonsense.
It'll pop up again during the next encounter when we can waste another 8
minutes deciding it's still not solvable, yet.
--
Larry
Larry
news:Xns9CCDC7E...@216.196.97.131:
> One fine day in alt.atheism, Frankie Lee <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Reply: How you guys drifted from the issue; chit-chat of insults to
>> silly talks of nonsense,totally unrelated to the excellent message of
>> mine!
>>
>> You guys have proven to be a bunch of nuts and fruitcakes.See for
>> yourself,those mindless nonsense are proves.
>>
>> You guys just give any readers here an impression,on how useless and
>> foolish were your response to my messages and retorts.
>
> So who's going to win on Dancing With the Stars tonight? Wy wife is a
> big Donnie Osmond fan. If the popular vote has enough weight, I think
> he has a chance.
>
Uncle Vic....Ever listen to the PIG, KPIG in Freedom, CA?
...about the most laid back bunch of humans you'll ever meet!
--
Larry
The Cynic
"....... others were" what? Can't you construct a simple sentence? Go
back to primary school.
>If u cannot read simple english,what on earth are you
> complaining?
"english" ? Who taught you English? Ah, then the proverb, "you can
bring a horse (a donkey in your case) to a well but you can't make it
drink water.
You purposely tried to be obnoxious,fully knowing that it
> was correct sentences.Or perhaps you didn't know?Don't act like
> sotong.Your colors are seen.
> Such Ah Beng attitude only degrade yourself in any intelligent
> debates.Trust me.How come you still identify yourself as an Idiot?Go
> and changed your silly name.
What is the meaning of "sotong". Only Ah Bengs use the term. So who is
the Ah Beng here? You. Hee hee hee. (Note: To non-Singaporeans: Sotong
means octopus which is supposedly a slow-thinking and confused
creature. This term is mainly used by the Chinese Hilly Billies or Ah
Bengs, Crankie Lee being one of them.)
>
> U: Hee hee hee. What is obvious? Are you aware that the grounds for
> the
> existence of Buddha is stronger than that for Jesus?
>
> Me: Have you ever read history?500 before Jesus Christ was Buddha
> born.We live in the year of my Lord,After the Death of Jesus 2009.
Do you know actually know history? If you know the origin and
background of the present day calendar you will realize how silly you
are to have posed this question. Fool
> Now which part you are still blurrr?
What is "blurrr"? No such word in English.
Andy W
> On Nov 22, 10:19 am, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 22, 4:21 pm, Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote:
>
> > > It is an ancient Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com>, and he posteth:
>
> > > > *** USA and UK have claim moral high grounds and they shouldn't be
> > > > ashamed of it,because they have articles enshrine in their
> > > > Constitution.
>
>
> > > --
> > > David Silverman
> > > aa #2208
> > > Defender of Civilisation
> > > "Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
> > > duity, and any response as persecution
>
> > > Not authentic without this signature.
>
> > *** Can you contribute to the discussion by providing for us?
>
> Do you ever answer a question? I can't recall an occasion when you
> haven't responded to a question with insults: Never answers - just
> insults. My opinion of you and the fraud you represent was never great
> and your behaviour isn't making it any better.
He won't answer questions. He won't even make the attempt because if
he does, he'll fail, and then he'll have to wonder why he couldn't
answer, and he'll start to question the delusions that prevent him
from knowing what a twat he is. The delusions must be protected at all
costs.
samvaknin
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/npdglance.html
For a more detailed view of pathological narcissism and the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) - click on these links:
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/npdglance.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/personalitydisorders12.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders13.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders14.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/narcissismglance.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq1.html
Other Personality Disorders
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faqpd.html
Pathological Narcissism diagnosed with Other Mental Health Disorders
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq82.html
NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder) and AsPD (Antisocial
Personality Disorder, Psychopathy, or Sociopathy)
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders16.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders15.html
Cyber (Internet) Narcissists and Psychopaths
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal67.html
Narcissism and Religion
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal45.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq47.html
Take care.
Sam