Re: The Science of Entropy Disproves Evolution
Jeanne Douglas
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
JD
bpuharic
<the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>Nor Destroyed.
cool! if only newton knew...
>
>"The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
>"God does not play poker" -- Einstein
yeah but he plays a helluva game of cribbage
RogerN
news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID. They make up strawmen that they claim
theists believe in. Alt.atheism IS the land of make believe!
RogerN
Andre Lieven
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
> \
> \
> \This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
> \
> \JD
>
> Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
-That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without
evidence.-
> almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID.
<Massive Ignorant Fundy Goon Projection>
> They make up strawmen that they claim theists believe in.
Ibid both.
> Alt.atheism IS the land of make believe!
This too. As usual, insane fundy goons have NOTHING...
Andre
Richo
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
Hmmm....
Troll?
Or outstandingly ignorant.
> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
Yeah and the smart guy says it out loud and proud!
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
Ok so you are a Po.
Its so hard to tell these days!
Mark.
Jeanne Douglas
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
>
> \
> \
> \This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
> \
> \JD
>
> Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
Only the theists believe that.
> almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID. They make up strawmen that they claim
> theists believe in. Alt.atheism IS the land of make believe!
Nope, we rely on actual facts.
JD
Richo
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
>
> \
> \
> \This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
> \
> \JD
>
> Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
Yeah? I dont believe any such a thing.
> almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID.
Nah! I don't believe you - do you have evidence for this claim?
> They make up strawmen that they claim
> theists believe in.
No need - the actual claims of theists are wacky enough without having
to make up stawmen.
> Alt.atheism IS the land of make believe!
>
Yeah sure it is. Whatever you say Roger.
Remember the harder you try and believe something the more True it
becomes!
8-)
Mark.
Christopher A. Lee
Why do you feel the need to lie about us to our faces?
Why don't you get an education?
Why do you pretend that the objective results of origins-related
scientific research are anything to do with atheism and vice versa?
Why do you pretend that what has been observed in quantum mechanics
doesn't happen?
Why do you pretend these are beliefs rather than results?
You've been corrected on these falsehoods every time you have pulled
this bullshit.
So why do you keep repeating what you know is falsehood?
What's wrong with you?
ilbe...@gmail.com
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:25:05 -0500, Doc Johnson
>
>
> >Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> >Nor Destroyed.
>
> cool! if only newton knew...
>
>
>
> >"The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> >"God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
> yeah but he plays a helluva game of cribbage
Quote by Einstein : " Everyone who is seriously interested in the
pursuit of science becomes convinced that a Spirit is manifest in the
Laws of the Universe ---- a spirit vastly superior to that of Man, and
one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble
" .
Free Lunch
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Selective quoting from Einstein to support your position only shows us
that you are happy to be mendacious.
bpuharic
gee. this is what he said about the creator god of the bible:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,355323,00.html
the word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of
human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable but still
primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish
---------
doesnt do much for you creatoinists, does it?
>" .
R Brown
"Doc Johnson" <the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:93k3l6pmhsdku1ten...@4ax.com...
>
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
>
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its
> pronounced.)
>
archie dux
<>
Ooooh, is it "Quote Einstein" time again?
Doesn't the time just FLY?
Here ya go, Davey:
"I cannot conceive of a personal God who
would directly influence the actions of
individuals, or would directly sit in
judgment on creatures of his own
creation."
"The word god is for me nothing more than
the expression and product of human
weaknesses, the Bible a collection of
honourable, but still primitive legends
which are nevertheless pretty childish.
No interpretation no matter how subtle
can (for me) change this."
"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and
punishes the objects of his creation,
whose purposes are modeled after our own -
- a God, in short, who is but a
reflection of human frailty. Neither can
I believe that the individual survives
the death of his body, although feeble
souls harbor such thoughts through fear
or ridiculous egotisms. I do not believe
in immortality of the individual, and I
consider ethics to be an exclusively
human concern with no superhuman
authority behind it."
"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards
and punishes his creatures, or has a will
of the kind that we experience in
ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want
to conceive of an individual that
survives his physical death; let feeble
souls, from fear or absurd egoism,
cherish such thoughts."
These, and more, at:
http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/einstein.htm
Wanna go again, Davey?
archie dux
<>
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
OK, I call Poe.
(anyone beat me to it? I mean, this one was pretty
obvious. the boy wasn't evey trying.)
archie
archie dux
> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
>
> \
> \
> \This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
> \
> \JD
>
<>
> Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
> almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID.
Hello, I used to work in the same department with
one of the physicists who proved not only that something
comes from nothing, but that it's happening constantly,
all around us, all the time.
The experiment was SO STUPID that he
received the Nobel in physics for it.
Hope this helps.
archie
bpuharic
<godshol...@heavenmail.org> wrote:
>On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:43:35 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
>wrote:
>mendacious isnt a word, idoit! LOL!
that's a lie! (nyuk, nyuk)
bpuharic
<godshol...@heavenmail.org> wrote:
>
>>" .
>
>Thank you brother IlBeBak, for prooving that Einstein was a Christain
>like us! I dont no why the atheist liers try to deny it cause its a
>prooven fact of histery!!!
>
OK now i KNOW he's a troll!
Christopher A. Lee
<architeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 8, 4:40 pm, "RogerN" <re...@midwest.net> wrote:
>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>> On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>> > Nor Destroyed.
>>
>> \This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
>> \
>> \JD
>>
>
><>
>
>> Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
>> almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID.
>
>Hello, I used to work in the same department with
>one of the physicists who proved not only that something
>comes from nothing, but that it's happening constantly,
>all around us, all the time.
>
>The experiment was SO STUPID that he
>received the Nobel in physics for it.
>
>Hope this helps.
This was the loonie who when we demanded he either prove his pretend
friend or shut up in his very first thread here, demanded proof for
the Statue of Liberty which would convince a solipsist - and lied that
he was "arguing like an atheist".
Don't expect any honesty or intelligence from this one.
Tim Miller
"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures,
or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can
I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical
death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts."
(Albert Einstein, The World as I See It)
Don Martin
wrote:
This one appears to be doing his best at it.
-
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
Robert Wills
>
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
In a debate with Niel Bohr over quantium mechanics, Einstein reemarked
"I'm convinced that God doesn't play dice with the universe". Bohr
responded, "you don't tell God what not to do".
>
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
>
anything. All I've been able to do is disassemble 40+ years old
nuclear power plants. It's a real tragedy and a shame - this is cheap,
reliable and safe energy. Also hydrogen fusion could, with sufficient
funds be possible, but if it became practicable, politics would not
permit it to be used. I'm a dying breed in that I know how to design a
nuclear power source for a plant, but if in the future the US decides
to build new plants, we'll have to import engineers from France,
England or Russia. France is decades ahead of us anyway. Russia isn't.
England(??) maybe.
Robert Wills
Robert Wills
> On 02/08/2011 06:25 PM, Doc Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>> Nor Destroyed.
>>
>> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>>
>> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
> >
> I guess you know that it was "dice" not poker.
> In a debate with Niel Bohr over quantium mechanics, Einstein reemarked
> "I'm convinced that God doesn't play dice with the universe". Bohr
> responded, "you don't tell God what not to do".
>>
>>
>> Doc Johnson
>> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
>> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its
>> pronounced.)
> >
> anything. All I've been able to do is disassemble 40+ years old
> nuclear power plants. It's a real tragedy and a shame - this is cheap,
> reliable and safe energy. Also hydrogen fusion could, with sufficient
> funds be possible, but if it became practicable, politics would not
> permit it to be used. I'm a dying breed in that I know how to design a
> nuclear power source for a plant, but if in the future the US decides
> to build new plants, we'll have to import engineers from France, England
> or Russia. France is decades ahead of us anyway. Russia isn't.
> England(??) maybe.
>
thermodynamics does not confute evolution. In that once an energy
source is accessable, a conversion method is available and a mechanism
for fabrication is in place life happens and continues.
Mike Painter
> On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be
>> Created Nor Destroyed.
>
>
>
Care t put some money on that?
PD
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
Oh dear. You claim to be a nuclear physicist and a professor of
physics at a respected academy in WV.
You misquote Newton's 2nd law as Einstein's 1st law.
Newton's 2nd law has nothing absolutely to do with entropy.
There is no such law that says that entropy can neither be created or
destroyed, and you may be confusing energy with entropy, and
conservation of energy STILL is not Newton's 2nd law.
I think you've just told me everything I need to know about your
knowledge of physics.
>
> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
Meteorite Debris
chipped away at his/her stone these gems of wisdom for posterity ...
>
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
So much ignorance in so few words.
Whoever shall say "thou fool" shall be in danger of hell fire Matt:5:22
--
Remove both YOUR_SHOES before replying
apatriot #1, atheist #1417,
Chief EAC prophet
Jason Gastrich prayed for me on 8 January 2009 and nothing happened.
Apatriotism Yahoo Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apatriotism
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make
you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
bpuharic
<thedrap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 8, 5:25�pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>> Nor Destroyed.
>
>Oh dear. You claim to be a nuclear physicist and a professor of
>physics at a respected academy in WV.
>
>You misquote Newton's 2nd law as Einstein's 1st law.
>Newton's 2nd law has nothing absolutely to do with entropy.
>There is no such law that says that entropy can neither be created or
>destroyed, and you may be confusing energy with entropy, and
>conservation of energy STILL is not Newton's 2nd law.
>
>I think you've just told me everything I need to know about your
>knowledge of physics.
this is why he's a troll..
raven1
Troll-ometer reading: 1.3
>Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>Nor Destroyed.
>
Devils Advocaat
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
Methinks thou art truly confused.
PD
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 03:59:07 -0500, bpuharic <w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:27:35 -0800 (PST), PD
> ><thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Feb 8, 5:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> >>> Nor Destroyed.
>
> >>Oh dear. You claim to be a nuclear physicist and a professor of
> >>physics at a respected academy in WV.
>
> >>You misquote Newton's 2nd law as Einstein's 1st law.
> >>Newton's 2nd law has nothing absolutely to do with entropy.
> >>There is no such law that says that entropy can neither be created or
> >>destroyed, and you may be confusing energy with entropy, and
> >>conservation of energy STILL is not Newton's 2nd law.
>
> >>I think you've just told me everything I need to know about your
> >>knowledge of physics.
>
> >this is why he's a troll..
>
> properly termed "Classical Physics" and were true only until Max
> Planck's phlogiston theory replaced Heisenberg's string theory as a
> better explanation for the molecular composition of the luminiferous
> ether.
Oh dear.
> In 2011, we now understand the Law of the Conservation of
> Entropy
Fascinating. Do tell.
> and how it correlates to the Intelligent Design of the cosmos.
Physics first. Design later.
>
> HTH
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its supposed too be pronounced.)
Paul Myers
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:56:08 -0500, Dr. GW
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <godsholywitn...@heavenmail.org> wrote:
> >On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:43:35 -0600, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
> >wrote:
>
> >><ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>
> >>>On Feb 8, 5:39 pm, bpuharic <w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:25:05 -0500, Doc Johnson
>
> >>>> <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> >Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> >>>> >Nor Destroyed.
>
> >>>> cool! if only newton knew...
>
> >>>> >"The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> >>>> >"God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
> >>>> yeah but he plays a helluva game of cribbage
>
> >>>Quote by Einstein : " Everyone who is seriously interested in the
> >>>pursuit of science becomes convinced that a Spirit is manifest in the
> >>>Laws of the Universe ---- a spirit vastly superior to that of Man, and
> >>>one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble
> >>>" .
>
> >>Selective quoting from Einstein to support your position only shows us
> >>that you are happy to be mendacious.
>
> >mendacious isnt a word, idoit! LOL!
>
> that's a lie! (nyuk, nyuk)
for your edification "DR" GW.
the free online dictionary gives the definition of mendacious as
follows
Adj. 1. mendacious - given to lying; "a mendacious child"
untruthful - not expressing or given to expressing the truth; "the
statement given under oath was untruthful"; "an untruthful person"
2. mendacious - intentionally untrue; "a mendacious statement"
false - not in accordance with the fact or reality or actuality; "gave
false testimony under oath"; "false tales of bravery"
and since your educational knowledge seems to be less that a high
school student should be I will assume you also don't know the
definition of "edification"
edification [ˌɛdɪfɪˈkeɪʃən]
n 1. improvement, instruction, or enlightenment, esp when
morally or spiritually uplifting
2. the act of edifying or state of being edified
Hope this helps "DR" GW
Irreverend Dave
news:144b65e5-2098-4c77...@m27g2000prj.googlegroups.com:
> On Feb 9, 10:25 am, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be
>> Created Nor Destroyed.
>>
>
> Hmmm....
>
> Troll?
> Or outstandingly ignorant.
Perhaps a multi nym troll. Maybe a kook. Maybe both, except that position
has already be filled by K-Man.
>
>> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>>
>
> Yeah and the smart guy says it out loud and proud!
>
>> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>>
>> Doc Johnson
>> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
>> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its
>> pronou
> nced.)
>
> Ok so you are a Po.
> Its so hard to tell these days!
>
> Mark.
>
--
Science addresses questions that may never be answered.
Religion provides answers that must never be questioned.
thomas p.
news:93k3l6pmhsdku1ten...@4ax.com...
>
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
>
>
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its
> pronounced.)
Too obvious. Might as well have a sign around your neck saying "I Am A
Troll".
Robert Wills
> with you that it's a damn shame that us 'merkins are so fricken
> imbecilic that we've refused to advance in nuclear power for the past
> 40 years, and I agree that nuclear power is clean and reliable.
> Christ, the coal plants kill TONS more ppl than the nukes ever could,
> and I wish these fucktards in the US could start to realize that.
>
>
> BTW, do you remember who, during the 2008 presidential elections, was
> the candidate in favor or nuclear power? (I preferred Obama too back
> then, but only because he promised more than he's since delivered.)
>
McCain said he would start an nuclear program to build 40 odd plants
by 2030 and eventually 100. Obama promised he would not oppose nuclear
plants. But I don't expect anything of President Obama in this.
Yet, I believe he could actually be the one person who could get
such a program going. Most of the opposition groups would yield
to his leadership. I don't think he has the interest. It would have
a second valuable effect. It would force competition with oil producers
and lower cost. Electric autos would become more feasable, with
fuel cells and as of yet unknown energy storage systems. This
would have a positive effect on the enviroment, and globle warming.
> I disagree with you, though, that fusion is a viable alternative in
> this year of AD 2011. If you disagree, then do you care to have a
> public discussion about it here?
>
I've been on discussion panels with politicians, EPA, and other
members of alphabet soup groups, even one where a President Carter,
a nuclear engineer himself, was present. Nothing ever became of it.
>
> "Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women
> there hath not risen a greater than Bretts the Baptist"
> -- Matthew 11:11
John Baker
>"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>> Nor Destroyed.
>\
>\
>\This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
>\
>\JD
>
>Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
>almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID.
Well, *you're* certainly that stupid, Rog, since no scientist - and no
atheist - *claims* that "everything came from nothing."
>They make up strawmen that they claim
>theists believe in.
And, like most theists, you accuse others of your own sins.
>Alt.atheism IS the land of make believe!
Thanks to the unwanted presence of morons like you.
>
>RogerN
>
Apostate
<thedoc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 03:59:07 -0500, bpuharic <wf...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:27:35 -0800 (PST), PD
>><thedrap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Feb 8, 5:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>>>> Nor Destroyed.
>>>
>>>Oh dear. You claim to be a nuclear physicist and a professor of
>>>physics at a respected academy in WV.
>>>
>>>You misquote Newton's 2nd law as Einstein's 1st law.
>>>Newton's 2nd law has nothing absolutely to do with entropy.
>>>There is no such law that says that entropy can neither be created or
>>>destroyed, and you may be confusing energy with entropy, and
>>>conservation of energy STILL is not Newton's 2nd law.
>>>
>>>I think you've just told me everything I need to know about your
>>>knowledge of physics.
>>
>>this is why he's a troll..
>>
>
>Not so. PD was correct, although the physics facts he stated are more
>properly termed "Classical Physics" and were true only until Max
>Planck's phlogiston theory replaced Heisenberg's string theory as a
>better explanation for the molecular composition of the luminiferous
>ether. In 2011, we now understand the Law of the Conservation of
>Entropy and how it correlates to the Intelligent Design of the cosmos.
>
>HTH
Just guessing: are the Johnson's related by blood or marridge to the
Corey's?
>
>Doc Johnson
>Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
>(I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its supposed too be pronounced.)
--
Apostate alt.atheist #1931 I've found it!
BAAWA Knife AND SMASHer freelance Minion #'e'
EAC Deputy Director in Charge of Getting Paid,
Department of Redundancy Department
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure
and the intelligent are full of doubt." -- Bertrand Russell
"Mr. Worf, set phasers on "Fuck You" and fire at will."
-- Doc Smartass
"Nature has a dark sense of humor, but life is certainly
one of the things it laughs at."
-- Rinaldo of Capadoccia
e-mail to %mynick%periodaaperiod%myAA#%@gee!mail!dottedcommie
John Baker
>
>Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>Nor Destroyed.
*Entropy* can neither be created nor destroyed? Son, you're setting a
new standard for stupidity.
>
>"The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
The wise man proclaimeth it aloud.
>
>"God does not play poker" -- Einstein
Einstein was not a theist. He was using god as a metaphor.
>
>
>Doc Johnson
>Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
>(I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
Except that it isn't pronounced that way - except by illiterate
morons.
His Exalted Highness the Mahārāja Giuzishavd Puzidatskwurtz
John Baker wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:25:05 -0500, Doc Johnson
> <the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> >Nor Destroyed.
>
> *Entropy* can neither be created nor destroyed? Son, you're setting a
> new standard for stupidity.
What is it about that, that you do not understand, or which scares
you?
> >
> >"The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> The wise man proclaimeth it aloud.
No trully wise man would ever state out loud that there is no God.
If we can't get a man to take Pascal's wager, fully, then at least
that man would have to be mentally deficient to proclaim that no God
exists, don't you agree?
> >
> >"God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
> Einstein was not a theist.
Psshaw! Certainly he was.
> He was using god as a metaphor.
"God" is capitolized. Always.
> >
> >
> >Doc Johnson
> >Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> >(I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
>
> Except that it isn't pronounced that way - except by illiterate
> morons.
English is not my first language, of course, being from India, but
Pres. Bush did indeed pronounciate it "nucular", which by Occam's
razor must be the correct pronounciation.
.. His Exalted Highness the Mahārāja Giuzishavd Puzidatskwurtz, KG
.. τὸ Α καὶ τὸ Ω
Conan the bacterium
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:25:05 -0500, Doc Johnson
>
<>
Well, morons and blatant trolls.
The problem with "Doc" here is that he's a stupid
troll. He keeps on stupidly letting it slip that
he's actually rather intelligent, and it's
trivially easy to see that he's too smart to
be as stupid as he stupidly tries to come
across as.
Or something.
conan
Igor
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
>
You're doing the same thing that Mia Farrow did to that
Chinaman that Woody Allen brought home from the circus!
John Baker
Mah?r?ja Giuzishavd Puzidatskwurtz <giuzi...@live.com> wrote:
>
>
>John Baker wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:25:05 -0500, Doc Johnson
>> <the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>> >Nor Destroyed.
>>
>> *Entropy* can neither be created nor destroyed? Son, you're setting a
>> new standard for stupidity.
>
>What is it about that, that you do not understand, or which scares
>you?
Nothing, Sport. It's just wrong. The correct statement is that
*energy* can neither be created nor destroyed, only altered in form.
And it's not an Einstein quote. It's the first law of thermodynamics.
*Entropy* is the term used to denote the tendency of things, when left
to their own devices, to move toward a state of equilibrium. It's why
cold things (relative to the ambient temperature) warm up and hot
things cool down.
Hope that clears things up for ya, Sunshine.
>
>> >
>> >"The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>>
>> The wise man proclaimeth it aloud.
>
>No trully wise man would ever state out loud that there is no God.
I see that recognizing humorous intent is not one of your strong
points.
>
>If we can't get a man to take Pascal's wager, fully, then at least
>that man would have to be mentally deficient to proclaim that no God
>exists, don't you agree?
Pascal's Wager is fatally flawed - and *I'll* wager you don't even
understand why.
>
>
>> >
>> >"God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>>
>> Einstein was not a theist.
>
>Psshaw! Certainly he was.
Nope. Sorry.
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product
of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still
primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No
interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. "
- Letter to philosopher Eric Gutkind, January 3, 1954
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God
is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share
the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is
mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of
religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of
humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual
understanding of nature and of our own being."
- Albert Einstein to Guy H. Raner Jr., Sept. 28, 1949, quoted by
Michael R. Gilmore in Skeptic magazine, Vol. 5, No. 2
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious
convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not
believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have
expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called
religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the
world so far as our science can reveal it."
- Albert Einstein, letter to an atheist (1954), quoted in Albert
Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas & Banesh Hoffman
I ask you, do those quotes read like the words of a theist?
>
>> He was using god as a metaphor.
>
>"God" is capitolized. Always.
Not in this newsgroup, Skippy.
>
>> >
>> >
>> >Doc Johnson
>> >Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
>> >(I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
>>
>> Except that it isn't pronounced that way - except by illiterate
>> morons.
>
>English is not my first language, of course, being from India, but
>Pres. Bush did indeed pronounciate it "nucular", which by Occam's
>razor must be the correct pronounciation.
Either that or Bush is an illiterate moron...
>
>
>.. His Exalted Highness the Mah?r?ja Giuzishavd Puzidatskwurtz, KG
>.. ?? ? ??? ?? ?
John Baker
Of course he's a troll. But as Chris Lee said, there's no practical
difference between deliberately trying to *look* like an idiot and
actually *being* an idiot. <G>
>
>
>conan
Brian E. Clark
ab7af9...@l22g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, hlwdjsd2
@gmail.com says...
> > > This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
> >
> > Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
>
> Only the theists believe that.
>
> > almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID. They make up strawmen that they claim
> > theists believe in. Alt.atheism IS the land of make believe!
>
> Nope, we rely on actual facts.
Note that contrary to your earlier, hopeful speculation,
Roger has proved that somebody *can* be "this stupid."
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
Brian E. Clark
<t_qdndPwjujuSczQ...@earthlink.com>,
re...@midwest.net says...
> Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
Here's a variation on an old joke:
Q: How can you when Roger N. is lying?
A: He still has a pulse.
Brian E. Clark
the.doc...@yahoo.com says...
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
Some say extropy will conquer entropy. But I think extropy
will eventually run out of steam...
Brian E. Clark
@m27g2000prj.googlegroups.com>, m.richa...@gmail.com
says...
> > Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
>
> Hmmm....
> Troll?
> Or outstandingly ignorant.
Outstandingly ignorant troll.
Christopher A. Lee
This is the stupid, dishonest loonie who when asked to either prove
his god or shut the fuck up about it, demanded we provide the kind of
proof for the Statue of Liberty that would convince a solipsist.
of Liberty "because he was arguing like an atheist".
Never mind that here came here to talk about his god as if it were
real.
bpuharic
<thedoc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 03:59:07 -0500, bpuharic <wf...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:27:35 -0800 (PST), PD
>><thedrap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Feb 8, 5:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>>>> Nor Destroyed.
>>>
>>>Oh dear. You claim to be a nuclear physicist and a professor of
>>>physics at a respected academy in WV.
>>>
>>>You misquote Newton's 2nd law as Einstein's 1st law.
>>>Newton's 2nd law has nothing absolutely to do with entropy.
>>>There is no such law that says that entropy can neither be created or
>>>destroyed, and you may be confusing energy with entropy, and
>>>conservation of energy STILL is not Newton's 2nd law.
>>>
>>>I think you've just told me everything I need to know about your
>>>knowledge of physics.
>>
>>this is why he's a troll..
>>
>
>Not so. PD was correct, although the physics facts he stated are more
>properly termed "Classical Physics" and were true only until Max
>Planck's phlogiston theory replaced Heisenberg's string theory as a
>better explanation for the molecular composition of the luminiferous
>ether. In 2011, we now understand the Law of the Conservation of
>Entropy and how it correlates to the Intelligent Design of the cosmos.
>
well i'm glad you cleared that up.
PD will be along shortly to register his objections...
bpuharic
<Apos...@yeehaw.org.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>Just guessing: are the Johnson's related by blood or marridge to the
>Corey's?
>
>>
'doc johnson' was the trade name of a line of sex toys awhile ago.
dont know if they're still in business.
Richo
> On Feb 8, 4:40 pm, "RogerN" <re...@midwest.net> wrote:
>
> > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > > Nor Destroyed.
>
> > \
> > \
> > \This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
> > \
> > \JD
>
> <>
>
> > Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
>
> one of the physicists who proved not only that something
> comes from nothing, but that it's happening constantly,
> all around us, all the time.
>
There are two ways of interpreting the vacuum fluctuations that you
are alluding to:
(1) Something can come out of a vaccum -> therefore something can come
from nothing.
(We were wrong to think that something cannot come from nothing)
(2) The vacuum isnt nothing.
(We were wrong to think of the vacuum as nothing.)
I actually vote for number 2 as being the correct understanding.
The vacuum has properties - empty space has properties.
We didnt need the Casimi effect to come to this conclusion.
When James Clerk Maxwell figured out that an electromagnetic wave will
propagate through a vacuum we knew that the vacuum was not nothing.
The vacuum contains force fields - Heisenberg says the fields cannot
be zero at all times - although they can be zero "on average" - so
when the field is non zero - there is something there.
Hence the Casimer effect and "Zero point energy".
Mark.
Stan McCann
news:bmp3l610il8ad8eld...@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:40:20 -0600, "RogerN" <re...@midwest.net> wrote:
>
>>"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com..
>>. On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be
>>> Created Nor Destroyed.
>>\
>>\
>>\This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
>>\
>>\JD
>>
>>Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from
>>nothing, almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID. They make up strawmen
>>that they claim theists believe in. Alt.atheism IS the land of make
>>believe!
>>
>>RogerN
>
> Why do you feel the need to lie about us to our faces?
That's the point; he wouldn't have the guts to lie to our faces. If he
were anywhere near me and spouted his bs, I'd knock the punk out despite
being in a wheelchair.
> Why don't you get an education?
He revels in his ignorance.
> Why do you pretend that the objective results of origins-related
> scientific research are anything to do with atheism and vice versa?
>
> Why do you pretend that what has been observed in quantum mechanics
> doesn't happen?
>
> Why do you pretend these are beliefs rather than results?
>
> You've been corrected on these falsehoods every time you have pulled
> this bullshit.
>
> So why do you keep repeating what you know is falsehood?
>
> What's wrong with you?
It's got to be brain damage. We need a psychiatrist to do a study; we
have evidence that religion causes brain damage.
--
Stan McCann st...@surecann.com
Apostate
I was fairly sure THAT Johnson was in play, but I was asking if the
poster might be kin to Professor Irwin Corey.
His Exalted Highness the Mahārāja Giuzishavd Puzidatskwurtz
You sound terrified, Madame.
Armageddon Fred
>Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>Nor Destroyed.
ROFL!
PD
So... nothing?
archie dux
> On Feb 9, 1:00 pm, archie dux <architeuthis0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 8, 4:40 pm, "RogerN" <re...@midwest.net> wrote:
>
> > > "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:49100101-f3a6-4513...@y4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > > > Nor Destroyed.
>
> > > \
> > > \
> > > \This HAS to be a joke. NOBODY is this stupid.
> > > \
> > > \JD
>
> > <>
>
> > > Hello, in this newsgroup the majority believe everything came from nothing,
> > > almost EVERYBODY here IS THAT STUPID.
>
> > Hello, I used to work in the same department with
> > one of the physicists who proved not only that something
> > comes from nothing, but that it's happening constantly,
> > all around us, all the time.
>
<>
> There are two ways of interpreting the vacuum fluctuations that you
> are alluding to:
> (1) Something can come out of a vaccum -> therefore something can come
> from nothing.
> (We were wrong to think that something cannot come from nothing)
>
> (2) The vacuum isnt nothing.
> (We were wrong to think of the vacuum as nothing.)
>
> I actually vote for number 2 as being the correct understanding.
> The vacuum has properties - empty space has properties.
Actually, I may tend to vote the same way.
On the other hand, Victor Stenger, in his last book
I read, claims that it can be demonstrated that
"nothing" is inherently unstable, and will tend to
evolve into something. Clearly, from the preceding
sentence, I didn't totally get what he was saying
(and perhaps it was just a re-statement of the
virtual particles bit). I should go back and re-read.
>
> We didnt need the Casimi effect to come to this conclusion.
> When James Clerk Maxwell figured out that an electromagnetic wave will
> propagate through a vacuum we knew that the vacuum was not nothing.
I actually wasn't referring to Casimir in my Brush With
Greatness, but to Willis Lamb.
> The vacuum contains force fields - Heisenberg says the fields cannot
> be zero at all times - although they can be zero "on average" - so
> when the field is non zero - there is something there.
> Hence the Casimer effect and "Zero point energy".
>
> Mark.
archie
Rev. Eaton B. Verre
Are you a Jew?
Rt. Rev. Eaton B. Verre
Good and Godly Christain
"Since 1979: HEAling HEAthens, who can now go to HEAven!"
Rev. Eaton B. Verre
Yeah. HE'S the dumb one.
HTH
:-)
Rev. Eaton B. Verre
Huh?
Rev. Eaton B. Verre
<brianecl...@address.invalid.invalid> wrote:
> In article <93k3l6pmhsdku1ten7hq9gg2us5ep41...@4ax.com>,
> the.doc12554...@yahoo.com says...
>
> > Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
>
> Some say extropy will conquer entropy. But I think extropy
> will eventually run out of steam...
All rather unimportant in teh end. God makes the Call.
Rt. Rev. Eaton B. Verre
Good and Godly Christain
"Since 1979: HEAling HEAthens, who can now go to HEAven!"
>
JohnN
> On Feb 8, 3:25 pm, Doc Johnson <the.doc12554...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
>
>
> JD
I don't know, he is a nucular fizzicist.
JohnN
Apostate
That's the Mentos-Diet Coke thing?
>
>JohnN
--
Apostate alt.atheist #1931 I've found it!
BAAWA Knife AND SMASHer freelance Minion #'e'
EAC Deputy Director in Charge of Getting Paid,
Department of Redundancy Department
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure
and the intelligent are full of doubt." -- Bertrand Russell
"Mr. Worf, set phasers on "Fuck You" and fire at will."
-- Doc Smartass
"Nature has a dark sense of humor, but life is certainly
one of the things it laughs at."
-- Rinaldo of Capadoccia
e-mail to %mynick%periodaaperiod%myAA#%@gee!mail!dottedcommie
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
Scott Balneaves
>
> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
Yeah, but the Schrodenberg uncertainty principle states that we can never know
how fast God's going in that box, and if we open it to take a look, all we find
are delicious puff pastries!
So it's kind of a wash.
> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
No no, quote it right. It's "God does not play Crazy 8's", and it's by
Nicolai Tesla.
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
I've been known to ask for bona fides from physicists, but you seem legit.
Brian E. Clark
> Alt.atheism IS the land of make believe!
Sometimes I do fantasize that this newsgroup hasn't been
polluted by trolling theists and lying fools. And when I
think such thoughts, I smile.
pete
>
> In alt.atheism Doc Johnson <the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Einstein's First Law, F=ma,
> > states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> > Nor Destroyed.
>
> Yeah,
No.
"F=ma" is a lot closer to what Newton wrote
than it is to anything that Einstein ever said.
"F=ma" says nothing about entropy.
--
pete
Tim Miller
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:36:02 -0500, pete <pfi...@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Scott Balneaves wrote:
>>> In alt.atheism Doc Johnson <the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma,
>>>> states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>>>> Nor Destroyed.
>>> Yeah,
>> No.
>>
>> "F=ma" is a lot closer to what Newton wrote
>> than it is to anything that Einstein ever said.
>>
>
>
>> "F=ma" says nothing about entropy.
>
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
How many nyms ARE you using at the moment? I've only been back
for a day, so I've only spotted 3...
(And those aren't very good...)
PD
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:36:02 -0500, pete <pfil...@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Scott Balneaves wrote:
>
>
> >> > Einstein's First Law, F=ma,
> >> > states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> >> > Nor Destroyed.
>
> >> Yeah,
>
> >No.
>
> >"F=ma" is a lot closer to what Newton wrote
> >than it is to anything that Einstein ever said.
>
>
> >"F=ma" says nothing about entropy.
>
I've already asked you this question and you haven't responded. What
law of conservation of entropy?
Physics first.
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its supposed too be pronounced.)
Richo
Yeah - I always assumed he was talking about vacuum fluctuations -
just saying it in a different way.
>
> > We didnt need the Casimi effect to come to this conclusion.
> > When James Clerk Maxwell figured out that an electromagnetic wave will
> > propagate through a vacuum we knew that the vacuum was not nothing.
>
> I actually wasn't referring to Casimir in my Brush With
> Greatness, but to Willis Lamb.
Ah interesting! His experimental work was an important step towards
QED.
Cool.
Mark.
>
> archie
Tim Miller
>
>> (And those aren't very good...)
>
>
I seriously doubt you're capable. But PLEASE, don't let me dissuade you!
For the next 60 seconds or so, it's at least possible you'll continue
to amuse me!
Tim Miller
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:15:04 -0500, Tim Miller
> done so more than once before. (And you ran away like a pussy each
> time.)
"We"? You have a gerbil up your ass or something?
Now, see? There you go, making stuff up again. You weren't even
HERE the last time I kicked creationist ass all over this
playground!
I can see I overestimated you. You never even made 60 seconds...
ROFLMAO@U!!
Tut-ank-clay-ton
Saying "entropy means evolution can't happen" is like saying "gravity means
birds can't fly"!
"Doc Johnson" wrote in message
news:93k3l6pmhsdku1ten...@4ax.com...
Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
Nor Destroyed.
"The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
"God does not play poker" -- Einstein
Doc Johnson
Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
(I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its
pronounced.)
Scott Balneaves
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:07:12 +0000 (UTC), Scott Balneaves
> <sbal...@alburg.net> wrote:
>
>>In alt.atheism Doc Johnson <the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Einstein's First Law, F=ma, states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
>>> Nor Destroyed.
>>
>>Yeah, but the Schrodenberg uncertainty principle states that we can never know
>>how fast God's going in that box, and if we open it to take a look, all we find
>>are delicious puff pastries!
>>
>>So it's kind of a wash.
>>
>
> correction.
>
>>> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>>>
>>> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>>
>>No no, quote it right. It's "God does not play Crazy 8's", and it's by
>>Nicolai Tesla.
>>
>
"Ach! Vere iss dat damned serfing-girl!? Mein bier-schtein ist der EMPTY!"
-- Albert "Two Pints" Einstein.
Little known fact: Einstein's famous thought experiment: if you are travelling
at the speed of light, and you try to pour a beer in a glass, you'll DEFINITELY
get some of it on your shirt.
>
>>> Doc Johnson
>>> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
>>> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
>>
>>I've been known to ask for bona fides from physicists, but you seem legit.
>
> Thank you. As do you. :)
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its supposed too be pronounced.)
Jeanne Douglas
Dr. GW <dr...@godmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:46:09 +1000, "Tut-ank-clay-ton"
> <clay...@spamblock.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Saying "entropy means evolution can't happen" is like saying "gravity means
> >birds can't fly"!
> >
> >
>
> Oh Contrerre! Birds flite has been observed but evolution has NEVER
> been observed.
Of course it has. In both the lab and the outside world.
> As a scientest, I no that observation is the
> cornerstone of science.
Then you must be thrilled with all the observations that confirm
evolution.
--
JD
"The good thing about science is that
it's true whether or not you believe
in it."--Neil deGrasse Tyson
Jeanne Douglas
Doc Johnson <thedoc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:36:02 -0500, pete <pfi...@mindspring.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Scott Balneaves wrote:
> >>
> >> In alt.atheism Doc Johnson <the.doc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Einstein's First Law, F=ma,
> >> > states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> >> > Nor Destroyed.
> >>
> >> Yeah,
> >
> >No.
> >
> >"F=ma" is a lot closer to what Newton wrote
> >than it is to anything that Einstein ever said.
> >
>
> Ya think?
>
> >"F=ma" says nothing about entropy.
>
> But you can't deny the Law of the Conservation of Entropy, right?
Bzzzzt. There's no such thing.
Tim Miller
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:33:36 -0500, Tim Miller
> like you and your cronies are so damn dumb that most of you can't even
> see through the paper-thin transparencies that we present here, and
> the only reason you're able to kick the cretinists' butts is because
> they're even stupider than you are.
And the creationists look like Einstein compared to you trolls.
> 2. Any time you run away and hide after a humilitation, rather than
> accept repeated challenges to confront the truth, your ass can safely
> be considered to have been kicked. Of course, it doesn't surprise me
> that your memory really is so short since, as I observed above, you're
> also damn dumb.
What "truth" are you talking about, pinhead? Hell, sonny, you wouldn't
recognize "truth" if you tripped over it while it was humping
your leg.
ROFLMAO@U!!
Devils Advocaat
> Einstein's First Law,
Did Einstein compose any laws of physics?
> F=ma,
The above is nothing to do with Einstein.
> states that Entropy Can Neither Be Created
> Nor Destroyed.
Wrong.
>
> "The fool that said in his heart, there is no God" -- Psalms 14.1
>
> "God does not play poker" -- Einstein
>
> Doc Johnson
> Nucular Physicist and published member of ICR
> (I know how to spell Nuclear, but I prefer to spell it the way its pronounced.)
Then you should spell it nookleeah :P
John Baker
<hlw...@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote:
>In article <s2i9l6dqk65uc4j3s...@4ax.com>,
> Dr. GW <dr...@godmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:46:09 +1000, "Tut-ank-clay-ton"
>> <clay...@spamblock.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Saying "entropy means evolution can't happen" is like saying "gravity means
>> >birds can't fly"!
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Oh Contrerre! Birds flite has been observed but evolution has NEVER
>> been observed.
>
>Of course it has. In both the lab and the outside world.
>
>> As a scientest, I no that observation is the
>> cornerstone of science.
>
>Then you must be thrilled with all the observations that confirm
>evolution.
And if you believe this clown is a scientist, I have a very nice
bridge in Brooklyn for sale. ;-)