On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:06:45 -0800, Mike Painter
Odd...my idea of Freedom and Free Speech was formulated by some old
dead white guys when they signed the Constitution.
Funny that eh?
Seen this btw?
Posted on Sunday, November 11, 2012 7:57:06 PM by mgist
Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud Rachel Alexander
Nov 11, 2012
There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama
in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in
the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who
wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably
did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's
race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly
minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black
president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote
for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to
keep on giving, despite the long-term unsustainability.
In spite of those odds, polls indicated that Romney was going to win
the election. The economy is close to Great Depression era conditions,
and unemployment is almost as high as when Obama entered office.
Economic conditions became so dire after Obama took office it prompted
the rise of an entire new movement, the Tea Party. Presidents rarely
win reelection when the economy is in the tank.
So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and
pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns?
The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states.
According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered
voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in
Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible
adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio's Wood County,
there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote.
An additional 31 of Ohio's 88 counties have voter registration rates
over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama
miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and
received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally
removed.
The inflated numbers can't just reflect voters who have moved, because
the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast
majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want
to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote,
one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest
counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means
the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration
level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by Videographer
James O'Keefe, known for his undercover videos exposing left wing
fraud, caught a Virginia Democratic Congressman's son on video in
October explaining how to commit voter fraud. Patrick Moran, the son
of Rep. Jim Moran, told O'Keefe's videographer that in order to make a
vote for someone else, you'd need two pieces of identification, such
as a utility bill, explaining, "they can fake a utility bill with
ease, you know?" He went on to advise the videographer that he should
also call the voter and pretend to be a polling company in order to
make sure the voter isn't intending to vote. He said that Democrat
attorneys would be located in the polling places to assist him if
challenged casting one of these illegal votes.
In another video, O'Keefe's videographer tells a DNC staffer from
Obama's Organizing for America that she intends to vote in both Texas
and Florida. The staffer laughs and says, "It's cool." The staffer
then prints out a voter registration form for the undercover
videographer and advises her on what to do if she gets caught.
These are just the known instances of attempted voter fraud. How many
instances occurred that were not discovered? Obama's Organizing for
America looked up voters in swing states – many who would not have
bothered voting otherwise – and got them to vote. How did they get
them to vote? They may have given them rides to the polls, they may
have offered to fill out and return their ballots for them, or they
may have voted ballots for the ones who were not going to vote.
Many on the left believe there is nothing wrong with committing fraud
in order to ensure Obama's reelection. It is a common tenet on the
left that the ends justify the means. Saul Alinsky, the 1960's radical
who inspired Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, taught community
organizers like Obama that dishonesty is acceptable if it achieves
your political goals. And when caught, Alinsky teaches radicals to
deny the wrongdoing and change the topic to put their accusers on the
defensive. One Obama supporter brazenly posted on Facebook that he was
voting four times for Obama, asserting that the ends justify the
means.
Aiding Obama's win was a devious suppression of the conservative vote.
The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased drastically since
2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was
enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for
overseas military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in
Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in requests for
ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas military
voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer
overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant
considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.
Voter fraud has been in the works for years. At least 52 employees of
the left wing group ACORN have been convicted of voter registration
fraud. ACORN itself was convicted of the crime of "compensation,"
paying its registration canvassers bonuses to exceed their quotas. In
2008, 36% of ACORN's voter registrations were invalidated. Left wing
political pundit Chris Matthews admitted last year that pretending to
call someone from a polling company, then voting their ballot for
them, has been happening in big cities since the 1950's. He admitted
he knows that kind of voter fraud takes place in Philadelphia.
Strong-arming people into voting who really have no desire to vote
undermines our form of government. People do not choose to vote
because they are uninformed about the issues and candidates, are lazy,
cynical, or are content with the status quo. Voting someone else's
ballot for them is cheating the system and essentially giving yourself
two votes.
When people claim that Obama won because the economy was improving, or
because Americans generally think he is doing a good job, it is not
true. He won through dishonest methods and rhetoric. Many of the votes
cast in the swing states were cajoled, some legally and perhaps even
more illegally, into supporting him. If voter fraud becomes
acceptable, then maybe Donald Trump is right: it's time for a
revolution.