The Trial of Joe Bruno

[Joe Bruno]

Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him

Judge Christoper Lee:Lies noted

Bruno:No evidence has been presented to support the charges

Judge Lee:Lies noted

District Attorney: He's right, Judge. Where is the evidence?

Judge Lee:Lies noted

Jury Foreman:Will someone present evidence so the jury can deliberate the case?

Judge Lee:Lies noted

Presiding Judge later, in his chambers:Judge Lee, you cannot conduct a trial without evidence. Doing so violates the cannons of legal ethics.

Judge Lee:Lies noted

Presiding Judge:Judge Lee, you are hereby suspended from the bench until a formal hearing can be held regarding your competency as a judge

Judge Lee:Lies noted

Outside the courthouse,reporters from the media stopped Judge Lee to get his reaction to his suspension and upcoming competency hearing.

ABC news:Judge Lee,what is your reaction to all of this, which could mean the end of your career?

Judge Lee:Lies noted

CBS News:Do you intend to retain counsel to defend you in the upcoming proceedings?

Judge Lee:Lies noted

NBC news:Where are you going now?

Judge Lee:Lies noted

Fox news:Judge Lee, what does your family think about all this?

Judge Lee:Lies noted

[hypatiab7]

Art Tandy's desperation noted.

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
<hypa...@comcast.net> wrote:

>On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:12:06 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
>
>> Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him
>>
>> Judge Christoper Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> Bruno:No evidence has been presented to support the charges

The liar snipped his lies.

Which is a dead giveaway, otherwise he would have left what he wrote,
for all to see for themselves.

But he's too narcissistic to realise this,

>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> District Attorney: He's right, Judge. Where is the evidence?

Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly snipped by
Bruno.

>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> Jury Foreman:Will someone present evidence so the jury can deliberate the case?

Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
Bruno.

>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> Presiding Judge later, in his chambers:Judge Lee, you cannot conduct a trial without evidence. Doing so violates the cannons of legal ethics.

Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
Bruno.

>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> Presiding Judge:Judge Lee, you are hereby suspended from the bench until a formal hearing can be held regarding your competency as a judge

Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
Bruno.

>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> Outside the courthouse,reporters from the media stopped Judge Lee to get his reaction to his suspension and upcoming competency hearing.

Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
Bruno.

>> ABC news:Judge Lee,what is your reaction to all of this, which could mean the end of your career?

Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
Bruno.

>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> CBS News:Do you intend to retain counsel to defend you in the upcoming proceedings?

Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
Bruno.

>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> NBC news:Where are you going now?
>>
>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>>
>> Fox news:Judge Lee, what does your family think about all this?
>>
>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
>Art Tandy's desperation noted.

He just can't stop lying, can he?

[Joe Bruno]

Lies noted.

[Joe Bruno]

On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 7:46:31 PM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
>
> <hypa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:12:06 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him
>
> >>
>
> >> Judge Christoper Lee:Lies noted
>
> >>
>
> >> Bruno:No evidence has been presented to support the charges
>
>
>
> The liar snipped his lies.

ROTFL It's a satire, you dumb shit.It never really happened.

HAHAHAHAHA

ROTFL It's a satire, you dumb shit.It never really happened.
It's a story I made up to mock you.

Come on. Nobody is THAT stupid.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>

[Joe Bruno]

Let's dance, Serbian style, shall we?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtFfU7MFtzQ
>
> >

[Father Haskell]

On Oct 23, 10:12 pm, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
> Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him

Persecution. Paranoid schizophrenia.

[Davej]

On Oct 23, 9:12 pm, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
> Defense Attorney: My client, Joe Bruno, is guilty of the charges brought against him
>


Just plead guilty and go away.

[Joe Bruno]

So, you also missed the fact that my post was a satire?????
It's a made up tale to mock Mr Lee.

Come on. NOBODY is that stupid.

Or ARE YOU?

[Joe Bruno]

Guilty of what?What, exactly are the charges?????

According to Miranda vs Arizona,decided by the Supreme Court in 1967, the accused has the right to be informed of the charges against him.

HEY, FOOL-WHAT ARE THE CHARGES????????????????????????
SPEAK UP,YOU BABBLING JACKASS.

[Syd M.]

Don't attribute to mental illness what can be attributed to as sheer
arrogance and idiocy.

[Joe Bruno]

Not surprising. I knew you were too stupid to catch the satire.

[Don Martin]

I'll settle for his just going away.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

[Joe Bruno]

On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:10:27 AM UTC-7, Don Martin wrote:
> Davej <gal...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 23, 9:12 pm, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >> Defense Attorney: My client, Joe Bruno, is guilty of the charges brought against him
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Just plead guilty and go away.
>
>
>
> I'll settle for his just going away.
>
>
>
> --
>

ROTFL.I'm a businessman. Make me an offer.HAHAHAHAHA

[Mike Painter]

On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:52:03 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno <ajt...@cox.net>
wrote:

>
>ROTFL It's a satire, you dumb shit.It never really happened.
>
>HAHAHAHAHA

Bruno is reminding me more and more of Earl with his repeated phrases,
"HAHAHAHAHA" in this case.

Who does that? Small children, those with the mentality of a small
child, and drunks.
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." ~ Robert Pirsig

[Syd M.]

Satire? I thought it was self mocking.
Can't get enough of it, can you?

[Syd M.]

On Oct 24, 11:10 am, Don Martin <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Davej <galt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 23, 9:12 pm, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> Defense Attorney: My client, Joe Bruno, is guilty of the charges brought against him
>
> > Just plead guilty and go away.
>
> I'll settle for his just going away.
>
>

I think all of us would.

[Syd Maniac]

People like Artie Bruno usually don't realize that they are.
Or won't accept it.

--
PDW


Check out my comic blogs:

http://theincognitomultiverse.blogspot.com/

http://incognitoheroes.blogspot.com/

http://warintime.blogspot.com/

http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/

http://thearrakiscycle.blogspot.com/

[atan...@gmail.com]

That's because you still can't read.

>
> Can't get enough of it, can you?

I had enough of you 10 months ago, you filthy little worm.

[atan...@gmail.com]

Who the fuck is Artie Bruno????????????????Joe Bruno is a nym.
There is no such person, you idiot.

[Syd Maniac]

atan...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:01:00 PM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 8:33 am, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:57:54 AM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:
>>
>> > > On Oct 23, 11:38 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > > On Oct 23, 10:12 pm, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > > > Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > > Persecution.  Paranoid schizophrenia.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > Don't attribute to mental illness what can be attributed to as sheer
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > arrogance and idiocy.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Not surprising. I knew you were too stupid to catch the satire.
>>
>>
>>
>> Satire? I thought it was self mocking.
>
> That's because you still can't read.
>>

<Yawn> Sez you.
And you don't matter.

>> Can't get enough of it, can you?
>
> I had enough of you 10 months ago, you filthy little worm.

So fuck off out of our newsgroup, asshole.

[Syd Maniac]

Oh, hello, Artie Bruno.
I see you've got a new sock.

[Doc Smartass]

Joe Bruno <ajt...@cox.net> wrote in news:334c47ec-78af-4fb0-8172-
80dc09...@googlegroups.com:

> Subject: The Trial of Joe Bruno

Guilty of stupid. Sentenced to remainder of life to being an idiot.

--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling aa # 1939

Kooks! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Books! http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Everything Else! http://pareidolia-global.blogspot.com/

Republicans are to Patriotism what Pimps are to Feminism.

[Joe Bruno]

On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:10:26 PM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:
> atan...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:01:00 PM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:
>
> >> On Oct 24, 8:33 am, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> > On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:57:54 AM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> > > On Oct 23, 11:38 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > > > On Oct 23, 10:12 pm, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > > > > Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > > > Persecution.  Paranoid schizophrenia.
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > > Don't attribute to mental illness what can be attributed to as sheer
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > > arrogance and idiocy.
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > Not surprising. I knew you were too stupid to catch the satire.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Satire? I thought it was self mocking.
>
> >
>
> > That's because you still can't read.
>
> >>
>
>
>
> <Yawn> Sez you.
>
> And you don't matter.
>
>
>
> >> Can't get enough of it, can you?
>
> >
>
> > I had enough of you 10 months ago, you filthy little worm.
>
>
>
> So fuck off out of our newsgroup, asshole.

It doesn't belong to you. If it did, you could keep me out.
>
>
>
> --
>

[hypatiab7]

We know that you made it up to mock Christopher. What
you don't understand is that you ended up mocking yourself. We were all laughing at you, Joe/Art.

[Don Martin]

Doc Smartass <Fortbr...@yahoobrick.com> wrote:
> Joe Bruno <ajt...@cox.net> wrote in news:334c47ec-78af-4fb0-8172-
> 80dc09...@googlegroups.com:
>
>> Subject: The Trial of Joe Bruno
>
> Guilty of stupid. Sentenced to remainder of life to being an idiot.

Hallelujah! He is at least sentenced to something he excells at!

[Joe Bruno]

And that is important because??????????????????????

[Mike Painter]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > Come on. NOBODY is that stupid.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Or ARE YOU?
>>
>>
>>
>> We know that you made it up to mock Christopher. What
>>
>> you don't understand is that you ended up mocking yourself. We were all laughing at you, Joe/Art.
>
>And that is important because??????????????????????

It's not important, it is funny.

[Syd M.]

On Oct 25, 12:44 am, Joe Bruno <atandy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:10:26 PM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:

It sure as hell ain't yours, religious dingbat.

[Joe Bruno]

On Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:11:46 AM UTC-7, Mike Painter wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>
> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> > Come on. NOBODY is that stupid.
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > Or ARE YOU?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> We know that you made it up to mock Christopher. What
>
> >>
>
> >> you don't understand is that you ended up mocking yourself. We were all laughing at you, Joe/Art.
>
> >
>
> >And that is important because??????????????????????
>
>
>
>
>
> It's not important, it is funny.
>

I don't take it seriously as funny or important.I learned here months ago
not to rely on you atheists to tell me the truth about anything.

You clods are all manipulators who will say whatever it takes to upset
theists or any other opponent in debate, whether it is true or not.That's why I laugh so hard when
you call me a "troll".
You all remind me of a nine-year old girl.

Mike Lovell is the worst offender, but you all do it.
>

[Joe Bruno]

It's a snakepit full of scum and ignorance. I don't want it.

[Syd M.]

Good.
Then get out.

[Joe Bruno]

I don't take orders from worms.

[Syd Maniac]

<Shrug> Then don't complain when you are treated with all the respect
you give, asshole.

[Joe Bruno]

Where have I complained?Respect from scum like you has no value to me.
>
>
>

[Syd M.]

You call us names, asshole.
That implies something.

[Joe Bruno]

It means I despise you.Gee whiz. Anyone but you can figure that out.

[Mike Painter]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:14:29 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>
>> It sure as hell ain't yours, religious dingbat.
>
>It's a snakepit full of scum and ignorance. I don't want it.

And yet you don't seem to stay away.

[Mike Painter]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>It means I despise you.Gee whiz. Anyone but you can figure that out.

We are scum.
We are ignorant.
We live in a snake pit
Beano despises us.

I'm guessing that he keeps coming back because we are the only ones
who will respond to his brilliant comments.

Either that, or like Earl, he is a masochist and likes the attention.

[Syd M.]

Oh, I figured out long ago that your just here to antagonize us, just
like the arrogant asshole that you are.

[Syd M.]

On Oct 27, 1:51 pm, Mike Painter <mddotpain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>

> <atandy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >It means I despise you.Gee whiz. Anyone but you can figure that out.
>
> We are scum.
> We are ignorant.
> We live in a snake pit
> Beano despises us.
>
> I'm guessing that he keeps coming back because we are the only ones
> who will respond to his brilliant comments.
>
> Either that, or like Earl, he is a masochist and likes the attention.
>

I'm going with option 'B', M'Lord.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <6k7o88h9ldkd5rsal...@4ax.com>,

Mike Painter <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >It means I despise you.Gee whiz. Anyone but you can figure that out.
>
>
> We are scum.
> We are ignorant.
> We live in a snake pit
> Beano despises us.
>
> I'm guessing that he keeps coming back because we are the only ones
> who will respond to his brilliant comments.
>
> Either that, or like Earl, he is a masochist and likes the attention.

The simplest and best explanation is that they came to troll and became
trapped. Since they will never get the response they want (us agreeing
with them and believing in their god) they cannot ever leave.

In other words, they're stuck being our toys, to play with or ignore at
our will.

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:53:49 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>In article <6k7o88h9ldkd5rsal...@4ax.com>,
> Mike Painter <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >It means I despise you.Gee whiz. Anyone but you can figure that out.
>>
>>
>> We are scum.
>> We are ignorant.
>> We live in a snake pit
>> Beano despises us.
>>
>> I'm guessing that he keeps coming back because we are the only ones
>> who will respond to his brilliant comments.
>>
>> Either that, or like Earl, he is a masochist and likes the attention.
>
>The simplest and best explanation is that they came to troll and became
>trapped. Since they will never get the response they want (us agreeing
>with them and believing in their god) they cannot ever leave.

They're "punishing" us.

[Joe Bruno]

On Saturday, October 27, 2012 10:47:50 AM UTC-7, Mike Painter wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:14:29 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>
> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >>
>
> >> It sure as hell ain't yours, religious dingbat.
>
> >
>
> >It's a snakepit full of scum and ignorance. I don't want it.
>
>
>
> And yet you don't seem to stay away.

I said I don't want to own it.
>
> --
>

[Joe Bruno]

On Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:53:51 PM UTC-7, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <6k7o88h9ldkd5rsal...@4ax.com>,
>
> Mike Painter <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>
> > <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> > >It means I despise you.Gee whiz. Anyone but you can figure that out.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > We are scum.
>
> > We are ignorant.
>
> > We live in a snake pit
>
> > Beano despises us.
>
> >
>
> > I'm guessing that he keeps coming back because we are the only ones
>
> > who will respond to his brilliant comments.

ROTFL.
>
> >
>

[Joe Bruno]

I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
you illiterate jackass.

[Joe Bruno]

Lies noted.ROTFL
>

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <d2mo88dc3d7ofv5o5...@4ax.com>,

They may think they are, but that's just another piece of evidence
proving their dleusions.

> >In other words, they're stuck being our toys, to play with or ignore at
> >our will.

[hypatiab7]

What you posted was just more evidence that you're a fool.
Of course, you'll never accept this because of your
bloviated ego. You keep right on demanding evidence of
whatever, yet refuse to give any evidence of your own.
You are your own dead end.

[hypatiab7]

On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:57:31 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:25:30 PM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:
> > Christopher A. Lee wrote:

> > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
> > > <hypa...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > >>On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:12:06 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
>
> > >>> Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him
>

> > >>> Judge Christoper Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> Bruno:No evidence has been presented to support the charges
>
> > > Which is a dead giveaway, otherwise he would have left what he wrote,
>
> > > for all to see for themselves.
>
> > > But he's too narcissistic to realise this,
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> District Attorney: He's right, Judge. Where is the evidence?
>
> > > Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly snipped by
> > > Bruno.
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> Jury Foreman:Will someone present evidence so the jury can deliberate the case?
>
> > > Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
> > > Bruno.
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> Presiding Judge later, in his chambers:Judge Lee, you cannot conduct a trial without evidence. Doing so violates the cannons of legal ethics.
>
> > > Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
> > > Bruno.
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> Presiding Judge:Judge Lee, you are hereby suspended from the bench until a formal hearing can be held regarding your competency as a judge
>
> > > Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
> > > Bruno.
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> Outside the courthouse,reporters from the media stopped Judge Lee to get his reaction to his suspension and upcoming competency hearing.
>
> > > Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
>
> > > Bruno.
>
> > >>> ABC news:Judge Lee,what is your reaction to all of this, which could mean the end of your career?
>
> > > Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
> > > Bruno.
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> CBS News:Do you intend to retain counsel to defend you in the upcoming proceedings?
>
> > > Right above where they were pointed out, and dishonestly trimmed by
> > > Bruno.
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> NBC news:Where are you going now?
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>> Fox news:Judge Lee, what does your family think about all this?
>
> > >>> Judge Lee:Lies noted
>
> > >>Art Tandy's desperation noted.
>
> > > He just can't stop lying, can he?
>
> > People like Artie Bruno usually don't realize that they are.
> > Or won't accept it.
>
> Who the fuck is Artie Bruno????????????????Joe Bruno is a nym.
> There is no such person, you idiot.
>
Joe Bruno is a nym. Art or Arthur Tandy is your real name. I call you
Joe/Art and Christopher calls you Artie Bruno. Both are combinations
of your false and real names. You aren't very bright if you couldn't
figure that out.

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:26:23 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7

He's also hid behind another sock puppet: Murdoch.

[Mike Painter]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:20:49 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno

<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:56:10 PM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:53:49 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>
>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >In article <6k7o88h9ldkd5rsal...@4ax.com>,
>>
>> > Mike Painter <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>>
>> >> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >
>>
>> >> >It means I despise you.Gee whiz. Anyone but you can figure that out.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> We are scum.
>>
>> >> We are ignorant.
>>
>> >> We live in a snake pit
>>
>> >> Beano despises us.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> I'm guessing that he keeps coming back because we are the only ones
>>
>> >> who will respond to his brilliant comments.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Either that, or like Earl, he is a masochist and likes the attention.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >The simplest and best explanation is that they came to troll and became
>>
>> >trapped. Since they will never get the response they want (us agreeing
>>
>> >with them and believing in their god) they cannot ever leave.
>>
>>
>>
>> They're "punishing" us.
>
>Lies noted.ROTFL
>>

And they have to read
EVERY
SINGLE
POST

[Mike Painter]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:06:26 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>>
>> Oh, I figured out long ago that your just here to antagonize us, just
>>
>> like the arrogant asshole that you are.
>
>I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
>you illiterate jackass.

And where does grammar demand that "you're" replace "you are"?

[Joe Bruno]

On Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:06:27 PM UTC-7, hypatiab7 wrote:
> On Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:12:48 AM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:53:55 AM UTC-7, hypatiab7 wrote:
>
> > > On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 3:57:36 AM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
>
> > > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 8:38:41 PM UTC-7, Father Haskell wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 23, 10:12 pm, Joe Bruno <ajta...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him
>
> >
>
> > > > > Persecution. Paranoid schizophrenia.
>
> >
>
> > > > So, you also missed the fact that my post was a satire?????
>
> >
>
> > > > It's a made up tale to mock Mr Lee.
>
>
>
> > > > Come on. NOBODY is that stupid.
>
> >
>
> > > > Or ARE YOU?
>
> >
>
> > > We know that you made it up to mock Christopher. What
>
> > > you don't understand is that you ended up mocking yourself. We were all
>
> > > laughing at you, Joe/Art.
>
> >
>
> > And that is important because??????????????????????
>
>
>
> What you posted was just more evidence that you're a fool.

According to you, which doesn't mean shit to me.
>

[Joe Bruno]

On Saturday, October 27, 2012 6:28:19 PM UTC-7, Mike Painter wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:06:26 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>
> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
>
> >>
>
> >> Oh, I figured out long ago that your just here to antagonize us, just
>
> >>
>
> >> like the arrogant asshole that you are.
>
> >
>
> >I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
>
> >you illiterate jackass.
>
>
>
>
>
> And where does grammar demand that "you're" replace "you are"?

So you can't spell, either?Since you can't read, I'm not surprised.
>
>
>
> --
>

[Joe Bruno]

EVIDENCE??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[Joe Bruno]

Lies noted.

[Mike Painter]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> >
>>
>> >I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
>>
>> >you illiterate jackass.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And where does grammar demand that "you're" replace "you are"?
>
>So you can't spell, either?Since you can't read, I'm not surprised.
>>

Where does spelling come in?

Nowhere in the thread does "your" appear when "you're" should have
been used.
The writer said "you are", proper English and correctly spelled.

So again I ask for the grammar rules that mandates you're instead of
you are.

However if you want a spelling war let us start with "YOu're a filthy
liar" from the "Archeology proves bible history" thread.

To quote you 'The contraction is spelled "You're"'

[Joe Bruno]

On Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:54:46 AM UTC-7, Mike Painter wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>
> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
>
> >>
>
> >> >you illiterate jackass.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> And where does grammar demand that "you're" replace "you are"?
>
> >
>
> >So you can't spell, either?Since you can't read, I'm not surprised.
>
> >>
>
> Where does spelling come in?
>
>
>
> Nowhere in the thread does "your" appear when "you're" should have
>
> been used.

You're lying again. I quote Syd:

> Oh, I figured out long ago that your just here to antagonize us, just
>
> like the arrogant asshole that you are.

I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
you illiterate jackass.

>

Can you stop lying, Painter????????????????????

[Syd M.]

On Oct 28, 1:03 pm, Joe Bruno <atandy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:54:46 AM UTC-7, Mike Painter wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Joe Bruno
>

> > <atandy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
>
> > >> >you illiterate jackass.
>
> > >> And where does grammar demand that "you're" replace "you are"?
>
> > >So you can't spell, either?Since you can't read, I'm not surprised.
>
> > Where does spelling come in?
>
> > Nowhere in the thread does "your" appear when "you're" should have
>
> > been used.
>
> You're lying again. I quote Syd:
>
> > Oh, I figured out long ago that your just here to antagonize us, just
>
> > like the arrogant asshole that you are.
>
> I'm here to correct your bad grammar. The contraction is spelled "You're",
> you illiterate jackass.
>
>
>
> Can you stop lying, Painter????????????????????

Oh. good. Joe Dumbo admits that he's only here to troll.
Thanks for finally being honest, asshole.

[hypatiab7]

Who is this Murdoch (full name) and where does he post? I'd like
to add him to my trolls list.

You know that Art Tandy is going nuts when he starts using up his
saved question marks. He usually does that when he asks for cites
after refusing to give any himself.

[Joe Bruno]

Saved question marks??????



???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:36:06 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7

He used it it to try and get around my killfile a while back.

[hypatiab7]

Anyway, since Joe/Art never gives any cites, evidence or answers
questions we ask, why should we be polite t him? He doesn't deserve
it. And, according to him all the time, he doesn't care. He isn't a
very smart troll and usually lacks any topics of interest. When he
does bring up an interesting historical topic, he invariable gets
it totally wrong. And, the second he realizes that he's been bested
yet again, he starts calling people names. Tres childish. He says
that he is a retired whatever, but he comes across like an angry child.

> > >> There is no such person, you idiot.

> > >Joe Bruno is a nym. Art or Arthur Tandy is your real name. I call you
> > >Joe/Art and Christopher calls you Artie Bruno. Both are combinations
> > >of your false and real names. You aren't very bright if you couldn't
> > >figure that out.
>
> > He's also hid behind another sock puppet: Murdoch.

> EVIDENCE??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Man. It had to take him at least a full month to save up all those
question marks! And, he was too chicken to comment about his name.

[hypatiab7]

On Sunday, October 28, 2012 1:40:32 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
> On Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:36:06 AM UTC-7, hypatiab7 wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 27, 2012 7:28:36 PM UTC-4, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:26:23 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
> > > <hypa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > >On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:57:31 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
> > > >> On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:25:30 PM UTC-7, Syd M. wrote:
> > > >> > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7

Wow! A half year's supply. Joe/Art, you always accuse people of not
recognizing sarcasm when it's obvious that they do. This time you
proved that YOU don't recognize sarcasm when it's flying right over
your pointy head wearing a propeller beanie.

[hypatiab7]

I forgot to mention that the sarcasm was wearing a tiny t-shirt with
the word sarcasm printed across the front.

[hypatiab7]

I stopped playing grammar cop when it made people angry. But, I will
take advantage of this opportunity, since it isn't addressed to anyone
in particular, to say that the past tense of lead (leed) is led not lead
like the ore. There, I feel better now.

[Joe Bruno]

blblblblblblbl

[Dreamer In Colore]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:


<Personal information snipped>

Seriously?

Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.

Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?

Uncheered,
Dreamer
AA 2306

[Dreamer In Colore]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:31:28 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:

>This clown has been stalking and harassing my friends and I for over 10 years, hiding behind one user name after another, pretending to be more than one person, lying about people, insulting posters & cursing at them, in general made an ass out of himself trolling dozens of websites over the last 10 years.
>
>Well, I had enough so I gave him just what he asked for. Validation of his postings.
>
>Now Artie can deal with the repercussions of his actions. He posted ALL that information himself, left it scattered across the web like confetti. I just put all of it in one nice spot for the data miners of not-so-nice people in the dark reaches of the world to find.

So why not just block and delete? The more you feed a troll, the more
validation you give it.

If you go down this route, where do you draw the line?

It's kind of a slippery slope.

Look, I really loathe this troglodyte too, but why sink down to his
level of disgust? Just poke fun... laugh at him, mock him at every
opportunity... I mean, Zeus knows he gives enough opportunity for
that...

Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306

"The more stupid the man, the larger his stock of adamantine
assurances, the heavier his load of faith."

H.L. Mencken

[duke]

Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
change.

The Dukester, American-American
*****
Obama lied to the American people.
Obama pays for it as worst pres ever.
*****

[Dreamer In Colore]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>><Personal information snipped>
>>
>>Seriously?
>>
>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>
>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>
>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>change.

The reason you think I'm a piece of shit is because I don't agree with
your stupid and unfounded belief structure.

The reason I think Joey's a piece of shit is because he demonstrates
it with every asinine post he makes, including the bits where he
wishes that others would die.

You, of course, remain the biggest piece of shit around simply because
you loathe women, you hate gays, you cling to an outdated tract of
contradictory statements as the basis of a completely skewed morality,
and you lack the integrity to improve yourself.

Any more questions, Dork?

[Joe Bruno]

On Friday, November 15, 2013 1:31:28 PM UTC-8, reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, November 15, 2013 12:43:38 PM UTC-8, Dreamer In Colore wrote:
>

> This clown has been stalking and harassing my friends and I for over 10 years, hiding behind one user name after another, pretending to be more than one person, lying about people,

EVIDENCE???

insulting posters & cursing at them, in general made an ass out of himself trolling dozens of websites over the last 10 years.

Name those websites, LIAR

>
>
>
> Well, I had enough so I gave him just what he asked for. Validation of his postings.
>
>
>
> Now Artie can deal with the repercussions of his actions. He posted ALL that information himself,

That is a lie. I never posted my real name to the internet. The atheists on AA
figured it out on their own without my help.I imagine they got it from my email
address.

YOU ARE A LIAR AND RACIST SCUM.I know at least 10 Black people personally who are alot more intelligent than you are and alot smarter than the White Nationalist scum who post to Stormfront.Most of those idiots don't even understand what they read.They can't do simple math and are completely ignorant
of law and history.

[Joe Bruno]

On Friday, November 15, 2013 3:37:25 PM UTC-8, duke wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>
> <dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> ><Personal information snipped>
>
> >
>
> >Seriously?
>
> >
>
> >Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>
> >
>
> >Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>
> >should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>
> >he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>
>
>
> Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>
> change.

It's simple, Duke. Retards are too unstable to control anything they do.
Their emotions run wild 24/7.
>
>
>

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <l4cd89dvffbpljv67...@4ax.com>,

And you can add his refusal to change any of his bigotry even though his
Pope has said he should.

--

JD

"If our country is going broke, let it be from
feeding the poor and caring for the elderly.
And not from pampering the rich and fighting
wars for them."--Living Blue in a Red State (seen on Facebook)

[Dreamer In Colore]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:58:53 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:

>Folks, calm down. Name calling of that nature is unbecoming. Let this be about Artie's lies, not attacking each other.

*grin*... let's call that a five on the irony meter.

I'm name-calling our resident troll because he earned it. I attack
simply on posts, not on height or weight or eye colour or anything
physically identifiable. He, on the other hand, resorts to racial and
sexual slurs because he can't defend his execrable positions.

Every time Dork posts... it's a personal attack. Responding in kind is
a long-honoured tradition of flame warfare, and as long as he
continues to troll, he's consigned to the flames he so lovingly wishes
upon anyone outside his disgusting beliefs.

[Dreamer In Colore]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>><Personal information snipped>
>>
>>Seriously?
>>
>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>
>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>
>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>change.
>

You know, Dork... you're absolutely right. It's clear that you're
uneducated... so obviously you can't change.

Thanks for continuing to point out your own stupidity, Dorkster. Keep
up the good work.

[Mike Painter]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:58:34 -0800 (PST), Joe Bruno
<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>That is a lie. I never posted my real name to the internet. The atheists on AA
>figured it out on their own without my help.I imagine they got it from my email
>address.

That could well be and the Art Tandy, living in the same area, with
the same interests, famous quotes, and occupation might not be you.
I'll bet a nickel that it is you.
http://anxietyforum.net/forum/member.php?32340-Art-Tandy

>
>YOU ARE A LIAR AND RACIST SCUM.I know at least 10 Black people personally who are alot more intelligent than you are and alot smarter than the White Nationalist scum who post to Stormfront.Most of those idiots don't even understand what they read.They can't do simple math and are completely ignorant
>of law and history.

Where was the race of the poster mentioned?

[Joe Bruno]

On Friday, November 15, 2013 9:53:34 PM UTC-8, Mike Painter wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:58:34 -0800 (PST), Joe Bruno
>
> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >That is a lie. I never posted my real name to the internet. The atheists on AA
>
> >figured it out on their own without my help.I imagine they got it from my email
>
> >address.
>
>
>
> That could well be and the Art Tandy, living in the same area, with
>
> the same interests, famous quotes, and occupation might not be you.
>
> I'll bet a nickel that it is you.
>
> http://anxietyforum.net/forum/member.php?32340-Art-Tandy

Liar. The search results are these

Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

[duke]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:41:26 -0500, Dreamer In Colore

<dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>><Personal information snipped>
>>>
>>>Seriously?
>>>
>>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>>
>>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>>
>>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>>change.
>
>The reason you think I'm a piece of shit is because I don't agree with
>your stupid and unfounded belief structure.

Actually no. You present a view that is absolutely void of truth. Until you
learn truth, you should stay off the ng.

>The reason I think Joey's a piece of shit is because he demonstrates
>it with every asinine post he makes, including the bits where he
>wishes that others would die.

And you are different???

>You, of course, remain the biggest piece of shit around simply because
>you loathe women, you hate gays,

I love the women and ignore the queers. They don't bother me at all as long as
they aren't seeking special rights under the disguise of equal rights.

That just goes to show you how confused you are.

>you cling to an outdated tract of
>contradictory statements as the basis of a completely skewed morality,
>and you lack the integrity to improve yourself.

A morality of love and obedience of God and love and service to our neighbor in
need is ...................outdated??? Wow, I never would have imagined that.

>Any more questions, Dork?

Now you know the truth.

The Dukester, American-American
*****
Obama's lasting legacy: If you like your
insurance policy or doctor or hospital, you
can keep them. PERIOD! Haahaahaa
*****

[duke]

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:58:53 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:

>Folks, calm down. Name calling of that nature is unbecoming. Let this be about Artie's lies, not attacking each other.

Oh, let him go. He's a child in man's clothing anyway.

The Dukester, American-American
*****

[duke]

Oh, I understand. Grik doesn't have the common sense needed to see his
mistakes.

The Dukester, American-American
*****

[duke]

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:41:14 -0500, Dreamer In Colore

<dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>><Personal information snipped>
>>>
>>>Seriously?
>>>
>>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>>
>>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>>
>>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>>change.
>>
>
>You know, Dork... you're absolutely right. It's clear that you're
>uneducated... so obviously you can't change.

Well, I sure burn your butt on scripture. What else do yo have in mind for
consideration?

>Thanks for continuing to point out your own stupidity, Dorkster. Keep
>up the good work.

The Dukester, American-American
*****

[Joe Bruno]

On Saturday, November 16, 2013 9:52:28 AM UTC-8, duke wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:41:14 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>
> <dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>
> >><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>><Personal information snipped>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>Seriously?
>
> >>>
>
> >>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>
> >>>
>
> >>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>
> >>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>
> >>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>
> >>
>
> >>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>
> >>change.
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >You know, Dork... you're absolutely right. It's clear that you're
>
> >uneducated... so obviously you can't change.
>
>
>
> Well, I sure burn your butt on scripture. What else do yo have in mind for
>
> consideration?

Dreamer is probably one of those idiots who think "Love Thy Neighbor" is one
of the Ten Commandments.
>
>
>

[Mike Painter]

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 01:56:23 -0800 (PST), Joe Bruno

<atan...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, November 15, 2013 9:53:34 PM UTC-8, Mike Painter wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:58:34 -0800 (PST), Joe Bruno
>>
>> <atan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >That is a lie. I never posted my real name to the internet. The atheists on AA
>>
>> >figured it out on their own without my help.I imagine they got it from my email
>>
>> >address.
>>
>>
>>
>> That could well be and the Art Tandy, living in the same area, with
>>
>> the same interests, famous quotes, and occupation might not be you.
>>
>> I'll bet a nickel that it is you.
>>
>> http://anxietyforum.net/forum/member.php?32340-Art-Tandy
>
>Liar. The search results are these
>
>Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.
>>

I suppose that means something to you.
The above URL is a valid link and I'd have to know what search term
you were using to make sense of your comment.

"Art Tandy" San Diego also gives many references with your name.

[hhya...@gmail.com]

On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:12:06 AM UTC+8, Joe Bruno wrote:
> Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him

Oh, now the Fake Jew is putting himself on trial.....hahahahhahahaha

[hhya...@gmail.com]

Idiot.....
Only a real retard would put himself on trial.
And you haven't listed out all the crimes committed.
>

[Joe Bruno]

On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 7:46:31 PM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7
>

> <hypa...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>
>
> >On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:12:06 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> Defense Attorney:My client, Joe Bruno, is innocent of the charges brought against him
>
> >>
>

> >> Judge Christoper Lee:Lies noted
>
> >>
>
> >> Bruno:No evidence has been presented to support the charges
>
>
>

> The liar snipped his lies.

YOu're too fucking stupid to realize it was a satire, right, idiot?

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

[duke]

I think he just peeks in the window to the tune of thump, thump, thump.

[Dreamer In Colore]

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:52:28 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:41:14 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>><Personal information snipped>
>>>>
>>>>Seriously?
>>>>
>>>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>>>
>>>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>>>
>>>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>>>change.
>>>
>>
>>You know, Dork... you're absolutely right. It's clear that you're
>>uneducated... so obviously you can't change.
>
>Well, I sure burn your butt on scripture. What else do yo have in mind for
>consideration?
>

Ah yes... you burn my butt on scripture, as if this is something
important.

First of all, scripture's open to all sorts of interpretation... so
yours has no more validity than anyone else's. Second, you seem to
accord scripture with some kind of respect that I don't. It's a book.
It was written 2000 years ago, by people that today would be in
intensive mental therapy.

The ambiguity of scripture does not lend itself to being a clarion for
all morality, and the subjectivity of the interpretation means that
you can twist it into any kind of meaning that you like.

I prefer my morality to be much less ambiguous, thanks.

By the way, what is it with you and butts? You're always so
obsessed.... honestly, you should talk to your padre about that.
Surely he's got something to say about that sort of thing, no?

[Dreamer In Colore]

On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:49:56 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:41:26 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>><Personal information snipped>
>>>>
>>>>Seriously?
>>>>
>>>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>>>
>>>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>>>
>>>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>>>change.
>>
>>The reason you think I'm a piece of shit is because I don't agree with
>>your stupid and unfounded belief structure.
>
>Actually no. You present a view that is absolutely void of truth. Until you
>learn truth, you should stay off the ng.
>

Awwww... how sweet. You think I'm presenting a view. I'm not. I just
don't agree with yours. Your kind of wishful thinking merely gives you
a marvelous look at my fantastic posterior.

Worship, Dorkster... worship my rounded alabaster cheeks.... marvel at
their perfection. Stare into the puckered hole.... try not to be too
mesmerized.

>>The reason I think Joey's a piece of shit is because he demonstrates
>>it with every asinine post he makes, including the bits where he
>>wishes that others would die.
>
>And you are different???
>

There are several people I wish dead. Rapists, for one. Child
molesters, for another. I don't have room in my world for these
creatures, and I don't believe in rehabilitation... but that's my
personal bugaboo.

However, on this particular newsgroup, having people stay alive is far
superior because they provide sources of endless amusement and a
certain fascination the way you can't take your eyes off a train
wreck. Yes, Dork... I'm talking about you. I'm just amazed that you
can continue to be so consistent in your stupidity for such a long
period of time.

>>You, of course, remain the biggest piece of shit around simply because
>>you loathe women, you hate gays,
>
>I love the women and ignore the queers. They don't bother me at all as long as
>they aren't seeking special rights under the disguise of equal rights.
>

Nice hair-splitting, Dorkster. That's what people said about women
getting the vote a few decades ago... and black people not being
slaves.

>That just goes to show you how confused you are.
>

No, Dork. When it comes to you.... there's no confusion. Just shock,
indignation and loathing.

>>you cling to an outdated tract of
>>contradictory statements as the basis of a completely skewed morality,
>>and you lack the integrity to improve yourself.
>
>A morality of love and obedience of God and love and service to our neighbor in
>need is ...................outdated??? Wow, I never would have imagined that.
>

You don't demonstrate any of those things, so I'm not sure how you
qualify for an opinion on that particular subject.

>>Any more questions, Dork?
>
>Now you know the truth.
>

Not yet. But as a skeptic, I'll just keep looking.

[Mike Painter]

Here is what Earl's once said about "love and service to our
neighbor"

I'm now 61, and totally happy with my decision. I don't know your
age, but if you open up your self to God and listen to him, you just
may hear him saying "why don't you give that elderly lady a ride
home", or "why don't you go visit your old neighbor in the nursing
home?" Or volunteer one day to serve at a homeless food line.
Jul 24 2003, 2:03 pm by duke32

Then you read what he said about the people after Katrina and find out
what he really meant. It's why the fat little toad made my kill file.

[Alex W]

Gee, mate, thanks for that mental image ...

<reaching for mindbleach>

>
>>>The reason I think Joey's a piece of shit is because he demonstrates
>>>it with every asinine post he makes, including the bits where he
>>>wishes that others would die.
>>
>>And you are different???
>>
>
> There are several people I wish dead. Rapists, for one. Child
> molesters, for another. I don't have room in my world for these
> creatures, and I don't believe in rehabilitation... but that's my
> personal bugaboo.

Rehbilitation of paedophiles is about as useful an approach
as conversion of homosexuals .....

>
> However, on this particular newsgroup, having people stay alive is far
> superior because they provide sources of endless amusement and a
> certain fascination the way you can't take your eyes off a train
> wreck. Yes, Dork... I'm talking about you. I'm just amazed that you
> can continue to be so consistent in your stupidity for such a long
> period of time.
>
>
>>>You, of course, remain the biggest piece of shit around simply because
>>>you loathe women, you hate gays,
>>
>>I love the women and ignore the queers. They don't bother me at all as long as
>>they aren't seeking special rights under the disguise of equal rights.
>>
>
> Nice hair-splitting, Dorkster. That's what people said about women
> getting the vote a few decades ago... and black people not being
> slaves.
>
>>That just goes to show you how confused you are.
>>
>
> No, Dork. When it comes to you.... there's no confusion. Just shock,
> indignation and loathing.

And ridicule, don't forget ridicule.

>
>>>you cling to an outdated tract of
>>>contradictory statements as the basis of a completely skewed morality,
>>>and you lack the integrity to improve yourself.
>>
>>A morality of love and obedience of God and love and service to our neighbor in
>>need is ...................outdated??? Wow, I never would have imagined that.
>>
>
> You don't demonstrate any of those things, so I'm not sure how you
> qualify for an opinion on that particular subject.
>
>>>Any more questions, Dork?
>>
>>Now you know the truth.
>>
>
> Not yet. But as a skeptic, I'll just keep looking.

Have you looked in the crack of the sofa yet?
If nothing else, you're likely to come away with some small
change. Cold hard currency is always good....

[duke]

On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:14:36 -0500, Dreamer In Colore

<dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:49:56 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:41:26 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>>>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>><Personal information snipped>
>>>>>
>>>>>Seriously?
>>>>>
>>>>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>>>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>>>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>>>>
>>>>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>>>>change.
>>>
>>>The reason you think I'm a piece of shit is because I don't agree with
>>>your stupid and unfounded belief structure.
>>
>>Actually no. You present a view that is absolutely void of truth. Until you
>>learn truth, you should stay off the ng.

>Awwww... how sweet. You think I'm presenting a view. I'm not.

I know you're knot. That's why you're the laughing stock of the ng.

>I just
>don't agree with yours. Your kind of wishful thinking merely gives you
>a marvelous look at my fantastic posterior.

>Worship, Dorkster... worship my rounded alabaster cheeks....

It's all silly putty.

[duke]

On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:07:09 -0500, Dreamer In Colore

<dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:52:28 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:41:14 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:37:25 -0600, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:38 -0500, Dreamer In Colore
>>>><dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:55 -0800 (PST), reidb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>><Personal information snipped>
>>>>>
>>>>>Seriously?
>>>>>
>>>>>Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just because Joey B. is a serious piece of shit, doesn't mean you
>>>>>should do this kind of stuff.... and what's the point? We already KNOW
>>>>>he's a buffoon, so why does this help things along?
>>>>
>>>>Yet why do you remain a serious piece of shit? If you're educated, you should
>>>>change.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You know, Dork... you're absolutely right. It's clear that you're
>>>uneducated... so obviously you can't change.
>>
>>Well, I sure burn your butt on scripture. What else do yo have in mind for
>>consideration?
>>
>
>Ah yes... you burn my butt on scripture, as if this is something
>important.

You tried; I kicked your ass; are you going for Mark, Luke and John?

>First of all, scripture's open to all sorts of interpretation... so
>yours has no more validity than anyone else's.

Translation, translation, the insider word is translation.

>Second, you seem to
>accord scripture with some kind of respect that I don't. It's a book.
>It was written 2000 years ago, by people that today would be in
>intensive mental therapy.

It's not just a book. It's a book that reveals the very things that the Son of
God said and did when he was here 2000 years ago.

>The ambiguity of scripture does not lend itself to being a clarion for
>all morality, and the subjectivity of the interpretation means that
>you can twist it into any kind of meaning that you like.

Pee in you pants, grik, pee in your pants.

>I prefer my morality to be much less ambiguous, thanks.

>By the way, what is it with you and butts?

I laugh my ass off at your unlearned ass.

You're always so
>obsessed.... honestly, you should talk to your padre about that.
>Surely he's got something to say about that sort of thing, no?