>
>"Jura Koch-Sacher" <ju...@koch-sacher.com> wrote in message
>news:1t38r0d509pa937jk...@4ax.com...
>> [erroneous xposting corrected]
>> fasgnād...@fukyoo.com.au (fasgnādh) wrote in message
>> <41b5bf16...@news.dodo.com.au>:
>>
>> >On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:01:31 +1100, "ferdie" <fer...@hotmail.com> wrote
>> >in message <JJvsd.386$A6.1...@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>:
>> [-- 8< --]
>> >>The australoid race just cant handle booze, fagarse - Isn't that obvious
>to
>> >>you ?
>> >
>> >Indeed.
>> >
>> Then why do they do it with such enthusiasm?
For the same reason some white people do - they don't have any gainful
employment, or hobbies, or interests, or a family that they care
about, and no work ethic whatsoever. So, they drink or drug
themselves into oblivion. (see note 1)
IOW, complete dunderheads.
Added to this, of course, is the fact that as a race, they have only
had a little over 200 years to accustom themselves to the amusing or
tragic results of the consumption of ethyl alcohol. That is, the
two-pot screamers haven't yet been darwinned out sufficiently.
>>
>> >All the bleating hand-wringing Political Correctness in the world
>> >won't change that.
>> >
>> All the cunt-servative stating of the obvious, with no regard for
>> either the cause of the problem or the search for a solution, won't
>> change it either.
See above. The problem (dunderheadedness) has been precisely pointed
out, and the solution (darwinning out the dross) is happening as we
speak.
In the unlikely event that Yanner et al succeeds in starting a race
war, we could possibly have a ringside seat from which to observe SJ
Gould's "punctuated equilibrium" at work.
Alcohol has for thousands of years been steadily working away
improving the human race, weeding out the dunderheads. The darkies
just got a bit of catching up to do, that's all. But with all the
lefty-engineered handouts to the least intelligent in the country,
this process is rapidly gathering momentum.
>>
>> >Faggie wants the alcohol-related spouse- and child-abuse tragedy to
>> >continue just for the sake of his leftist ideology.
>> >
>> Dear fool: if you prevent peoples' access to booze without dealing
>> with *why* they drink, you just divert their behaviour into some other
>> form of brain-blattering. Petrol sniffing, glue sniffing, pot smoking,
>> canetoad licking, whatever.
Yes, I'm aware of your pot smoking. But have you tried petrol or glue
yet? You should be capable of it - after all, if you can drive a bong
as well as you claim to, sniffing a tube of Selleys ought to be easy.
>>
>> If people want to get blotto, they'll do it one way or another. We
>> need to find and deal with the reasons *why* they indulge in this
>> behaviour.
How do you suggest we do this?
Note 1: Hm, I just described you, didn't I?
--
fasgnādh - the Thinking Man's Seppo Renfors.
A True Gentleman.- not many of us left.
Now with extra reasonableness and 10% more humility.
>
> In the unlikely event that Yanner et al succeeds in starting a race
> war, we could possibly have a ringside seat from which to observe SJ
> Gould's "punctuated equilibrium" at work.
>
Actually, a race war might be a good solution from the Humans' point of
view.
Save us heaps in dole payouts.
"fasgnâdh" <fasgnâd...@fukyoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:41b4c93a...@news.dodo.com.au...
Some half-arsed babble about booze and evolution.
Nothing relevant to act-b.
Piss off, troll.
----snip----
Ned
--
True Blue FAQ: <slrncrcn2...@arthur.valhalla.oz>
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
>"Persifor" wrote in <1goezgr.1y8r7yxfuz60wN%pers...@pyramid.com>:
>
>Nothing relevant to act-b.
As you're irrelevant to all news groups.
--
"Atheism is the world of reality, it is reason, it is freedom. Atheism is human
concern, and intellectual honesty to a degree that the religious mind cannot
begin to understand. And yet it is more than this. Atheism is not an old
religion, it is not a new and coming religion, in fact it is not, and never has
been, a religion at all. The definition of Atheism is magnificent in its
simplicity: Atheism is merely the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
[Atheism: An Affirmative View, by Emmett F. Fields]
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
Wrong again, moron. The atheism groups, perhaps, but then, they're
irrelevant to the world. I mean, what do you do in there?
Oh, that's right:
a. Preach to the converted;
b. Dispute with the unconvertable.
Pffft.
----snip----
And what's that rubbish in your .sig? Atheism is a religion?
Pigshit. It's a simple rejection of the god hypothesis. Nothing
more, nothing less.
>Al Klein wrote in <cj5dr0t6rdl7v8r27...@4ax.com>:
>> Ned Latham said:
>> > "Persifor" wrote:
>> >
>> > Nothing relevant to act-b.
>>
>> As you're irrelevant to all news groups.
>
>Wrong again, moron. The atheism groups, perhaps, but then, they're
>irrelevant to the world. I mean, what do you do in there?
If you don't know, why do you post here?
>And what's that rubbish in your .sig? Atheism is a religion?
>Pigshit. It's a simple rejection of the god hypothesis. Nothing
>more, nothing less.
Try actually reading. (And not snipping what you refer to.)
--
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him, the
spinal cord would fully suffice."
- Albert Einstein
"fasgnâdh" <fasgnâd...@fukyoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:41b4c93a...@news.dodo.com.au...
>
> [piggyback]
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:28:34 GMT, "Diabolik" <diab...@email.com>
> wrote in message <CnXsd.61605$K7.3...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>:
>
>>
>>"Jura Koch-Sacher" <ju...@koch-sacher.com> wrote in message
>>news:1t38r0d509pa937jk...@4ax.com...
>>> [erroneous xposting corrected]
>>> fasgnâd...@fukyoo.com.au (fasgnâdh) wrote in message
>>> <41b5bf16...@news.dodo.com.au>:
>>>
>>> >On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:01:31 +1100, "ferdie" <fer...@hotmail.com> wrote
>>> >in message <JJvsd.386$A6.1...@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>:
>>> [-- 8< --]
>>> >>The australoid race just cant handle booze, fagarse - Isn't that
>>> >>obvious
>>to
>>> >>you ?
>>> >
>>> >Indeed.
>>> >
>>> Then why do they do it with such enthusiasm?
>
> For the same reason some white people do - they don't have any gainful
> employment, or hobbies, or interests, or a family that they care
> about, and no work ethic whatsoever. So, they drink or drug
> themselves into oblivion. (see note 1)
>
> IOW, complete dunderheads.
>
> Added to this, of course, is the fact that as a race, they have only
> had a little over 200 years to accustom themselves to the amusing or
> tragic results of the consumption of ethyl alcohol. That is, the
> two-pot screamers haven't yet been darwinned out sufficiently.
>
>
>
> In the unlikely event that Yanner et al succeeds in starting a race
> war, we could possibly have a ringside seat from which to observe SJ
> Gould's "punctuated equilibrium" at work.
I don't know how much useYannar would be in a race war considering his
hideous mixture of European Chinese & Abo.
He is as big a mongrel as I am.
>
> Alcohol has for thousands of years been steadily working away
> improving the human race, weeding out the dunderheads. The darkies
> just got a bit of catching up to do, that's all. But with all the
> lefty-engineered handouts to the least intelligent in the country,
> this process is rapidly gathering momentum.
>
& I like my grog,
> fasgnâdh - the Thinking Man's Seppo Renfors.
>
Abos are most likely a tad worse on the booze than the the rest of us, (but
I am going on only my own extended family)
>
>
>
>"fasgnādh" <fasgnād...@fukyoo.com.au> wrote in message
>news:41b4c93a...@news.dodo.com.au...
>>
>> [piggyback]
>> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:28:34 GMT, "Diabolik" <diab...@email.com>
>> wrote in message <CnXsd.61605$K7.3...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>:
>>
>>>
>>>"Jura Koch-Sacher" <ju...@koch-sacher.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1t38r0d509pa937jk...@4ax.com...
>>>> [erroneous xposting corrected]
>>>> fasgnād...@fukyoo.com.au (fasgnādh) wrote in message
>>>> <41b5bf16...@news.dodo.com.au>:
>>>>
>>>> >On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:01:31 +1100, "ferdie" <fer...@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>> >in message <JJvsd.386$A6.1...@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>:
>>>> [-- 8< --]
>>>> >>The australoid race just cant handle booze, fagarse - Isn't that
>>>> >>obvious
>>>to
>>>> >>you ?
>>>> >
>>>> >Indeed.
>>>> >
>>>> Then why do they do it with such enthusiasm?
>>
>> For the same reason some white people do - they don't have any gainful
>> employment, or hobbies, or interests, or a family that they care
>> about, and no work ethic whatsoever. So, they drink or drug
>> themselves into oblivion. (see note 1)
>>
>> IOW, complete dunderheads.
>>
>> Added to this, of course, is the fact that as a race, they have only
>> had a little over 200 years to accustom themselves to the amusing or
>> tragic results of the consumption of ethyl alcohol. That is, the
>> two-pot screamers haven't yet been darwinned out sufficiently.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the unlikely event that Yanner et al succeeds in starting a race
>> war, we could possibly have a ringside seat from which to observe SJ
>> Gould's "punctuated equilibrium" at work.
>
>I don't know how much useYannar would be in a race war considering his
>hideous mixture of European Chinese & Abo.
He seems to have inherited all the worst qualities of all those races,
and none of the good. Intriguing how often that seems to happen.
>He is as big a mongrel as I am.
But with a much bigger mouth, surely?
>
>>
>> Alcohol has for thousands of years been steadily working away
>> improving the human race, weeding out the dunderheads. The darkies
>> just got a bit of catching up to do, that's all. But with all the
>> lefty-engineered handouts to the least intelligent in the country,
>> this process is rapidly gathering momentum.
>>
>
>& I like my grog,
Nothing wrong with a couple of coldies in the arvo.
>
>> fasgnādh - the Thinking Man's Seppo Renfors.
>>
>
>Abos are most likely a tad worse on the booze than the the rest of us,
Two-pot screamers, for the most part. Haven't the brains to realise
the harm it does to them.
> (but
>I am going on only my own extended family)
Please explain?
Nothing relevant to act-b.
----snip----
Ask the originater of the crosspost, fuckwit,
> > And what's that rubbish in your .sig? Atheism is a religion?
>
> > Pigshit. It's a simple rejection of the god hypothesis. Nothing
> > more, nothing less.
>
> Try actually reading.
What's that got to do with what I said, moron?
Get a clue, cretin: what I gave you defines it. The waffle in your
fuckwit FAQ is just that: waffle.
> (And not snipping what you refer to.)
So says the hypocritical prick who commits forgery with surreptitious
snipping. Here again is what *I* wrote above that he "responded" to with
"If you don't know, why do you post here?":
> * Wrong again, moron. The atheism groups, perhaps, but then, they're
> * irrelevant to the world. I mean, what do you do in there?
> *
> * Oh, that's right:
> *
> * a. Preach to the converted;
> *
> * b. Dispute with the unconvertable.
> *
> * Pffft.
Some racist babble. Nothing relevant to act-b.
Piss off, troll.
----snip----
Ned