Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

you won't believe the latest Obama conspiracy theory

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 4:18:59 AM7/10/12
to
Seriously. You won't.

<http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
>

--
JD

"the lybian lier"

Dakota

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 6:00:34 AM7/10/12
to
On 7/10/2012 3:18 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> Seriously. You won't.
>
> <http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
>>
>
World Net Daily? Matt Drudge? Jerome Corsi? Yikes! Next we'll learn
that President Obama planned the 9-11 attacks with Saddam while
working for the CIA.

Malcolm McMahon

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 6:02:37 AM7/10/12
to
On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 09:18:59 UTC+1, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> Seriously. You won&#39;t.
>
> &lt;http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
> &gt;
>

Expect the frequency of conspiracy theories to accelerate as the election looms.

That's all they've got.

default

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 6:53:55 AM7/10/12
to
And the scary part - there are people that actually find this stuff
credible.

Malcolm McMahon

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 7:16:49 AM7/10/12
to
On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 11:53:55 UTC+1, (unknown) wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:02:37 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm McMahon
> &lt;malcol...@googlemail.com&gt; wrote:
>
> &gt;On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 09:18:59 UTC+1, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> &gt;&gt; Seriously. You won&amp;#39;t.
> &gt;&gt;
> &gt;&gt; &amp;lt;http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
> &gt;&gt; &amp;gt;
> &gt;&gt;
> &gt;
> &gt;Expect the frequency of conspiracy theories to accelerate as the election looms.
> &gt;
> &gt;That&#39;s all they&#39;ve got.
>
> And the scary part - there are people that actually find this stuff
> credible.

Not sure whether the Democrats should get equally nasty, or try to take the moral high ground.

Obahma, when he came to power, didn't really make an effort to heap all the country's troubles on The Shrub (as he so easilly could have).

Ben Kaufman

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 8:18:27 AM7/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:18:59 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlw...@NOSPAMpacbell.net>
wrote:

>Seriously. You won't.
>
><http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
>>

It's like religion. If they can make money from morons lapping it up then full
steam ahead and damn the torpedoes of common sense and decency.

Ben

Ben Kaufman

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 8:22:33 AM7/10/12
to
Absolutely. I know someone who emails me this stuff. And even if he can see how
wrong something was, after I've sent him citations debunking it, it's like
there's no connection that the next one he is getting from the same source is
just another turd too.

Ben

thomas p.

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 10:11:06 AM7/10/12
to
"Dakota" <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:jtgufg$b2v$1...@dont-email.me...
The entire plan was based on a film script first put together by Ed Woods,
which he rejected because of its unbelievability.
--
thomas p

Ignorance is the mother of devotion.

David Hume


Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 2:35:10 PM7/10/12
to
We have one here, fully supporting birtherism again, months after he
claimed he was done with it.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 2:36:04 PM7/10/12
to
In article <jtgufg$b2v$1...@dont-email.me>, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com>
wrote:
Yeah, this one is the looniest yet.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 2:36:19 PM7/10/12
to
In article <4ffc37fc$0$56791$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>,
"thomas p." <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Dakota" <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:jtgufg$b2v$1...@dont-email.me...
> > On 7/10/2012 3:18 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> Seriously. You won't.
> >>
> >> <http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
> >>>
> >>
> > World Net Daily? Matt Drudge? Jerome Corsi? Yikes! Next we'll learn that
> > President Obama planned the 9-11 attacks with Saddam while working for the
> > CIA.
> >
>
>
> The entire plan was based on a film script first put together by Ed Woods,
> which he rejected because of its unbelievability.

<tee hee>

thomas p.

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 3:52:33 PM7/10/12
to
"Jeanne Douglas" <hlw...@NOSPAMpacbell.net> skrev i meddelelsen
news:hlwdjsd-E92672...@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com...
More than once he rejected it and asserted it in the same post. He is an
impressively stupid loony.

Smiler

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 10:43:47 PM7/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:11:06 +0200, thomas p. wrote:

> "Dakota" <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:jtgufg$b2v$1...@dont-email.me...
>> On 7/10/2012 3:18 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>> Seriously. You won't.
>>>
>>> <http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
>>>>
>>>>
>> World Net Daily? Matt Drudge? Jerome Corsi? Yikes! Next we'll learn that
>> President Obama planned the 9-11 attacks with Saddam while working for
>> the CIA.
>>
>>
>
> The entire plan was based on a film script first put together by Ed Woods,
> which he rejected because of its unbelievability.

I understand that the film was to be called 'Plan 10 from outa their
minds', or something similar.

--
Smiler,

The godless one. a.a.# 2279

All gods are tailored to order. They're made to

exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

Mike Painter

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 11:42:07 PM7/10/12
to
On 7/10/2012 1:18 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> Seriously. You won't.
>
> <http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/07/09/513284/drudge-obama-cia-agent/
>>
>
I don't believe it because I and only I know the truth.
The CIA cover story was put forth by a secret socialist group that
planned to make him president.

His real mission during that time was to cover up the fact that he was
actually born in Argentina to a family of Nazis living with Hitler in a
secret bunker.

They had to lie to Hitler and tell him he was a beautiful blond haired,
blue eyed boy.

default

unread,
Jul 11, 2012, 6:04:12 AM7/11/12
to
I know. The "need to believe" is far stronger than the need to be
rational. They react on some emotional level that precludes reason.

Religions have been tapped into this human foible for a very long
time. Is your friend religious too? What flavor?
0 new messages