Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Fake News / Fake Science: Gwobull Warbling!!!!
97 views
Skip to first unread message
JTEM
Feb 1, 2022, 11:07:36 PM2/1/22
to
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
: This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
: cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
: could take decades or centuries to occur.
Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
There. That's it. But if you're a brainwashed buffoon, and you
probably are, you've been trained to ignore even your own eyes
in favor of what the 1%, through the media, order you to think.
Example: "IT'S SO HOT THAT IT'S COLD."
You can't remember back even a single news cycle, being a
brainwashed buffoon, but remember the idiotic "Bomb Cycle"
arctic weather that was proof positive that the earth was too
hot?
No? Of course not...
What about this: Do you remember only recently reading about
how 2021 saw RECORD HOT ocean temperatures? Dude, it was
a La Nina year!
You don't know what that means, and lack any curiosity much
less enough to Google it but, a La Nina means it was COLDER
THAN NORMAL ocean temperatures.
El Nino: Warmer than usual.
La Nina: COLDER THAN NORMAL!
La Ninas have been more common... "IT'S SO HOT THAT IT'S COLD!"
And to this media propaganda that you think is science we may now
add the claim that ice in water only raises the water level when it
melts.
"But the media is my friend! It loves me! It exists only to keep me
informed with the most relevant and accurate information."
Yeah, half dozen or so multi-billion dollar Wall Street firms that own
and control the media are themselves owned & operated by tree
hugging hippies on a Vermont commune...
That, or you're a blithering idiot and it's a wonder if you manage to
pee without turning your socks yellow.
Have a pleasant day.
-- --
https://rumble.com/vqo5n4-a-padded-envelope-from-madrid.html
Michael Cook
Feb 1, 2022, 11:21:22 PM2/1/22
to
On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 at 20:07:36 UTC-8, JTEM wrote:
> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
>
> : This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> : cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> : could take decades or centuries to occur.
>
> Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
Ice has more volume, but it also has less density
> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
>
> : This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> : cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> : could take decades or centuries to occur.
>
> Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
than water. Consider putting a huge block of ice
in the middle of a cookie tray. Note how the water
fills up the tray as the ice melts.
JTEM
Feb 2, 2022, 1:10:58 AM2/2/22
to
Michael Cook wrote:
> JTEM wrote:
> > https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
> >
> > : This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> > : cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> > : could take decades or centuries to occur.
> >
> > Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
> Ice has more volume, but it also has less density
> than water. Consider putting a huge block of ice
> in the middle of a cookie tray.
Why? What on earth would posses you to spew such idiocy?
> JTEM wrote:
> > https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
> >
> > : This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> > : cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> > : could take decades or centuries to occur.
> >
> > Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
> Ice has more volume, but it also has less density
> than water. Consider putting a huge block of ice
> in the middle of a cookie tray.
What you're pretending here -- defending -- is that ice increases
water level as it melts. And it doesn't. And you can test this and
see for yourself that it's bullshit BY PUTTING ICE IN WATER!!!
If you want to test if ice increases water levels AS IT MELTS you
put ice in water and NOT on the middle of a cookie try.
WHAT EVER INCREASE in water level the ice will cause is
immediate. You drop the ice into the water, the water level goes
up. The ice melts, the water level stays exactly the same. Yet
the propaganda brainwashing you is saying that it takes decades
if not a century for the water to rise.
Why? Because glacial calving is not unusual much less something
to wet your bed over. And glaciers will plop into the ocean, including
whatever glacier you need you to panic over this week, and when it
does you will NOT see doom & gloom. So right away you will see with
your own eyes that the media is not your most bestest friend ever,
that "Facebook" isn't Latin for "Science" and that you were lied to.
Unless...
Unless they order you to think that ice only raises water levels when
it melts. And if you're brainwashed enough, and stupid enough, you
will believe it. You do believe whatever the media orders you to
believe.
You will only think approved thoughts.
And you just proved it. You did. Here. In this thread.
Congratulations.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/AGW
JTEM
Feb 2, 2022, 2:43:33 AM2/2/22
to
JTEM wrote:
> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
>
> : This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> : cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> : could take decades or centuries to occur.
>
> Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
>
> You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
> thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
> mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
> tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
> we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
>
> Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
>
> There. That's it. But if you're a brainwashed buffoon, and you
> probably are, you've been trained to ignore even your own eyes
> in favor of what the 1%, through the media, order you to think.
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/AGW/page/2
> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
>
> : This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> : cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> : could take decades or centuries to occur.
>
> Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
>
> You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
> thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
> mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
> tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
> we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
>
> Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
>
> There. That's it. But if you're a brainwashed buffoon, and you
> probably are, you've been trained to ignore even your own eyes
> in favor of what the 1%, through the media, order you to think.
JTEM is your gift from Heaven, proof positive that God loves you.
Lucky you.
I mean, look at the rancid filth he stuck me with...
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/AGW/page/2
Ted
Feb 2, 2022, 5:50:23 PM2/2/22
to
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:07:33 -0800 (PST), lying faggot loser JTEM
<jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't believe in global warming!
> I believe in dick sucking instead!
> I'd rather suck a dick than warm a globe
> lol.
Dumbass
<jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't believe in global warming!
> I believe in dick sucking instead!
> I'd rather suck a dick than warm a globe
> lol.
Dumbass
John Locke
Feb 2, 2022, 6:44:19 PM2/2/22
to
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:07:33 -0800 (PST), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
>
>: This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
>: cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
>: could take decades or centuries to occur.
>
>Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
>
>You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
>thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
>mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
>tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
>we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
>
>Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
>
...wrong. That's not the way it works.
...make a glass of water and then ADD an ice cube...the water level
will go up. Just like when a glacier falls into the sea !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has
a responsibility to give your life meaning and point
The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful
as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it.
- Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
wrote:
>
>https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
>
>: This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
>: cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
>: could take decades or centuries to occur.
>
>Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
>
>You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
>thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
>mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
>tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
>we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
>
>Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
>
...make a glass of water and then ADD an ice cube...the water level
will go up. Just like when a glacier falls into the sea !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has
a responsibility to give your life meaning and point
The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful
as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it.
- Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
JWS
Feb 2, 2022, 7:01:18 PM2/2/22
to
Antarctica ice sheets and the Greenland ice sheets
are on land and do not float in the water. Antarctica
ice accounts for 90% of all glacial ice.
If all of this ice melted, sea level would rise about 216 feet.
%
Feb 2, 2022, 7:23:17 PM2/2/22
to
hhya...@gmail.com
Feb 2, 2022, 7:45:56 PM2/2/22
to
JTEM
Feb 2, 2022, 9:01:06 PM2/2/22
to
Wow, your mental illness flares up, cowering behind a sock puppet, and
suddenly ice doesn't work the way ice works, not anymore.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/674660740178886656
JTEM
Feb 2, 2022, 9:06:24 PM2/2/22
to
John Locke wrote:
> JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
> >
> >: This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> >: cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> >: could take decades or centuries to occur.
> >
> >Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
> >
> >You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
> >thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
> >mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
> >tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
> >we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
> >
> >Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
> ...wrong. That's
Of course it's how it works, you fucking retard. You are so goddamn DIVORCED
> JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
> >
> >: This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> >: cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> >: could take decades or centuries to occur.
> >
> >Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
> >
> >You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
> >thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
> >mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
> >tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
> >we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
> >
> >Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
> ...wrong. That's
from the "Objective" oh so "Empirical" person you pretend to be that the issue
has to a massive personality disorder.
> ...make a glass of water and then ADD an ice cube...the water level
> will go up.
years or decades or "Centuries" delay as the ice melts.
Moron.
Instead of defending fake news, propaganda masquerading as "Science," why
don't you pretend you have some integrity and tell the truth for a change?
You're staring at PROOF POSITIVE BY YOUR OWN WORDS that the Gwobull
Warbling "Science" is utter bullshit, and you're protecting it. You're misrepresenting
what I said, and misrepresenting the facts.
You're a maggot.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/674660740178886656
JTEM
Feb 2, 2022, 9:10:02 PM2/2/22
to
JWS wrote:
> Only the ice in the Arctic is floating in the water.
Good God, are you so THIRSTY to prove what a fuckwit you are
> Only the ice in the Arctic is floating in the water.
that you can't be honest even once?!?
The claim is that a glacier is going to collapse into the fucking
ocean, AND THEM maybe centuries later it was cause a rise in
sea level. ALL OF THE MEDIA reports telling you it's AGW
"Science" is this inaccurate. It's all fake. It's all exploiting your
amazing levels of stupidity & emotional weakness.
Yeah, exactly like in this case.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/674660740178886656
aaa
Feb 2, 2022, 9:38:10 PM2/2/22
to
temperature will evaporate more water from the sea into the air. The
entire Earth would be covered by thick cloud. As the result, sea level
is likely to remain the same or even become lower.
>
--
God's spiritual evidence:
Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence,
happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
God's spiritual evidence is evident in everyone.
Find it and treasure it because it's the covenant of God.
It's the reason why we are given this life on earth.
It's the foundation why we can have meaning in life.
Let's all honor our personal spiritual evidence of God for the sake of
Christ!
JWS
Feb 2, 2022, 10:33:58 PM2/2/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 8:10:02 PM UTC-6, JTEM wrote:
> JWS wrote:
>
> > Only the ice in the Arctic is floating in the water.
> Good God, are you so THIRSTY to prove what a fuckwit you are
> that you can't be honest even once?!?
>
> The claim is that a glacier is going to collapse into the fucking
> ocean, AND THEM maybe centuries later it was cause a rise in
> sea level. ALL OF THE MEDIA reports telling you it's AGW
> "Science" is this inaccurate. It's all fake. It's all exploiting your
> amazing levels of stupidity & emotional weakness.
You seem to be extremely confused.
> JWS wrote:
>
> > Only the ice in the Arctic is floating in the water.
> Good God, are you so THIRSTY to prove what a fuckwit you are
> that you can't be honest even once?!?
>
> The claim is that a glacier is going to collapse into the fucking
> ocean, AND THEM maybe centuries later it was cause a rise in
> sea level. ALL OF THE MEDIA reports telling you it's AGW
> "Science" is this inaccurate. It's all fake. It's all exploiting your
> amazing levels of stupidity & emotional weakness.
> Yeah, exactly like in this case.
JWS
Feb 2, 2022, 10:34:35 PM2/2/22
to
El Kabong
Feb 2, 2022, 10:47:45 PM2/2/22
to
29,000 feet of water, that didn't raise sea level either.
JWS
Feb 2, 2022, 11:26:43 PM2/2/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:45 PM UTC-6, El Kabong wrote:
LOL
aaa
Feb 2, 2022, 11:30:11 PM2/2/22
to
much rain. There is no need of 29,000 feet of water.
JWS
Feb 2, 2022, 11:45:32 PM2/2/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:30:11 PM UTC-6, aaa wrote:
> On 2022-02-02 10:47 p.m., El Kabong wrote:
> On 2022-02-02 10:47 p.m., El Kabong wrote:
aaa
Feb 2, 2022, 11:47:17 PM2/2/22
to
:-)
Kevrob
Feb 2, 2022, 11:50:43 PM2/2/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 6:44:19 PM UTC-5, John Locke wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:07:33 -0800 (PST), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
> >
> >: This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> >: cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> >: could take decades or centuries to occur.
> >
> >Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
> >
> >You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
> >thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
> >mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
> >tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
> >we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
> >
> >Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
> >
> ...wrong. That's not the way it works.
>
> ...make a glass of water and then ADD an ice cube...the water level
> will go up. Just like when a glacier falls into the sea !
>
>
Ice on land raises the water level when it melts and the water runs down
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:07:33 -0800 (PST), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2021/12/16/antarctica-glacier-collapse-raise-sea-levels/8924940002/
> >
> >: This story has been updated to reflect that if the Thwaites Glacier
> >: cracks in the next decade, the rise in sea levels by at least a foot
> >: could take decades or centuries to occur.
> >
> >Ice doesn't increase water levels as it melts.
> >
> >You can actually test this. If you're one of those morons who
> >thinks Gwobull Warbling propaganda is science -- i.e. a mouth
> >mouth breathing imbecile -- you haven't the faintest clue how. I'll
> >tell you but, as you are a brainwashed jackass it won't help and
> >we're both wasting out time. Anyhow, this is how you test it:
> >
> >Make a glass of ice water. Note the water level.
> >
> ...wrong. That's not the way it works.
>
> ...make a glass of water and then ADD an ice cube...the water level
> will go up. Just like when a glacier falls into the sea !
>
>
into the ocean. There's land under the Antarctic glaciers, frex .
--
Kevin R
a.a #2310
THE son of the First Cause
Feb 2, 2022, 11:51:24 PM2/2/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
>
> :-)
Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have head injuries that affected you?
> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
>
> :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNsee-gRLAY
aaa
Feb 3, 2022, 12:04:39 AM2/3/22
to
On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
>
>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
>>
>> :-)
>
>
> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have head injuries that affected you?
Yes, I did, but thanks to God, I believe I have recovered.
> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
>
>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
>>
>> :-)
>
>
> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have head injuries that affected you?
You can call it a miracle.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNsee-gRLAY
THE son of the First Cause
Feb 3, 2022, 12:10:21 AM2/3/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>
> >> :-)
> >
> >
> > Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have head injuries that affected you?
> Yes, I did,
Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here, convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>
> >> :-)
> >
> >
> > Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have head injuries that affected you?
> Yes, I did,
aaa
Feb 3, 2022, 12:15:37 AM2/3/22
to
like to have honest and serious debate. So it doesn't bother me.
El Kabong
Feb 3, 2022, 12:16:14 AM2/3/22
to
atmosphere would create crushing air pressure, just like
on Neptune. Then there will be an endless hail of
diamonds from the sky.
We will all be rich, but we will need to carry armored
umbrellas.
aaa
Feb 3, 2022, 12:30:17 AM2/3/22
to
can be as high as 21600 feet.
:-)
>
> We will all be rich, but we will need to carry armored
> umbrellas.
>
THE son of the First Cause
Feb 3, 2022, 12:53:29 AM2/3/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:15:37 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
> >>> head injuries that affected you?
> >> Yes, I did,
> >
> > Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> > convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
> like to have . So it doesn't bother me.
> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
> >>> head injuries that affected you?
> >> Yes, I did,
> >
> > Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> > convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
It might bother someone if there was actual real serious debate where someone is trying to win, you terribly detract from that, bobby.
THE son of the First Cause
Feb 3, 2022, 1:13:28 AM2/3/22
to
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:16:14 PM UTC-7, El Kabong wrote:
> That's nothing. That extra 216 feet of water in the
> atmosphere would create crushing air pressure, just like
> on Neptune. Then there will be an endless hail of
> diamonds from the sky.
Okay mr arm chair conjecturer.
> That's nothing. That extra 216 feet of water in the
> atmosphere would create crushing air pressure, just like
> on Neptune. Then there will be an endless hail of
> diamonds from the sky.
How about you build dams to trap water into reservoirs so it doesn't flow into the ocean and see if you can slow or halt sea level raising claims.
JWS
Feb 3, 2022, 8:08:41 AM2/3/22
to
on top of your head.
:)
aaa
Feb 3, 2022, 9:09:20 AM2/3/22
to
Tim
Feb 3, 2022, 9:25:16 AM2/3/22
to
:-)
aaa
Feb 3, 2022, 9:34:07 AM2/3/22
to
any debate. Too bad it hasn't been proven useful.
aaa
Feb 3, 2022, 9:52:48 AM2/3/22
to
THE son of the First Cause
Feb 3, 2022, 4:31:45 PM2/3/22
to
On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 7:34:07 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> On 2022-02-03 12:53 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:15:37 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever
> >>>>> have head injuries that affected you?
> >>>> Yes, I did,
> >>>
> >>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing
> >>> here, convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> >> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I
> >> would like to have . So it doesn't bother me.
> >
> > It might bother someone if there was actual real serious debate where
> > someone is trying to win, you terribly detract from that, bobby.
> How can that be?
Making bad arguments about the other sides position, making it appear it is a bad position to hold to, as it appears they can't effectively argue it in the canned phony discussion that one person types hoping people do not know it is the same person typing both sides for example. Der. Or why someone would use sockpuppets 101.
> On 2022-02-03 12:53 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:15:37 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever
> >>>>> have head injuries that affected you?
> >>>> Yes, I did,
> >>>
> >>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing
> >>> here, convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> >> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I
> >> would like to have . So it doesn't bother me.
> >
> > It might bother someone if there was actual real serious debate where
> > someone is trying to win, you terribly detract from that, bobby.
> How can that be?
aaa
Feb 3, 2022, 5:51:09 PM2/3/22
to
THE son of the First Cause
Feb 4, 2022, 3:31:16 AM2/4/22
to
hhya...@gmail.com
Feb 4, 2022, 3:59:07 AM2/4/22
to
hhya...@gmail.com
Feb 4, 2022, 4:01:09 AM2/4/22
to
On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 1:53:29 PM UTC+8, THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:15:37 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> > On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> > >> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:15:37 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> > On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> > >> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> > >>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
> > >>> head injuries that affected you?
> > >> Yes, I did,
> > >
> > > Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> > > convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> > It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
> > like to have . So it doesn't bother me.
>
> It might bother someone if there was actual real serious debate where someone is trying to win, you terribly detract from that, bobby.
There would be no body to win anything if the Noah flood had killed all human beings!!!
> > >>> head injuries that affected you?
> > >> Yes, I did,
> > >
> > > Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> > > convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> > It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
> > like to have . So it doesn't bother me.
>
> It might bother someone if there was actual real serious debate where someone is trying to win, you terribly detract from that, bobby.
hhya...@gmail.com
Feb 4, 2022, 4:02:33 AM2/4/22
to
hhya...@gmail.com
Feb 4, 2022, 4:05:33 AM2/4/22
to
On Friday, February 4, 2022 at 6:51:09 AM UTC+8, aaa wrote:
> On 2022-02-03 4:31 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 7:34:07 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-03 12:53 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:15:37 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> On 2022-02-03 4:31 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 7:34:07 AM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-03 12:53 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:15:37 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>>>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever
> >>>>>>> have head injuries that affected you?
> >>>>>> Yes, I did,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are
> >>>>> arguing here, convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't
> >>>>> it?
> >>>> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I
> >>>> would like to have . So it doesn't bother me.
> >>>
> >>> It might bother someone if there was actual real serious debate
> >>> where someone is trying to win, you terribly detract from that,
> >>> bobby.
> >> How can that be?
> >
> > Making bad arguments about the other sides position, making it appear
> > it is a bad position to hold to, as it appears they can't effectively
> > argue it in the canned phony discussion that one person types hoping
> > people do not know it is the same person typing both sides for
> > example. Der. Or why someone would use sockpuppets 101.
> The problem is that I'm not a sock puppet.
The problem is you are not aware that you are a sock puppet of con theists...
> >>>>>>> have head injuries that affected you?
> >>>>>> Yes, I did,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are
> >>>>> arguing here, convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't
> >>>>> it?
> >>>> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I
> >>>> would like to have . So it doesn't bother me.
> >>>
> >>> It might bother someone if there was actual real serious debate
> >>> where someone is trying to win, you terribly detract from that,
> >>> bobby.
> >> How can that be?
> >
> > Making bad arguments about the other sides position, making it appear
> > it is a bad position to hold to, as it appears they can't effectively
> > argue it in the canned phony discussion that one person types hoping
> > people do not know it is the same person typing both sides for
> > example. Der. Or why someone would use sockpuppets 101.
> The problem is that I'm not a sock puppet.
Kurt Nicklas
Feb 4, 2022, 4:52:13 AM2/4/22
to
aaa
Feb 4, 2022, 9:36:59 AM2/4/22
to
aaa
Feb 4, 2022, 9:37:00 AM2/4/22
to
aaa
Feb 4, 2022, 9:37:00 AM2/4/22
to
JTEM
Feb 4, 2022, 3:36:53 PM2/4/22
to
JWS wrote:
> You seem
Someone who isn't fucked up like you, someone who isn't as emotionally
fragile as you are, someone who can handle reality would be agreeing
here: It's fake news. It's propaganda. The media is labelling BULLSHIT as
science. It's reporting lies.
And you know it! It's a fact. You. Know. It's. Happening.
You know Gwobull Warbling is a crock of shit. You know there isn't a lick
of science involved. This "Water rises of decades or even centuries after
ice falls in" is utter crap. It's a lie. And you know it.
But, you're such a massive joke, you're so demented you can't admit it.
You are WORSE than any Young Earth Creationist.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/675289305206472704
> You seem
Someone who isn't fucked up like you, someone who isn't as emotionally
fragile as you are, someone who can handle reality would be agreeing
here: It's fake news. It's propaganda. The media is labelling BULLSHIT as
science. It's reporting lies.
And you know it! It's a fact. You. Know. It's. Happening.
You know Gwobull Warbling is a crock of shit. You know there isn't a lick
of science involved. This "Water rises of decades or even centuries after
ice falls in" is utter crap. It's a lie. And you know it.
But, you're such a massive joke, you're so demented you can't admit it.
You are WORSE than any Young Earth Creationist.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/675289305206472704
JTEM
Feb 4, 2022, 3:38:33 PM2/4/22
to
JWS wrote:
> WOW! That's not even a Whoosh!
...it said, as it defended fake news as "Science."
> WOW! That's not even a Whoosh!
(Let me know when it dawns on you)
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/675289305206472704
Ted
Feb 4, 2022, 10:40:22 PM2/4/22
to
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 18:01:03 -0800 (PST), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Wow, your mental illness flares up, cowering behind a sock puppet,
and
> suddenly ice doesn't work the way ice
> works, not anymore.
You're thinking about dry ice, JTurd.
wrote:
> Wow, your mental illness flares up, cowering behind a sock puppet,
and
> suddenly ice doesn't work the way ice
> works, not anymore.
You're thinking about dry ice, JTurd.
Ted
Feb 4, 2022, 10:59:08 PM2/4/22
to
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 12:36:50 -0800 (PST), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> JWS wrote:
> > You seem
> like a dick sucker? That's because I am!
We know.
wrote:
> JWS wrote:
> > You seem
> like a dick sucker? That's because I am!
We know.
JTEM
Feb 6, 2022, 4:28:05 PM2/6/22
to
You are so brave & clever, the way you walk in step perfectly as the media
orders you to, not to mention how you've managed to reinvent the laws of
nature so that now ice raises the water level as it melts...
That, or you're a disgrace & laughed at by everyone who makes the mistake
of reading one of your demented posts.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/675396082168184832
JTEM
Feb 6, 2022, 4:29:35 PM2/6/22
to
Hmm. Nothing has changed. Ice still doesn't raise water levels as it melts and
you're still exposed as a fucked up troll for pretending that it does.
Thank you for making me look so superior, again.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/675396082168184832
Michelle Malkin
Feb 6, 2022, 4:43:17 PM2/6/22
to
On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 12:15:37 AM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>
> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
> >>> head injuries that affected you?
> >> Yes, I did,
> >
> > Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> > convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
> like to have honest and serious debate. So it doesn't bother me.
> >>>
> >>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
> >>> head injuries that affected you?
> >> Yes, I did,
> >
> > Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> > convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
As long as you say weird things such as knowledge resides in the heart
and not the brain, you can never have a serious debate with anyone. No
one takes anything you say seriously.
Michelle Malkin
Feb 6, 2022, 4:46:10 PM2/6/22
to
On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 9:09:20 AM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
Michael Christ
Feb 6, 2022, 5:00:53 PM2/6/22
to
You say nothing but silly childish things. Seriously.
Michael Christ
--
Jesus is the Father, Jesus is God, Jesus is the Lord.
Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were
YET sinners, Christ died for us.
Jeremiah 10:23 O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it
is not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
"To seek your own will is to seek your own glory."
"If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything."
"Sin is not what you do, it is what you are."
"What makes the bible the truth? The resonance of God."
"All men were born sinners. Why? Because all men were born not loving
God with all their heart, soul and mind. An abomination."
"Compromise will condemn you."
"There are no sinners in Christ Jesus."
"My sons are born of Me. In them is no darkness at all."
"You can't learn righteousness. Haven't you had enough time already to
know that?"
"The way of truth is the testimony of life."
"I merely speak the truth, what is revealed to me, and the cards fall
where God intends."
"Nothing that is produced is produced without first being faith."
"You can only find proof of God through faith because that is how we all
live, by faith."
"It is not what you do that matters, it is how you treat Me."
"Keep going forward. Forget about the past. Lift up your head, look
ahead."
"You cannot be free with guilt in your heart."
"Priority is everything."
"The truth doesn't need evidence, it is evidence."
"There is no greater possession a man has than his own will, to squander
it or to place it where it truly belongs."
"An atheist is a fool who thinks truth is found in living a lie."
"Saying "prove it" [as a foundation] is merely a straw man, to a straw man."
"Wait, rest, be still, and know."
"No man can wash his own hands!!!"
"I find this in the Christianity religions: 'Nobody's perfect' they say,
and they use that as an excuse not to do what is perfect."
The Atheist: "They don't believe and put their faith in a Creator. So
no evidence and proof is to be found!!"
"The world is the way it is because God can't compromise who He is."
"Man is not the centre of being."
El Kabong
Feb 6, 2022, 5:50:07 PM2/6/22
to
Michael Christ <jesusisth...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/02/2022 8:43 am, Michelle Malkin wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 12:15:37 AM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
> >>>>> head injuries that affected you?
> >>>> Yes, I did,
> >>>
> >>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> >>> convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> >> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
> >> like to have honest and serious debate. So it doesn't bother me.
> >
> > As long as you say weird things such as knowledge resides in the heart
> > and not the brain, you can never have a serious debate with anyone. No
> > one takes anything you say seriously.
>
> I do. You, on the other hand, how can anyone take seriously what you say?
>
> You say nothing but silly childish things. Seriously.
Do you take your christhood seriously?
> On 7/02/2022 8:43 am, Michelle Malkin wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 12:15:37 AM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
> >> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
> >>>>> head injuries that affected you?
> >>>> Yes, I did,
> >>>
> >>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
> >>> convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
> >> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
> >> like to have honest and serious debate. So it doesn't bother me.
> >
> > As long as you say weird things such as knowledge resides in the heart
> > and not the brain, you can never have a serious debate with anyone. No
> > one takes anything you say seriously.
>
> I do. You, on the other hand, how can anyone take seriously what you say?
>
> You say nothing but silly childish things. Seriously.
John Locke
Feb 7, 2022, 2:19:35 PM2/7/22
to
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 09:00:48 +1100, Michael Christ
<jesusisth...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 7/02/2022 8:43 am, Michelle Malkin wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 12:15:37 AM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
>>> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
>>>>>> head injuries that affected you?
>>>>> Yes, I did,
>>>>
>>>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
>>>> convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
>>> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
>>> like to have honest and serious debate. So it doesn't bother me.
>>
>> As long as you say weird things such as knowledge resides in the heart
>> and not the brain, you can never have a serious debate with anyone. No
>> one takes anything you say seriously.
>
>I do. You, on the other hand, how can anyone take seriously what you say?
>
>You say nothing but silly childish things. Seriously.
>
...my irony meter just maxed out...Seriously !
<jesusisth...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 7/02/2022 8:43 am, Michelle Malkin wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 12:15:37 AM UTC-5, aaa wrote:
>>> On 2022-02-03 12:10 a.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 10:04:39 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-02-02 11:51 p.m., THE son of the First Cause wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 9:47:17 PM UTC-7, aaa wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for agreeing with my simple point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell me something, triple a towing service, did you ever have
>>>>>> head injuries that affected you?
>>>>> Yes, I did,
>>>>
>>>> Don't you think that would go against whatever you are arguing here,
>>>> convenient for the opposing viewpoint, isn't it?
>>> It would be a convenient excuse to ignore my point, yes, but I would
>>> like to have honest and serious debate. So it doesn't bother me.
>>
>> As long as you say weird things such as knowledge resides in the heart
>> and not the brain, you can never have a serious debate with anyone. No
>> one takes anything you say seriously.
>
>I do. You, on the other hand, how can anyone take seriously what you say?
>
>You say nothing but silly childish things. Seriously.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has
a responsibility to give your life meaning and point
The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful
as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it.
- Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
JTEM
Feb 7, 2022, 2:38:18 PM2/7/22
to
John Locke wrote:
> ...my irony meter
You don't have one. You're a fake atheists who by his own standards can't
even support the claim that atheists exist, much less prove it, a nimrod
who think Darwin somehow invented or discovered evolution, or it was even
his "Theory," an idiot that believes abiogenesis is science AND is currently in
a thread where he is defending junk, pure propaganda as "Science."
You don't have an irony meter. If you did, the exploding pieces would have
torn through you like shrapnel decades ago.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/675396082168184832
> ...my irony meter
You don't have one. You're a fake atheists who by his own standards can't
even support the claim that atheists exist, much less prove it, a nimrod
who think Darwin somehow invented or discovered evolution, or it was even
his "Theory," an idiot that believes abiogenesis is science AND is currently in
a thread where he is defending junk, pure propaganda as "Science."
You don't have an irony meter. If you did, the exploding pieces would have
torn through you like shrapnel decades ago.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/675396082168184832
John Locke
Feb 7, 2022, 5:26:43 PM2/7/22
to
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:38:15 -0800 (PST), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>John Locke wrote:
>
>> ...my irony meter
>
>You don't have one. You're a fake atheists who by his own standards can't
>even support the claim that atheists exist, much less prove it,
>
...but of course I can prove it. I've stated many times that there's
no evidence to the substantiate the existence of any "God"/gods
and that the probability of the existence of any god is near zero.
You've been reading my posts...you should know by now that I
reject the silly notion that there's a magic sky daddy !
>a nimrod who thinks Darwin somehow invented or discovered evolution,
>or it was even his "Theory".
>
...no, of course I don't believe that Darwin was the first. There
were others before him such as Lamarck and Hilaire who proposed
their own versions of evolution. It was Darwin, however, who
firsrt proposed that complexity evolved simply as a result of life
adapting to its local conditions from one generation to the next
which set the theory in motion to the current day.
>an idiot that believes abiogenesis is science AND is currently in
>a thread where he is defending junk, pure propaganda as "Science."
>
...we know that abiogenesis happened. because we're here.
There's no other viable option. Problem is, we don't the bio-chemical
and logistical details of how it happened. It's very difficult to
reconstruct the primordial earth environment billions of years ago.
Most likely there were millions of concurrent bio-chemical reactions
going on all over the planet in tide pools and possibly around
underwater thermo-vents that eventually led to living cells. Science
will eventually figure it out but NOT by proposing supernatural
bullshit and when they do, it'll be the death knell for most
religions.
>You don't have an irony meter. If you did, the exploding pieces would have
>torn through you like shrapnel decades ago.
>
...heh, heh...yes I do. One needs a meter for amusement when reading
posts form delusional theists !
wrote:
>John Locke wrote:
>
>> ...my irony meter
>
>You don't have one. You're a fake atheists who by his own standards can't
>even support the claim that atheists exist, much less prove it,
>
no evidence to the substantiate the existence of any "God"/gods
and that the probability of the existence of any god is near zero.
You've been reading my posts...you should know by now that I
reject the silly notion that there's a magic sky daddy !
>a nimrod who thinks Darwin somehow invented or discovered evolution,
>or it was even his "Theory".
>
...no, of course I don't believe that Darwin was the first. There
were others before him such as Lamarck and Hilaire who proposed
their own versions of evolution. It was Darwin, however, who
firsrt proposed that complexity evolved simply as a result of life
adapting to its local conditions from one generation to the next
which set the theory in motion to the current day.
>an idiot that believes abiogenesis is science AND is currently in
>a thread where he is defending junk, pure propaganda as "Science."
>
There's no other viable option. Problem is, we don't the bio-chemical
and logistical details of how it happened. It's very difficult to
reconstruct the primordial earth environment billions of years ago.
Most likely there were millions of concurrent bio-chemical reactions
going on all over the planet in tide pools and possibly around
underwater thermo-vents that eventually led to living cells. Science
will eventually figure it out but NOT by proposing supernatural
bullshit and when they do, it'll be the death knell for most
religions.
>You don't have an irony meter. If you did, the exploding pieces would have
>torn through you like shrapnel decades ago.
>
posts form delusional theists !
JTEM
Feb 7, 2022, 10:42:59 PM2/7/22
to
John Locke wrote:
> JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >You don't have one. You're a fake atheists who by his own standards can't
> >even support the claim that atheists exist, much less prove it,
> ...but of course I can prove it.
Lol! Liar. Not a good liar. In fact, you're a shitty liar because you had to know
that I would point out the fact you didn't do it. You didn't support let alone
"Prove" that atheists exists, not by any standard that you yourself exist.
> >a nimrod who thinks Darwin somehow invented or discovered evolution,
> >or it was even his "Theory".
> ...no, of course I don't believe that Darwin was the first.
The first... what?
>There
> were others before him such as Lamarck and Hilaire who proposed
> their own versions of evolution.
> It was Darwin, however, who
> firsrt proposed that complexity evolved simply as a result of life
> adapting to its local conditions from one generation to the next
> which set the theory in motion to the current day.
You misspelled "Wallace" but that's par for the course...
> ...we know that abiogenesis happened.
Your faith in your religion is noted.
Again, lucky you have no irony meter...
-- --
https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html
> JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >You don't have one. You're a fake atheists who by his own standards can't
> >even support the claim that atheists exist, much less prove it,
> ...but of course I can prove it.
that I would point out the fact you didn't do it. You didn't support let alone
"Prove" that atheists exists, not by any standard that you yourself exist.
> >a nimrod who thinks Darwin somehow invented or discovered evolution,
> >or it was even his "Theory".
> ...no, of course I don't believe that Darwin was the first.
>There
> were others before him such as Lamarck and Hilaire who proposed
> their own versions of evolution.
> It was Darwin, however, who
> firsrt proposed that complexity evolved simply as a result of life
> adapting to its local conditions from one generation to the next
> which set the theory in motion to the current day.
> ...we know that abiogenesis happened.
Again, lucky you have no irony meter...
-- --
https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html
Ted
Feb 9, 2022, 11:48:45 PM2/9/22
to
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 19:42:56 -0800 (PST), Illiterate Buffon JTurd
> > > atheists who can't
> > > even support the claim that I don't eat
> > > shit, much less prove it,
> > ...but of course I can prove it.
> Lol! Liar. Not a good liar. In fact, you're a
> shitty liar because you had to know
> that I would point out the fact I do eat it.
> standard.
> > > Also I'm an illiterate moron who thinks
> > > "nimrod" is somehow synonymous with
> > > "idiot" because I'm too stupid to
> > > understand a literary reference from a
> > > Bugs Bunny cartoon.
> > > You believe Darwin was the first thing I
> > > encountered that I'm too retarded to
> > > understand?
> > ...no, of course I don't believe that Darwin
> > was the first. There were others before
> > him.
True. Such as Bugs Bunny.
> > > atheists who can't
> > > even support the claim that I don't eat
> > > shit, much less prove it,
> > ...but of course I can prove it.
> Lol! Liar. Not a good liar. In fact, you're a
> shitty liar because you had to know
> You didn't support let alone
> "Prove" that I don't eat shit, not by any
> standard.
> > > Also I'm an illiterate moron who thinks
> > > "nimrod" is somehow synonymous with
> > > "idiot" because I'm too stupid to
> > > understand a literary reference from a
> > > Bugs Bunny cartoon.
> > > You believe Darwin was the first thing I
> > > encountered that I'm too retarded to
> > > understand?
> > ...no, of course I don't believe that Darwin
> > him.
True. Such as Bugs Bunny.
JTEM
Feb 20, 2022, 5:07:54 AM2/20/22
to
So the media reported that it could take decades, or even a century, for
a glacier that has plunged into the ocean to raise sea level, and the
mental illness pretending it's an atheist thinks this is "Science."
Not just that, the mental illness pretending it's an atheist is militantly
defending this idiocy as "Science"...
Ice doesn't raise water levels as it melts. You plop ice into a glass of
water, the water line goes up. The ice melt, the water line stays
exactly where it was when you placed the ice inside.
You know this. you learned this as a child. And now you're ignoring
what you know because you're fucked up. Emotionally, you can't
deal with the fact that the media is lying to you.
After YEARS of being told that you're a superior human being for
deepthroating the media, you were confronted by the fact that you
are a fucking idiot. And you can't deal with it.
You'd rather be boned up the ass by the 1%, through its media, then
admit that you were played.
You're pathetic.
-- --
https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html
Ted
Feb 20, 2022, 2:09:26 PM2/20/22
to
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:07:48 -0800 (PST), JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
wrote:
LOL. True.
> You're pathetic.
Your posts are appreciated, JTEM. You're right more often than not.
wrote:
> You're pathetic.
Your posts are appreciated, JTEM. You're right more often than not.
%
Feb 20, 2022, 2:26:10 PM2/20/22
to
0 new messages