The PCR tests don’t work

[Andrew W]

https://off-guardian.org/2021/08/03/repeat-after-me-the-pcr-tests-dont-work/

If you run your tests at 30 cycles or more the results are very likely to be
junk and any positives meaningless. And, incredibly, most labs performing
these tests have been doing just that – running cycles of 30 or more, even
up to 45.

[Malte Runz]

On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 23:36:11 +1100, "Andrew W" <sp...@defense.com>
wrote:

By Catte Black. I'm sure Catte Black is qualified to pontificate on
vaccines and testing. She (I assume it's a she) says:

"We know it but keep forgetting it. So let’s say it again.

The PCR tests don’t work.

The PCR tests. /Don’t. Work/.

We all know the danger of false positives if too many cycles are run.
This is admitted even by Fauci."

Well, let's see what Fauci "admitted" this time. The link is embedded
in Catte's piece.

https://archive.is/7fqu3

"In newly surfaced July interview, Fauci warns that widely used COVID
tests may pick up 'dead' virus"

So, the tests do pick up virus. Let's keep that in mind.

"In newly resurfaced video from July, Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared to
acknowledge that large numbers of positive COVID-19 cases may arise
from oversensitive tests that pick up mere fragments of the virus
rather than active, viable infections."

"Appeared to acknowledge" = "Admitted". Not off to a good start.

"If true, ...

'I'm not sayin' it's true... but it's true!!!'


"... many patients may have been receiving false-positive test results
— causing much needless anxiety and disruption to everyday life —
while the numbers of COVID-19 cases reported by public health
authorities and major COVID tracking websites could be vastly
overstated."

Of course it's never good to create "needless anxiety". I agree 100%.
Just look at what all the lies about the vaccines have caused.
Millions of people are too scared to get the shot, because they've
been told it'll kill them or turn them into mindless drones controlled
by Big Deep Globalist Elite State. The people spreading such lies
should be ashamed.

"At the center of the debate is the "cycle threshold" at which a PCR
test operates. ..."

Again, the test do work, insofar as they can detect the virus and that
they do not give 'false negatives'. But, do to the way the tests are
run, there is a risk that they turn out a false positive. In that
case, correct me if I'm wrong here, the test shows that the test
subject has been infected earlier, and still has some dead virus in
their system.

The rest of the article milks Fauci's 'admission', and they conclude
that:

"Positive COVID-19 tests have been greatly increasing since the
beginning of October. On Thursday of this week the U.S posted a new
one-day record of nearly 120,000 new cases, though — as has been the
case for the course of the pandemic — it is unclear how many of those
test results are indicative of actual infection and how many are the
product of the high cycle thresholds of the kind Fauci warned about."

What I conclude is that the test sometimes might give a false
positive, but not a false negative.

This is another great example of the conspiracy theorist's demand for
'perfection in science'. If it is not 110% accurate, all the time, in
any and all circumstances, we are allowed to dismiss everything They
say, and make up our own 'truths' and have our own 'specialists'.

The rest of Catte Black's article is irrelevant speculation and fear
mongering like this:

"That the pandemic has been invented in part to sell the various
potentially toxic non-vaccines is undeniable. ..."

And

"Depopulation or just cynical exploitation of an opportunity to shift
those damn mRNA “vaccines” never previously approved for human use
(because the animal trials were a disaster)?"

With all do respect, and there's not a helluva lot of it going your
way, Catte Black, FUCK YOU!


--
Malte Runz

[sri atman devi]

//

> The rest of Catte Black's article is irrelevant speculation and fear
> mongering like this:

> "That the pandemic has been invented in part to sell the various
> potentially toxic non-vaccines is undeniable. ..."

> And

> "Depopulation or just cynical exploitation of an opportunity to shift
> those damn mRNA “vaccines” never previously approved for human use
> (because the animal trials were a disaster)?"

> With all do respect, and there's not a helluva lot of it going your
> way, Catte Black, FUCK YOU!

Catte Black's Facebook page is very ... entertaining.

Here's a quote from an article someone posted on her page:

"In contrast to what is generally expected in science, the existence of viruses
is not factually proven in virology. Instead, their existence is considered to be proven
solely on the basis of interpreted appearances and conceptual models.
Pathogenic viruses are thus nothing more than mere consensus, i.e. an opinion
that has been agreed upon in science".

Viruses don't exist! Problem solved!!!

That might explain this phrase from her OffGuardian article:
"RNA from the (alleged) Sars-Cov-2 virus".

Alleged virus.

I definitely think Andrew W. should run with this one.



Sri

[Michelle Malkin]

Your brain doesn't work, Andyroo.

[Malte Runz]

I've heard, from an insider, that bacteria is just a concept! Big
Iodine manipulating the gullible masses!

>That might explain this phrase from her OffGuardian article:
>"RNA from the (alleged) Sars-Cov-2 virus".
>
>Alleged virus.
>
>I definitely think Andrew W. should run with this one.

Especially if we fact-check it.

--
Malte Runz

[sri atman devi]

//

> >Catte Black's Facebook page is very ... entertaining.

> >Here's a quote from an article someone posted on her page:

> >"In contrast to what is generally expected in science, the existence of viruses
> >is not factually proven in virology. Instead, their existence is considered to be proven
> >solely on the basis of interpreted appearances and conceptual models.
> >Pathogenic viruses are thus nothing more than mere consensus, i.e. an opinion
> >that has been agreed upon in science".

> >Viruses don't exist! Problem solved!!!
> I've heard, from an insider, that bacteria is just a concept! Big
> Iodine manipulating the gullible masses!
> >That might explain this phrase from her OffGuardian article:
> >"RNA from the (alleged) Sars-Cov-2 virus".

> >Alleged virus.

> >I definitely think Andrew W. should run with this one.

> Especially if we fact-check it.

Heh.

It appears to go back to this guy. Excuse me, this "well-known virologist".

Full disclosure: I could only read so far. I had to stop before my head exploded.

https://tinyurl.com/2tbr3bdk



Sri

[El Kabong]

I think that one's on the Andrew's Proof list...

#10. Govt/Corps are corrupt. You have to judge them from
their motives.

Is Big Iodine corrupt? Check.
Motivated to fool us? Check.

Ditto for virii and Big Vaxen.

There's your smoking gun.

[sri atman devi]

Go to this writer's Facebook page. Look for a post about "Projekt Immanuel".

If you google for "Projekt Immanuel", you will find it's based on
a virologist named Stefan Lanka. And if you pursue that name,
you will come across this interview with Dr. Lanka.

https://tinyurl.com/2tbr3bdk



Bottom line: viruses do not cause illness. And the reason
viruses do not cause illness is that viruses do not exist.

Problem solved.




Sri

[Andrew W]

"sri atman devi" wrote in message
news:f8bc75cb-536c-4ce6...@googlegroups.com...

Viruses do not exist as independent life forms. Viruses are just small
collections of genetic code, either DNA or RNA, surrounded by a protein
coat. A virus cannot replicate alone.

[sri atman devi]

That is all correct.

I was just pointing out that if we pursue the links and claims made
on the Facebook page of your source for this thread, we end up
with a virologist who claims that viruses do not exist. Period.

"Doing your own research" on some of the things you post here
can lead one to some very ... interesting ... world views indeed.



Sri

[Andrew W]

"sri atman devi" wrote in message

news:ac690a8c-3861-4718...@googlegroups.com...

You are taking the statement too strictly and literally.

>
>"Doing your own research" on some of the things you post here
>can lead one to some very ... interesting ... world views indeed.
>

How do you know if some things that sound strange might be true?
Fact is often stranger than fiction.

[Malte Runz]

On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:10:15 +1100, "Andrew W" <sp...@defense.com>

Sure. Don't take people at their word. Always interpret, or put your
own spin on what is said. That way you can have anyone admitting
anything you need them to have admitted. Plus, do stay away from
accurate numbers. Who needs them anyway.

>
>>
>>"Doing your own research" on some of the things you post here
>>can lead one to some very ... interesting ... world views indeed.
>>
>
>How do you know if some things that sound strange might be true?
>Fact is often stranger than fiction.

And sometimes the facts are just what you see:

There is a real virus, just like those we have seen earlier.

It is highly infectious.

It can kill you.

It mutates into new strains.

Vaccines have been developed.

They reduce the chances of dying from the virus dramatically.

There are millions of people, who refuse to get vaccinated.

Those people perpetuate the pandemic and cause thousands of otherwise
preventable deaths.

--
Malte Runz

[sri atman devi]

//

> >I was just pointing out that if we pursue the links and claims made
> >on the Facebook page of your source for this thread, we end up
> >with a virologist who claims that viruses do not exist. Period.


> You are taking the statement too strictly and literally.

Spoken like someone who did not read the link.

"Do viruses exist? No. Simply because they cannot exist.
You look at what virologists publish and you realise that they refute
themselves".

or:

"In short, if one looks at what virologists do, one
concludes that no, there is no such thing as a
virus. Knowing the history we understand that it
is in fact a wrong model and that the correct
one was censored".

Literal enough for you?

> >"Doing your own research" on some of the things you post here
> >can lead one to some very ... interesting ... world views indeed.

> How do you know if some things that sound strange might be true?

How do you know the Flat Earthers are wrong?

How do you know the breatharians are wrong?

How do you know the Hollow Earthers are wrong?

How do you know the armed guards stopping us
from exploring the Antarctic Ice Wall which keeps
the Earth's waters from falling into space are not there?

> Fact is often stranger than fiction.

And fiction is far easier to construct than fact is to prove.



Sri

[JWS]

Does not matter. As long as anti-vax Rightards
are dying, that is the only thing that matters.
Thanks for your help in accomplishing our goals.