Re: Flying Spaghetti Proto-cell

[Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess]

On Wed, 08 May 2013 18:15:12 -0800
linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
> Father Haskell wrote:
> > On May 8, 7:42 am,AsteroidSe...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> >4:17 AMlinuxgal
> >> >- show quoted text -
> >> >And the starch was without form and void. But it said to itself,
> >> >"Let there be linguini!" and the Flying Spaghetti Monster took
> >> >shape.
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians
> >> >326-0
> >> >
> >> >Which is why it's a bad argument.
> > But it meshes with string theory*perfectly*, more
> > so than any other imagined deity!
>
> The quantum entanglement is a problem, however.

Like a cat stuck in a box, his great noodliness was in a canned state,
until there was a revelation brought forth by the wonderous can opener.

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"If you use too much circular reasoning, you might go dizzy!"
-- The Cool Tech Ace (a.k.a., "Dan the Man"; Jun 13, 2012)

[Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess]

On Tue, 7 May 2013 21:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Astero...@yahoo.com wrote:

> It's not that simple. It never happens in a lab.

...unless the lab is actually a pregnant bitch, in which case there
could be whole litters of cell formations, divisions, etc., all
"happening in a lab."

Or were you thinking of a fair popular misspelling of "dog?"

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

"Dogs have owners; cats have staff."
-- Don Kresch

[linuxgal]

Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess wrote:
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 18:15:12 -0800
> linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>> Father Haskell wrote:
>>> On May 8, 7:42 am,AsteroidSe...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>> 4:17 AMlinuxgal
>>>>> - show quoted text -
>>>>> And the starch was without form and void. But it said to itself,
>>>>> "Let there be linguini!" and the Flying Spaghetti Monster took
>>>>> shape.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians
>>>>> 326-0
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is why it's a bad argument.
>>> But it meshes with string theory*perfectly*, more
>>> so than any other imagined deity!
>>
>> The quantum entanglement is a problem, however.
>
> Like a cat stuck in a box, his great noodliness was in a canned state,
> until there was a revelation brought forth by the wonderous can opener.

And the revelation was that His Noodliness had divided into countless
Spaghetti-Os.