Thermite v Thermate

Rocky

unread,

Nov 17, 2013, 8:16:20 PM11/17/13

to

To those that want or need some help with the difference between thermite
and the thermate I have two URLs.

Published on Dec 6, 2012
Seems to be confusion on the difference between thermite and thermate. TH3
grenades are thermate, not thermite. Here is a small scale of the
difference.

Thermite v Thermate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmENraVFXWA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermate

And neither one of them was very loud making them the perfect way to weaken
tall buildings and then blame it's destruction on something else. <G>

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

Rocky

Tony Dragon

unread,

Nov 18, 2013, 2:55:07 AM11/18/13

to

No details there of the chemical equation of burning thermate, unless
you know that you can't know the outcome after the burn, therefore you
do not know what compounds/elements exist after the burn.

Rocky

unread,

Nov 18, 2013, 3:01:05 AM11/18/13

to

"Tony Dragon" <tony....@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:L8KdnTE5Oa1BWhTP...@bt.com...

Ok, I pressed 1 for English and it didn't help.

Tony Dragon

unread,

Nov 18, 2013, 7:11:12 AM11/18/13

to

Try harder, but to help you, after thermate burns, what
elements/compounds then exist.

Dean Markley

unread,

Nov 18, 2013, 7:58:09 AM11/18/13

to

You 'effing conspiracy nuts and your YouTube videos. Sheesh! You do realize that Thermite/Thermate is not a steel cutting mechanism? And none of you can answer how such a conspiracy was kept secret by the thousands of people it supposedly involved? And how did they smuggle in the tons of thermite/thermate? Yeah, over the weekend as you stated before. LMAO.

Rocky

unread,

Nov 18, 2013, 11:10:35 AM11/18/13

to

"Dean Markley" <dama...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c187e728-3ee0-499b...@googlegroups.com...

On Sunday, November 17, 2013 8:16:20 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
> To those that want or need some help with the difference between thermite
> and the thermate I have two URLs.
>
> Published on Dec 6, 2012
> Seems to be confusion on the difference between thermite and thermate. TH3
> grenades are thermate, not thermite. Here is a small scale of the
> difference.
>
> Thermite v Thermate
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmENraVFXWA
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermate
>
> And neither one of them was very loud making them the perfect way to
> weaken
> tall buildings and then blame it's destruction on something else. <G>
>
> 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g
>
> Rocky

==========

> You 'effing conspiracy nuts and your YouTube videos. Sheesh!

Do not forget regardless of how someone thinks about 9/11 it is always a
conspiracy because you are trying to say it was a conspiracy of 19 alleged
hijackers.

> You do realize that Thermite/Thermate is not a steel cutting mechanism?

If you watched the last video above you would have seen there is at least
one way to make it a steel cutting mechanism and patents prove there are
more.

> And none of you can answer how such a conspiracy was kept secret by the
> thousands of people it supposedly involved?

Certainly you know why the Anthrax attacks started on 9/11/01 and don't tell
me you don't know about non-disclosure agreements and death threats.

> And how did they smuggle in the tons of thermite/thermate? Yeah, over
> the weekend as you stated before. LMAO.

No, I didn't say the weekend but that would probably work too. I stated the
middle of the night for at last 6 week prior to the media hoax. And since
the support columns in the middle of the Twin Towers were in an enclosed
area they could even work on those during broad daylight and never be seen.

And do not forget that the media now claims there was no explosives and yet
the Twin Towers came down at 66% of freefall leaving only 34% of the weight
of the top part of the building to do any crushing. And then after the Twin
Towers were over 1/2 way down there was nothing above to crush the bottom
part yet they still came down? That should have caught people's eyes on
9/11/01 but they were too psyched by other things in Chenny's movie out to
think.

BTW another great video is:

Normal magnalium thermite vs submicron super thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61gImPPFRrk

Rocky

george152

unread,

Nov 18, 2013, 2:03:12 PM11/18/13

to

On 19/11/13 01:11, Tony Dragon wrote:

>
> Try harder, but to help you, after thermate burns, what
> elements/compounds then exist.

You have to stop asking questions based on science or common sense.
Rolloverrocky doesn't do science

John Thimakis

unread,

Jun 13, 2021, 2:03:01 AM6/13/21

to

// And then after the Twin

Towers were over 1/2 way down there was nothing above to crush the bottom

part yet they still came down? //

There was nothing above? Seriously?
Where did that part of the building go? Into a wormhole?
Well obviously it came down. The floors pancaked on top of each other. Once 2 or 3 floors had fallen, the combined weight was greater than the floor below could support, especially because this was now a moving weight not static like before.

Siri Cruise

unread,

Jun 13, 2021, 5:01:40 AM6/13/21

to

In article
<8ae5eab2-ea99-40d8...@googlegroups.com>,

John Thimakis <johnth...@gmail.com> wrote:

> fallen, the combined weight was greater than the floor below could support,
> especially because this was now a moving weight not static like before.

To get technical the combined mass didn't change. What changed
was the momentum and kinetic energy.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed