I've always been aware of the astrological significance of this synastric
aspect and until recently had no personal experience.
Recently I met someone on the Internet and her Moon is about a degree away
from my natal Moon. To say that we've become close is an understatement.
There was something immediately familiar as if we'd met in a previous
lifetime. In my experience it also bears out the traditional interpretation
of this aspect - we both have a similar past, similar ups and downs, similar
family patterns - strong karmic ties. One wouldn't believe that there could
be so much empathy and psychic energy between two people that use the
Internet for a communication medium. We even know when one another is going
to log on!
I'd welcome anyone else that would like to share their experience or
comments.
Russ
I have friends who are a couple with both Moon in Aquarius at exactly the same
degree. They share a very strong bond, even though they come from radically
different cultures. However, they also share a number of especially strong
synastric points.
As for me, there's usually a very strong sexual attraction between myself and
men I've meet with their moons conjunct mine, but not anything lasting. I
suspect that's because indications of whether a relationship is durable go far
beyond this single point of synastry. For example, the moon of the man I
married (with whom I had a very strong karmic relationship) was square my own.
Best,
Maria
----
I've suffered for my art.
Now it's your turn.
http://www.thehandlesspoet.com
Another interesting thing is my Moon conjunct another's Uranus. I've had two
Internet friendships (one I know only from the Web, the other a neighbor I
taught to use it, who later moved and we communicate via the web now) with
people who have Uranus in Scorp within a few degrees of my Moon, and the
coincidences were remarkable and consistant: logging on at the same time,
similar dreams, "feeling" what the other felt, etc, over and over. Both
friendships developed during the last Mars transit through Scorpio, and waned
somewhat after Mars moved into Sag (though the effects increased again with
Mars in Pisces for a while). Both friends have first house Aquarian Moons,
square my own Moon by wide orb, also, and one is a Cap Sun, one a Leo Sun.
Traditional rulership of dreams and psychic phenomenon are both given to the
Moon. It's the deepest part of us; the part that remembers.
<< Subject: Synastry/Moon conjunct Moon
From: "Russ" ru...@safford.fsbusiness.co.uk
Date: Sun, Sep 24, 2000 12:45 PM
Message-id: <8qknba$qrl$1...@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>
>>
Sharyn
You! Out of the Gene Pool!
>Has anyone ever met their soulmate? I'm referring to synastry and person
>A's Moon conjunct person B's.
>
>I've always been aware of the astrological significance of this synastric
>aspect and until recently had no personal experience.
>
>Recently I met someone on the Internet and her Moon is about a degree away
>from my natal Moon. To say that we've become close is an understatement.
>There was something immediately familiar as if we'd met in a previous
>lifetime. In my experience it also bears out the traditional interpretation
>of this aspect - we both have a similar past, similar ups and downs, similar
>family patterns - strong karmic ties. One wouldn't believe that there could
>be so much empathy and psychic energy between two people that use the
>Internet for a communication medium. We even know when one another is going
>to log on!
>
>I'd welcome anyone else that would like to share their experience or
>comments.
>
>Russ
REPLY
Just a few comments. (We've got to keep you on track here)!
Do you recall when you discovered her Moon position? Because if it was
early in your conversations, you could have become a bit biased.
Having the same degree as another person, as we all know does bring
with it similarities.
Also, I suppose we've all seen several examples of how new friends can
talk endlessly and think they agree on almost everything. Some get
married and 50% of them get divorced. If the partner is born in
another country nearly all get divorced (according to a new survey
released yesterday).
Anyway it's good to hear about this, and I hope you can share
something about the similarities you have, for our collective
information. It would be interesting too, to hear about other
connections in your Charts.
Regarding finding compatible people on the Internet: I reached the
conclusion a few months ago that it may be better than real-life
meetings because character and personality seem to show very clearly -
and it's so quick.
Ray Murphy
DJ
Yah, Ray, but you've gotta check your pulse every five seconds and keep really
clear in romantic situations. The Internet is a veritable swamp of ego
projection and deception. At least, that's been my experience as a woman on
the Net for 10 years.
Cheers,
The Moon sign involved is Gemini (emphasis on communication and a very
mercurial medium - The Internet!).
We will meet one day and it will be interesting to see what transits are
plugging into both or our charts when we do.
Russ
Russ <ru...@safford.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8qknba$qrl$1...@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>Regarding finding compatible people on the Internet: I reached the
>>conclusion a few months ago that it may be better than real-life
>>meetings because character and personality seem to show very clearly -
>>and it's so quick.
>
>Yah, Ray, but you've gotta check your pulse every five seconds and keep
>really
>clear in romantic situations. The Internet is a veritable swamp of ego
>projection and deception. At least, that's been my experience as a woman on
>the Net for 10 years.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Maria
REPLY
Yes Maria, that sounds right, but I wasn't referring to anything
romantic in my case, but just a general feeling about different people
according to the words they type (like on this NG), but I suppose that
Chat could be quite different at times.
Nevertheless I still think that it would be hard not to show more and
more about ones'self the more one writes.
Ray
True, Ray. It's much safer when it's not a romantic situation. I just keep
reminding myself (and sometimes friends, when they're musing) to not try and
fill in the gaps left by electronic communication. And I've found that people
naturally reveal certain sides of themselves in e-writing that they don't in
person, and vica versa.
Joyce
"Blacktech" <blac...@aol.combbanzai> wrote in message
news:20000924215146...@ng-bh1.aol.com...
> >Regarding finding compatible people on the Internet: I reached the
> >conclusion a few months ago that it may be better than real-life
> >meetings because character and personality seem to show very clearly -
> >and it's so quick.
>
> Yah, Ray, but you've gotta check your pulse every five seconds and keep
really
> clear in romantic situations. The Internet is a veritable swamp of ego
> projection and deception. At least, that's been my experience as a woman
on
> the Net for 10 years.
>
>Three years ago I met my man on the internet. When we first got talking I
>did his chart and came up with a Leo Asc. It put me off any thought of a
>relationship, having had a very bad time with a Leo Sun ex husband.
>We chatted and met a few times, he didn't seem to be Leo Asc he was too
>quiet, then he gave me the correct time, 12 hours out. I can't decide if he
>is 29 Sag or 0 deg Cap. He seems more like a Capricorn but he has a 12th
>house Sat sq sun/mercury. I have Gem asc so it would be perfect if he was
>Sag but it doesnt matter because we are already in the relationship now.
>He has a 16 pisces sun and 17 taurus moon - I have an 18 pisces moon and 8
>taurus sun. We dont argue, we have more or less the same values and goals.
>We know what each other are thinking/feeling, we go through similar
>experiences - his dad died when he was 17 - my dad died when I was 17, he
>was married to a woman with a scorpio moon I married a scorpio asc.
>We didnt jump into a relationship it just slowly progressed into what we
>have now.
>I feel as though I have met my soul mate but who can tell? It might be
>perfect now because we both have something to experience together in the
>future.
>
>Joyce
REPLY
Joyce, that's one of the disappointing things I hear from people
(especially Astrologers): when they keep their distance from someone -
based on one Chart factor, such as a Sun Sign.
Sure, some people know what they ~don't~ need in their lives - but the
example you gave of Leo Asc is actually quite harmless in reality. I
could understand an aversion to quite a few other factors, which I
won't mention here for obvious reasons.
Those Sun-Moon connections look like a very good starting point for
your synastry! (The potential Pisces/Taurus problems would be all
understood and forgiven easily).
Ray
<SNIP>
At least, that's been my experience as a woman on
>the Net for 10 years.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Maria
REPLY
I missed that point when I replied before -"10 years"
That IS a lot of experience!
You probably know things we are yet to learn.
Anything you care to pass on?
Ray
>>Nevertheless I still think that it would be hard not to show more and
>>more about ones'self the more one writes.
>
>True, Ray. It's much safer when it's not a romantic situation. I just keep
>reminding myself (and sometimes friends, when they're musing) to not try and
>fill in the gaps left by electronic communication. And I've found that
>people
>naturally reveal certain sides of themselves in e-writing that they don't in
>person, and vica versa.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Maria
REPLY
It would be very interesting to find out if people's own perception of
how they sound - matched the perception of others.
Apparently that is a common phenomena in real life - people having no
idea that "they come across" in a particular way.
Ray Murphy
Ginger-lyn
"Joyce" <jo...@jupitercomputers.net> wrote:
> Three years ago I met my man on the internet. When we first got talking I
> did his chart and came up with a Leo Asc. It put me off any thought of a
> relationship, having had a very bad time with a Leo Sun ex husband.
It is such a bad idea to judge all with a certain position by our experience
of one with a certain position. This is astro-bigotry at its worst. Even
if the judgement is a matter of preference rather than righteousness. Any
position at its worst is undesirable and any position at its best is a
delight. Until we are healed on an emotional level, the very act of
intimacy brings out the worst in a person as a part of flushing out the
emotional circuitry. This is one of the things about astrologers or at
least afficianados of astrology, which puts non-astrologers off astrology.
> I have Gem asc so it would be perfect if he was
> Sag but it doesnt matter because we are already in the relationship now.
> He has a 16 pisces sun and 17 taurus moon - I have an 18 pisces moon and 8
> taurus sun. We dont argue, we have more or less the same values and goals.
> We know what each other are thinking/feeling, we go through similar
> experiences - his dad died when he was 17 - my dad died when I was 17, he
> was married to a woman with a scorpio moon I married a scorpio asc.
I, for one, am certain that we are soul-mates with every being we share
reality with. Having said that, the only setup for satisfying intimacy
better than a Sun-Moon conjunction is mutual Sun-Moon conjunctions. Of
course there are many other pleasant ways charts connect and all. But, its
far more important to learn to use the sysastry to solve problems at hand
than to find a 'perfect love'.
> We didnt jump into a relationship it just slowly progressed into what we
have now.
That's healthy enough.
> I feel as though I have met my soul mate but who can tell? It might be
> perfect now because we both have something to experience together in the
> future.
That's astute on your part. I think its true that sometimes we come
together for a time and that's all.
Still intimacy - openness, honesty, cooperative effort, and regular episodes
of spontaneous play, is quite a yoga. Its one of the most universal
spiritual practices. As such intimacy is a powerful healing catalyst
towards wholeness. Severly repressed parts of the psyche and thinly veiled
aspects of self alike are energized and brought to the surface. How common
it is for family members to occasionally treat each other worse than they
would anyone else.
Folks stay together for the long term intentionally. Without the intent,
the sweetest compatability (shown as good synastry) won't hold them
together against the tidal forces of time. With real commitment -
commitment to mutual healing as well as staying together - any synastry can
be made to be compatible.
Its common to approach love with a romantic spin. But Love is ruthless and
we can't maintain it in a pollyannish approach. We must be strong and
resilient. And committed.
Paul Reeder
Oh dear!!!
What survey is that Ray?
Best wishes
Achernar
Wondering whether to consult a divorce lawyer ;-)
Hi Ginger-lyn,
I have a friend who just married, with conjunct moon's. This is both of their
3rd marriage. They married each other in 1985 and divorced in 1988. They
married other people and came back together in 1994. They married for the
second time last weekend. Also an interesting side note...his second wife has
the same birthday (although a year apart) as his current wife.
p/s I'm also Can SU and Ari MO squared...
moondanz
>Hello Joyce and all,
>
>"Joyce" <jo...@jupitercomputers.net> wrote:
>
>> Three years ago I met my man on the internet. When we first got talking I
>> did his chart and came up with a Leo Asc. It put me off any thought of a
>> relationship, having had a very bad time with a Leo Sun ex husband.
>
>It is such a bad idea to judge all with a certain position by our experience
>of one with a certain position. This is astro-bigotry at its worst. Even
>if the judgement is a matter of preference rather than righteousness. Any
>position at its worst is undesirable and any position at its best is a
>delight. Until we are healed on an emotional level, the very act of
>intimacy brings out the worst in a person as a part of flushing out the
>emotional circuitry. This is one of the things about astrologers or at
>least afficianados of astrology, which puts non-astrologers off astrology.
>
>> I have Gem asc so it would be perfect if he was
>> Sag but it doesnt matter because we are already in the relationship now.
>> He has a 16 pisces sun and 17 taurus moon - I have an 18 pisces moon and 8
>> taurus sun. We dont argue, we have more or less the same values and goals.
>> We know what each other are thinking/feeling, we go through similar
>> experiences - his dad died when he was 17 - my dad died when I was 17, he
>> was married to a woman with a scorpio moon I married a scorpio asc.
>
>I, for one, am certain that we are soul-mates with every being we share
>reality with. Having said that, the only setup for satisfying intimacy
>better than a Sun-Moon conjunction is mutual Sun-Moon conjunctions. Of
>course there are many other pleasant ways charts connect and all. But, its
>far more important to learn to use the sysastry to solve problems at hand
>than to find a 'perfect love'.
>
>> We didnt jump into a relationship it just slowly progressed into what we
>have now.
>
>That's healthy enough.
>
>> I feel as though I have met my soul mate but who can tell? It might be
>> perfect now because we both have something to experience together in the
>> future.
>
<< Subject: Re: Synastry/Moon conjunct Moon
From: do...@webtv.net (doovinator)
Date: Sun, Sep 24, 2000 8:27 PM
Message-id: <5960-39C...@storefull-617.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
DJ
>>
Sharyn
REPLY
The survey details were read out by a radio announcer on Radio station
5AA in Adelaide, Australia yesterday (Mon) in the early hours of the
morning. I'm not sure if he was reading from the local newspaper or
other news which comes in from all sources.
Ray
"Paul Reeder" <ree...@azstarnet.com> wrote:
> "Joyce" <jo...@jupitercomputers.net> wrote:
>
> > Three years ago I met my man on the internet. When we first got talking
I
> > did his chart and came up with a Leo Asc. It put me off any thought of a
> > relationship, having had a very bad time with a Leo Sun ex husband.
>
> It is such a bad idea to judge all with a certain position by our
experience
> of one with a certain position. This is astro-bigotry at its worst.
I reread what I had written and want to make sure no one thinks I believe
Joyce is a bigot. I do not! I apologize for the way I worded that. I
apologize to you, Joyce, and I apologize to the group for my hasty ways.
My submissions to the newsgroup are quick and off the cuff, stolen moments
so to speak. I responded to the way words used in Joyce's post because they
represented to me a culturally common problem, a superstitious approach,
which attempts to glean real information from symbols without taking time to
determine the level of energy and awareness at work.
I wish I had called attention to what I see as a cultural problem in a way
that hadn't clumsily pointed fingers at anyone but myself.
Paul Reeder
>Joyce, and all,
>
>"Paul Reeder" <ree...@azstarnet.com> wrote:
>
>> "Joyce" <jo...@jupitercomputers.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Three years ago I met my man on the internet. When we first got talking
>I
>> > did his chart and came up with a Leo Asc. It put me off any thought of a
>> > relationship, having had a very bad time with a Leo Sun ex husband.
>>
>The Moon sign involved is Gemini (emphasis on communication and a very
>mercurial medium - The Internet!).
>
I had a relationship with someone who had Moon conjunct Venus a few
degrees from my Moon in Gemini, which is in the 12th, only major
aspect a quincunx. It was a great connection, one of my favourites. In
the relationship before this one, emotions had got very repressed and
being with this second chap was so opposite - emotions were
everything. He always knew when I wasnt expressing how i felt and I
can still hear him passionately imploring me on one occasion to "tell
me what you are really really feeling, doesnt matter if it will hurt
me or you think I wont like it, it doesnt matter, just empty your
heart .... " and he really cared and understood, it was wonderful.
Emotionally I became very articulate and vibrant in that relationship,
which was a great way to feel. (Such a shame he had a few less
attractive emotional characteristics, like wild, rampant jealousy!)
Corrie.
>Joyce, and all,
>
>"Paul Reeder" <ree...@azstarnet.com> wrote:
>
>> "Joyce" <jo...@jupitercomputers.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Three years ago I met my man on the internet. When we first got talking
>I
>> > did his chart and came up with a Leo Asc. It put me off any thought of a
>> > relationship, having had a very bad time with a Leo Sun ex husband.
>>
>> It is such a bad idea to judge all with a certain position by our
>experience
>> of one with a certain position. This is astro-bigotry at its worst.
>
>I reread what I had written and want to make sure no one thinks I believe
>Joyce is a bigot. I do not! I apologize for the way I worded that. I
>apologize to you, Joyce, and I apologize to the group for my hasty ways.
>
>My submissions to the newsgroup are quick and off the cuff, stolen moments
>so to speak. I responded to the way words used in Joyce's post because they
>represented to me a culturally common problem, a superstitious approach,
>which attempts to glean real information from symbols without taking time to
>determine the level of energy and awareness at work.
>
>I wish I had called attention to what I see as a cultural problem in a way
>that hadn't clumsily pointed fingers at anyone but myself.
>
>Paul Reeder
>
I didn't think you were calling Joyce a bigot but I do agree with what
you said in this and the other post. I'm so sick of hearing people
with rudimentary astrology knowledge say things like "I can't help it
- mercury retro in pisces" or the various sunsign stereotypes. It's
tantamount to blaming astrology for being a jerk or whatever - taking
all responsibility away from themselves.
I'm presently struggling with some Taurean males and notice the
tendency in myself to want to write them off because they're Taureans
(and that's what they're like! type thinking) but I love some of the
taurus stuff in them and know it's not that simple. They're just so
sure they're right! Even my 15yo daughter recently said about her dad
"you just can't talk to him - he tells you what's right and that's
it". I'm beginning to see it's a genuine problem for them to step out
of their worldview (just the few I know - not all taureans) and walk
in another's shoes awhile. Trouble is, 2 of them have had past issues
with virgos (which I am) so you can see the problem... (Especially
since they're my 2 children's fathers.) The other 2 are my older twin
sons. I'm convinced I have something to learn from Taurus (it's on my
MC) but I can't figure it out! Any Taurean men out there with some
insight on how life seems to them, I'd love to hear it. I've wondered
about mercury signs but my group has all 3 possibilities represented
so I don't know what to think. Of course, it could all be me! <gulp>
When we were teens my brother and I read a chinese/sunsign book that
said "virgo tigers (me) always get what they want". My brother
resented me for that! It's not true, anyway! I forget what it said
about his combo (pisces dragon) but it just wasn't fair in his view.
>
>
Couldn't resist joining in this one! I met my (latest?) man through the
internet - his ad said he was a Sagittarian. Hooray! I thought - a fellow
Sag (having previously suffered some trials & tribs with a multi-Pisces).
Only to discover from his chart he had Moon Pisces closely quincunx Neptune
plus Sun/Mercury on the 12th cusp! (A Pisces disguised as a Sag!) However
we do have a lot of good synastry (inc my Moon sextile his Sun). Going back
to the original Moon/Moon theme, our Moons are semi-sextile - hmmm!
When we actually arranged to meet he missed his train and was an hour late.
Checking the chart for when we did meet, Venus was slap-bang on the MC in
Libra! How sweet! The joys of astrology!
Linda at Pooh Corner, somewhere in London
"Ginger-lyn Summer" <glsu...@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:39cf7ead...@news.earthlink.net...
> I'm still keeping an open mind on soulmates, what they are and whether
> they exist, but my husband's Moon and mine are, indeed, conjunct, and
> we certainly feel like we were "meant for each other". In synastry, I
> tend to look at a lot more than Moons, though -- aspects between
> Venus-Mars, Sun-Moon, Ascendant and the inner planets, among other
> things. My husband and I not only have Moons conjunct, we also have
> Suns conjunct, and Venuses as well. Our charts don't perfectly mesh,
> of course, and with our own squares between our Suns and Moons (Cancer
> and Aries), it certainly can get interesting sometimes when that comes
> in within the relationship! But our Moons in Aries desire some
> conflict in order to avoid boredom, so that's perfectly fine with us.
> Although he is 16 years younger than I am, we have a lot in common
> from an emotional perspective -- innate understanding of emotional
> things, ways of reacting and feeling, that are very similar -- exactly
> what I would expect of conjunct Moons.
>
> Ginger-lyn
>
<< Subject: Re: Synastry/Moon conjunct Moon - my apologies
From: "Ray Murphy" ray...@box.net.au
Date: Mon, Sep 25, 2000 4:08 PM
Message-id: <39cfb...@news.chariot.net.au>
REPLY
Hey Paul, don't worry - be happy. Joyce and the rest of us know where
you're coming from.
I was very impressed with your post, particularly the last paragraph
which mentioned that things work out if people are committed. But yes,
those few words were a bit too strong.
Ray Murphy
----------
In article <ssvdima...@corp.supernews.com>, "Paul Reeder"
<ree...@azstarnet.com> wrote:
>Joyce, and all,
>
>"Paul Reeder" <ree...@azstarnet.com> wrote:
>
>> "Joyce" <jo...@jupitercomputers.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Three years ago I met my man on the internet. When we first got talking
>I
>> > did his chart and came up with a Leo Asc. It put me off any thought of a
>> > relationship, having had a very bad time with a Leo Sun ex husband.
>>
>> It is such a bad idea to judge all with a certain position by our
>experience
>> of one with a certain position. This is astro-bigotry at its worst.
>
>I reread what I had written and want to make sure no one thinks I believe
>Joyce is a bigot. I do not! I apologize for the way I worded that. I
>apologize to you, Joyce, and I apologize to the group for my hasty ways.
>
>My submissions to the newsgroup are quick and off the cuff, stolen moments
>so to speak. I responded to the way words used in Joyce's post because they
>represented to me a culturally common problem, a superstitious approach,
>which attempts to glean real information from symbols without taking time to
>determine the level of energy and awareness at work.
>
>I wish I had called attention to what I see as a cultural problem in a way
>that hadn't clumsily pointed fingers at anyone but myself.
>
>Paul Reeder
>
>
>
>>
Sharyn
I believe there is the potential for us to have many 'soulmates'.
My husband and I share Aries Moons. I always hear a Sun/Moon conjunction is
said to have a better synastry pull, but invariably, when I immediately
click with someone, chances are they have an Aries Moon like mine. Maybe I
just like a few sparks.
Most of my other deep connections to people involve Moons in harmonious
aspect to my Sun.
~ Karin
Hmm. Well, I wouldn't know where to begin, Ray. Not long after I started on
the Net, I began masquerading as a man because I was constantly getting
harrassed. As I worked five years ago on producing a graphical virtual world
with Randy Farmer (communities.com) for Fujitsu, I did everything I could to
ensure that no one could be harmed that way again. Randy, bless his sweet
heart, listened to everything I had to say. I've seen the Net bring out the
best in people and the beast in people -- and, as a result, I can't bear
listening to someone extole the peerless virtues of online communication. I've
learned that, to keep safest and reap the most benefits of the technology, I
should hang out where the people are the best. Those places are still quite
hard to find, but one of them is definitely here. :)
Fishboys! Gotta luv 'em! :) Girlfriend, I can't get enough of them,
apparently.
>(A Pisces disguised as a Sag!)
Or, as I like to say, a Pisces in drag. ;-)
Good luck!
Best,
Maria
who loves Pooh Corner!
Exactly. I think this phenomena is far more rampant online than offline
because we have fewer visual and vocal cues. In some ways, communication is
clearer -- like in any form of prose -- but prose is meant as communication
from one to many, and the interpretation can be wide. Personal relationships,
however, require communication from one to one, where you can afford less
"interpretation" and need all the cues you can get.
But I digress. ;)
Maria
I'm glad that this has evoked an interesting discussion.
Russ
Linda Parkes <lindaa...@poohcorner17.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8qoogp$q5h$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Hello All!
>
> Couldn't resist joining in this one! I met my (latest?) man through the
> internet - his ad said he was a Sagittarian. Hooray! I thought - a fellow
> Sag (having previously suffered some trials & tribs with a multi-Pisces).
> Only to discover from his chart he had Moon Pisces closely quincunx
Neptune
> plus Sun/Mercury on the 12th cusp! (A Pisces disguised as a Sag!)
> > <ru...@safford.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >Has anyone ever met their soulmate? I'm referring to synastry and
person
> > >A's Moon conjunct person B's.
> > >
Hey Russ,
I don't know if it's what a woman is looking for so to speak, but I've found
that a woman's Mars sign often shows what a woman is attracted to. That
completely explains why, with a Mars in Scorpio in the 1st, I'm hopelessly
attracted to Fishboys, Scorpios and Cancerians. (Although, the man I had the
most passionate relationship with was a Capricorn, with moon conj. mine.) I
believe the same is for men -- their Venus indicates what kind of woman they
are attracted to. I tell you, the Leo/Aries Queen here has never failed to
attract a man who had Venus in a fire sign. ;-)
Bestest,
Cheers
Linda at The Corner
"Blacktech" <blac...@aol.combbanzai> wrote in message
news:20000925235250...@ng-bj1.aol.com...
> >(having previously suffered some trials & tribs with a multi-Pisces).
>
> Fishboys! Gotta luv 'em! :) Girlfriend, I can't get enough of them,
> apparently.
>
> >(A Pisces disguised as a Sag!)
>
> Or, as I like to say, a Pisces in drag. ;-)
>
> Good luck!
>
> Best,
>
> Maria
> who loves Pooh Corner!
>
Sorry, gone way off topic here, but I do think the internet is becoming more
and more popular as the way to meet, and hearing other people's experiences
certainly helps!
Cheers
Linda
"Russ" <rsaff...@icqmail.com> wrote in message
news:8qq1n7$tbq$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
> As the original 'poster' to this thread, I couldn't resist coming in
> here....I'm a Sun Leo with a Pisces Ascendant with Mars rising also in
> Pisces! I'm a Pisces disguised as a Leo in many ways. The connection
with
> my Internet friend is not only through our conjunct Moons, but also her
> Venus in Pisces falls on my Ascendant/Mars - the Aries/Leo interplay is
also
> evident (Sun in a woman's chart often describes the type of man she looks
> for...in here case it also answers my Mars rising!).
>
> I'm glad that this has evoked an interesting discussion.
>
> Russ
>
> Linda Parkes <lindaa...@poohcorner17.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:8qoogp$q5h$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Hello All!
> >
> > Couldn't resist joining in this one! I met my (latest?) man through the
> > internet - his ad said he was a Sagittarian. Hooray! I thought - a
fellow
> > Sag (having previously suffered some trials & tribs with a
multi-Pisces).
Mars and Venus are more instantaneous, but the Sun/Moon dyad are the
masculine/feminine principles that reaches a deeper level and in which need
to be fulfilled at that deeper level. Sun/Mars are distinctly two different
masculine expressions as is Venus for the feminine.
Russ
Blacktech <blac...@aol.combbanzai> wrote in message
news:20000926105752...@ng-fz1.aol.com...
> >(Sun in a woman's chart often describes the type of man she looks
> >for...in here case it also answers my Mars rising!).
> >
>
> Hey Russ,
>
> I don't know if it's what a woman is looking for so to speak, but I've
found
> that a woman's Mars sign often shows what a woman is attracted to. That
> completely explains why, with a Mars in Scorpio in the 1st, I'm
hopelessly
> attracted to Fishboys, Scorpios and Cancerians. (Although, the man I had
the
> most passionate relationship with was a Capricorn, with moon conj. mine.)
I
> believe the same is for men -- their Venus indicates what kind of woman
they
> are attracted to. I tell you, the Leo/Aries Queen here has never failed
to
> attract a man who had Venus in a fire sign. ;-)
>
> Bestest,
>
> Maria
>
Hey Russ,
So, how does that work? Myself for example, I have a Leo Sun, Aries Moon, and
Mars in Scorpio. I adore Sagittarian men (and Sag-types in general), but I
assumed that was because that sign completes my fire grand trine -- another
thing I've noticed in attraction, whether or not the other person "completes"
you elementally. Sexually, I've been attracted to three Leo men, but I could
just as easily shoot them. ;-) And I've never come within ten feet of an
Aries man that I know of, as I suspect they fear that very tight Saturn/Moon
conj. of mine at 11Aries. So, maybe I'm misunderstanding the dynamic you're
describing.
Thanks!