On 2/8/2012 10:18 PM, Honor Flight 93 wrote:
> On Feb 8, 12:46 pm, Honor Flight 93<
HONORfligh...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=nNpSAAAAIBAJ&sjid=1H8DAAAAIBAJ&p...
>>
>> Irving, TX gunsmith Dial Ryder states that the gun brought by an "Oswald"
>> to Ryder in October 1963 that Ryder mounted a scope onto and then
>> bore-sighted aligned the scope, was not the same type Carcano rifle that
>> authorities showed him after the assassination.
>
>
> 2 (of several) points written by the WC in its WCR, chapter 6, page 315:
>
> "As discussed in chapter IV, the telescopic sight on the C2766
> Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was already mounted when shipped to Oswald, and
> both Ryder and his employer, Charles W. Greener, feel certain that they
> never did any work on this rifle."
>
> So, we have the very first interview statements by Ryder of him being
> quoted in an 11-28-63 interview that he DID mount a scope on a non-
> Carcano rifle brought into the shop by Oswald, yet, 10-months later, the
> WC claims the opposite and it wrote that he never did any work on the
> C2766 rifle-in-evidence.
>
> That is a 180-degrees, polar-opposite claim by the WC of what Ryder was
> first quoted as saying in his very first statements.
>
No, two different rifles.
> Additionally, the WC wrote that the scope was already mounted when shipped
> from Klein's.
>
> Maybe it is my Robin Unger archived, very large copy of the March 1963
> captured, so-called, "backyard photos," but when I look at these photos
> (even when the shades are inverted) I do not see a scope mounted on that
> March 1963 photographed rifle! (does anyone have a link to an enhancement
> of any of the "backyard photos" that reveals the scope?)
>
>
>
Could you be thinking of the copy of LIFE magazine? They admitted to
having airbrushed out the scope. So eager to participate in the cover-up
they believed early reports about Oswald not getting a scope mounted until
October.
PS. I am not sure what you mean by Honor Flight 93.
What is your political ideology in saying that?
I hope you mean that we should honor the sacrifice and heroism of the
passengers stormed the cockpit and caused the plane to crash in a field
and thus saved the lives of thousands in Washington, D.C.
I personally don't think it honors their memory to use that as a pretext
to invade Iraq or Iran or Syria or North Korea or Yemen or France, etc.