<Quote on>
Here's a few dates and places:
11/5/34 joins FBI as Special Agent, Indianapolis IN
4/24/35 SA in New York City
5/11/38 Assistant SAC in Newark NJ
8/14/38 SAC in Butte MO
8/6/41 "transferred to Oakland City"
11/4/43 "transferred back to Butte"
10/1/51 SAC in Minneapolis MN
1/4/54 SAC in Chicago IL
12/12/54 retires from FBI
<Quote off>
Dave, or anybody else, can you give me a source for this?
Obviously, this is one of "Garrison's lies" -- unless somebody can
come up with a plausible hypothesis about how Garrison might simply
have been misinformed about this. Garrison asked: "Was it just
conincidence . . . that Guy Banister, who had begun his career in
World War II with the O.N.I., had chosen an office right across the
street from his old employers?" OTTOTA, p. 26.
.John
The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Guy Banister, autobiographical sketch, FBI #62-103863-13, cited in Vol. X,
paragraph 483. The following paragraph indicates that the HSCA examined
FBI files (and CIA, for that matter) relating to Banister, so presumably
the verifiable information in Banister's sketch checks out. (The HSCA was
apparently unable to verify Banister's claim in this sketch that he was
born in a log cabin, so they qualify that statement with an "according
to.")
>Obviously, this is one of "Garrison's lies" -- unless somebody can
>come up with a plausible hypothesis about how Garrison might simply
>have been misinformed about this. Garrison asked: "Was it just
>conincidence . . . that Guy Banister, who had begun his career in
>World War II with the O.N.I., had chosen an office right across the
>street from his old employers?" OTTOTA, p. 26.
>
>.John
To my knowledge, Garrison has never cited a source for this claim, but
Bill Turner *almost* has. In "The Garrison Commission" (*Ramparts, Jan.
1968), Turner writes, "A man who knew Banister well has told Garrison that
Banister became associated with the Office of Naval Intelligence through
the recommendation of Guy Johnson, an ONI reserve officer and the first
attorney for Clay Shaw when he was arrested by Garrison" (*The
Assassinations: Dallas and Beyond,* Scott, Hoch, Stetler, eds., 284).
Turner, obviously, does not name Garrison's source.
Problem: We know from *OTTOTA* that Garrison considered Johnson "a friend
of mine" (1991 ed., 29 fn.). But Garrison doesn't name Johnson as his
source for this info, nor did his friend Guy Johnson ever seem to correct
Garrison about this Banister-ONI (or Johnson recommendation) claim.
(Garrison *never* discussed it at all with his pal Johnson?) BTW, I don't
recall Johnson being Shaw's lawyer at this time, though perhaps David
Blackburst or Jerry Shinley know better. It was the Wegmann brothers and
Sal Panzeca that Shaw phoned from NOPD the day he was arrested.
Yet another BTW -- Contrary to what Bill Davy says in his new book, this
Guy Johnson -- Guy Persac Johnson -- is *not* the Guy Johnson -- Guy D.
Johnson -- who was approved for the mysterious QK/ENCHANT operation.
Guy Persac Johnson was the ONI-lawyer guy, while Guy D. Johnson was in the
export business, which supports the claim that QK/ENCHANT was an operation
involved with gathering international trade intelligence.
Jerry Shinley posted Guy D. Johnson's obituary:
(end quote) - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
New York Times Feb 8, 1971 P36
Guy Johnson, 85, Type Exporter
Head of Company Dealing in Printing Gear Dies
-
Guy D. Johnson, president of Guy D. Johnson, Inc., exporters of
printing equipment, died at his home yesterday. He was 85 years old
and lived at 969 Park Avenue.
Mr. Johnson was born in New Orleans on Oct. 8, 1885. He spent
three years in railroad work in Central America before joining
National Paper and Type Company, a printing equipment exporter in
1907.
He spent 45 years with that company, serving as president from
1945 to 1953. In the latter year he organized his own company, in
which he had been active until recently.
Mr. Johnson had traveled extensively in Latin America, selling
printing equipment, and was well known as an authority in graphic
arts.
[...]
(end quote) - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Anyway, it's not clear where Garrison got his Banister-ONI claim, nor is
it clear why he believed his friend Guy Johnson had anything to do with
Banister and the ONI, when Johnson presumably could have offered some
information on this.
Trivia question: Only one other person is known to have claimed that Guy
Banister served in the Armed Forces in WWII. Name that witness.
Dave
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
John, I know the Debunkers have been on to this as a "factoid" for some
time now, but there is a big gap in the career between Butte and
Minnenapolis, and a detailed report on Bannister's file fails to show a
Navy let alone an ONI connection, but Tony Summers, and I will get you a
quotable source on this though it is not handy at the momen, Tony cites
Bannister's family as his source for Navy work during the war. This could,
of course, come as an FBI or other agency liason with the ONI, rather than
assignment with the Navy.
One way or another however, it should be cleared up, a conclusion
based not just on family recollection or official records, both of which
seem to be inconclusive.
Bill Kelly
Thanks for the lead. I have my copy of Summers' CONSPIRACY (Paragon
House, 1989) and on page 290 is says:
<Quote on>
In World War II -- according to his family -- he distinguished himself
with Naval Intelligence, a connection he reportedly maintained all his
life.
<Quote off>
It's plausible that Garrisoo might have *gotten* this from an earlier
edition of Summers, since he had certainly read Summers, and denounced
his book as a "CIA book!"
See:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/toole.txt
So I may delete this from my "Garrison's lies" web page, on the grounds
that I don't put stuff there that Garrison may have honestly believed --
no matter how wacky. The page is for stuff that he had to know was
untrue. However, the fact that Garrison had an ONI buddy, and
apparently didn't bother to ask him about Banister is "suspicious" :-).
Anybody wanting to look at the current draft can see:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jimlie.htm
> One way or another however, it should be cleared up, a conclusion
> based not just on family recollection or official records, both of which
> seem to be inconclusive.
> Bill Kelly
>
I think the material Dave and Jerry have posted is pretty conclusive he
wasn't in the ONI. I can't rule out your liason suggestion, however.
And you may have convinced me that it wasn't a "Garrison lie." Just a
factoid.
.John
--
Garrison was claiming Banister to be ONI at least as early as 1968. (See my
previous post in this thread.)
>See:
>
>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/toole.txt
>
>So I may delete this from my "Garrison's lies" web page, on the grounds
>that I don't put stuff there that Garrison may have honestly believed --
>no matter how wacky.
Again, I would refer you to my previous post in this thread. Garrison should
have been able to confirm the ONI info with his friend, Guy Johnson.
The page is for stuff that he had to know was
>untrue. However, the fact that Garrison had an ONI buddy, and
>apparently didn't bother to ask him about Banister is "suspicious" :-).
Very suspicious.
>Anybody wanting to look at the current draft can see:
>
>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jimlie.htm
>
>
>> One way or another however, it should be cleared up, a conclusion
>> based not just on family recollection or official records, both of which
>> seem to be inconclusive.
>> Bill Kelly
>>
>
>I think the material Dave and Jerry have posted is pretty conclusive he
>wasn't in the ONI. I can't rule out your liason suggestion, however.
>And you may have convinced me that it wasn't a "Garrison lie." Just a
>factoid.
>
>.John
Garrison had no business passing on information he could not support. If that
doesn't make it a lie, it's still deceptive.
Dave