Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DiEugenio: Paul Nolan is pure disinfo

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Dave Reitzes

unread,
Jul 18, 2010, 3:06:59 PM7/18/10
to
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=16135

In response to info on a website that cites John's website:


<QUOTE ON>-------------------------------

Jim DiEugenio

Posted Today, 07:23 AM

This is goofy.

The Marquette Unviersity link on Oswald's chronology is the John McAdams'
time line page.Ha HA

Johnny has Oswald ordering the rifle from Klein's, without explaining how
he picked it up if it was in Hidell's name.

He says Oswald gave Marina the Imperial Reflex camera to take his picture.
Then why was it not found by the DPD during their two day search? Why did
the FBI not get it until February of 1964? Through the one and only Ruth
Paine who gave it to Robert Oswald.

McAdams says that Oswald tried to kill Walker. Ha ha. Then why did Walker
write Blakey and tell him that the bullet in evidence is not the bullet
fired into his home? And he should know since he held it in his hand.

He then covers Oswald's stay in New Orleans without mentioning 544 Camp
Street, Clinton-Jackson, Kerry Thornley, Sergio Arcacha Smith, Banister,
Ferrie, Shaw etc.

He then says that Oswald went to Mexico City without saying how and when.
Or why is there no pic of him produced by the CIA and the tapes sent to
Dallas are not of his voice.

He then says Oswald fled after the shooting of Kennedy. Ha ha. Really, by
a bus which he got off of and cab which he offered to give to an old lady
first? That's really high tailing it.

He then says Oswald shot TIppit. BS. Please explain the two wallets then.
One at the scene and one taken from Oswald in the car. Sure, the killer
throws down his wallet to be sure to be identified. What about the prints
off the car that are not Oswald's? The bullets not matching the shells.
The shells that were first reported as automatics. Etc etc.

And you say this guy is not a disifno agent.

Paul Nolan is pure disinfo.

This post has been edited by Jim DiEugenio: Today, 07:27 AM

<QUOTE OFF>------------------------------

John McAdams

unread,
Jul 18, 2010, 3:18:13 PM7/18/10
to

The guy is obsessed. Deranged, actually.

I must have stung him very badly in the debate.

.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

David Von Pein

unread,
Jul 19, 2010, 11:27:37 AM7/19/10
to

>>> "The guy [DiEugenio] is obsessed. Deranged, actually." <<<

Bingo.

The more I hear him talk on Black Op and write his Anybody-But-Oz
crappola on Edu. Forum and CTKA, the closer I get to the word .John
just used to describe Mr. DiEugenio -- "deranged".

Jimbo actually says he believes the evidence in the Tippit case
EXONERATES Oswald.

That's "deranged" alright. And really goofy, to boot.

j leyden

unread,
Jul 19, 2010, 3:10:12 PM7/19/10
to

Look at it this way, DVP: If DiEugenio accepted the WC and HSCA
findings ("Oswald did it"), what would he do with the rest of his
life.

JGL

Robert Harris

unread,
Jul 19, 2010, 3:10:55 PM7/19/10
to
In article <mqk6465013rmmuqkf...@4ax.com>,
John McAdams <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote:


Hmm... if memory serves, Paul Nolan was not about disinformation, but out
of fear that conspiracy buffs would beat the crap out of you if they knew
who you were:-)

Robert Harris

John McAdams

unread,
Jul 19, 2010, 3:13:16 PM7/19/10
to
On 19 Jul 2010 15:10:55 -0400, Robert Harris <bobha...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

No, none of that crew could beat me up -- although if enough ganged up
on me they doubtless could.

Rather, some nasty confrontation or shouting match was a definite
possibility.

Remember how Wecht treated Todd Wayne Vaughan at ASK.

.John

--
The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

slice...@comcast.net

unread,
Jul 19, 2010, 8:04:28 PM7/19/10
to
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Errrahh...maybe the same thing you're doing with your life?


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Jul 19, 2010, 11:07:59 PM7/19/10
to

Lisa Pease. And I offered to protect him from harm. And he is a BIG guy.

>
> Robert Harris
>


0 new messages