> >=20
> > >> >> jo=
> hn-mccone-warren-commission-cia-213197
> > >> >
> > >> > Can you quote the part of the article that has relevance to
> > >> > anyth=
> ing? I
> > >> > skimmed it and couldn`t find anything.
> > >> >
> > >>=20
> > >>=20
> > >> Nothing new there. We know you can't read English.
> > >> How about the headline of the article?
> > >>=20
> > >> Yes, the CIA Director Was Part of the JFK Assassination Cover-Up
> > >>=20
> > >> John McCone was long suspected of withholding information from
> > >> the=20 Warren Commission. Now even the CIA says he did.
> > >>=20
> > >> By Philip Shenon
> > >>=20
> > >> October 06, 2015
> > >>=20
> > >> Can you figure that out?
> > >>=20
> > >> How about this part?
> > >>=20
> > >> The report offers no conclusion about McCone?s motivations,
> > >> including =
> why=20
> > >> he would go to lengths to cover-up CIA activities that mostly
> > >> predated=
> his=20
> > >> time at the agency. But it suggests that the Johnson White House
> > >> might=
> =20
> > >> have directed McCone to hide the information. McCone ?shared the=20
> > >> administration?s interest in avoiding disclosures about covert
> > >> actions=
> =20
> > >> that would circumstantially implicate [the] CIA in conspiracy
> > >> theories=
> and=20
> > >> possibly lead to calls for a tough US response against the
> > >> perpetrator=
> s of=20
> > >> the assassination,? the article reads. ?If the commission did not
> > >> know=
> to=20
> > >> ask about covert operations about Cuba, he was not going to give
> > >> them =
> any=20
> > >> suggestions about where to look.?
> > >>=20
> > >> In an interview, David Slawson, who was the Warren Commission?s
> > >> chief=
> =20
> > >> staff investigator in searching for evidence of a foreign
> > >> conspiracy, =
> said=20
> > >> he was not surprised to learn that McCone had personally withheld so
> > >> m=
> uch=20
> > >> information from the investigation in 1964, especially about the
> > >> Castr=
> o=20
> > >> plots.
> > >>=20
> > >> Can you figure that out?
> > >> Didn't think so.
> > >>=20
> > >> BTW I like the fact that the CIA interpreted NOFORN as meaning
> > >> the=20 Warren Commission.
> > >>=20
> > >> Again, do you understand the simple fact that there is a subtle
> > >> differ=
> ence=20
> > >> between the crime and the cover-up? Apparently not. Richard Nixon
> > >> did =
> not=20
> > >> know how to pick the lock to break into the Watergate so he hired=20
> > >> professionals to do it. He was not one of the burglars, he was just
> > >> th=
> e=20
> > >> mastermind.
> > >>=20
> > >> Finally, do you know what a rogue operation is?
> > >
> > ><Richard Nixon did not know how to pick the lock to break into the=20
> > >Watergate so he hired professionals to do it. He was not one of the=20
> > >burglars, he was just the mastermind. >
> > >
> > >There is no evidence whatsoever that Nixon "hired professionals" to
> > >brea=
> k=20
> > >into Watergate.
> > >
> > >There is no evidence at all that he knew about the break ins BEFORE
> > >the=
> =20
> > >actual break ins (plural, there were two).
> > >
> > >There is no evidence that he was the "mastermind" behind the break
> > >ins.
> > >
> > >In fact, all of the available evidence is that he didn't know
> > >anything=
> =20
> > >about the plans to bug the offices. In fact, he asked his chief of
> > >staff=
> =20
> > >shortly after the story broke about who ordered the operation.
> >=20
> > Watergate gave rise to the saying "it's not the crime, it's the
> > cover-up."
> >=20
> > .John
> > -----------------------
> >
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
> I'm not a Nixon defender. But I wonder what would have happened if,
> fairly soon after learning about the break-in, he had gone on tv to say
> he had found out that people in his administration where involved, that
> he had done an investigation into who was responsible, and that he had
> fired them all.
>
> Done something along those lines, anyway. A badly damaged presidency,
> yes. A destroyed presidency, maybe not. But that wasn't Nixon. Always
> his own worst enemy. Mark
===========================================================================
==== just another "phsycho" ! ! ! !
===========================================================================