Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Wikipedia and Judyth Vary Baker

505 views
Skip to first unread message

WhiskyJoe

unread,
Jan 24, 2009, 9:46:53 PM1/24/09
to

Wikipedia and Judyth Vary Baker

Has anyone checked out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judyth_Vary_Baker

From this site we learn that Judyth, while in high school and in her
first two years of college, became a top science researcher. I guess
after Sputnik, we were really desperate to catch up with the Russians.

In any case, she soon started work on a cancer weapon that could be
used against Castro. I don't know why this was necessary. Didn't he
smoke cigars?

Before she knew it, she was working with CIA agents, former Nazi
double agents, Anti Castro weapon smugglers and other associated low
lifes.

In the mean time, her parents feared that she might become a nun. So
they had her yanked from a university. They must have had strange
ideas about the Catholic Church and how they train women to be nuns.

The article and discussion sections are pretty good.

Dave Reitzes

unread,
Jan 25, 2009, 12:14:23 PM1/25/09
to


For Jaap and anyone else seeking restitution from Judyth, Lady J
indicates here that she was living in Istanbul in summer 2008, and in
another Web post that's been brought to my attention, she says she was
planning to leave Istanbul for Ireland.

Dave

http://www.jfk-online.com/judyth-menu.html

JLeyd...@aol.com

unread,
Jan 25, 2009, 7:57:35 PM1/25/09
to
On Jan 24, 9:46�pm, WhiskyJoe <jr...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Wikipedia and Judyth Vary Baker
>
> Has anyone checked out:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judyth_Vary_Baker

You realize, WJ, that one can pretty much write his/her own ticket on
Wikipedia which is why it may be ok for a quick reference but can not be
considered a "reliable source." I'm working on my own Wikipedia entry as
we speak. It says I'm faster than a speeding bullet and can leap tall
buildings in a single bound. But the real problem with your post is that
it resurrects the Judyth story which has been dormant since Shackelford
stopped posting more than a month ago, as I always predicted it would.
And with no Shackelford to play off of, even Pam has fallen silent. It's
been so peaceful.

JGL

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Jan 25, 2009, 9:28:29 PM1/25/09
to
On 1/24/2009 9:46 PM, WhiskyJoe wrote:
> Wikipedia and Judyth Vary Baker
>
> Has anyone checked out:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judyth_Vary_Baker
>
> From this site we learn that Judyth, while in high school and in her
> first two years of college, became a top science researcher. I guess
> after Sputnik, we were really desperate to catch up with the Russians.
>
> In any case, she soon started work on a cancer weapon that could be
> used against Castro. I don't know why this was necessary. Didn't he
> smoke cigars?
>

Then did the CIA try dozens of bizarre ideas to assassinate him? You think
it would be more practical to wait 50 years for him to die of lung cancer?
The type of cancer they would want to use would work very quickly and not
be traceable back to the CIA. Plausible Deniability.

Steve Thomas

unread,
Jan 26, 2009, 11:11:11 AM1/26/09
to
> > The article and discussion sections are pretty good.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Marsh still clings to the notion that Judyth might actually be
truthfull on this nonsense lol!

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Jan 26, 2009, 10:05:24 PM1/26/09
to


Nonsense. I am just pointing out that it is silly for you to deny simple
facts just because you fear that they might lend any credence to her
story. The CIA did propose several bizarre ways to assassinate Castro.

athena...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 16, 2019, 11:06:33 PM3/16/19
to

I believe her and Ed Haslam - Have you done any research?

Mark OBLAZNEY

unread,
Mar 17, 2019, 8:48:45 PM3/17/19
to
On Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 4:06:33 AM UTC+1, athena...@gmail.com wrote:
> I believe her and Ed Haslam - Have you done any research?

Oh, let's all listen to athena !!! no, wait........ i haven't done any
research yet. be back shortly

bpete1969

unread,
Mar 17, 2019, 8:52:18 PM3/17/19
to

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Mar 17, 2019, 8:53:38 PM3/17/19
to
On 3/16/2019 11:06 PM, athena...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I believe her and Ed Haslam - Have you done any research?
>

A lot. I do not believe 99% of what she says, but I was the only person
who actually tried and found proof of something that she said. The WC
defenders simply lie and falsely attack her. I believe she worked in the
same company where Oswald did so she probably knew him just like anyone
else there. A lot of the people in the TSBD said they knew Oswald, but
they did not have to have sex with him.

benroz...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 4, 2019, 8:25:13 PM6/4/19
to
I did the research, it's all about book sales and not about history . Sad.

benroz...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 4, 2019, 8:25:31 PM6/4/19
to
On Saturday, March 16, 2019 at 8:06:33 PM UTC-7, athena...@gmail.com wrote:
> I believe her and Ed Haslam - Have you done any research?

If you belive Haslam read his first book, JVB is not in that. Shes in the
second book, the first one they took off the market. Coincidence the same
publisher on the second version, published Me and Lee.

Follow the money .. Read Walt Brown's book In Her Own Words" Judy Vary
Baker.

Those that re write history for personal gain have the right too. THis is
Capitalism at it's best...

benroz...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 4, 2019, 8:25:49 PM6/4/19
to
Right on the money, she did'nt work at TSBD however, they both worked at
Reily Coffee company so you are on the right track but on the wrong train.

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Jun 6, 2019, 9:25:51 AM6/6/19
to
On Saturday, January 24, 2009 at 9:46:53 PM UTC-5, WhiskyJoe wrote:
> Wikipedia and Judyth Vary Baker
>
> Has anyone checked out:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judyth_Vary_Baker
>
> From this site we learn that Judyth, while in high school and in her
> first two years of college, became a top science researcher. I guess
> after Sputnik, we were really desperate to catch up with the Russians.
>
> In any case, she soon started work on a cancer weapon that could be
> used against Castro. I don't know why this was necessary. Didn't he
> smoke cigars?
>

Silly, that may take many years. The CIA wanted him dead immediately.

> Before she knew it, she was working with CIA agents, former Nazi
> double agents, Anti Castro weapon smugglers and other associated low
> lifes.
>

Nothing unusual there.

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Jun 6, 2019, 9:25:59 AM6/6/19
to
As I said before the cover-up has scared away most conspiracy believers.


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Jun 6, 2019, 9:26:24 AM6/6/19
to
Thanks. I didn't even know that the train went from
Dallas to New Orleans. I thought they had to drive or take
a bus.


tanyao...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 6, 2019, 8:00:42 PM6/6/19
to
Excellent work, sir +

mike...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 23, 2020, 9:29:29 AM3/23/20
to
I've read a couple of these objections to Judyth Vary Baker's 'veracity'.
And, in full disclosure I am currently reading 'Lee and Me', and that I
find her account of the summer months spent with LHO in New Orleans
overall convincing - while acknowledging she has some tarnishes on her
armor. I think the type of inaccuracy your dilligent efforts uncovered
(e.g. the actual beginning of 2nd Semester at University of Florida being
Feb and not Jan as she describes) are minor blemishes and not
disqualifying of everything she relates. I would hope she might be given
an opportunity to take questions on these inaccuracies.

My opinion is still forming, but what I mean by tarnishes in her armor are
a king of juvenile conceit that allowed her to embellish some things,
while not undermining what is most important - which is: what was LHO
doing in New Orleans and who were his associates.

John McAdams

unread,
Mar 23, 2020, 9:51:29 AM3/23/20
to
On 23 Mar 2020 09:29:28 -0400, mike...@gmail.com wrote:

>On Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 8:52:18 PM UTC-4, bpete1969 wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 16, 2019 at 11:06:33 PM UTC-4, athena...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > I believe her and Ed Haslam - Have you done any research?
>>
>> Yes, I have done research. She's a fraud.
>>
>> http://www.bpete1969.com/2017/02/another-thread-unravelsa-pretty.html
>>
>> http://www.bpete1969.com/2017/03/judys-emanicpation-proclamation.html
>>
>> http://www.bpete1969.com/2017/03/the-only-lie-that-matters.html
>>
>> http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/03/judyth-vary-baker-continues-to-lie.html
>>
>> http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/03/more-bullshit-from-judyth-vary-baker.html
>>
>> http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/03/judyth-vary-baker-in.html
>>
>> http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/11/judyth-very-faker-is-still-in-exile.html
>
>I've read a couple of these objections to Judyth Vary Baker's 'veracity'.
>And, in full disclosure I am currently reading 'Lee and Me', and that I
>find her account of the summer months spent with LHO in New Orleans
>overall convincing

Why? Because it corresponds to what you have read in conspiracy
books?

>
>My opinion is still forming, but what I mean by tarnishes in her armor are
>a king of juvenile conceit that allowed her to embellish some things,
>while not undermining what is most important - which is: what was LHO
>doing in New Orleans and who were his associates.

So what do you think "LHO doing in New Orleans and who were his
associates."

Have you considered that a lot of Judyth's account corresponds to what
you have read in conspiracy books because *she* has read the same
conspiracy books, and wove what they said into her account?

https://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/judyth.htm

It's long, but that's because there is a long history of her
convoluted tale being "adjusted" and changed to meet challenges.

.John
-----------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

bpete1969

unread,
Mar 24, 2020, 1:19:41 AM3/24/20
to
On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 9:29:29 AM UTC-4, mike...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 8:52:18 PM UTC-4, bpete1969 wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 16, 2019 at 11:06:33 PM UTC-4, athena...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I believe her and Ed Haslam - Have you done any research?
> >
> > Yes, I have done research. She's a fraud.
> >
> > http://www.bpete1969.com/2017/02/another-thread-unravelsa-pretty.html
> >
> > http://www.bpete1969.com/2017/03/judys-emanicpation-proclamation.html
> >
> > http://www.bpete1969.com/2017/03/the-only-lie-that-matters.html
> >
> > http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/03/judyth-vary-baker-continues-to-lie.html
> >
> > http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/03/more-bullshit-from-judyth-vary-baker.html
> >
> > http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/03/judyth-vary-baker-in.html
> >
> > http://www.bpete1969.com/2018/11/judyth-very-faker-is-still-in-exile.html
>
> I've read a couple of these objections to Judyth Vary Baker's 'veracity'.
> And, in full disclosure I am currently reading 'Lee and Me', and that I
> find her account of the summer months spent with LHO in New Orleans
> overall convincing - while acknowledging she has some tarnishes on her
> armor. I think the type of inaccuracy your dilligent efforts uncovered
> (e.g. the actual beginning of 2nd Semester at University of Florida being
> Feb and not Jan as she describes) are minor blemishes and not
> disqualifying of everything she relates.

It's not a minor blemish. She claims that a U.S. Senator, broke the law,
set up a secret funding account and that a Dean at the university
submitted a false document to law enforcement and *poof....she was
emancipated.

> I would hope she might be given
> an opportunity to take questions on these inaccuracies.

I have put the word out that she is welcome to address any of the
inconsistencies I have found. I know that she and her cult followers read
my blog because they have sent messages to her and make reference to items
contained on my blog. I have a standard policy of allowing anyone to post
in the comment section of each entry, without censorship. She refuses to
correct the record or explain the impossible, let alone the improbable.

Judyth Very Faker is the Queen of the Weaver Clan. A title she wears
proudly.

Mark

unread,
Mar 24, 2020, 1:19:58 AM3/24/20
to
Mike, did you read bpete1969's material or McAdams' piece? If so what's
your answer? Mark


0 new messages