Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anthony Marsh-for the 3rd time, PLEASE respond to this post!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Steve

unread,
Aug 9, 2005, 10:18:32 AM8/9/05
to
Please respond to this, Tony:


Pull out your ***recording of channel 1***, listen to the section you
claim contains the words "Take off, Buddy!" type out the LAST words
spoken ***right BEFORE*** we should hear your "Take off, Buddy!" and
post it here. If you do not completely understand the last words
spoken before the section where you say you hear the words "Take off,
Buddy!", then please type out an idea of what you think is spoken.


Don't bring up any other subjects or points into the discussion until
AFTER you have done so, just type it up and post it here, please.


Thank you.


Steve Barber


Robert Harris

unread,
Aug 10, 2005, 1:44:22 AM8/10/05
to

Hi Steve.

When do you intend to respond to my posts?

Or do you only debate the slam-dunks:-)

Robert Harris

In article <1123569476.8...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,

Steve

unread,
Aug 10, 2005, 11:04:55 AM8/10/05
to

Robert Harris wrote:

Hi Steve.


When do you intend to respond to my posts?

Steve writes:

I don't.

Robert Writes:

Or do you only debate the slam-dunks:-)

Steve writes:

I don't consider it "deabating", Robert. I consider it you trying to
recruit folks to believe what you think happend on 11-22-63. Nothing
more. And, I am not interested in discussing the events of that day in
history with you.

Robert Harris

Steve


Steve

unread,
Aug 10, 2005, 11:49:01 AM8/10/05
to
Steve writes:


I don't consider it "deabating", Robert. I consider it you trying to

recruit folks to believe what you think happend on 11-22-63. Nothing
more. And, I am not interested in discussing the events of that day in

history with you.


Steve writes:

I need to proof read my posts b4 I click the "send" button...;-)

Excuse the typo, re: "deabating", should be "debating", of course.

Steve


Robert Harris

unread,
Aug 11, 2005, 12:48:52 AM8/11/05
to
In article <1123653182....@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
"Steve" <drumr...@wmconnect.com> wrote:


Let me see if I understand you correctly, Steve.

You refuse to discuss the shooting with me, because you think I am
trying to recruit you?

Steve, you are mistaken.

I in fact, have no hope whatsoever, of recruiting you to my side. The
reason I like to discuss this stuff with you, is that our discussions
make it crystal clear to lurkers that my arguments are correct.

Now that we have resolved that, would you like to talk about whether it
was possible for Oswald to have fired all the shots that day?

Dr. Mcadams said this was a very important issue. Surely, it's not
something you want to evade, is it Steve?

Robert Harris

>
> Robert Harris
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>

0 new messages