Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Proof of JFK limo windshield switch

93 views
Skip to first unread message

Todd Wilson

unread,
Feb 7, 2015, 5:43:24 PM2/7/15
to
I'm watching a JFK documentary and in the background the windshield switch
is shown.

The limo is at Parkland, the trunk is open, and there are five cops in
white hats guarding the rear portion of the limo. Then a plain clothes man
lifts a windshield into view over the front driver's side of the vehicle.
Another white-hatted cop comes into view on the passenger front of the
vehicle and assists with the windshield. It looks like the new windshield
was already in a snap-in, removable frame. They must have had an extra one
in the trunk in case a late frontal shot was necessary for the head shot.

I have heard theories about the car being taken to Detroit and the
windshield being replaced there. I have never heard anyone even mention
this video footage. Am I seeing something that is not really happening in
this documentary??? The voice-over during this scene has nothing to do
with the windshield, just a heavy secret service presence.

I'll tell you the documentary if someone replies with info.

Todd Wilson

unread,
Feb 7, 2015, 5:47:27 PM2/7/15
to
I'm watching a JFK documentary and the windshield switch or cover-up is
shown.

The limo is at Parkland, the trunk is open, and there are five cops in
white hats guarding the rear portion of the limo. Then a plain clothes man
lifts a windshield into view over the front driver's side of the vehicle.
Another white-hatted cop comes into view on the right front of the vehicle

David Von Pein

unread,
Feb 8, 2015, 12:17:49 AM2/8/15
to
What you're seeing in the video is undoubtedly sections of the bubbletop
roof being taken from the trunk---not a windshield.

And how can anybody possibly think a group of conspirators would be so
brazen to replace the windshield in broad daylight as part of some kind of
cover-up--right there in the Parkland parking lot!--with many cameras
recording their skullduggery?

Get real, Todd. (Or is this thread just tongue-in-cheek to mock the
silliness of CTers? It's hard to tell sometimes.)

mainframetech

unread,
Feb 8, 2015, 3:34:40 PM2/8/15
to
It would be useful if you gave the link to this video you were watching.
I believe that you were not seeing the windshield being replaced at
Parkland. The trunk was where they kept a plastic cover for the limo for
inclement weather, if I remember right.

There is NOT a theory as to the limo being taken to Detroit, it is a
witness statement of actual happenings. The witness was George Whitaker,
a manager for the Ford plant in Rouge Michigan. He was called in to work
by a VP to help in his glass shop. when he got there, the door was locked
and when he got in, he saw the windshield on a stand and it had already
been taken off the limo. The limo was in the process of having its
complete interior stripped out and replaced. That would destroy any
evidence that might have been left.

The windshield had a clear through-and-through bullet hole in it
slightly on the left as the driver would see it. Whitaker had enough
experience with bullet tests that he knew that it was a bullet hole, and
he knew too, that it had come from the front of the limo, since the way
the safety glass breaks when hit tells you that.

The details of the story can be found in the book "Murder in Dealey
Plaza", and the short story in the book is called: "The Kennedy Limousine:
Dallas 1963".

Please try to leave us the video information so that we can check it
out.

Chris

Toddzobean

unread,
Feb 8, 2015, 6:36:01 PM2/8/15
to
I will send anyone the video. I can't post it here. I want to know if
anyone else has seen this and if the cops really are replacing the
windshield

Caeruleo

unread,
Feb 8, 2015, 6:44:46 PM2/8/15
to
In article <30ebc8a4-1543-4cb6...@googlegroups.com>,
Todd Wilson <toddz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm watching a JFK documentary and the windshield switch or cover-up is
> shown.

Strange that in this article also you don't say the name of the
documentary without being asked to do so.

> The limo is at Parkland, the trunk is open, and there are five cops in
> white hats guarding the rear portion of the limo. Then a plain clothes man
> lifts a windshield into view over the front driver's side of the vehicle.
> Another white-hatted cop comes into view on the right front of the vehicle
> and assists with the windshield. It looks like the new windshield was
> already in a snap-in, removable frame. They must have had an extra one in
> the trunk in case a late frontal shot was necessary for the head shot.
>
> I have heard theories about the car being taken to Detroit and the
> windshield being replaced there. I have never heard anyone even mention
> this video footage.

As I proposed in my other reply to you, could that simply be that this
is not genuine footage of that particular limo from anywhere near 1963
but instead is a "reenactment" filmed many years later with an entirely
different vehicle?

> Am I seeing something that is not really happening in
> this documentary???

Hard to tell what you're seeing when you failed, at least twice now, to
tell all of us the *name* of this documentary.

Whenever I say anything about any documentary about this assassination,
I always tell everyone the *name* of it in my earliest article about it,
without being asked, with the sole exception of documentaries I saw long
ago and honestly can't remember the names of. However, you put it in
the present tense, "I'm watching," as in you were watching it at the
same time as you were composing your article, or you had watched it less
than 24 hours before composing your article.

> The voice-over during this scene has nothing to do
> with the windshield, just a heavy secret service presence.

Ok...um...so?

OHLeeRedux

unread,
Feb 8, 2015, 6:47:14 PM2/8/15
to
Absolute nonsense. But you do have quite an imagination. You should go on
tour.

Lanny

unread,
Feb 8, 2015, 6:54:52 PM2/8/15
to
On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 5:43:24 PM UTC-5, Toddzobean wrote:

> Am I seeing something that is not really happening in
> this documentary??? The voice-over during this scene has nothing to do
> with the windshield, just a heavy secret service presence.
>

Yes, again.


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 9, 2015, 1:37:22 PM2/9/15
to
The cops at Parkland Hospital did not replace the windshield.
It was replaced at the WH garage:

http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/ferguson-1.gif


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 9, 2015, 1:38:46 PM2/9/15
to
As always you cite only kooks and kook sources.

http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/ferguson-1.gif


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 9, 2015, 5:15:07 PM2/9/15
to
On 2/8/2015 12:17 AM, David Von Pein wrote:
> What you're seeing in the video is undoubtedly sections of the bubbletop
> roof being taken from the trunk---not a windshield.
>

Yes, but specifically he is pointing out the center piece of the roof
being put on, the short one that goes over the front seat compartment.

http://www.thehenryford.org/images/P833_122900_163_roofpanels.jpg

> And how can anybody possibly think a group of conspirators would be so
> brazen to replace the windshield in broad daylight as part of some kind of
> cover-up--right there in the Parkland parking lot!--with many cameras
> recording their skullduggery?
>
> Get real, Todd. (Or is this thread just tongue-in-cheek to mock the
> silliness of CTers? It's hard to tell sometimes.)
>

Just a simple mistake. He did not notice that the piece they were putting
in is a straight rectangle not curved like a windshield. After he looks at
the footage again he'll see what I mean.


So tell us again how the SS agent could have removed evidence with all
those cameras recording the scene? 2 or 3?


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 9, 2015, 9:37:45 PM2/9/15
to
Your voice over claims they are putting a windshield on the limo.
That is wrong. They were putting a roof panel on the limo.
The roof came in several pieces, each of which could be put on
independently.


http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/kn-c29366%20cropped.jpg

http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/JFK-And-President-Of-Peru-In-Bubbletop-Limousine-9-19-61.jpg

http://www.the-puzzle-palace.com/ih064040.jpg


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 9, 2015, 9:40:07 PM2/9/15
to
I already did and you didn't. Looks like Canadian TV.


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 11, 2015, 3:27:07 PM2/11/15
to
On 2/8/2015 6:44 PM, Caeruleo wrote:
> In article <30ebc8a4-1543-4cb6...@googlegroups.com>,
> Todd Wilson <toddz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm watching a JFK documentary and the windshield switch or cover-up is
>> shown.
>
> Strange that in this article also you don't say the name of the
> documentary without being asked to do so.
>

He won't even say after I asked him.

>> The limo is at Parkland, the trunk is open, and there are five cops in
>> white hats guarding the rear portion of the limo. Then a plain clothes man
>> lifts a windshield into view over the front driver's side of the vehicle.
>> Another white-hatted cop comes into view on the right front of the vehicle
>> and assists with the windshield. It looks like the new windshield was
>> already in a snap-in, removable frame. They must have had an extra one in
>> the trunk in case a late frontal shot was necessary for the head shot.
>>
>> I have heard theories about the car being taken to Detroit and the
>> windshield being replaced there. I have never heard anyone even mention
>> this video footage.
>
> As I proposed in my other reply to you, could that simply be that this
> is not genuine footage of that particular limo from anywhere near 1963
> but instead is a "reenactment" filmed many years later with an entirely
> different vehicle?
>
>> Am I seeing something that is not really happening in
>> this documentary???
>
> Hard to tell what you're seeing when you failed, at least twice now, to
> tell all of us the *name* of this documentary.
>

Just watch the .MOV and you'll see they are just putting on the roof.

> Whenever I say anything about any documentary about this assassination,
> I always tell everyone the *name* of it in my earliest article about it,
> without being asked, with the sole exception of documentaries I saw long
> ago and honestly can't remember the names of. However, you put it in
> the present tense, "I'm watching," as in you were watching it at the
> same time as you were composing your article, or you had watched it less
> than 24 hours before composing your article.
>

But you can't always upload the whole show. DRM, you know.
0 new messages