Whose opinion is this.
Every moron measures the blur of frame 313 by mistake.
> Many people see the Zapruder film and point to the president
> being forced to the back and to the left and believe it supports
> a shot coming from the grassy knoll. But it may be more important
> to see what actually happens at the moment of the bullet impact.
>
> I have isolated frames 312 and 313 of the Zapruder film which are
> the frames that capture the instant that the bullet strikes President
> Kennedy???s head. It is noticeable that his head moves some distance
> forward and downward, consistent with a shot coming from behind
> and above. I have superimposed the images and placed some white
> reference lines to help show the relative movement.
>
> It is doubtful that the bullet would be capable of exerting sufficient
> force to overcome the weight of the seated President whose neck
> was already bent forward from the first hit. Being seated, his feet
> are also in front of him and he is wearing a brace because of his
> back. All of these factors would impact how his body would react.
>
Straw man argument. No one said the bullet had the force to push the whole
body. But ALL WC defenders are hypocritical when they say a bullet from
behind forced JFK's head forward. If a Carcano bullet can move the head
forward then it could just as well move the head back. But again the
problem is bias selection. They focus ONLY on JFK and never notice that
ALL the passengers were moving forward. So is the only possible cause a
bullet hitting each of them in the back o0f the head? No, the cause is
something that WC defenders never heard of because the never studied
SCIENCE in school. It's called INERTIA. They were not wearing seat belts
so when the limo suddenly slowed down from about 12 MPH to about 8 MPH
that 4 MPH had to go somewhere. So they kept moving forward.
> It seems reasonable from a physics aspect, that his head was forced
> violently forward and downwards before snapping or bouncing back
> from being instantly compressed and subsequently falling to his left.
> The explosion of brain matter visible in frame 313 is consistent with
> an exit wound.
>
> I recall reading that the blur on frame 313 at the moment of the
> shot may have been the result of Mr. Zapruder's muscle reaction
> to the shot.
I don't think they call it muscle. It is a reflex reaction like when the
doctor hits your knee. Only in this case it's like when you hear a big
bang and your body wants to protect itself.
>
> Many also have said that his back brace prevented him from
> movement keeping him in a more upright position thus
> providing a better target.
>
Not exactly. Just prevented him from ducking.
Also no room.
> On a separate matter, I am of the opinion that a competent
> and experienced sniper would never choose the grassy knoll
You are not qualified to tell a sniper where he must hide.
Can you SEE him? If you say yes you admit that the sniper is there.
If you say no you prove that it was a good hiding spot.
> as a potential hide. It would be impossible to secure with any
That's why snipers use a second to protect them. Read a manual.
> advance reliability and would require a horizontal tracking shot,
> more difficult than a shot where the target is moving away or
> towards the shooter or not in motion. The open and potentially
> visible location would also be a psychological distracting factor
> for a shooter.
>
So, you are saying that a shot from the TSBD was impossible? SCIENCE
proves where the shots came from, not YOUR opinion. Go back to 1978 and
tell the DPD marksman that he can't shoot from behind the fence because it
is physically impossible. The WC defenders sent their expert who is even
taller than Bigfoot and he stood behind the fence and said any shot is
impossible from there because HE couldn't even see the street from there.
So how did the DPD shooter keep hiting the sandbag targets down on the
pavement? You guys believe in MAGIC. MAGIC BULLET. MAGIC SHOOTER. SBT.