Six Days In Roswell .... !
cdddraftsman
The truth isn't out there .... it's right here in this original ,
odd , hilarious documentary about a gathering of Ufo buffs in Roswell
NM
The Dallas Morning News
Yes kookyness is contagious !
Enjoy ....
tl ...
..
.
cdddraftsman
On Dec 11, 3:22 pm, davidemerling <davidemerl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> JFK Assassination. False Flag Attacks: How "Patsies" are Framed
> The Case of Lee Harvey Oswald
> by Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs
>
> To appreciate the magnitude of the issue, consider the words of Robert
> Blakey stated :
>
> “If [the backyard photographs] are invalid, how they were produced
> poses far-reaching questions in the area of conspiracy, for they
> evince a degree of technical sophistication that would almost
> necessarily raise the possibility that [someone] conspired not only to
> kill the President, but to make Oswald a patsy.”
>
>
HIS EXTENDED STATEMENTS ON FRONTLINE ! : 'Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald' :
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/oswald/interviews/blakey.html
Q : Can you describe why there is a controversy surrounding the back
yard photographs?
A : "There are three photographs of Lee Harvey Oswald taken by Marina,
each holding a rifle and some Communist Party literature. When Oswald
himself was shown those photographs, he denied that he owned a rifle
and denies that this was him in it. He said his head was pasted on it.
The critics of the Warren Commission seized on this and did studies of
shadows. The nature of his chin, with a cleft here and shadows in the
background led to arguing that the photographs were composites or
fakes.
We took very seriously these charges. Surely, if they were faked, it
would be an indication of the most sophisticated effort to frame Lee
Harvey Oswald. We had our first bit of evidence examined by the Warren
Commission. Marina testifies that she took it; she identifies the
camera that she used. The FBI was able, to the exclusion of all other
cameras, tie that camera to these photographs.
Assuming that all that's fake, we went further with a photographic
panel and studied very carefully all of the testimony about the
shadows being inappropriate. Our photographic panel indicated in great
detail that these shadows were not inappropriate, that the critics had
simply not understood optics accordingly.
But for me at least the single most important counter indication of a
faked photograph is that we uncovered in the possession of George de
Mohrenschildt a third photograph. On the back of that photograph is an
inscription in Lee Harvey Oswald's handwriting, including his
signature. We had a panel of handwriting experts look at his
handwriting over his whole life, including on that photograph, and
their conclusion was without any doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald had
signed that photograph."
Q : What was the connection therefore between Oswald and the
assassination weapon?
A : "Lee Harvey Oswald in this photograph is holding the weapon that
can be identified as the weapon found in the depository. And that
weapon, in turn, can be ballistically linked to the exclusion of all
others with the bullets that killed John Kennedy.
The photograph itself does several things. One: it self-identifies
Oswald as associated with the Marxist literature. He's holding in his
hand the Daily Worker and the Socialist Worker Party literature.
Incidentally, it also indicates Oswald's confusion: These two branches
of Marxism are hardly friends.
The rifle itself can be identified as the rifle used in the
assassination. It therefore directly links, in a photographic way,
Oswald with the gun that killed Kennedy.
How do we know he wasn't just holding a rifle of the kind used in the
assassination? On the committee, we did a detailed microscopic
examination of the rifle in the photograph and compared and contrasted
it to the rifle seized from the Texas School Book Depository that can
be ballistically linked to the bullets that killed the President. You
can identify unique physical characteristics of this rifle to the
exclusion of all others between the photograph and the rifle that's
now in the National Archives".
Q : The FBI looked at the camera and the film. What kind of tests did
they do and what did they conclude?
A : "There are microscopic, unique indentations. Based on them, if you
have the negative and the camera you can -- just like you can match
the grooves in a bullet to the grooves created by the barrel
ballistics -- you can match a camera and a negative or a photograph.
That's precisely the technique that the FBI employed. The details of
it are set out for all to read in the Warren Commission hearings and
report. We undertook a similar analysis on the committee and the
photographic panel's report is set out in our hearings as well. This
is science. This is not memory, this is not perception, and this is
something that anybody with the expertise can replicate for
themselves".
See also book :
Photo Fakery
Dino A. Brugioni
The History and Technology of Photographic Deception and Manipulation
Chapter : Spotting Fakes Page 89
Microscopic Analysis (in short) proves photo's genuine .
tl
Thalia
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ep8WEsb5b0&feature=PlayList&p=FFAAC88...
> The truth isn't out there .... it's right here in this original ,
> odd , hilarious documentary about a gathering of Ufo buffs in Roswell
> NM
>
> The Dallas Morning News
>
> Yes kookyness is contagious !
>
> Enjoy ....
>
> tl ...
>
> ..
>
> .
Roswell, UFO's and Aliens have nothing to do with the JFK
assassination. This is a classic Lone Nut tactic that is dishonest and
disengenous.
cdddraftsman
>
> - Show quoted text -
The Academic JFK Assassination Site
Stressing physical evidence and critical thinking
Reactions from readers 1999–2000
From John Kelin, 3 July 2000
John Kelin <jke...@rmi.net>
Subject: your page
Dr. Rahn,
I recently looked at your JFK page, in particular the profiles you
offer of some of the leading critics, and I must say that in my view
much of what you present is misleading and unfair.
As a case in point, consider the summary you offer on Sylvia
Meagher:
"...Sylvia Meagher was a leftist and untrained in the art of
investigating, a person who didn¹t consider evidence that ran counter
to her position, who transferred a passion for flying saucers to a
passion for the JFK assassination, whose leftism leaned her toward an
answer very early, and who found that answer nurtured by the influence
of Mark Lane."
What's wrong with this picture?
Your comments about Meagher are so biased I hardly know where to
begin. For one thing you cribbed shamelessly from Richard Warren
Lewis, who wrote probably the most meaningless book on the entire
case. Your allegation about Meagher and "a passion for flying saucers"
is an obvious smear, as if an interest in UFOs were not legitimate.
More important is the attempt --- I consider it a dirty trick worthy
of Nixon --- of linking someone capable of seeing through the
transparant rubbish of the Warren Commission (and articulating and
documenting it brilliantly) with a belief in the cliche of little
green men. You say she "came from a background of UFOs." What does
that mean?
Prof. Rahn : "Your strong reaction to my notes about Meagher and UFOs
was most interesting. I have seen it before in JFK conspiracists, who
often are exceedingly reluctant to have the two subjects raised in the
same breath. Yet, is it not true that many of the web sites that deal
with JFK also deal with UFOs? Even major JFK figures like Jim Marrs
are strongly concerned with UFOs. Let us not deny the contemporary
fact that the two subjects hold a similar attraction for many
people.......I am surprised that you plead ignorance on such an
interesting and important aspect of JFK "research" without trying to
inform yourself about it. Here's how to get the answer in just a few
minutes. Open your web browser and go to Google (http://
www.google.com). Type in "JFK UFO." Google will then search for all
sites that mention JFK and UFOs. You'd better stand back, for there
seem to be hundreds of them. (I didn't count, though.) You will then
appreciate how many people speak of the "JFK conspiracy" and the "UFO
conspiracy" in the same breath".
Get the connection now , or do I have to draw you a picture ?
tl
cdddraftsman
> assassination. This is a classic Lone Nut tactic that is dishonest and
> disengenous.
The Academic JFK Assassination Site