On 5/7/2014 9:23 AM, John McAdams wrote:
> From Morley's blog:
>
> <Quote on>
>
> jeffmorley
>
> May 7, 2014 at 7:38 am
>
> No. John McAdams is not being censored. Nor is anyone else.
>
> As I have explained to John, his comments are on 48 hour delay because
> he said, falsely, that his comments were being ?censored.? They were
> being held, pending a discussion about his tone, a discussion I have
> had with other commenters. He also, falsely, that I had ?caved in? to
> pressure from other people; I had not. He also called said that I had
> engaged in a ?stupid stunt? which I had not.
>
> For this kind of uncivil language, the publication of his comments is
> delayed 48 hours until further notice, as stipulated by the site?s
> Comments Policy, which you can read here:
>
http://jfkfacts.org/comment-policy/
>
>
> <end quote>
>
> Of course, Morley *still* hasn't approved the five comments I made in
> response to DiEugenio's ranting about how all the evidence tying
> Oswald to the rifle and revolver was faked and forged.
>
> And I posted those comments in good faith, *before* Morley sent me the
> insulting letter relaying buff complaints about my "style."
>
> I sent him a civil response back, and he *still* failed to approve the
> comments.
>
> Jeff, it's hard to avoid the conclusion you are caving to buff
> pressure (even if you have ginned up an excuse to do so), and censored
> posts that buffs would not like.
>
> Your credibility is shot.
>
Sounds like a circular firing squad to me. In the old days there was a
rule here forbidding posters from posting private e-mails and messages
from another newsgroup (mentioning no name) without explicit permission.
So now you say anything goes. Does that mean I can post all your e-mails?
Even your mailing list where you plot strategy with your fellow WC
defenders about how to attack the conspiracy believers here and force them
out?
> .John
> -------------------------------
>
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>