Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

That wasn't Oswald shot in DPD basement(Dont shoot me I'm just the

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Nobody

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 10:52:15 PM11/7/09
to
Sad but true. Hard to believe so I have to try to prove it to you and
thank the lord for You tube!!! Look at the film and stop frame or zoom
whatever you can and look at the supposed Oswald. Don't look at the
published photo. Still photos are childs play to alter. Altering movie
film is extremely difficult. Among a few of my laymens jobs I've had
was I hired on at the age of 13 to work at my hometown newspaper where
some of my duties were black and white continuous tone and process
photography. I was fortunate to be able to take advantage of very
experienced people who did this work their entire lives so I learned
quite a bit. Really it's very easy and rewarding work. But I say this
to show you a child can alter a photo. But altering movie film and
make it look real is another game altogether. So to keep it simple a
man of oswald size and wardrobe can be used in a film and all you have
to alter is the face. But at 18 frames per second that's a lot of
altering for a 20 second clip. In the films I've viewed I would say
they used a man probably in his 40's withway less hair than Oswald and
did a terrible job of doctoring his face. Look for yourself. Please
do. But you have to stop the film to tell. At a random viewing if you
are not watching his face you assume it's Oswald cause you have been
told it's Oswald. But whatever you do don't base your proof on the
still photo. As I said a child can do the still photo altering!! And
another interesting thing I've seen in some of the films that aren't
cropped so heavy is a light colored car pulls almost into the
photographers from the left side of the basement just as the man is
being "shot" Now who was that and why wasn't that mentioned when
describing the security in the basement. I thought the armored car had
that entrance blocked!! The ambulance scenes with the "shot" man for
some strange reason the face is obviously not Oswald! Please look for
yourself and I'm sure you will see these things too!

cdddraftsman

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 6:31:35 PM11/8/09
to

You could of saved your breath .

Subjective gimmicky based upon blurred film induced by hand held
camera's .

tl

Nobody

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 9:05:16 PM11/8/09
to

And the car in the basement? Surely that's not camera shake

j leyden

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 9:06:49 PM11/8/09
to

To the Moderators: I don't believe running these kind of nonsense items
adds anything to the JFK assn. discussion or the prestige of the NG.
"Nobody," unfortunately, is nobody for very good reason.

JGL


Nobody

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:41:19 PM11/8/09
to

Well mr Leyden I see your mentality in this and previous post but I will
respond and ask you did you look at the photos or are you scared to be
found a incompetent researcher. One camera view shows a car almost running
over some of the photographers as Oswald is supposedly being shot! Now in
case you didn't know this was a supposedly secure basement with a prisoner
transfer using an armored car and yet here comes a civilian car right up
in the middle of it. Now that leads to credibility evidence on many fronts
and if you can't see that well I guess the people that read in this forum
can see your opinion

Nobody

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:42:06 PM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 8:06 pm, j leyden <JLeyden...@aol.com> wrote:

Well mr Leyden I see your insult was allowed to post but I can take it.
Evidence of ana totally insecure basement which allowed a cheap vehicle
that was clearly not DPD to come in and almost run over some of the
photographers at a time when the supposed killer of the president is
supposedly shot is not important to the case when Oswalds dyslexia is
posted is important? I think you need to think before you speak cause your
liable to choke or say something stupid like you just did! Look at the
photos and then state your opinion please or take your own advice

0 new messages