If you have a education system with kooky college prof.'s teaching
conspiracy will it be a wonder college graduates are ready to just do
one thing ? :
Start filling out their unemployment forms ?
Comments ?
:-(
tl
PS : (-: John if you see this guy wack him upside his head once for
us ! :-)
9/11 = date of terrorist attack in 2001.
Yeah.... smack him one!!! How DARE he belive in cojnspiracies. There is
not a single shred of proof of any conspiracy occurring in the whole of
history. Everything is the result of lone nuts!!! WT7 just collapsed
because of.... well we don't know because the collapse of this building
doesn't appear in the official 9/11 report but I am sure everything is all
above board (after all this is the land of the free, God's own country we
are talking about)
If you have an educational system with college professors teaching that
the Earth is flat and only 5,000 years old, what does that portend for
our future?
Oh, please. Here we go again....The Kennedy assassination of the 21st
Century.
As John Stossel says 'Give me a break!' You've got your head into "U.S.
government conspiracy" so much, you've lost your bearing on reality my
friend.
9/11 was indeed a conspiracy -- a conspiracy involving al Qaeda
terrorists, not the U.S. government. Sheesh.
The collapse of World Trade 7 has been explained as the internal structure
failing from the internal fire that raged the entire day.
And, might I add, and to use your caps posting "technique" right back at
you, SHAME ON YOU. Have respect for the innocent people that died
tragically that day, as well as their families, loved ones, and friends.
Conspiracists... yikes. As Roger Daltrey screamed, "Meet the new boss,
same as the old boss."
James
<thali...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b6f7cc73-9b66-46cf...@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Don't fall into their trap. 9/11 is still a conspiracy regardless of which
people you think caused it. The JFK assassination is a conspiracy
regardless of which people you think caused it. Physical facts prove the
conspiracy. Then you can speculate about who did it and why.
We have : It was a conspiracy of one !
Ploink !
tl
thaliac :
"There is not a single shred of proof of any conspiracy occurring in
the whole of history."
Glad to see you're finally getting with the program .
I'll buy that for a dollar !
tl
For your info, I accept that 911 was planned and carried out by Islamic
Terrorists. However, I also believe it is possible that there was inside
knowledge that these "attacks" were going to be carried out. The complete
incompetence of the US authorities to anticipate, plan for and then
respond adequately while the attacks were occurring is bordering on
complicity. Oh, and then, Bush and his cronies conveniently decide to let
Bin Laden's family fly out of America the very next day, and use 911 as a
justification to attack Iraq (which had nothing to do with 911) Condo Rice
then says "we had never contemplated terrorists flying planes into
buildings" Oh come on!!!
911 is an emergency telephone number. 9/11 is the date of the
terrorist attacks in 2001.
The Bush Administration's casus belli and the U.S. Congress Iraq War
Resolution, rightly or wrongly, focused on two major causes for the
invasion:
* Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 cease fire,
including interference with weapons inspectors.
* Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop
such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United
States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf
region."
The claim that members of al-Qaeda were known to be in Iraq played a
much less prominent role in the justification than the first two above.
Thirteen relatives of Osama bin Laden, accompanied by bodyguards and
associates, were allowed to leave the United States on a flight chartered
by the Saudi government eight days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Not the next day. Being a relative of Osama bin Laden is not a crime, and
there was no legal justification for detaining them for more than 72
hours. They were, however, investigated and interviewed by the FBI before
their departure.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4014-2004Jul21.html
All lies. The neocons were planning to invade Iraq long before 9/11.
While failing to provide substantial evidence for the controlled
demolition of WTC 7, the story has functioned to eclipse the overwhelming
case for building failure based on the physical characteristics of the
collapse documented in photo's and videos of the event and the rubble pile
that resulted. No question that a conventionally steel framed building
that was severly damaged and then burnt for (4) four hours furiously would
eventually collapse.
It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure that no brainer out .
tl
Interim Report on WTC 7
http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/appendixl.pdf