Wild Charges of CIA Connections
John McAdams
Anthony Marsh
The cover-up is alive and well, supported by CIA officers who lie about
what really happened. The CIA continues to support and cooperate with the
major drug producers.
Coondog
> On 11/26/2009 12:01 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>
>
>
> > .John
> > --------------
> >http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
> The cover-up is alive and well, supported by CIA officers who lie about
> what really happened. The CIA continues to support and cooperate with the
> major drug producers.
Spoken like a true CIA-hater who doesn’t have a clue about what the
CIA is doing.
I think, Marsh, it would be different if you had ever put your life in
danger for your country like many of the CIA agents have done. But
you haven’t.
Bill Clarke
James Moriarty
> On 11/26/2009 12:01 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>
>
>
> > .John
> > --------------
> >http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
Mr. Marsh,
Per your CIA cliche type, cyberspace commentary...
> The cover-up is alive and well, supported by CIA officers who lie about
> what really happened. The CIA continues to support and cooperate with the
> major drug producers.
You have professed on a countless number of occasions to NEVER RELY
ON
EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY!
Is this an exception to your rule?
If not, then please post the documentation you utilized to support
this recent claim of cover-up?
I tend to agree with Bill Clarke per his post reply to yours.....
"Spoken like a true CIA-hater who doesn’t have a clue about what the
CIA is doing.
I think, Marsh, it would be different if you had ever put your life
in
danger for your country like many of the CIA agents have done. But
you haven’t. "
To take the words of the author unknown to me,
PUT UP or SHUT UP!
Respectfully Submitted,
James Moriarty
Anthony Marsh
> On Nov 26, 7:51 pm, Anthony Marsh<anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 11/26/2009 12:01 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2009/11/drugs-corruption-and-ju...
>>> .John
>>> --------------
>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>>
>
> Mr. Marsh,
>
> Per your CIA cliche type, cyberspace commentary...
>
>> The cover-up is alive and well, supported by CIA officers who lie about
>> what really happened. The CIA continues to support and cooperate with the
>> major drug producers.
>
> You have professed on a countless number of occasions to NEVER RELY
> ON
> EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY!
>
Who said anyting about eyewitness testimony in regards to this issue?
> Is this an exception to your rule?
>
You are not making sense.
> If not, then please post the documentation you utilized to support
> this recent claim of cover-up?
>
> I tend to agree with Bill Clarke per his post reply to yours.....
>
> "Spoken like a true CIA-hater who doesn�t have a clue about what the
> CIA is doing.
>
> I think, Marsh, it would be different if you had ever put your life
> in
> danger for your country like many of the CIA agents have done. But
> you haven�t. "
>
> To take the words of the author unknown to me,
>
> PUT UP or SHUT UP!
>
I suggest you do the second part since you don't know what you are
talking about.
> Respectfully Submitted,
> James Moriarty
>
>
James Moriarty
> On 11/27/2009 10:52 PM, James Moriarty wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 26, 7:51 pm, Anthony Marsh<anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On 11/26/2009 12:01 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>
> >>>http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2009/11/drugs-corruption-and-ju...
> >>> .John
> >>> --------------
> >>>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
> > Mr. Marsh,
>
> > Per your CIA cliche type, cyberspace commentary...
>
> >> The cover-up is alive and well, supported by CIA officers who lie about
> >> what really happened. The CIA continues to support and cooperate with the
> >> major drug producers.
>
> > You have professed on a countless number of occasions to NEVER RELY
> > ON
> > EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY!
>
> Who said anyting about eyewitness testimony in regards to this issue?
>
> > Is this an exception to your rule?
>
> You are not making sense.
>
>
>
>
>
> > If not, then please post the documentation you utilized to support
> > this recent claim of cover-up?
>
> > I tend to agree with Bill Clarke per his post reply to yours.....
>
> > CIA is doing.
>
> > I think, Marsh, it would be different if you had ever put your life
> > in
> > danger for your country like many of the CIA agents have done. But
>
> > To take the words of the author unknown to me,
>
> > PUT UP or SHUT UP!
>
> I suggest you do the second part since you don't know what you are
> talking about.
>
>
>
> > Respectfully Submitted,
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Tony,
I'm surprised you misunderstood my prior.
Let me explain it this way.....
The only evidence for a CIA cover-up in this latest episode
has been eyewitness and hearsay only. No documentation
has been brought forward to support your claim. No audio
has been brought forward to support your claim. No photos
have been brought forward to support your claim.
Doesn't leave much else, does it Tony?
Like I posted prior....
PUT UP or SHUT UP.
Just admit that you are breaking your rule and be done with it.
JM
Anthony Marsh
> On Nov 28, 12:00 am, Anthony Marsh<anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 11/27/2009 10:52 PM, James Moriarty wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 26, 7:51 pm, Anthony Marsh<anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2009 12:01 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>>
>>>>> http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2009/11/drugs-corruption-and-ju...
>>>>> .John
>>>>> --------------
>>>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>>
>>> Mr. Marsh,
>>
>>> Per your CIA cliche type, cyberspace commentary...
>>
>>>> The cover-up is alive and well, supported by CIA officers who lie about
>>>> what really happened. The CIA continues to support and cooperate with the
>>>> major drug producers.
>>
>>> You have professed on a countless number of occasions to NEVER RELY
>>> ON
>>> EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY!
>>
>> Who said anyting about eyewitness testimony in regards to this issue?
>>
>>> Is this an exception to your rule?
>>
>> You are not making sense.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> If not, then please post the documentation you utilized to support
>>> this recent claim of cover-up?
>>
>>> I tend to agree with Bill Clarke per his post reply to yours.....
>>
>>> CIA is doing.
>>
>>> I think, Marsh, it would be different if you had ever put your life
>>> in
>>> danger for your country like many of the CIA agents have done. But
>>
>>> To take the words of the author unknown to me,
>>
>>> PUT UP or SHUT UP!
>>
>> I suggest you do the second part since you don't know what you are
>> talking about.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Respectfully Submitted,
>>> James Moriarty- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Tony,
>
> I'm surprised you misunderstood my prior.
> Let me explain it this way.....
> The only evidence for a CIA cover-up in this latest episode
> has been eyewitness and hearsay only. No documentation
> has been brought forward to support your claim. No audio
> has been brought forward to support your claim. No photos
> have been brought forward to support your claim.
>
The CIA cover-up is the self-serving article by a participant in those
crimes.
The idea that we have audio and photos proving he is covering up is
juvenile. It's the damn CIA.
> Doesn't leave much else, does it Tony?
>
> Like I posted prior....
>
> PUT UP or SHUT UP.
>
Like I posted prior, I suggest that you take your own advise.
> Just admit that you are breaking your rule and be done with it.
>
My rule as you put it is about eyewitnesses to a crime. He does not fall
into such a category. He is a participant lying about what really
happened.
> JM
>