On 22 Mar 2012 08:56:50 -0700, Ben Holmes <
ad...@burningknife.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >I assume you are talking about the PHONE taps of Oswald talking to the
>>>> >Soviet embassy, not the room bugs of Oswald at the Soviet embassy or Cuban
>>>> >consulate. Well, Hoover didn't get out much except to go to some parties
>>>> >where he could dress up as a woman or vacation with his lover Tolson or
>>>> >watch and bet on the horse races. He almost never went into the field to
>>>> >investigate anything. But he did have FBI agents in Mexico who went to the
>>>> >CIA station and listened to the tapes. They couldn't tell whose voice it
>>>> >was. When they compared that to what they heard on the TV of the real
>>>> >Oswald it didn't sound like the real Oswald.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, my!
>>>>
>>>> None of this is true, Tony. The Hoover in the dress stuff is
>>>> nonsense.
>>>>
>>>> And no FBI agents listened to the tapes.
>>>
>>> Here is a response made by Ben Holmes over on the conspiracy board
>>>to John`s claim that no FBI agents listed to the tapes...
>
>
>
>
>>> Does John think that FBI's Belmont was lying to Tolson when he
>>>noted in a memo:
>>>
>>>"...Inasmuch as the Dallas Agents who listened to the tape of the
>>>conversation allegedly of Oswald from the Cuban Embassy to the Russian
>>>Embassy in Mexico and examined the photographs of the visitor to the
>>>Embassy in Mexico and were of the opinion that neither the tape nor the
>>>photograph pertained to Oswald..." Or perhaps Mr. Hoover himself lied when
>>>he noted in a memo to the head of the Secret Service:
>>>
>>>"Special Agents of this Bureau, who have conversed with Oswald in Dallas,
>>>Texas, have observed photographs of the individual referred to above, and
>>>have listened to a recording of his voice."
>>>
>>>
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/lopezrpt/html/LopezRpt_00...
>>>More citations and evidence can be found here:
>>>
http://history-matters.com/essays/frameup/FourteenMinuteGap/FourteenM...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>What the buffs fail to notice is that *all* of these accounts come
>>through Alan Belmont. He talked to Shanklin, and apparently
>>misunderstood what Shanklin said. His misinformation then got passed
>>around.
>>
>>From the HSCA:
>>
>>
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/clueless3.htm
>
>How silly!!
>
>The HSCA *KNEW* that the tapes existed, and had been listened to:
>
>
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/cia_testimony/Goodpasture/html/Goodpasture_0148a.htm
>
Ben somehow fails to notice that this is supposedly a tape in Mexico
City.
Nothing about any tapes having been sent to Dallas.
And indeed, Goodpasture has no recollection if it!
.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm