> > Anthony,
>
> > It's obvious you didn't read the initial post on this thread, but in your
> > case that happens so often we're used to it by now. Whatever form of
> > protest, it makes sense to do it near the source of power. Dallas has no
>
> It also makes sense to do it at the scene of the crime. How did Wall
> Street itself do anything to oppress the 99%? It's just a road. It has
> no power to do anything, but take traffic. But it is a SYMBOL of the
> ruling 1% who are stealing from the 99%.
So therefore destroying the scene of the crime with a riot is a good idea?
All governments who tax steal from the people. The more they tax the more
they steal. At least in the stock market,citizens have a chance to make
money.
> > power to do anything. The Federal Government has all the power to reopen
> > the investigation, hopefully this time with all documents now available.
>
> No, the Federal Government had officially closed the case.
> If you think all we need are documents to investigate this case you are
> clueless.
They can officially reopen the case, then demand all remaining
documents.
> > A week long riot or month long occupation in Dallas will not do anything
>
> Week long riot? Jeez, why would it take the Dallas police a whole week
> to riot? These things are usually over in hours.
Ask that question of the whoever wrote the first post.
> > to pressure Congress or the White House. They will simply shrug their
> > shoulders and business as usual. This event just becomes a local problem
> > not a national movement. Based on the first message you failed to read,
> > this occupy movement wants to interrupt planned ceremonies and generate
> > riots on the street if possible.
>
> I think possibly to interrupt the planned ceremonies by WC defenders
> intent on covering up the conspiracy.
How about ceremonies to simply honor the memory of JFK?
> Funny how the rioting is ALWAYS started by the police, never the protestors.
BS. Protestors pelt rocks, smash windows, start fires, turn cars upside
down and you blame that on police! Look at the recent trouble caused by
fans when their favorite team won a basketball game. Think of what could
happen to Dealey Plaza.
> > Maybe Dallas should just cancel all ceremonies and instead let TV specials
> > interview the Mayor and City Council. Gary Mack will be inundated with
> > requests for interviews and Grodey will be holding court in his office on
> > the plaza. The carney sideshow atmosphere might include an encore
> > performance of Erykah Badu stripping butt naked to entertain the
> > occupation troops. This crassy carnival on the grassy knoll is somehow
> > supposed to convince the current Administration to come clean about the
> > assassination of President Kennedy. Somehow I doubt President Obama will
> > be influenced to take action based on bad behavior in Dealey Plaza.
>
> Obama has no vested interest in investigating the Kennedy assassination.
> He won't even investigate the assassination of Martin Luther King.
No vested interest? So he is now part of the cover-up. Thanks for
the clarification. By the way, there is no statue of limitations on
murder.
> > That's out-of-sight out- of-mind for the White House, plus Dallas County
> > is not going to vote for him anyway so why should he care. So take this
> > show on the road to DC.
>
> Yeah sure, just as Texas was not going to vote for JFK anyway so why
> bother making a campaign trip there.
Texas voted for JFK in 1960. After the successful tour of of major Texas
cities JFK he was going to carry the state again, propbably by a larger
margin. By the way, J D Tippit and his wife voted for JFK.
> > This brings up the question once again. President Obama was a charismatic
> > young Senator who beat the odds and became President just like JFK. He
> > was helped tremendously by Kennedy family endorsements during the
> > Democratic primary and general election. As President why has he not
> > insisted on releasing all documents that have been withheld from the
> > public for almost 5 decades? By now he's got to know what really
>
> Why has his used his power as President to order the agencies to release
> all their files and yet allowed the CIA to thumb their nose at the law?
> As the CIA said to him, "If you want to shut us down, then go kill bin
> Laden yourself."
Cite please.
> > happened. Why he is he so reluctant to share that knowledge with the
> > American people? Is he now part of the cover-up so many CTs believe in?
> > If so, why?
>
> So, you really think that Obama knows the secrets about the Kennedy
> assassination?
Yes, and it is significant this is not a priority for his administration
to resolve this decades old national debate that has damaged the national
psyche and image of the Federal government. Did we have a coup d'etat in
1963 as Oliver Stone's version of twisted history said? That question
remains unanswered by a majority of Americans who still believe LHO did
not act alone. So no transparency on this issue.
> Did he read that in the Book of Secrets hidden in the Oval Office desk?
Possibly or he simply asked for this information as he has authority
to do as Chief Executive of the US Government.