Confirming Herbert Blenner

[Mike]

I have confirmed that Herbert Blenner is correct in the following article.

I observe the 60 cycle frequency at about 57 cycles in the uncorrected
Bowles tape.

I can also confirm that the 1.683 KHz "brieftone" exists in both the
Bullah Broadcast and the Bullah Cross talk on Channel 1.

http://hdblenner.com/believe.htm


I am working on confirming that the "brieftone" associated with the
Decker broadcast does not appear on the Channel 1 crosstalk.

Herbert has done some good work on this...

[Steve Barber]

Well, I am about to burst your bubble, Mike, because Herbert is not
correct about the "brieftone".

There is a "brieftone" that is very audible at the conclusion of Decker's
2nd transmission, that Herbert claims is not there. It is very brief, but
it appears on both channels one and two.

What you will hear in this small clip is first, the "brieftone" as it is
heard on channel one, followed by how it sounds on channel two. I repeated
the segments several times.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9EfBY0tv7Y

Since there is no speech by Decker accompanying the "brieftone", you
should have absolutely NO problem comparing the two sounds.

I'm not going to hold my breath on this. You two both have your minds
made up. I am posting here for the regulars and the lurkers to hear for
themselves that the two tones I supplied are one and the same, from the
two different radio channels in use 11-22-63.

[Michael O'Dell]

>
>"Mike" wrote in message news:534c...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...

And I can confirm the dictabelt was made of plastic.

Seriously though, this is just a matter of looking. We've known this all
along. It doesn't take much "good work".

Michael

[Mike]

Ok if you have know this a long time, please tell me the frequencies
that IBM used for their Brief tone analysis.

I do not want a range , I want to know exactly what frequencies they
used when they created their "transfer functions".

[Mike]

The fact that there is no speech is the problem. There should be speech
associated with it if it is truly a brieftone.

Also, the brieftone is not at the correct frequency on channel 1.

[Michael O'Dell]

"Mike" <MikeR...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:534d4651$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...

I am not at your service and your demand has nothing to do with knowing
about the 57 Hz frequency. That fact had been written about long before
Herbert brought it up.

Michael