Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Lying The Mark Lane Way # 2 (Rush To Judgment Film)
11 views
Skip to first unread message
timstter
Oct 1, 2012, 8:55:17 PM10/1/12
to
Hi All,
Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
the Warren Commission Report:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
right here (left hand side of page):
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0432a.htm
Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
Commission totally ignored Simmons!
The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
the Warren Commission Report:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
right here (left hand side of page):
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0432a.htm
Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
Commission totally ignored Simmons!
The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
John McAdams
Oct 1, 2012, 9:05:00 PM10/1/12
to
On 1 Oct 2012 20:55:17 -0400, timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
>the Warren Commission Report:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
>
>What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
>interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
>right here (left hand side of page):
>
>http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0432a.htm
>
>Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
>Commission totally ignored Simmons!
>
>The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
>
In that video, Lane is terribly selective about what questions he asks
>Hi All,
>
>Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
>the Warren Commission Report:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
>
>What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
>interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
>right here (left hand side of page):
>
>http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0432a.htm
>
>Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
>Commission totally ignored Simmons!
>
>The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
>
witnesses. For example, he never asks Brehm or Bowers from where they
thought the shots came.
That's because he knew Brehm would say "one of those two buildings up
and the corner of Houston and Elm," and Bowers were say that there
were too many reverberations in the Plaza area for anybody to tell.
.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Anthony Marsh
Oct 1, 2012, 10:54:02 PM10/1/12
to
tell where the shots came from. Ok, then never cite anyone claiming that
the shots came from the TSBD.
> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
timstter
Oct 3, 2012, 9:00:08 PM10/3/12
to
On Oct 2, 11:04 am, John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
Brehm is coming up next in the series!
> On 1 Oct 2012 20:55:17 -0400, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Hi All,
>
> >Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
> >the Warren Commission Report:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
>
> >What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
> >interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
> >right here (left hand side of page):
>
> >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Hi All,
>
> >Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
> >the Warren Commission Report:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
>
> >What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
> >interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
> >right here (left hand side of page):
>
>
> >Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
> >Commission totally ignored Simmons!
>
> >The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
>
> In that video, Lane is terribly selective about what questions he asks
> witnesses. For example, he never asks Brehm or Bowers from where they
> thought the shots came.
>
> That's because he knew Brehm would say "one of those two buildings up
> and the corner of Houston and Elm," and Bowers were say that there
> were too many reverberations in the Plaza area for anybody to tell.
>
> .John
> --------------http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Hi .John,
> >Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
> >Commission totally ignored Simmons!
>
> >The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
>
> In that video, Lane is terribly selective about what questions he asks
> witnesses. For example, he never asks Brehm or Bowers from where they
> thought the shots came.
>
> That's because he knew Brehm would say "one of those two buildings up
> and the corner of Houston and Elm," and Bowers were say that there
> were too many reverberations in the Plaza area for anybody to tell.
>
> .John
> --------------http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Brehm is coming up next in the series!
John Reagor King
Oct 3, 2012, 11:07:38 PM10/3/12
to
In article <506a5459$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
to use the Internet, Anthony?
> Ok, then never cite anyone claiming that
> the shots came from the TSBD.
This thread isn't about who said shots came from the TSBD, it is about
Mark Lane cherrypicking the witness statements. Strange that you often
falsely criticize others for doing that, but never truthfully criticize
Lane for doing that.
Anthony Marsh <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 10/1/2012 9:05 PM, John McAdams wrote:
> > On 1 Oct 2012 20:55:17 -0400, timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
> >> the Warren Commission Report:
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
> >>
> >> What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
> >> interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
> >> right here (left hand side of page):
> >>
> >> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_043
> >> 2a.htm
> >>
> >> Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
> >> Commission totally ignored Simmons!
> >>
> >> The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
> >
> > In that video, Lane is terribly selective about what questions he asks
> > witnesses. For example, he never asks Brehm or Bowers from where they
> > thought the shots came.
> >
> > That's because he knew Brehm would say "one of those two buildings up
> > and the corner of Houston and Elm," and Bowers were say that there
> > were too many reverberations in the Plaza area for anybody to tell.
>
> No, YOU would say that there were too many reverberations in the Plaza to
> tell where the shots came from.
So did Bowers, and this has been quoted to you before. Don't you know how
> On 10/1/2012 9:05 PM, John McAdams wrote:
> > On 1 Oct 2012 20:55:17 -0400, timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
> >> the Warren Commission Report:
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
> >>
> >> What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
> >> interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
> >> right here (left hand side of page):
> >>
> >> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_043
> >> 2a.htm
> >>
> >> Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
> >> Commission totally ignored Simmons!
> >>
> >> The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
> >
> > In that video, Lane is terribly selective about what questions he asks
> > witnesses. For example, he never asks Brehm or Bowers from where they
> > thought the shots came.
> >
> > That's because he knew Brehm would say "one of those two buildings up
> > and the corner of Houston and Elm," and Bowers were say that there
> > were too many reverberations in the Plaza area for anybody to tell.
>
> No, YOU would say that there were too many reverberations in the Plaza to
> tell where the shots came from.
to use the Internet, Anthony?
> Ok, then never cite anyone claiming that
> the shots came from the TSBD.
Mark Lane cherrypicking the witness statements. Strange that you often
falsely criticize others for doing that, but never truthfully criticize
Lane for doing that.
Robert Harris
Oct 9, 2012, 4:00:45 PM10/9/12
to
John McAdams wrote:
> On 1 Oct 2012 20:55:17 -0400, timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
>> the Warren Commission Report:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
>>
>> What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
>> interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
>> right here (left hand side of page):
>>
>> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0432a.htm
>>
>> Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
>> Commission totally ignored Simmons!
>>
>> The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
>>
>
> In that video, Lane is terribly selective about what questions he asks
> witnesses. For example, he never asks Brehm or Bowers from where they
> thought the shots came.
On 11/22/63, just minutes after the assassination, Brehm told the Dallas
> On 1 Oct 2012 20:55:17 -0400, timstter <tims...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Say, according to this video, James L. Simmons was NEVER mentioned in
>> the Warren Commission Report:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5No9Jiu0GI
>>
>> What Mark Lane fails to tell the viewer is that Simmons's FBI
>> interview DID appear in the Warren Commission VOLUMES. Here it is,
>> right here (left hand side of page):
>>
>> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0432a.htm
>>
>> Lane is simply LYING by omission, pretending that the Warren
>> Commission totally ignored Simmons!
>>
>> The fellow is a total research FRAUD, in my view.
>>
>
> In that video, Lane is terribly selective about what questions he asks
> witnesses. For example, he never asks Brehm or Bowers from where they
> thought the shots came.
Times Herald something quite different:
"(D)rehm (sic) seemed to think the shots came from in FRONT OF or BESIDE
the President."
He apparently changed his opinion after being "informed" that all the
shots came from the depository.
Robert Harris
0 new messages