So what? The logos of a couple of E&A firms somehow makes the lighting
plan special? Was it drawn by unicorns?
> The plans provided so far show the STRUCTURE of the building. This photo
> was taken during the renovation. As you can see the skeleton/guts remain.
The floor plan would show the same thing, and include measurements of the
walls, columns, windows and other structural information. If you get
really lucky, and get the original construction documents with detail
drawings, elevations, and schedules. The latter is a treasure trove of
info for doors an windows.
Again, so what? How does that tell you where, how big, or what shape
anything is?
> I have told the team of designers that:
>
> (1) The outside remains very close to the way it was in 1963. Yes,
> adjustments will be made. Yes, Tony, everybody knows about the Elm Street
> asphalt being thicker now. I will be happy to relay your extraordinary
> revelation to MIT.
None of this addresses what I pointed out. Why are you being so evasive?
> (2) The inside is being done from blueprints and photos. I have yet
> another project to have the JFK community calling the media asking for
> footage (film/video) of the inside. The NBC Affiliate in Dallas has a
> YouTube videoclip where they show a room in the TV station's basement
> dedicated to store such material. It is lying there waiting for us.
But if all you have are the lighting plans, you don't really have the
blueprints. At least, you don't have the blueprints of what you really
need.
> The Mary Ferrell Foundation gave me a free membership, in appreciation for
> the work done (almost ended up in jail).
Again, so what? Why does your status with MFF matter on this point?