Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

It is time for everybody to pray

92 views
Skip to first unread message

Piotr Mancini

unread,
Feb 19, 2020, 11:23:59 AM2/19/20
to
Ever since 2015 Ole' JFK Numbers has been behind the Ark of the Covenant,
the Philosopher's Stone. That would be the blueprints for the Dallas
County Administration Building, formerly known as Texas School Book
Depository.

After innumerable e-mails and phone calls, I decided to take it all the
way to the top, to this handsome fellow (I bet he is an Obama democrat, my
kinda guy):

https://www.dallascounty.org/government/comcrt/administrator.php

Well, he finally got things moving!

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/1-Herrera-to-Darryl-Martin.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/2-Public-Information-Act.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/3-District-Attorney-to-Attorney-General.jpg

The full letter has 4 pages, with a list of 64 exceptions. One alone would
be enough to deny my Texas Public Information Act Request.

I bet that more than a reader is praying for my request to fail. I have 3
things to say to those:

:-P :-P :-P

See current model, with precise dimensions -specially inside- to be
determined.

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/your-designers/ArchVision3D/From_PBS_Laser_Measurements_6c.jpg

Tripping Trip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHb_1swWS5M&t=20s

Class: what will be the first thing I will do when I get my hands on those
blueprints, plus those of the limo (currently kept as a state secret for
reasons that nobody can logically explain)?

Anyone?
Anyone?

That's right! Put them in the project's web server:

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/this-government-as-promised/

Why?

Because those files are not mine. They belong to my ultimate boss: The
People.

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 20, 2020, 9:37:00 PM2/20/20
to
On 2/19/2020 11:23 AM, Piotr Mancini wrote:
> Ever since 2015 Ole' JFK Numbers has been behind the Ark of the Covenant,
> the Philosopher's Stone. That would be the blueprints for the Dallas
> County Administration Building, formerly known as Texas School Book
> Depository.
>
> After innumerable e-mails and phone calls, I decided to take it all the
> way to the top, to this handsome fellow (I bet he is an Obama democrat, my
> kinda guy):
>
> https://www.dallascounty.org/government/comcrt/administrator.php
>
> Well, he finally got things moving!
>
> http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/1-Herrera-to-Darryl-Martin.jpg
> http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/2-Public-Information-Act.jpg
> http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/3-District-Attorney-to-Attorney-General.jpg
>
> The full letter has 4 pages, with a list of 64 exceptions. One alone would
> be enough to deny my Texas Public Information Act Request.
>
> I bet that more than a reader is praying for my request to fail. I have 3
> things to say to those:
>
> :-P :-P :-P
>

Jeez, they actually show up on my screen as emojis! ;]>

Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 11, 2020, 6:14:22 PM3/11/20
to
Breaking news - breaking news

This is a special report from JFK Numbers News.

My request was APPROVED!!!

It only took me 5 years.

This government, as promised, immediately uploaded the blueprints here:

http://dealey-plaza.org/this-government-as-promised/full_building/Architectural_Model/Blueprints/

Let the record show that the JFK Numbers project is the first and only
that:

(1) Is based on precise, official measurements of the TSBD building
interior.

(2) Placed them in the public domain.

Therefore, all the other "scientific" studies are FRAUDULENT.

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

"Millions were watching and nobody -except Ole' JFK Numbers- saw anything"


recip...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 12, 2020, 8:54:43 AM3/12/20
to
1.) The blueprints of public buildings are already in the public domain.

2.) For that matter, building blueprints are kept by local permitting and
fire authorities, and copies can generally be obtained by almost
anyone.

3.) The plans you show are for the building as it currently exists, after
Dallas County bought it and performed extensive renovations on it. How
much that's going to help you recreate its 1963 form is anyone's
guess.

4.) Even then, all you've shown is the lighting plan


Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 12, 2020, 8:53:09 PM3/12/20
to
On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 7:54:43 AM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> 4.) Even then, all you've shown is the lighting plan


Kindly ask Deagle to translate this for you:

"Con tan buena voz y mandando a otros a cantar?"

Marsh knows some Spanish as well.

-Ramon F. Herrera
JFK Numbers

Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 12, 2020, 8:53:15 PM3/12/20
to
On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 7:54:43 AM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
[Mistaken Anonymous wrote:]

>
> 1.) The blueprints of public buildings are already in the public domain.
>
> 2.) For that matter, building blueprints are kept by local permitting and
> fire authorities, and copies can generally be obtained by almost
> anyone.
>


Not exactly, specially after 9/11. See a small sample of my travails.

https://www.pinterest.com/ramonfh/desperately-looking-for-the-tsbd-blueprints/

By the time you read it, I will try to upload more screenshots.

Care to provide a link about your assertion in reference to the fire
authorities? I already contacted the DFD.


-Ramon
JFK Numbers

ps: Does "Almost anyone" include YOU? "Con tan buena voz y mandando a
cantar?"


Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 12, 2020, 8:53:18 PM3/12/20
to
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 5:14:22 PM UTC-5, JFK Numbers wrote:
> Breaking news - breaking news - breaking news
>
> This is a special report from JFK Numbers News.
>
> My request was APPROVED!!!
>
> It only took me 5 years.
>
> This government, as promised, immediately uploaded the blueprints here:
>
> http://dealey-plaza.org/this-government-as-promised/full_building/Architectural_Model/Blueprints/
>
> Let the record show that the JFK Numbers project is the first and only
> that:
>
> (1) Is based on precise, official measurements of the TSBD building
> interior.
>
> (2) Placed them in the public domain.
>
> Therefore, all the other "scientific" studies are FRAUDULENT.
>
> -Ramon
> JFK Numbers
>
> "Millions were watching and nobody -except Ole' JFK Numbers- saw anything"

This is a small sample of my communications with Dallas entities, a quest
which began in 2015.

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-01.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-02.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-03.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-04.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-05.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-06.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-07.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-08.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-09.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-10.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-11.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-12.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-13.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-14.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-15.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-16.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-17.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-18.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-19.jpg
http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Image-20.jpg

Attention, class:

These 2 videoclips are also REQUIRED material:

All I wanted to be was Ferguson Herrera:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdDmMyosk-4

but ended up being Ramon Pantuso:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovq7n1Y97BA&t=1s

-Ramon
JFK Numbers
ra...@jfknumbers.org


Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 12, 2020, 8:53:28 PM3/12/20
to
On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 7:54:43 AM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> 4.) Even then, all you've shown is the lighting plan

With such a Critical Eagle Eye and yet you missed this?

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Engineering-and-Architecture-Firms-Involved.jpg

The plans provided so far show the STRUCTURE of the building. This photo
was taken during the renovation. As you can see the skeleton/guts remain.

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/6th-Floor-During-Renovation.png

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Seventh-Floor-Exhibit.jpg

The current curator who replaced Gary Mack, Stephen Fagin wrote a book
about the renovations, etc. Yes, I already sent him an e-mail.

https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-Commemoration-Dallas-Museum-Dealey/dp/0806143584/ref=sr_1_1


I have told the team of designers that:

(1) The outside remains very close to the way it was in 1963. Yes,
adjustments will be made. Yes, Tony, everybody knows about the Elm Street
asphalt being thicker now. I will be happy to relay your extraordinary
revelation to MIT.

(2) The inside is being done from blueprints and photos. I have yet
another project to have the JFK community calling the media asking for
footage (film/video) of the inside. The NBC Affiliate in Dallas has a
YouTube videoclip where they show a room in the TV station's basement
dedicated to store such material. It is lying there waiting for us.

The Mary Ferrell Foundation gave me a free membership, in appreciation for
the work done (almost ended up in jail).

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

ps: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHb_1swWS5M&t=20s

recip...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 12, 2020, 10:49:02 PM3/12/20
to
On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 7:53:28 PM UTC-5, Piotr Mancini wrote:
> On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 7:54:43 AM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > 4.) Even then, all you've shown is the lighting plan
>
> With such a Critical Eagle Eye and yet you missed this?
>
> http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Engineering-and-Architecture-Firms-Involved.jpg

So what? The logos of a couple of E&A firms somehow makes the lighting
plan special? Was it drawn by unicorns?


> The plans provided so far show the STRUCTURE of the building. This photo
> was taken during the renovation. As you can see the skeleton/guts remain.

The floor plan would show the same thing, and include measurements of the
walls, columns, windows and other structural information. If you get
really lucky, and get the original construction documents with detail
drawings, elevations, and schedules. The latter is a treasure trove of
info for doors an windows.
Again, so what? How does that tell you where, how big, or what shape
anything is?


> I have told the team of designers that:
>
> (1) The outside remains very close to the way it was in 1963. Yes,
> adjustments will be made. Yes, Tony, everybody knows about the Elm Street
> asphalt being thicker now. I will be happy to relay your extraordinary
> revelation to MIT.

None of this addresses what I pointed out. Why are you being so evasive?


> (2) The inside is being done from blueprints and photos. I have yet
> another project to have the JFK community calling the media asking for
> footage (film/video) of the inside. The NBC Affiliate in Dallas has a
> YouTube videoclip where they show a room in the TV station's basement
> dedicated to store such material. It is lying there waiting for us.

But if all you have are the lighting plans, you don't really have the
blueprints. At least, you don't have the blueprints of what you really
need.


> The Mary Ferrell Foundation gave me a free membership, in appreciation for
> the work done (almost ended up in jail).

Again, so what? Why does your status with MFF matter on this point?


recip...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 12, 2020, 10:49:04 PM3/12/20
to
Most fire departments have some kind of archive for building blueprints,
at least for large buildings. Sometimes comes in handy fighting fires.
Most jurisdictions also require construction drawings be submitted for
inspection in order for a building permit to be issued.


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Mar 13, 2020, 8:29:38 AM3/13/20
to
Great. Another defective web page gumming up my browser.

> This is a special report from JFK Numbers News.
>
> My request was APPROVED!!!
>
> It only took me 5 years.
>
> This government, as promised, immediately uploaded the blueprints here:
>
> http://dealey-plaza.org/this-government-as-promised/full_building/Architectural_Model/Blueprints/
>

WTF is that mess supposed to be?
TSBD today? Not 1963?
What good is that?
You are a waste of time and patience.

Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 13, 2020, 5:05:32 PM3/13/20
to
On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 9:49:02 PM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 7:53:28 PM UTC-5, Piotr Mancini wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 7:54:43 AM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > 4.) Even then, all you've shown is the lighting plan
> >
> > With such a Critical Eagle Eye and yet you missed this?
> >
> > http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Engineering-and-Architecture-Firms-Involved.jpg
>

> So what? The logos of a couple of E&A firms somehow makes the lighting
> plan special? Was it drawn by unicorns?

Those are the firms, heretofore unknown who did the original work. They
are a source of further plans, blueprints, etc.

NOBODY has had access to what YOU have now. NO ONE. (*)

You are welcome.

>
> > The Mary Ferrell Foundation gave me a free membership, in appreciation for
> > the work done (almost ended up in jail).
>
> Again, so what? Why does your status with MFF matter on this point?

The one and only central source of photos should matter, in order to
reconstruct the interior of our favorite building.

My question to all (National Archives, stock photo companies, etc.) has
been:

"I need any photo which is NOT here":

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/10IEZXOSN2tNdUhD2E96TLY3ayP7ds9xh

Notice the MFF folder. It came with the free membership at the only price
I can afford.

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

(*) "If there are secret files, it is not Science"

ps: If you despise the lighting so much, I can post a version with all
those pesky distracting lights removed.


Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 13, 2020, 5:05:53 PM3/13/20
to

X, the one who -like Marsh- does not read -and calls me EVASIVE- wrote:

On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 9:49:04 PM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Care to provide a link about your assertion in reference to the fire
> > authorities? I already contacted the DFD.
>
> Most fire departments have some kind of archive for building blueprints,
> at least for large buildings. Sometimes comes in handy fighting fires.
> Most jurisdictions also require construction drawings be submitted for
> inspection in order for a building permit to be issued.

Care to provide a link about your assertion in reference to the fire
authorities? I already contacted the DFD.

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

ps:

http://www.dealey-plaza.org/~ramon/misc/Sample-Communications-with-Dallas-Entities.pdf


Piotr Mancini

unread,
Mar 13, 2020, 8:28:14 PM3/13/20
to
On Friday, March 13, 2020 at 7:29:38 AM UTC-5, Anthony Marsh wrote:
> On 3/11/2020 6:14 PM, JFK Numbers wrote:
Your observations are duly noted. Rest assured that MIT et al. will be
informed of such a show stopping event. They will never dare to attempt
anything without obtaining the green light by their bus driver.

Question: The Eleven Fraudulent Studies are authorized by you
McAdamites/Trumpites, but if the author (using infinitely superior
science, technology and OPEN files, not sponsored by anybody and therefore
INDEPENDENT) is a dirt poor, silly immigrant, refugee from Cubazuela who
attempts the sacrilege, you all go clutching your pearls, shrieking,
running around like headless CHICKEN.

Is that the way it works in America?

Not in MY America.

-Ramon
JFK Numbers

ps:

"Sweet Caroline is Hitting the JFK Researchers, for Falling Behind in
Sci+Tech"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_U46KG2KeA



0 new messages