On 12/4/2015 8:38 PM,
stevemg...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 11:35:14 PM UTC-6, John Paul Jones wrote:
>> On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 8:24:33 PM UTC-8, John Paul Jones wrote:
>>> We have established that there was likely two Oswalds at the TSBD. One
>>> seen existing the front entrance and confirmed by Oswald's admission
>>> during interrogation. The other seen exiting the rear entrance down the
>>> loading dock as witnessed by Buell Frazier.
>>>
>>> We have the testimony of James Files who describes a LHO that drove an
>>> automobile. Yet we know as per Ruth Payne that Oswald could not drive.
>>> Payne gave him driving lessons.
>>>
>>> Of course we have the Hoover memo indicating a suspicion of an Oswald
>>> impostor.
>>>
>>> One could speculate that the intelligence agency at the heart of this was
>>> playing a deadly covert game and manipulating the real Oswald. This
>>> explains the conflicting attributes ascribed to LHO. More to think
>>> about.............
>>
>> To Continue............When Veciana described seeing Oswald with David
>> Phillips it was likely the impostor not the real LHO.
>>
>> In addition............Oswald's body was exhumed by the family with the
>> consent of authorities who were concerned about the identity of the body
>> in the grave. Giving credence to the suspicion by the government.
>
> Veciana said the meeting was between Maurice Bishop and Oswald. For
> decades he said Bishop was not Phillips. It's only recently that he said
> he believed Bishop, whom he met numerous times, was Phillips.
>
Because he was in fear for his life.
> So, he met Bishop numerous times over several years and only recently says
> he was Phillips? After saying he wasn't for years? Is that credible?
>
He originally said it was Phillips.
That's why he went with an HSCA staffer to observe Phillips.
> He also said the meeting between Maurice Bishop and a man he later said
> was Oswald took place in Dallas in late August or early September. All of
> the evidence indicates that Oswald was in New Orleans during that time.
>
This is just one reason. But the sketch does look like Phillips.
But several CIA officers used the alias Maurice Bishop. Just like
Knight, which E. Howard Hunt used occasionally.
> He has zero credibility to me at this point.
>
We don't care what your opinion is.
You are biased in favor of the CIA.