That's a false accusation, George.
I publish a monthly online, and yearly print, collection of AAPC poetry -- both of which you are included in.
A troll, by definition, seeks to disrupt a group -- not to promote group activities.
> > it would do well to keep in mind, that you're the one who introduced the "ethical" strategy of "Tit for Tat" here.
> But you do not follow "Tit for Tat". In past attacks on Pickering, on Rachel, on Ilya, and on me (not to mention others who have left here), you were clearly the aggressor. (Again, that's not meant as an accusation, but as a simple statement of fact.)
>
I don't recall ever having attacked Ilya. I have asked him, many times, to limit his threads to poetry (this is not alt.arts.editorials), and have humorously countered his editorial opinions... but that in no way constitutes an attack. Nor have I attacked Rachel. I have often encouraged her to continue writing poetry and invited her to participate in AYoS (which she has declined to do).
As to Pick -- I had merely questioned one of his bizarre statements only to be called an anti-Semite, Nazi, etc. Pick started that war -- and I finished it (and Pick).
As to my past fights with you, let's just say that my memory of it differs from yours.
> > IOW: I'm not following Mr. Senetto's example... I'm following Mr. Dance's.
> Wrong.
Not at all. Tit for Tat is Tit for Tat.
Will disrupts AAPC with his "Shadowville Mythos" blog advertisements (dozens of threads advertising his blog, reverbnation page, instagram, FB, etc.), so I responded by posting my "Shadowville Mythos" group poem at the end of each.
Donkey disrupts group -- group disrupts Donkey.
Tit for Tat.