I see you've already posted an updated version, but I'd got halfway with
this reply, so I may as well get to the end and post it.
(I've only glanced through the newer version, but there were things that
seemed to read a lot smoother.)
I have snipped erratically and tried to compensate for the pig's ear of
double spacing that I think originates in G-Groups. If I've fouled up
the attributions, I apologise to anyone reading.
<...>
>> > The trailers are not stacked so much in rows
>> > as they are left like cars used in a heist,
>>
<...>
>>
>> Your phrasing sets up a strong IP at the start and builds expectation in
>> the - or at least in /this/ - reader. Then you abandon the meter (as
>> far as I can see for no good reason) and I feel cheated.
>
> THere are a few lines later that are also ip. It wasn't meant to be overly nticeable, there is some it as well, just certain areas where I meant to elevate the speech. I didn't intend for it to be metric per se, but that is no reason to have no metric thought.
Starting with two full-on IP lines where it sounds like the phrasing has
been twisted to suit the meter isn't a good opening gambit if you are
only planning on having intermittently regular meter later on.
You're writing in English: it's natural that there will be some clearly
iambic phrases - though I don't think it will necessarily 'elevate the
speech' - but the non-contracted verb forms and weird (to me) word order
really draw attention to this opening. And then it goes somewhere else
completely, for no apparent reason.
<...>
>>
>> > is hard-packed in the heat, not rich enough
>> > to be brown - it�s gray, or sometimes the faded
>> > dun of dust or a sickly olive where mold grew
>> > when the water collected in tire ruts from the last
>> > rain. Patches of weeds struggle through the breaks
>> > of dusty gravel and tire marks.
>>
>>
>> I like this description and it's got some good sounds, but it needs
>> tightening.
>>
>> Repetitions like "dust" and "dusty", "tire ruts" and "tire marks" make
>> me think this is a very early draft.
>
> this is a first draft. everything I write starts as first drafts. Sometimes I post edit, sometimes I re-post later. Not necessarily to this sight as there isn't a lot of good crit left here which is why it is so good to see you!!
Contrary to rumour, I am usually here. I just don't usually find
anything that piques my interest enough to comment. The fact that this
has stirred me into commentary may suggest that you're doing something
right.
In the past, I have tended to post things here when I think they've
reached the state that they're "OK" - I can't see where I should be
improving them. Sometimes they get shredded, which is interesting and
informative.
Occasionally, I post much earlier drafts, in which case I tend to label
them as such. I think it helps focus the critter.
>>
>>
>> I can imagine writing something very similar, so I've tweaked to see
>> what I might have done with your picture and similar words. I think it'd
>> be something like this (line breaks depending on context):
>>
>> The earth is hard-packed in the heat. Not rich enough to be brown, it�s
>> gray, or sometimes the faded dun of dust or a sickly olive where mold
>> grew when the last rain pooled in tire ruts. Weeds straggle through
>> breaks in ridged gravel.
>
> I am going to toy a little if there is enough promise, memorial day is still a couple days off, but there may at least one irredeemable flaw so i will see.
Memorial Day means nothing to me (I certainly didn't know it was this
weekend), but I've got lots of hard earth and weeds in my recent poems,
so maybe that's what appealed here.
>>
>>
>> > They run a sprinkler for the heat
>> > at the far end, just before the break in the trees
>> > where teenagers sneak off to smoke pot
>> > or break beer bottles in a fire pit, but the Nelson�s sewer
>> > stopped working 2 years ago so
>> > the earth there never really dries;
>> > the stink of urine vapors up
>> > from a soft warm clay.
>>
>>
>>
>> You've got "heat" again, two occurrences of "break" and another of "earth".
>> You might be doing it intentionally, but I'm not getting that
>> impression: it's too random - there isn't enough apparent control.
>>
>>
>>
<...>
> Repeated words should come across as more subtle and as accents so i am surprised to see them causing such a bother in you.
>>
As I said, I didn't feel there was enough control for it to be
intentional, so it came across as lazy.
>>
>>
<...>
>>
>> > It is the time of year men take their shirts off
>>
>> Irregular use of contractions - "it's gray" v. "It is the time of year"
>> - makes me think you're trying for metrical effect, but the fact that I
>> noticed suggests that it's not smooth enough to have worked.
>
> interesting call out.
>
Note, too, that I felt the same about the contractions in the first two
lines. (which probably helped draw attention to the IP.)
<...>
>>
>> > They come to me, not on days like today
>> > when I am sitting outside drinking beer and drawing fiddleheads
>> > in the dirt and cigarette butts with my boot tip
>> > or throwing another empty at the twisted,
>> > hanging skirting of my trailer, but they do come.
>>
>>
>> I'm not at all sure about the grammatical logic of this long sentence.
>
> you may not be familiar with "skirting", it is like an aluminum skirt that hides the mounts of trailers in trailer parks.
>
It's not the meaning I know of skirting - that would be the low wooden
panel at the foot of interior walls - but I wasn't at all confused by
your use: it was deducible even by someone who is unfamiliar with
trailer parks.
<...>
>>
>> "twisted, /hanging skirting" seems too much. I have a tendency to
>> overwrite, so I'm never sure that I recognise it in other people's
>> writing, but I suspect you could trim and tighten the descriptors quite
>> a lot all through.
>
> check the definition of skirting, it may be throwing you
No, it's not that. It's probably the fact that 'skirting' has an -ing
ending and adding two adjectives to it makes it very heavy, particularly
as one of them is also an -ing form. Maybe the meter draws attention to
itself, too.
"bent metal skirting" , "battered skirting" , "twisted skirting" would
all give me the same information and none of them would be problematic.
>
>>
>>
>> > I lead them inside to where lop-sided furniture,
>> > old Styrofoam food containers and mounds
>> > of forgotten belongings crowd us into the center
>> > of the room. There is a mustard yellow sofa
>> > with two good cushions and a chair
>> > and one good lamp. A homemade tattoo gun,
>> > tubs of scattered ink, cotton balls
>> > and a half bottle of rubbing alcohol
>> > litter a bar table to the side.
>>
>>
>> It's very odd to have this description in the first person. (e.g. if the
>> belongings are "forgotten" I wouldn't expect the narrator to be aware of
>> them.) I think this stanza works least well for me because of this.
>
> yes, I had a different description here, changed it and left this here as a place holder.
>
There's a lot of stuff here that might work; just not with the narrator
doing the describing.
<...>
>>
>>
>> I'd like to see a later draft of this.
>>
>> Thanks for posting.
>>
>>
>>
>> g.
>
> It is always a pleasure to see you. The voicing in this is a lot different than what I usually write but in spots, I think it is the "Americanism" of the writing that strikes as weird and, in other spots it is still very raw.
>
The Americanism of it didn't bother me.
The title gave me some idea what to expect and the first couple of words
was enough to clarify if I'd had doubts.
I think you have conjoured an atmosphere that stands a chance of being
believable, but I do think it needs work.
> I post what I write because I am not a professional and have little else to do with it as I don't even personally know a single person that reads poetry. I improve and rewrite when I get well-informed commentary from the likes of you.
>
> Comments of any kind are always appreciated as they let me know there are people out there.
I assume that anything posted here is for c&c, but it does sometimes
help to know if the writer thinks they have got as far as they can with
the piece or is just sharing an early draft.
Since there are (apparently) so few people here, it's easier just to
post without any explanation, but there was a time when I thought it
made sense to explain what I thought I needed help with on each piece;
of course it was up to the critter whether they addressed my doubts or
took an entirely different tack as that was what they thought needed
addressing. (I'm sure there's something in the FAQ about this.)
>
> indeed there are.
There are more people out there than we know about.
>
> Thanks again. I hope you have written something as well.
>
>
Nothing to be posted here at the moment, I'm afraid.
However, in keeping with the heat of your piece, I can offer you this
very old fragment:
Lizard
trickles across concrete:
memory of water
g.