Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Painting of the Lady -- new thread for Ash

397 views
Skip to first unread message

Zod

unread,
Apr 27, 2021, 8:16:20 PM4/27/21
to

Ash Wurthing

unread,
Apr 27, 2021, 8:23:25 PM4/27/21
to
Thanks but you wanting me to look at your paintings is kinda pointless. Not that I'm against your art or art in general, I possess quite a bit of artwork, including work by comic book artists. (Art not in comic books but separate originals and custom pieces of my characters)

General-Zod

unread,
Apr 27, 2021, 8:26:05 PM4/27/21
to
Since Nancy G. lied about my art and you seemed interested...

Not a problem...

Ash Wurthing

unread,
Apr 27, 2021, 9:56:45 PM4/27/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:

> Not a problem...

Nope, I have no idea about what you all are discussing about your art, I can't keep up with half the threads here and unfortunately, your and Will's threads seem to be old threads you're bumping up. And I said in the one thread I commented on , I don't have time to read 600 posts of hi's, bumping and fighting. I don't need to join in the fighting about your work, it's your war not mine.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 27, 2021, 10:53:34 PM4/27/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>
> > Not a problem...
>
> Nope, I have no idea about what you all are discussing about your art, I can't keep up with half the threads here and unfortunately, your and Will's threads seem to be old threads you're bumping up. And I said in the one thread I commented on , I don't have time to read 600 posts

Nancy G. was lying about this earlier, in a troll thread I skipped and ignored.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 12:21:08 AM4/28/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>
One of your best, by the way.

Michael Pendragon

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 8:37:16 AM4/28/21
to
NancyGene thinks your sock stole the painting, because the woman in it is better drawn than his usual "monkey-face" people.

I, otoh, believe that the painting is yet another poorly executed example of your sock's work.

Either way, shoving it in the face of every new/returning member who drops by here is just plain cruel.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 9:46:10 AM4/28/21
to
Ash seemed interested in another thread.

Michael Pendragon

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 10:09:11 AM4/28/21
to
No one is interested in your sock's 4th grade level artwork, Will.

This is a poetry group -- not a refrigerator art group.

Your sock shows more promise as an artist than he does as a poet... but that's not saying a heckuva lot. Nor should it be an excuse for spamming a poetry group with his childishly executed paintings.

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 10:12:14 AM4/28/21
to
If you skipped and ignored the thread, how do you know what was posted there?

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 10:16:35 AM4/28/21
to
I didn't reply to the post in the troll thread.

I skipped and ignored it.

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 10:17:46 AM4/28/21
to
If you had skipped and ignored it, you wouldn’t know what she had posted.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 10:26:36 AM4/28/21
to
No, you're confused again.

Coco DeSockmonkey

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 10:51:23 AM4/28/21
to
We can now add "skipped" to the ever-growing list of words and phrases Will Dockery refuses to understand.

W.Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 11:02:05 AM4/28/21
to
Coco DeSockmonkey wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 10:26:36 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>
>> > > > > Nancy G. was lying about this earlier, in a troll thread I skipped and ignored.
>> > > >


> We can now add "skipped" to the ever-growing list of words and phrases Will Dockery refuses to understand.

Wrong again... I didn't respond on the troll thread, I skipped and ignored it.

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 11:04:56 AM4/28/21
to
If you skipped and ignored the post, you would have no idea what was written in the post.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 11:14:51 AM4/28/21
to
No, skipped and ignored simply means letting it pass without responding.

Coco DeSockmonkey

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 11:17:28 AM4/28/21
to
LESSON TIME:

Skipping a post means that you didn't open or read it.

Ignoring a post means that you've read it, but didn't respond to it.

Words matter.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 11:21:42 AM4/28/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 11:17:28 AM UTC-4, cocodeso...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 11:14:51 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > Wrong again... I didn't respond on the troll thread, I skipped and ignored it.
>
> > No, skipped and ignored simply means letting it pass without responding.
>
> Skipping a post

Spare me, Pendragon.

I kopped and ignored the post.

You can accept that, or you can whine about it or another dozen posts.

After all, we have no posting limits on this poetry group.

:)

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 12:46:51 PM4/28/21
to
Precisely. Without responding.
So, you don’t skip and ignore.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 1:16:13 PM4/28/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 12:46:51 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
>
> So, you don’t skip and ignore.

Yes, I skipped and ignored that thread.

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 1:21:00 PM4/28/21
to
We are talking about the post that you responded to, not the thread.

You didn’t skip and ignore it.
You lied.

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 2:36:56 PM4/28/21
to
I guess you’ve figured out you can’t lie your way out of this argument. Too many facts and rational logic for you to bullshit your way around it.
So I suspect zod will show up shortly to try and bury this under 30 or so pointless and useless posts.

But if you’re going to continue advising others to skip and ignore, you’d better do the same.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 3:13:29 PM4/28/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:19:48 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:14:52 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > > I skipped and ignored that thread.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> > But you didn’t skip and ignore the post.

Sure I did, I skipped it and ignored it, along wth probably a dozen more today.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I guess you’ve figured out

Nothing to figure out, see above. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

HTH & HAND.

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 3:57:14 PM4/28/21
to
You are a liar, will.
See my explanation and facts on “Mankind” thread.

NancyGene

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 4:14:02 PM4/28/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 12:37:16 PM UTC, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 10:53:34 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not a problem...
> > >
> > > Nope, I have no idea about what you all are discussing about your art, I can't keep up with half the threads here and unfortunately, your and Will's threads seem to be old threads you're bumping up. And I said in the one thread I commented on , I don't have time to read 600 posts
> > Nancy G. was lying about this earlier, in a troll thread I skipped and ignored.
> NancyGene thinks your sock stole the painting, because the woman in it is better drawn than his usual "monkey-face" people.
It's not a good painting at all. The real problem with the "painting" is that (as pointed out by others) you can see the page gutters from the book. George Sulzbach has been challenged by ME and others to have someone take a picture of him holding the "painting." ME was even going to travel to Columbus to see it in person. Edward Rochester offered to buy it. Sulzbach has refused all attempts to verify that he actually created that "painting."
>
> I, otoh, believe that the painting is yet another poorly executed example of your sock's work.
A poorly executed theft from a book.
>
> Either way, shoving it in the face of every new/returning member who drops by here is just plain cruel.
He trots out the same old "poems" and "paintings" for everyone. He does not exist, he has not earned respect, and his life has been wasted.

Zod

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 4:38:01 PM4/28/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 4:14:02 PM UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
>
> He trots out the same old "poems" and "paintings"

I posted this one because in the other thread you lied and said it was not my painting, Nancy G.
***

ME

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 4:46:57 PM4/28/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 2:36:56 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:21:00 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:16:13 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 12:46:51 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So, you don’t skip and ignore.
> > > Yes, I skipped and ignored that thread.
> > We are talking about the post that you responded to, not the thread.
> >
> > You didn’t skip and ignore it.
> > You lied.
> I guess you’ve figured out you can’t lie your way out of this argument. Too many facts and rational logic for you to bullshit your way around it.

********
> So I suspect zod will show up shortly to try and bury this under 30 or so pointless and useless posts.



Just as I predicted. I’ll let zod post himself out, then the adults can address this subject, once again, with will.

Zod

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 4:47:51 PM4/28/21
to
I thank you Doc...

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 9:05:50 PM4/28/21
to
Good enough that Nancy G. is still sputtering her lies about it being a fake.

:)

Family Guy

unread,
Apr 28, 2021, 10:00:46 PM4/28/21
to
I don't see you or Zod proving her wrong.

W-Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 9:55:04 AM4/29/21
to
ME wrote:

> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 3:13:29 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:19:48 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:14:52 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>> >
>> > > > I skipped and ignored that thread.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> > > But you didn’t skip and ignore the post.
>>
>> Sure I did, I skipped it and ignored it, along wth probably a dozen more today.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > I guess you’ve figured out
>> Nothing to figure out, see above. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> HTH & HAND.

>
> You are

No, you are confused, worse than ever.

ME

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 11:45:48 AM4/29/21
to

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 11:58:02 AM4/29/21
to
No, I'm not.

:)

W.Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 12:31:04 PM4/29/21
to
Skipping and ignoring a post doesn't mean it wasn't read, just that it wasn't responded to

There's the truth for you.

:)

Michael Pendragon

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 1:51:42 PM4/29/21
to
If you skip over a song on a CD, do you play it?

If you skip over a post in a thread, do you open it?

Words matter.

Learn how to use them correctly.

W-Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 2:08:04 PM4/29/21
to
If I skip over a troll post or thread without responding, that means I've skipped and ignored it.

Glad to clear that up for you.

:)

Michael Pendragon

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 2:46:47 PM4/29/21
to
On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 2:08:04 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> If I skip over a troll post or thread without responding, that means I've skipped and ignored it.
>
> Glad to clear that up for you.

I asked you a question, Will.

When you skip over a song on a CD, do you play it?

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 3:04:17 PM4/29/21
to
My reply:

If I skip over a troll post or thread without responding, that means I've skipped and ignored it.

Glad to clear that up for you, Pendragon.

:)

Michael Pendragon

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 3:05:53 PM4/29/21
to
Answer the question, Will.

When you skip over a song on a CD, do you play it?

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 3:26:32 PM4/29/21
to
Skipping and ignoring means not responding to the thread or post.

Coco DeSockmonkey

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 3:43:03 PM4/29/21
to
On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> Skipping and ignoring means not responding to the thread or post.

Answer the question, Will:

W-Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 4:09:04 PM4/29/21
to
Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.


:)

Coco DeSockmonkey

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 4:12:55 PM4/29/21
to
On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 4:09:04 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.

Think of the Track List as a Thread.

A Track List has multiple songs on it.

A Thread has multiple posts on it.

If you skip one of the tracks on the Track List, you don't play open/play the song.

If you skip one of the posts in a Thread, you don't open/read the post.

Words matter.

Stop being such a potato.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 4:45:57 PM4/29/21
to
Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.

For starters, you don't reply to a CD.

Zod

unread,
Apr 29, 2021, 6:51:14 PM4/29/21
to
On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 5:45:57 PM UTC-3, Will Dockery wrote:
>
> Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.
> For starters, you don't reply to a CD.

It is quite stupid of Pendragon to try such a comparison...

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 30, 2021, 4:26:52 PM4/30/21
to
Usenet messages and thre tracks on a CD have zero in common.

Zod

unread,
Apr 30, 2021, 6:55:15 PM4/30/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:23:25 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> > to Ash
> >
> > "Painting of The Lady"
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login
> Thanks but you wanting me to look at your paintings is kinda pointless. Not that I'm against your art or art in general, I possess quite a bit of artwork, including work by comic book artists. (Art not in comic books but separate originals and custom pieces of my characters)

Okay, do you like comix?

I think I saw that you did...?

Family Guy

unread,
Apr 30, 2021, 7:56:58 PM4/30/21
to
Your brain and any working neurons left have zero in common

W-Dockery

unread,
Apr 30, 2021, 8:36:04 PM4/30/21
to
I read about that somewhere here.

Ash Wurthing

unread,
Apr 30, 2021, 9:56:31 PM4/30/21
to
On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 6:51:14 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
Both you and Zod show your lack of ability in non-literal thinking, threads can easily be compared to CD tracks-- on the computer's media player, tracks are listed just like the threads list here. And a thread could be a track on a CD if it's burned to a CD. The ability to respond to a post/thread doesn't negate the base comparison and doesn't change the fact that you two are the only ones fooling yourselves with your definition of skip.

I do more than like comics. But you'll never get to know what that means.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 30, 2021, 10:34:48 PM4/30/21
to
On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 9:56:31 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
>
> threads can easily be compared to CD tracks

Not on the basic level we're discussing here.

Will Dockery

unread,
Apr 30, 2021, 10:53:17 PM4/30/21
to
On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 7:56:58 PM UTC-4, Family Guy wrote:
> On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 4:26:52 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > > > Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.
> > > > For starters, you don't reply to a CD.
>
> > > It is quite stupid of Pendragon to try such a comparison...
> > Usenet messages and the tracks on a CD have zero in common.
>
> Your brain and any working neurons left have zero in common

You're off topic again, troll.

:)

Will Dockery

unread,
May 1, 2021, 3:35:12 AM5/1/21
to
On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 9:56:31 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
>
> I do more than like comics. But you'll never get to know what that means.

Why not?

Zod

unread,
May 1, 2021, 6:11:07 PM5/1/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:23:25 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> > to Ash
> >
> > "Painting of The Lady"
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login
> Thanks but you wanting me to look at your paintings is kinda pointless. Not that I'm against your art or art in general, I possess quite a bit of artwork, including work by comic book artists. (Art not in comic books but separate originals and custom pieces of my characters)

Any links to your comix online...?

Will Dockery

unread,
May 1, 2021, 10:48:35 PM5/1/21
to
I've dabbled in comix myself over the years, a look at your work would be interesting, Ash.

Will Dockery

unread,
May 2, 2021, 2:06:39 AM5/2/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> to Ash
>
> "Painting of The Lady"
>
> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login

One of your better paintings, and interesting realism this time.

Will Dockery

unread,
May 2, 2021, 7:44:16 AM5/2/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>
> > Not a problem...
>
> Nope, I have no idea about what you all are discussing about your art

I suppose that Zod thought you might have an interest.

Will Dockery

unread,
May 2, 2021, 12:58:12 PM5/2/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:23:25 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>
> > to Ash
> >
> > "Painting of The Lady"
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login
> Thanks but you wanting me to look at your paintings is kinda pointless. Not that I'm against your art or art in general, I possess quite a bit of artwork, including work by comic book artists. (Art not in comic books but separate originals and custom pieces of my characters)

Sounds Interesting, too bad you can't be more specific.

General Zod

unread,
May 2, 2021, 6:34:23 PM5/2/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:23:25 PM UTC-3, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>
> > to Ash
> >
> > "Painting of The Lady"
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login
> Thanks but you wanting me to look at your paintings

Thank you for the kind response....

Zod

unread,
May 3, 2021, 6:55:28 PM5/3/21
to
Ash is oddly secretive..

General Zod

unread,
May 5, 2021, 7:00:00 PM5/5/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 1:21:08 AM UTC-3, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> >
> > to Ash
> >
> > "Painting of The Lady"
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login
> One of your best, by the way.

I thank, again...

Will Dockery

unread,
May 7, 2021, 5:43:35 PM5/7/21
to
Looking forward to seeing the new art, Zod.

General Zod

unread,
May 7, 2021, 7:17:33 PM5/7/21
to
I am working at a few in the location...

Will Dockery

unread,
May 9, 2021, 3:55:35 PM5/9/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> Ash Wurthing wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> >
> >> to Ash
> >>
> >> "Painting of The Lady"
> >>
> >> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login
>
> > Thanks but you wanting me to look at your paintings is kinda pointless. Not that I'm against your art or art in general, I possess quite a bit of artwork, including work by comic book artists. (Art not in comic books but separate originals and custom pieces of my characters)
> Since Nancy G. lied about my art and you seemed interested...
>
> Not a problem...

Good to keep the record straight, and the lies corrected.

General Zod

unread,
May 9, 2021, 6:37:16 PM5/9/21
to
Yep...

Zod

unread,
May 10, 2021, 6:49:26 PM5/10/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:23:25 PM UTC-3, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:16:20 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> > to Ash
> >
> > "Painting of The Lady"
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login
> Thanks but you wanting me to look at your paintings is kinda pointless. Not that I'm against your art or art in general, I possess quite a bit of artwork, including work by comic book artists. (Art not in comic books but separate originals and custom pieces of my characters)

Maybe later, then...?

Ash Wurthing

unread,
May 11, 2021, 12:10:19 AM5/11/21
to
To show that despite the fighting, I keep it focused on what I'm fighting. I am fighting your actions not your work.

I don't read your work or comment on it because I am boycotting your work because of what you are doing here. Even though I boycott your work I don't trash it.

As for your art I don't have to boycott it. It is pointless to look at most images and video because I can't see them any longer.

W-Dockery

unread,
May 11, 2021, 12:17:05 AM5/11/21
to
Ash Wurthing wrote:

> On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 6:51:14 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 5:45:57 PM UTC-3, Will Dockery wrote:
>> >
>> > Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.
>> > For starters, you don't reply to a CD.
>
>> It is quite stupid of Pendragon to try such a comparison...
>
> threads can easily be compared to CD tracks-- on the computer's media player, tracks are listed just like the threads list here.

But you do not reply to a CD track.

You do not Hae discussions with CD tracks.

That is why the comparison simply does not work.

Zod

unread,
May 11, 2021, 6:16:58 PM5/11/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 11:53:34 PM UTC-3, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> >
> > > Not a problem...
> >
> > Nope, I have no idea about what you all are discussing about your art, I can't keep up with half the threads here and unfortunately, your and Will's threads seem to be old threads you're bumping up. And I said in the one thread I commented on , I don't have time to read 600 posts
> Nancy G. was lying about this earlier, in a troll thread I skipped and ignored.

About my days as a navy hero...?

Michael Pendragon

unread,
May 11, 2021, 9:38:39 PM5/11/21
to
But you *can* skip over them.

That's why the comparison does work.

Remember, the comparison was drawn in regards to *skipping* posts.

You are desperately trying to argue that, for you, *skipping* over a post means that you open it, read it, but don't comment on it.

This stance places your mentality in perfect clarity: You feel compelled to respond to *every* post in *every* thread; so for you, *skipping* a posts equates to not responding. You are, nevertheless, wrong.

The saner members of AAPC don't share your compulsion. We are content to simply mark all of Stink's posts as "unread" and not open and/or read them.

That is what the rest of us mean by *skipping* over a post. And that is why the comparison to the track list on a CD is 100% accurate.

And that is what *skipping* actually means.

The word that describes your approach (opening, reading, but not responding to) is "disregard." You claim that you disregard the posts that you find offensive. Of course, you're still lying about it, but at least this way you're lying in proper English.





Will Dockery

unread,
May 11, 2021, 9:53:39 PM5/11/21
to
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 9:38:39 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 12:17:05 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > Ash Wurthing wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 6:51:14 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 5:45:57 PM UTC-3, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.
> > >> > For starters, you don't reply to a CD.
> > >
> > >> It is quite stupid of Pendragon to try such a comparison...
> > >
> > > threads can easily be compared to CD tracks-- on the computer's media player, tracks are listed just like the threads list here.
> > But you do not reply to a CD track.
> >
> > You do not Hae discussions with CD tracks.
> >
> > That is why the comparison simply does not work.
> But you *can* skip over them.

But unlike Usenet posts, there's no way to respond to, talk back to, or troll the artist on the CD.

Ash Wurthing

unread,
May 11, 2021, 9:58:48 PM5/11/21
to
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 9:38:39 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef wrote:
> And that is what *skipping* actually means.

Funny how they ignore the "skip" feature of the forward one song on CD players or computer media players.

> The word that describes your approach (opening, reading, but not responding to) is "disregard." You claim that you disregard the posts that you find offensive. Of course, you're still lying about it, but at least this way you're lying in proper English.

You speak to those who don't need proper English or labels, such things are for those who follow rules, they're Usenet hedonists who don't need rules.

Michael Pendragon

unread,
May 11, 2021, 10:01:22 PM5/11/21
to
So what?

All you're saying is that you *don't* skip over them and/or ignore them because you have the ability to respond.

Will Dockery

unread,
May 11, 2021, 10:02:12 PM5/11/21
to
So, the comparison doesn't work.

Michael Pendragon

unread,
May 11, 2021, 10:08:12 PM5/11/21
to
Of course it works, Will.

You have the option to press the "skip" button on the CD player. If you do, it will skip over the track without playing it.

In AAPC you have the option to open a post, or to mark it as "read" and never open it or read it.

That is how you *skip* a post at AAPC.

That is what the word "skip" means. If you open and read a post, you haven't skipped over it.

Words matter. Learn what they mean and use them correctly.

Will Dockery

unread,
May 11, 2021, 10:10:35 PM5/11/21
to
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 10:08:12 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 10:02:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> > Usenet posts and compact discs are not at all alike.
> > > > > > >> > For starters, you don't reply to a CD.
>
> > > > > > But you do not reply to a CD track.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You do not have discussions with CD tracks.

>
> You have the option to press the "skip" button on the CD playe

But there's no "Reply" button, so the concept just doesn't work.

Ash Wurthing

unread,
May 11, 2021, 11:27:57 PM5/11/21
to
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 10:10:35 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> But there's no "Reply" button, so the concept just doesn't work.

As so it goes... faulty logic loop. Only if someone would blue screen of death...

Will Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 7:55:11 AM5/12/21
to
If your post were a CD track... this post would not exist.

Amusing, and slightly amazing, how you people don't get that.

Edward Rochester Esq.

unread,
May 12, 2021, 8:02:45 AM5/12/21
to
So you remain dumb no matter the time of day.

Will Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 8:16:57 AM5/12/21
to
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 10:08:12 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> In AAPC you have the option to open a post

And reply to the post... or skip and ignore it.

:)

Brother Dave Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 10:43:36 AM5/12/21
to
You were never a hero, nor will you ever be. A hero wouldn't sink to the depths you have, scumbag.
Add stolen valor to your douchebag resume.
Message has been deleted

Will Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 1:41:44 PM5/12/21
to
On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 10:43:36 AM UTC-4, Fake Dave forged:
> On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 6:16:58 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>
> > About my days as a navy hero...
>
> You were xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Forgery & Identity Theft Announcement from Will Dockery (2021)

Looks like a good time to re-post this... a forgery notice to all my friends:

I want to let you know we have a vicious troll online making nasty attacks even forgery of my name. If you get any of these forgeries with misogyny, racism and worse, under my name or other, friends and family. Be aware that it is not me or another friend, but a forgery, identity theft by a malicious impostor troll.

Thanks, as ever, I remain the real Will Dockery:

Poetry of Will Dockery:
https://shadowville-mythos.blogspot.com/

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Family Guy

unread,
May 12, 2021, 2:00:01 PM5/12/21
to
On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 1:41:44 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 10:43:36 AM UTC-4, Fake Dave forged:
> > On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 6:16:58 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> >
> > > About my days as a navy hero...
> >
> > You were xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Forgery & Identity Theft Announcement from Will Dockery (2021)
>
> Looks like a good time to re-post this...

Looks like a good time to report you for spamming...

Family Guy

unread,
May 12, 2021, 2:00:43 PM5/12/21
to
Dockery's stupidity and ignorance clocks out on universal time. His speed-of-light dumbness is studied by scientists in hope of creating a new energy source.

Will Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 2:16:10 PM5/12/21
to
Google Removals already have the reports on these forgery posts, and as violations of the Google terms of service, are working to remove the impostor troll posts.

Family Guy

unread,
May 12, 2021, 2:23:28 PM5/12/21
to
Well, first of all, I was clearly talking about your post and not your dumbass obsession of "forgery". But even with your poor reading comprehension I think you knew that
Second, you do realize that google doesn't control the Internet or Usenet, right?

Will Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 2:54:36 PM5/12/21
to
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 4:38:01 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 4:14:02 PM UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
> >
> > He trots out the same old "poems" and "paintings"
>
> I posted this one because in the other thread you lied and said it was not my painting, Nancy G.
> ***

You produce good art and poetry, and harm no one.

All the lying cyberbullies in the world can't take that away from you, Zod.

Michael Pendragon

unread,
May 12, 2021, 3:14:57 PM5/12/21
to
On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:54:36 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 4:38:01 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 4:14:02 PM UTC-4, NancyGene wrote:
> > >
> > > He trots out the same old "poems" and "paintings"
> >
> > I posted this one because in the other thread you lied and said it was not my painting, Nancy G.
> > "Painting of The Lady"
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d
> > ***
>
> You produce good art and poetry, and harm no one.

He produces monkey-face paintings and "abstract" paint splatters. His skill level is that of a 10-year old.

As for his "poetry," his inane gibberings have the dubious honor of being tied for the absolute worst I've ever had the misfortune to read.

I needn't mention which other AAPC troll shares that same honor.

> All the lying cyberbullies in the world can't take that away from you, Zod.

Poor, poor widdle Stinky. [Cue the violins.]

Will Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 3:32:20 PM5/12/21
to
Like I said.

:)

Zod

unread,
May 12, 2021, 7:12:29 PM5/12/21
to
I thank you...

Will Dockery

unread,
May 12, 2021, 11:00:50 PM5/12/21
to
You're welcome.

:)

Zod

unread,
May 13, 2021, 3:58:40 PM5/13/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>
> > Not a problem...
>
> Nope, I have no idea about what you all are discussing about your art, I can't keep up with half the threads here and unfortunately, your and Will's threads seem to be old threads you're bumping up. And I said in the one thread I commented on , I don't have time to read 600 posts of hi's, bumping and fighting. I don't need to join in the fighting about your work, it's your war not mine.

OK

General Zod

unread,
May 16, 2021, 6:50:15 PM5/16/21
to
Again, I thank....

W.Dockery

unread,
May 26, 2021, 2:09:17 AM5/26/21
to
Zod wrote:
>
> to Ash
>
> "Painting of The Lady"
>
> https://www.pinterest.com/pin/357684395407045313/?d=t&mt=login

Great, I hope you get some nice work done on the sunny beaches.

:)

Zod

unread,
May 26, 2021, 4:36:41 PM5/26/21
to
Twas nice, indeed...

Zod

unread,
Jun 8, 2021, 6:07:04 PM6/8/21
to
They have a heavy workload here no doubt...

Zod

unread,
Jun 9, 2021, 7:16:01 PM6/9/21
to
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 10:53:34 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 9:56:45 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 8:26:05 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> >
> > > Not a problem...
> >
> > Nope, I have no idea about what you all are discussing about your art, I can't keep up with half the threads here and unfortunately, your and Will's threads seem to be old threads you're bumping up. And I said in the one thread I commented on , I don't have time to read 600 posts
> Nancy G. was lying about this earlier, in a troll thread I skipped and ignored.

nancy G. lies a lot...

Will Dockery

unread,
Jul 18, 2021, 2:52:34 PM7/18/21
to
When she isn't busy stalking.

:)
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages