On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 12:24:04 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
I notice you only say that the other side/s posts and threads must stop but your side's is still allowed to go on, with posts that are just the same as the ones you condemn, like this one:
George Dance May 6, 2023, 7:47:49 AM
"I don't know why you think [RR] reads aapc. (AFAIK, he does nothing but post his blog links here.) Or why you can win a libel suit over usenet comments. (You can ask Cujo about that.) But, just in case he is reading, let's give him something to sue about."
"[RR] is a hater. Being a left-wing anarchist hater, he hates non-leftists of all kinds (whom he calls "chuds".) His blog posts are almost invariably rants about them and what he imagines is going on in their minds. I'm sure he celebrates the death of every "chud". And, to repeat:"
"[RR] was inciting the killing of so-called transphobes, you were cheering it on, and the Nashville shooter was acting on it. You're three peas in a pod: All haters, all promoters of violence against their real or perceived enemies."
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.arts.poetry.comments/c/BIG7nL8ZUEQ/m/4BC9FGjeAAAJ
(1) Now RR wasn't involved in any of this flame war, so why was he attacked? Obviously because Dance saw a chance to get at me, so he went after an innocent victim (in the flame war) to do so.
(2) Now, RR's blog posts are no different than yours or Dance's blog posts (links)-- so attacks against those posts of yours and Dance's are perfectly acceptable by Dance's own actions, which you didn't protest so you came across as supporting his actions.
(3) If RR was so vile as Dance accuses, which you defended Dance while he did it, why do you call RR a "Usenet friend," thank him for posting his blog posts and give him holiday greetings?