Re: Ray Banana SPNAKS! Nadegda Derbyshire

[CastAlone]

Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> posted as news in:
<jufvbv$de9$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 04:24:50 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda Derbyshire
><nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in <jufvai$eb7$2...@dont-email.me>:
>
>>On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 23:07:35 -0500, The
>>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>>
>>> Better check with Seth on that definition of Usenet spam, Nadegda
>>
>>Posting the same, or substantially the same, message repeatedly.
>>Generally, 25 or more times, less if some of those times are crossposted.
>>
>>You've posted two copies in this thread, and both times that was the bulk
>>of your message, so that's 2. You posted another copy crossposted to four
>>groups a while ago, which adds another 2 to your BI (the square root of
>>the number of crosspost groups). So your BI is now at least 4. And that's
>>just in the past few hours. At this rate, in about three days you'll
>>officially be a spammer, Ferd.
>
#>Pitiful clueless Nadegda Derbyshire doesn't like the reposting of his SPNAK by
#>Ray Banana. Too bad.
>
><snicker>

tee hee ;)

[CastAlone]

Fred Hall <fkh...@databasix.com> posted as news in:

<jufthf$b3r$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 03:27:35 +0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>Derbyshlre<nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote in <jufrv7$tur$1...@dont-email.me>:
>
>>On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:09:37 -0500, The

>>FNVW (aka Fred Hall) wrote:
>>

>>[snip paranoid BS]
>[Restored, coward]
>
>Paul Derbyshlre whined:
>
>>I'm seeing evidence of spotty completion of alt.usenet.kooks, and
>>possibly rec.arts.tv and other newsgroups, on Eternal-September today. As
>>well, crossposts between comp.os.os2.advocacy and alt.usenet.kooks are
>>being rejected with "441 Forbidden Crosspost", which I'm quite certain
>>shouldn't be happening, since I'm quite certain I've made such a
>>crosspost before via E-S without issue.
>>
>>I don't see a heads-up here about any known issues with the service. Are
>>any other users experiencing similar issues? I recently updated my news
>>client software and various other things here, so it's possible I've
>>gummed something up at my end that's causing this. If so, I'll go digging
>>through my configuration to try to identify the cause; if not, I'd like
>>to know an ETA on when the issues will likely be resolved.
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>SPNAK!
>
#>Ray Banana responded:

#>>If it's a 441, that's exactly what's supposed to happen. The restriction
#>>applies to the current flood of drivel posted to alt.usenet.kooks and
#>>alt.free.newsservers with occasional crossposts to the totally
#>>unrelated comp.os.os2.* (presumably to trigger the "What has this
#>>question to do with OS/2, Derbyshlre?" Tholenbot, and also to
#>>comp.lang.java.*). I am sure this restriction will affect exactly two
#>>people, one of them *not being* Paul Derbyshlre and the other one *not
#>>being* Murphy.

[quotefixed (glue)] so all can run their eyes over sush a splendid
sPnak forever more.
>>
>>That's not a SPNAK, it's simply a politely-worded explanation, in
>>response to a politely-worded question, of a change in a server's policy.

IOW...you (derbyshlre) fucked up, again.

>>Except, of course, in the minds of kooks that read way too much into
>>things.
>
>Ray Banana slapped you down, Nadegda Derbyshlre. That public spnak must have
>hurt.
>
oh dear!

>>
>>> This is will be a periodic repost in the future.
>>
>>Your statement of intent to spam usenet is noted, kook, as is your
>>declaration of your obsession with me. Look, I'm living rent-free! Whee!
>
oh do get a life, derbyshlre.

>Better check with Seth on that definition of Usenet spam, Nadegda Derbyshlre.
indeed so ;D